Two cores at the outer margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure show significant structural and depositional variations that illuminate its history. Detailed stratigraphy of the Watkins School core reveals that this site is outside the disruption boundary of the crater with respect to its lower part (nonmarine Cretaceous Potomac Formation), but just inside the boundary with respect to its upper part (Exmore Formation and a succession of upper Eocene to Pleistocene postimpact deposits). The site of the U.S. Geological Survey–National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley core, 6.4 km to the east, lies wholly within the annular trough of the crater. The Potomac Formation in the Watkins School core is not noticeably impact disrupted. The lower part of crater unit A in the Langley core represents stratigraphically lower, but similarly undeformed material. The Exmore Formation is only 7.8 m thick in the Watkins School core, but it is over 200 m thick in the Langley core, where it contains blocks up to 24 m in intersected diameter. The upper part of the Exmore Formation in the two cores is a polymict diamicton with a stratified zone at the top. The postimpact sedimentary units in the two cores have similar late Eocene and late Miocene depositional histories and contrasting Oligocene, early Miocene, and middle Miocene histories. A paleochannel of the James River removed Pliocene deposits at the Watkins School site, to be filled later with thick Pleistocene deposits. At the Langley site, a thick Pliocene and thinner Pleistocene record is preserved.

Chesapeake is a 35-Ma-old shallow-marine, complex impact structure with a diameter of ~85 km. The structure is completely buried beneath several hundreds of meters of postimpact sediments. Therefore, subsurface information can be obtained only from geophysical surveys and drill holes. Recently, deep drilling into the inner crater zone, at Eyreville near Cape Charles, was carried out in order to provide constraints on geophysical modeling and cratering processes in a multilayered marine target. We analyzed samples of the Eyreville core including postimpact, impact- produced, and basement-derived units in order to clarify the magneto-mineralogy, to provide physical parameters for better understanding the influence of the impact on the petrophysical and rock-magnetic properties, and to provide rock-magnetic data for magnetic modeling. Results show a complex behavior of physical properties of the lithologies in the Eyreville core due to different lithologies having been affected by shock-induced changes. Our data suggest that pyrrhotite and magnetite carry the magnetic properties in most of the core samples, whereas hematite is present in oxidized clays from the uppermost impact-generated unit (Exmore beds) and related sediment megablocks. The granitic megablock appears to be undeformed based on lack of brittle deformation in magnetite and petrophysically appears as a single block. In contrast, the impactite sequence below the megablock shows brittle deformation and magnetic fabric randomization, and the pyrrhotite in the associated schist fragments is strongly fractured. Thus, the Chesapeake Bay deep core provides an extraordinary opportunity to study the effect of impact on magnetite and pyrrhotite, the two main magnetic minerals creating crustal magnetic anomalies.

The International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) drilled three core holes to a composite depth of 1766 m within the moat of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Core recovery rates from the drilling were high (~90%), but problems with core hole collapse limited the geophysical downhole logging to natural-gamma and temperature logs. To supplement the downhole logs, ~5% of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure cores was processed through the USGS GeoTek multisensor core logger (MSCL) located in Menlo Park, California. The measured physical properties included core thickness (cm), density (g cm −3), P-wave velocity (m s −1), P-wave amplitude (%), magnetic susceptibility (cgs), and resistivity (ohm-m). Fractional porosity was a secondary calculated property. The MSCL data-sampling interval for all core sections was 1 cm longitudinally. Photos of each MSCL sampled core section were imbedded with the physical property data for direct comparison. These data have been used in seismic, geologic, thermal history, magnetic, and gravity models of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Each physical property curve has a unique signature when viewed over the full depth of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure core holes. Variations in the measured properties reflect differences in pre-impact target-rock lithologies and spatial variations in impact-related deformation during late-stage crater collapse and ocean resurge.

