1-20 OF 39 RESULTS FOR

Cheverie

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 1986
Economic Geology (1986) 81 (8): 2016–2021.
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 July 1976
Economic Geology (1976) 71 (4): 749–762.
...R. W. Boyle; R. K. Wanless; R. D. Stevens Abstract The consolidated rocks underlying the Walton-Cheverie area are mainly sediments of Lower Carboniferous (Mississippian) and Triassic age. Diabase sills, probably of Triassic age, occur in one place. The Mississippian rocks consist of a lower series...
Image
Published: 17 February 2010
Fig. 3. Detailed map showing relationships in the Cheverie area (after Ferguson 1983 ; Johnston 1999 ; Moore et al. 2000 ; Roselli 2003 ).
Journal Article
Published: 17 February 2010
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2010) 47 (2): 137–159.
...Fig. 3. Detailed map showing relationships in the Cheverie area (after Ferguson 1983 ; Johnston 1999 ; Moore et al. 2000 ; Roselli 2003 ). ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Kennetcook thrust system: late Paleozoic transpres...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1930
AAPG Bulletin (1930) 14 (5): 607–616.
... on the state of knowledge of petroleum geology at that time. This is a pamphlet of 16 pages, entitled “Report on the Petroleum Indications at Cheverie, Hants County, Nova Scotia. In Reference to the Probability of a Permanent Supply being Reached by Boring,” by Henry Y. Hind, M. A. It was published in Windsor...
Image
Schematic stratigraphy of the study area, showing Horton Group (i.e., Cheverie and Horton Bluff Formations) and a fault-bounded slice of Windsor Group rocks. The numbers on the column correspond to localities and rock types in Figure 1c. Fault contacts between some of the units.
Published: 01 March 2006
F ig . 2. Schematic stratigraphy of the study area, showing Horton Group (i.e., Cheverie and Horton Bluff Formations) and a fault-bounded slice of Windsor Group rocks. The numbers on the column correspond to localities and rock types in Figure 1c . Fault contacts between some of the units.
Journal Article
Published: 15 September 2020
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2021) 58 (4): 315–331.
... paleomagnetic study localities ( Spariosu et al. 1984 ) for the White Rock and Torbrook formations at Torbrook (WR, TB) and the Cheverie Formation (CV). Inset map shows the Meguma terrane in regional relationship with other peri-Gondwanan terranes Avalonia, Ganderia and with Laurentian elements...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Meguma terrane orocline: U–Pb age and paleomagneti...
Second thumbnail for: Meguma terrane orocline: U–Pb age and paleomagneti...
Third thumbnail for: Meguma terrane orocline: U–Pb age and paleomagneti...
Journal Article
Published: 18 October 2006
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2006) 43 (8): 1183–1204.
... of this unit, which are in turn overlain unconformably by red beds of the Cheverie Formation ( Martel et al. 1993 ; Martel and Gibling 1996 ). South of the fault, the Horton Group is restricted to the continental clastic rocks of the Coldstream Formation ( Giles and Boehner 1979 ), which bears a slightly...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Gradual encroachment of a rocky shoreline by an in...
Second thumbnail for: Gradual encroachment of a rocky shoreline by an in...
Third thumbnail for: Gradual encroachment of a rocky shoreline by an in...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 March 2006
Economic Geology (2006) 101 (2): 407–430.
...F ig . 2. Schematic stratigraphy of the study area, showing Horton Group (i.e., Cheverie and Horton Bluff Formations) and a fault-bounded slice of Windsor Group rocks. The numbers on the column correspond to localities and rock types in Figure 1c . Fault contacts between some of the units. ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Structurally Controlled Vein Barite Mineralization...
Second thumbnail for: Structurally Controlled Vein Barite Mineralization...
Third thumbnail for: Structurally Controlled Vein Barite Mineralization...
Image
Simplified context geological map of the Meguma terrane, Nova Scotia, after White et al. (2018). Primary Meguma rock unit divisions are shown, along with a box indicating the Mavillette gabbro at Cape St. Marys (Fig. 2), and other published paleomagnetic study localities (Spariosu et al. 1984) for the White Rock and Torbrook formations at Torbrook (WR, TB) and the Cheverie Formation (CV). Inset map shows the Meguma terrane in regional relationship with other peri-Gondwanan terranes Avalonia, Ganderia and with Laurentian elements of the Appalachian orogen as indicated. NB, New Brunswick; NL, Newfoundland; NS, Nova Scotia; QUE, Quebec. [Colour online.]
