1-20 OF 136 RESULTS FOR

Chemehuevi Mountains

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 26 October 2017
Geosphere (2017) 13 (6): 1867–1886.
... compositional variation and age ( Tables 1 and 2 ; Supplemental Fig. S1 1 ). TABLE 1. GEOCHEMICAL DATA OF THE MIOCENE CHEMEHUEVI DIKE SWARM TABLE 2. SHRIMP-RG ISOTOPIC AGE DATA, CHEMEHUEVI DIKE SWARM (CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS) X-ray fluorescence analyses of 27 dikes for SiO 2 , TiO...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1993
GSA Bulletin (1993) 105 (8): 1091–1108.
...BARBARA E. JOHN; DAVID A. FOSTER Abstract The Cenozoic normal fault system exposed in the Chemehuevi Mountains of the southern Cordillera provides constraints on the initiation angle and geometry of an extensional fault system that has accommodated extreme crustal stretching. There, three stacked...
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.1130/MEM174-p71
... Structural relief resulting from middle Tertiary extensional deformation in the Chemehuevi Mountains exposes a unique cross section through a temporally and compositionally zoned (both vertically and horizontally), laccolith-shaped intrusion of Late Cretaceous age. The calc-alkalic...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 July 1988
Geology (1988) 16 (7): 613–617.
...Barbara E. John Abstract Structural relief resulting from middle Tertiary extensional deformation in the Chemehuevi Mountains of California exposes a unique cross section through an extensive (>280 km 2 ) calc-alkalic, compositionally zoned, sill-like granitic intrusion of Late Cretaceous age...
Image
Published: 26 October 2017
TABLE 2. SHRIMP-RG ISOTOPIC AGE DATA, CHEMEHUEVI DIKE SWARM (CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS)
Image
Published: 26 October 2017
TABLE 2. SHRIMP-RG ISOTOPIC AGE DATA, CHEMEHUEVI DIKE SWARM (CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS)
Image
Published: 26 October 2017
TABLE 2. SHRIMP-RG ISOTOPIC AGE DATA, CHEMEHUEVI DIKE SWARM (CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS)
Image
(A) Simplified geologic map of the Chemehuevi Mountains. (B) Simplified map showing the distribution of paleoisotherms in the footwall to the Chemehuevi detachment fault system at initiation of extension ca. 23 Ma (reconstruction from 40Ar/39Ar and fission track data from footwall samples; modified from John and Foster, 1993). Structural domains separated by dashed black lines. Lines A–A’, A’–A’’, and A’’–A’’’ indicate the location of cross section shown in Figure 6.
Published: 26 October 2017
Figure 1. (A) Simplified geologic map of the Chemehuevi Mountains. (B) Simplified map showing the distribution of paleoisotherms in the footwall to the Chemehuevi detachment fault system at initiation of extension ca. 23 Ma (reconstruction from 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and fission track data from footwall
Image
Cross section through the Chemehuevi Mountains (looking northwest, normal to the slip direction) showing generalized rock types, isotherms at fault initiation, structural domains, and schematic dike orientations. Wavy lines in Proterozoic gneiss and migmatite indicate the approximate orientation of metamorphic and tectonic fabrics. Stereonets show poles to dikes and mylonitic lineations contoured with an interval of 2 and significance level of 3 and include the maximum eigenvector (E1; from Stereonet v 9.3.0; Allmendinger, 2015). Dike orientations plotted in domains 1–3 are Miocene but potentially include some similar oriented Cretaceous dikes indistinguishable in the field. In domains 1 and 2, set 1 includes dikes that strike within 45° of 105° or 285°; set 2 represents all other orientations. Only Miocene dike orientations are plotted in domains 4 and 5. Mylonitic lineations hosted in Miocene dikes are shown for domains 4 and 5; mylonitic foliations are parallel to dike orientations. All data are shown in their present-day orientation (unrotated). CDF—Chemehuevi detachment fault; MWF—Mohave Wash fault.