Optical and electron-beam petrography of melt-rich suevite and melt-rock clasts from selected samples from the Eyreville B core, Chesapeake Bay impact structure, reveal a variety of silicate glasses and coexisting sulfur-rich melts, now quenched to various sulfide minerals (±iron). The glasses show a wide variety of textures, flow banding, compositions, devitrification, and hydration states. Electron-microprobe analyses yield a compositional range of glasses from high SiO 2 (>90 wt%) through a range of lower SiO 2 (55–75 wt%) with no relationship to depth of sample. Some samples show spherical globules of different composition with sharp menisci,suggesting immiscibility at the time of quenching. Isotropic globules of higher interfacial tension glass (64 wt% SiO 2) are in sharp contact with lower-surface-tension, high-silica glass (95 wt% SiO 2). Immiscible glass-pair composition relationships show that the immiscibility is not stable and probably represents incomplete mixing. Devitrification varies and some low-silica, high-iron glasses appear to have formed Fe-rich smectite; other glass compositions have formed rapid quench textures of corundum, orthopyroxene, clinopy-roxene, magnetite, K-feldspar, plagioclase, chrome-spinel, and hercynite. Hydration (H 2 O by difference) varies from ~10 wt% to essentially anhydrous; high-SiO 2 glasses tend to contain less H 2 O. Petrographic relationships show decomposition of pyrite and melting of pyrrhotite through the transformation series; pyrite→pyrrhotite→troilite→iron. Spheres (~1 to ~50 μm) of quenched immiscible sulfide melt in silicate glass show a range of compositions and include phases such as pentlandite, chalcopyrite, Ni-As, monosulfide solid solution, troilite, and rare Ni-Fe. Other sulfide spheres contain small blebs of pure iron and exhibit a continuum with increasing iron content to spheres that consist of pure iron with small, remnant blebs of Fe-sulfide. The Ni-rich sulfide phases can be explained by melting and/or concentrating target-derived Ni without requiring an asteroid impactor source component. The presence of locally unaltered glasses in these rocks suggests that in some rock volumes, isolation from postimpact hydrothermal systems was sufficient for glass preservation. Pressure and temperature indicators suggest that, on a thin-section scale, the suevites record rapid mixing and accumulation of particles that sustained widely different peak temperatures, from clasts that never exceeded 300 ± 50 °C, to the bulk of the glasses where melted sulfide and unmelted monazite suggest temperatures of 1500 ± 200 °C. The presence of coesite in some glass-bearing samples suggests that pressures exceeded ~3 GPa.

We investigated whole-rock chemical compositions of 318 samples of Exmore breccia (diamicton), impactite (suevite, impact melt rock, polymict lithic impact breccia), and crystalline basement-derived rocks from 444 to 1766 m depth in the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP)–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Eyreville A and B drill cores (Chesapeake Bay impact structure, Virginia, USA). Here, we compare the average chemical compositions for the Exmore breccia (diamicton), the impactites and their subunits, sandstone, granite, granitic gneiss, and amphibolite of the lithic block section (1095.7–1397.2 m depth), cataclastic gneiss of the impact breccia section, and schist and pegmatite/granite of the basal crystalline section (1551.2–1766.3 m depth). The granite of the megablock (1097.7–1371.1 m depth) is of I-type and is seemingly related to a syncollisional setting. The amphibolite (1377.4–1387.5 m depth) of the lithic block section is of igneous origin and has a tholeiitic character. Based on chemical composition, the Exmore breccia (diamicton) can be subdivided into five units (444.9–450.7, 450.7–468, 468–518, 518–528, and 528–~865 m depth). The units in the depth intervals of 450.7–468 and 518–528 m are enriched in TiO 2 , MgO, Sc, V, Cr, and Zn contents compared to the other Exmore breccia units. In some samples, especially at ~451–455 m depth, the Exmore breccia contains significant amounts of P 2 O 5 . The Exmore breccia is recognized as a mixture of all sedimentary and crystalline target components, and, when compared to the impactites, it contains a significant amount of a SiO 2 -rich target component of sedimentary origin. The chemical composition of the impactites overlaps the compositional range for the Exmore breccia. The impactites generally display a negative correlation of SiO 2 and CaO, and a positive correlation of TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , and MgO with depth. This is the result of an increasing basement schist component, and a decreasing sedimentary and/or granitic component with depth. Suevite units S2 and S3 display distinct enrichment of Na 2 O by a factor of ~2 compared to all other impactite units, which is interpreted to reflect a higher granitic component in these units.

An unusually thick section of sedimentary breccias dominated by target-sediment clasts is a distinctive feature of the late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact structure. A cored 1766-m-deep section recovered from the central part of this marine-target structure by the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP)–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) drilling project contains 678 m of these breccias and associated sediments and an intervening 275-m-thick granite slab. Two sedimentary breccia units consist almost entirely of Cretaceous nonmarine sediments derived from the lower part of the target sediment layer. These sediments are present as coherent clasts and as autoclastic matrix between the clasts. Primary (Cretaceous) sedimentary structures are well preserved in some clasts, and liquefaction and fluidization structures produced at the site of deposition occur in the clasts and matrix. These sedimentary breccias are interpreted as one or more rock avalanches from the upper part of the transient-cavity wall. The little-deformed, unshocked granite slab probably was transported as part of an extremely large slide or avalanche. Water-saturated Cretaceous quartz sand below the slab was transported into the seafloor crater prior to, or concurrently with, the granite slab. Two sedimentary breccia units consist of polymict diamictons that contain cobbles, boulders, and blocks of Cretaceous nonmarine target sediments and less common shocked-rock and melt ejecta in an unsorted, unstratified, muddy, fossiliferous, glauconitic quartz matrix. Much of the matrix material was derived from Upper Cretaceous and Paleogene marine target sediments. These units are interpreted as the deposits of debris flows initiated by the resurge of ocean water into the seafloor crater. Interlayering of avalanche and debris-flow units indicates a partial temporal overlap of the earlier avalanche and later resurge processes. A thin unit of stratified turbidite deposits and overlying laminated fine-grained deposits at the top of the section represents the transition to normal shelf sedimentation.