Published: 15 September 2020
al. 1984 ) for the White Rock and Torbrook formations at Torbrook (WR, TB) and the Cheverie Formation (CV). Inset map shows the Meguma terrane in regional relationship with other peri-Gondwanan terranes Avalonia, Ganderia and with Laurentian elements of the Appalachian orogen as indicated. NB, New
Journal Article
Published: 14 July 2010
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2010) 47 (7): 957–970.
... basal Tournaisian hiatus. They pass up into lacustrine- and shoreline-facies mudstones and sandstones of the Curry Brook, Blue Beach, and Hurd Creek members dating from late Tn2 or early Tn3. The overlying Cheverie Formation consists of red, coarse-grained sandstones and siltstones dating from mid Tn3...
Image
Stable isotope data for the Brookfield deposit, Nova Scotia, with comparison to data from Mississippi Valley-type mineralized areas in Nova Scotia and to siderite data from base and silver metal vein deposits of southern British Columbia (Beaudoin et al., 1992) and Keno Hill, Yukon Territory (Lynch et al., 1990). Data for Nova Scotia MVT mineralization includes the Gays River Zn-Pb deposit (Akande and Zentilli, 1984; Savard, 1996; and Savard and Kontak, 1998), Walton Ba-Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag deposit (Savard et al., 1998), Cheverie Zn-Pb (Kontak et al., 2000), Kinsac Ba-F (Kontak et al., 1999), and Smithfield Zn-Pb (Ravenhurst et al., 1989). (a). Plot of δ13C(PBD) vs. δ18O(SMOW) for siderite (British Columbia, Keno Hill, Brookfield, Walton), calcite (Gays River, Smithfield), and whole-rock dolomite (Windsor Group) and carbonate (Windsor Grouop). The arrows indicate the paragenesis at Gays River (see Savard and Kontak, 1998). (b). Plot of temperature (°C) vs. δ18O(siderite) with isopleths for δ18O(water) in equilibrium with the siderite (curves calculated using fractionation equation of Carothers et al., 1988; diagram modified from Savard et al., 1998). The temperatures are inferred from fluid inclusion studies from aforementioned references. For the Walton deposit, Savard et al. (1998) interpreted the siderite as having formed during low-temperature diagenesis. The plotted composition of the Brookfield calcite sample is calculated allowing for the difference in fractionation between siderite and calcite. (c). Plot of δD vs. δ18O(water) with boxes showing the variation for mineralizing fluids at a variety of sites in southern Nova Scotia, as discussed in the text (Gays River temperatures from Kontak, 1998, and isotope data are from Savard and Kontak, 1998, and Ravenhurst et al., 1987; Brookfield data are from this study; Kinsac data from Kontak et al., 1999; Cheverie data are from Kontak et al., 2000; note that there are no hydrogen data for this area). The isotopic variation of fluids from the Alberta basin is from Longstaffe (2000).
Published: 01 March 2006
Territory ( Lynch et al., 1990 ). Data for Nova Scotia MVT mineralization includes the Gays River Zn-Pb deposit ( Akande and Zentilli, 1984 ; Savard, 1996 ; and Savard and Kontak, 1998 ), Walton Ba-Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag deposit ( Savard et al., 1998 ), Cheverie Zn-Pb ( Kontak et al., 2000 ), Kinsac Ba-F ( Kontak et
Image
Meguma terrane paleomagnetic results plotted as overall mean characteristic remanence magnetization (ChRM) directions ▪, with reference to expected 390–300 Ma paleomagnetic directions  for Mavillette, calculated from the Laurentia apparent polar wander path (Torsvik et al. 2012). (A) Results for the Mavillette gabbro (MV – this study), and two results reported by Spariosu et al. (1984) for the White Rock Formation (WR) and the Cheverie Formation (CH), as discussed in the text and given in Table 3. (B) Meguma terrane results after correcting for post-Triassic tilt (250/7°N) for better comparison with the Laurentia reference directions. MV, WR and CH still show significant counter-clockwise rotation with respect to their reference directions, but the dual-polarity remagnetized Torbrook Formation (TB) result (Spariosu et al. 1984) shows no significant rotation with respect to ca. 220 or 210 Ma expected directions ☆ for the Torbrook locality (Table 3).
Published: 15 September 2020
). (A) Results for the Mavillette gabbro (MV – this study), and two results reported by Spariosu et al. (1984) for the White Rock Formation (WR) and the Cheverie Formation (CH), as discussed in the text and given in Table 3 . (B) Meguma terrane results after correcting for post-Triassic tilt (250/7°N
Image
Meguma terrane paleomagnetic results plotted as overall mean characteristic remanence magnetization (ChRM) directions ▪, with reference to expected 390–300 Ma paleomagnetic directions  for Mavillette, calculated from the Laurentia apparent polar wander path (Torsvik et al. 2012). (A) Results for the Mavillette gabbro (MV – this study), and two results reported by Spariosu et al. (1984) for the White Rock Formation (WR) and the Cheverie Formation (CH), as discussed in the text and given in Table 3. (B) Meguma terrane results after correcting for post-Triassic tilt (250/7°N) for better comparison with the Laurentia reference directions. MV, WR and CH still show significant counter-clockwise rotation with respect to their reference directions, but the dual-polarity remagnetized Torbrook Formation (TB) result (Spariosu et al. 1984) shows no significant rotation with respect to ca. 220 or 210 Ma expected directions ☆ for the Torbrook locality (Table 3).
Published: 15 September 2020
). (A) Results for the Mavillette gabbro (MV – this study), and two results reported by Spariosu et al. (1984) for the White Rock Formation (WR) and the Cheverie Formation (CH), as discussed in the text and given in Table 3 . (B) Meguma terrane results after correcting for post-Triassic tilt (250/7°N
Image
Schematic paleogeographic reconstructions during (A) the Coldstream Formation time slice, (B) the Macumber – Gays River – Meaghers Grant formations time slice, (C) the Gays River – Meaghers Grant – Carrolls Corner formations time slice, (D) the Meaghers Grant – Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice, (E) the Lindsay Brook Marker time slice, and (F) the Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice. 1, Goldenville Formation (Cambrian); 2, Halifax Formation (Ordovician); 3, Horton Bluff Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 4, Cheverie Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 5, Coldstream Formation clastics (uppermost Tournaisian); 6, Macumber Formation carbonate laminites (Viséan); 7, Gays River Formation interbank carbonate (Viséan); 8, Gays River Formation carbonate bank buildup (Viséan); 9, Meaghers Grant Formation clastics (Viséan); 10, Carrolls Corner Formation sulphates (Viséan); 11, Stewiacke Formation halite (Viséan).
Published: 18 October 2006
– Stewiacke formations time slice, (E) the Lindsay Brook Marker time slice, and (F) the Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice. 1, Goldenville Formation (Cambrian); 2, Halifax Formation (Ordovician); 3, Horton Bluff Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 4, Cheverie Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 5
Image
Schematic paleogeographic reconstructions during (A) the Coldstream Formation time slice, (B) the Macumber – Gays River – Meaghers Grant formations time slice, (C) the Gays River – Meaghers Grant – Carrolls Corner formations time slice, (D) the Meaghers Grant – Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice, (E) the Lindsay Brook Marker time slice, and (F) the Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice. 1, Goldenville Formation (Cambrian); 2, Halifax Formation (Ordovician); 3, Horton Bluff Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 4, Cheverie Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 5, Coldstream Formation clastics (uppermost Tournaisian); 6, Macumber Formation carbonate laminites (Viséan); 7, Gays River Formation interbank carbonate (Viséan); 8, Gays River Formation carbonate bank buildup (Viséan); 9, Meaghers Grant Formation clastics (Viséan); 10, Carrolls Corner Formation sulphates (Viséan); 11, Stewiacke Formation halite (Viséan).
Published: 18 October 2006
– Stewiacke formations time slice, (E) the Lindsay Brook Marker time slice, and (F) the Carrolls Corner – Stewiacke formations time slice. 1, Goldenville Formation (Cambrian); 2, Halifax Formation (Ordovician); 3, Horton Bluff Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 4, Cheverie Formation clastics (Tournaisian); 5
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1144/SP290.14
EISBN: 9781862395381
... the study area, shown in Figure 3 . MFZ, Minas fault zone. Fig. 3. ( a ) Geological map of Cheverie–Walton area, areas of detailed maps, line of cross-section, and other geographical features mentioned the in text (with information from maps by Weeks 1948 ; Boyle 1957 ; Stevenson 1959...