In this study, we extend the knowledge of postimpact alteration processes through an investigation of mineralogy and petrology of 24 samples from the Exmore Formation and sedimentary megablock intervals in the Eyreville borehole within the Chesa-peake Bay impact structure and comparisons to similar studies of cored intervals of the Cape Charles borehole. The bulk mineralogical studies reveal quartz, feldspars (microcline and albite), muscovite, smectite-vermiculite clays, and kaolinite with variable quantities of pyrite, zeolites, calcite, and chlorite. X-ray diffraction analysis of the clay (<2 μm) fraction of samples indicates that the clays are dominated by expandable clays with lesser quantities of illite, kaolinite, glauconite, and mixed-layered clays. The expandable clays include smectite, vermiculite, and smectite-vermiculite intergrade varieties; illite interlayering is minimal (generally, <10% illite layers). Thin section and scanning electron microscope petrography in the Exmore breccia show evidence for extensive authigenic expandable clay in the matrix and dispersed pyrite lepispheres and fine calcite rhombs. Grain alteration includes feldspar dissolution and albitization, glauconite recrystallization, and dissolution and expandable-clay replacement of micas. Taken together, the results indicate that low-temperature alteration (maximum temperatures 60–80 °C) is prevalent in the sedimentary clast–rich intervals in the Eyreville cores, and the maximum effects are observed between 600 and 970 m depth. In comparison, the Exmore Formation from the Cape Charles borehole, 8 km to the southwest and overlying the central peak of the inner crater, shows more advanced authigenesis with Fe-rich chlorite, common quartz overgrowths, and mixed-layered illite-smectite clay with as much as 20% interlayered illite. A low-temperature hydrothermal mineral assemblage is documented in suevite and crystalline-clast breccia at depths of 725–820 m in the Cape Charles borehole. The fine-grained clastic target material and contained seawater are argued to have limited initial target melting and initial crater-floor temperatures in the Chesa-peake Bay impact structure to an even greater degree than that of other marine craters targeted in consolidated sedimentary substrates. Subsequent hydrothermal circulation was confined to the central uplift and neighboring fractured zones, whereas alteration in the overlying sedimentary breccias involved conductive heat flow, reaction with hypersaline pore fluids, and minor fluid flow into more porous, permeable sedimentary blocks adjacent to the central uplift.

The late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact structure, located on the Atlantic margin of Virginia, may be Earth's best-preserved large impact structure formed in a shallow marine, siliciclastic, continental-shelf environment. It has the form of an inverted sombrero in which a central crater ∼40 km in diameter is surrounded by a shallower brim, the annular trough, that extends the diameter to ∼85 km. The annular trough is interpreted to have formed largely by the collapse and mobilization of weak sediments. Crystalline-clast suevite, found only in the central crater, contains clasts and blocks of shocked gneiss that likely were derived from the fragmentation of the central-uplift basement. The suevite and entrained megablocks are interpreted to have formed from impact-melt particles and crystalline-rock debris that never left the central crater, rather than as a fallback deposit. Impact-modified sediments in the annular trough include megablocks of Cretaceous nonmarine sediment disrupted by faults, fluidized sands, fractured clays, and mixed-sediment intercalations. These impact-modified sediments could have formed by a combination of processes, including ejection into and mixing of sediments in the water column, rarefaction-induced fragmentation and clastic injection, liquefaction and fluidization of sand in response to acousticwave vibrations, gravitational collapse, and inward lateral spreading. The Exmore beds, which blanket the entire crater and nearby areas, consist of a lower diamicton member overlain by an upper stratified member. They are interpreted as unstratified ocean-resurge deposits, having depositional cycles that may represent stages of inward resurge or outward anti-resurge flow, overlain by stratified fallout of suspended sediment from the water column.