Image
Photographs of rock lithologic units at Brookfield. (a). Intercalated sequence of siltstones and shales of the Cheverie Formation along the road at the northeast entrance to the open pit. The beds strike at 110o and dip 75o S (to the right, as indicated by arrow), but facing directions are to the north, hence the beds are overturned. Person standing (outlined in gray) is 1.7 m tall. (b). Close-up of the previous photo, showing well-developed space fracture cleavage and narrow barite-siderite veins (lines dipping to left) with alteration halos. Inset figure is close-up of part of the outcrop. (c). Massive siltstone in the pit wall in contact with highly deformed, finely laminated shales in lower part of photo (hammer for scale is outlined). Bedding is shown by the dashed white and solid lines. (d). Close-up of shale in the previous photo, showing intense development of spaced fractures with trends outlined by dashed white lines. (e). Thick unit of east-west–striking sandstone in the pit wall with abundant carbonaceous debris and pyrite (circled areas). (f). Close-up of previous photo, showing a dark, carbonaceous-rich layer containing pyrite that is overlain by a coarser layer with plant debris, rock clasts, and scour structures (hammer for scale).
Published: 01 March 2006
F ig . 3. Photographs of rock lithologic units at Brookfield. (a). Intercalated sequence of siltstones and shales of the Cheverie Formation along the road at the northeast entrance to the open pit. The beds strike at 110 o and dip 75 o S (to the right, as indicated by arrow), but facing
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1935
AAPG Bulletin (1935) 19 (9): 1253–1307.
... Scotia region, where the Lower Mississippian Horton Bluff formation is succeeded unconformably by nonmarine arkosic grits of the Cheverie formation (700 feet), and this in turn is overlain with little if any break by the marine Windsor series (1,100 feet). It is difficult to correlate the Windsor fauna...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Late Paleozoic Crustal Movements of Europe and Nor...
Second thumbnail for: Late Paleozoic Crustal Movements of Europe and Nor...
Third thumbnail for: Late Paleozoic Crustal Movements of Europe and Nor...
Image
(a). Map of Atlantic Canada, showing the extent of the Maritimes basin, which is filled by Middle Devonian to Lower Permian sedimentary rocks. The depocenter of the basin is beneath the Magdalen Islands. The dashed line shows the offshore extent of these rocks, whereas the solid lines are major fault structures. Areas of mineralization (boxes hosted by terrestrial clastic, circles hosted by carbonate, i.e., Macumber Formation, and triangle other) around the Maritimes basin are shown (references provided where available, but see text for 1–6): (1) Gays River Zn-Pb, (2) Kinsac (hosted by granite), (3) Cheverie Zn-Pb, (4) Walton Ba-Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag, (5) Brookfield Ba, (6) Smithfield Zn-Pb, (7) red-bed Cu-Ag(-U) throughout area (Ryan et al., 1989), (8) Antigonish basin Cu (Bourque, 1980; Kirkham, 1985), (9) Jubilee Zn-Pb (Fallara et al., 1998), (10) Lake Enon Sr as celestite (Felderhof, 1978), (11) Pine Brook Ba (Felderhof, 1978), (12) Yava Pb (Sangster and Vaillancourt, 1990), (13) Lake Ainslie Ba-F veins hosted by deformed basement and Horton Group sediments (Kontak and Macdonald, 1995), (14) Newfoundland carbonate platform Zn-Pb-Ba (Kirkham, 1985; Saunders and Strong, 1986), (15) Dorchester Cu, many occurrences in this area (Ruitenberg et al., 1977), (16) Peekaboo Corner Zn-Pb. (b). Regional geology of southern Nova Scotia with inset showing the extent of the subbasins of southern Nova Scotia that comprise the larger Maritimes Basin: K = Kennetcook, MB = Musquodoboit, S = Shubenacadie, SM = St. Mary’s. The Brookfield deposit is located at the north end of the Shubenacadie subbasin just south of the West River St. Mary’s fault (WRSMF), a splay of the terrane-bounding Cobequid-Chedabucto fault system (CCFS), which separates the Meguma terrane to the south and the Avalon terrane to the north. (c). Geologic setting of the Brookfield deposit, showing extent of the Horton and Windsor Group rocks. Note that the Windsor Group rocks are in fault contact with these formations and out of stratigraphic sequence. Geology modified after Stevenson (1954). The numbers (1–8) refer to areas discussed in the text and illustrated in the schematic stratigraphic section in Figure 2.
Published: 01 March 2006
by granite), (3) Cheverie Zn-Pb, (4) Walton Ba-Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag, (5) Brookfield Ba, (6) Smithfield Zn-Pb, (7) red-bed Cu-Ag(-U) throughout area ( Ryan et al., 1989 ), (8) Antigonish basin Cu ( Bourque, 1980 ; Kirkham, 1985 ), (9) Jubilee Zn-Pb ( Fallara et al., 1998 ), (10) Lake Enon Sr as celestite ( Felderhof