Published: 26 October 2017
Figure 6. Cross section through the Chemehuevi Mountains (looking northwest, normal to the slip direction) showing generalized rock types, isotherms at fault initiation, structural domains, and schematic dike orientations. Wavy lines in Proterozoic gneiss and migmatite indicate the approximate
Image
Published: 26 October 2017
TABLE 3. MIOCENE MAGMATISM AND FAULTING IN THE CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS
Image
Published: 01 May 2006
TABLE 1. CHEMEHUEVI MOUNTAINS APATITE FISSION-TRACK (AFT) DATA
Image
Figure 2. Simplified fault relationships of the Chemehuevi Mountains foot-wall. Also marked are apatite fission-track (AFT; from John and Foster, 1993) and AHe (apatite [U-Th]/He) sample localities (this study) (modified from John and Foster, 1993).
Published: 01 May 2006
Figure 2. Simplified fault relationships of the Chemehuevi Mountains foot-wall. Also marked are apatite fission-track (AFT; from John and Foster, 1993 ) and AHe (apatite [U-Th]/He) sample localities (this study) (modified from John and Foster, 1993 ).
Image
Figure 2. Sediment and nuclide budget for Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont. A: Schematic diagram of Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont from source basins to last transect 12 km southwest of mountain front. On piedmont, black represents bedrock surface, gray represents alluvial surface, and white represents ephemeral channels. Top numbers under geomorphic unit labels represent average addition of mass (kg·yr−1·km−2) from that unit; italicized numbers represent nuclide activity (atoms·g−1). Total mass flux increases down piedmont as shown by graph adjacent to piedmont. B: Mass flux of sediment moving down Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont. Arrow thickness represents cumulative flux of sediment. Numbers represent mass fluxes of sediment from transect locations, on geomorphic units, to ephemeral channels. CM—Chemehuevi Mountains; SR—Sawtooth Range. C: Cumulative flux of nuclides moving down Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont represented by horizontal arrow thickness. Addition of nuclides from geomorphic surfaces is represented by vertical numbers. Small diagonal arrows and associated numbers represent additional nuclide activity from dosing as sediment moves down piedmont. D: Nuclide activity of ephemeral-channel sediment (solid squares) and nuclide-balance model (open squares) without dosing during transport. Nuclide-balance model closely predicts channel measurements in pediment region where sediment speeds are fast. Nuclide-balance model and channel data diverge on distal piedmont where sediment speeds are slower. Difference is due to dosing by cosmogenic radiation during transport (represented by diagonal arrows in 2C)
Published: 01 February 2005
Figure 2. Sediment and nuclide budget for Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont. A: Schematic diagram of Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont from source basins to last transect 12 km southwest of mountain front. On piedmont, black represents bedrock surface, gray represents alluvial surface, and white represents
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 July 1988
Geology (1988) 16 (7): 645–648.
...Julia M.G. Miller; Barbara E. John Abstract Miocene sedimentary strata exposed in the eastern Chemehuevi Mountains, southeastern California, record development of an evolving low-angle normal fault system. The sequence includes more than 1 km of conglomerate and sandstone with rare interbedded...
Image
Figure 3. Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont geomorphic units. A: Pediment surface; incised bedrock face is ∼0.5 m high. B: Sawtooth Range on horizon; total relief of range in view is ∼100 m. C: Incised alluvium down gradient of Sawtooth Range; channels are incised ∼2 m. D: Wash surface from 10 to 12 km down piedmont; channel banks are <30 cm high
Published: 01 February 2005
Figure 3. Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont geomorphic units. A: Pediment surface; incised bedrock face is ∼0.5 m high. B: Sawtooth Range on horizon; total relief of range in view is ∼100 m. C: Incised alluvium down gradient of Sawtooth Range; channels are incised ∼2 m. D: Wash surface from 10 to 12 km
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 February 2005
Geology (2005) 33 (2): 133–136.
...Figure 2. Sediment and nuclide budget for Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont. A: Schematic diagram of Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont from source basins to last transect 12 km southwest of mountain front. On piedmont, black represents bedrock surface, gray represents alluvial surface, and white represents...
FIGURES
Image
Figure 1. Location map. Black box represents location of Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont, eastern Mojave Desert
Published: 01 February 2005
Figure 1. Location map. Black box represents location of Chemehuevi Mountain piedmont, eastern Mojave Desert
Image
Relative magmatic intrusion and/or eruption rates versus time-averaged slip rates for the Chemehuevi detachment fault (CDF) and Mohave Wash fault (MWF) at the latitude of the Chemehuevi Mountains plotted as a function of time. Rates of magmatism highly generalized. MWF slip rate shown as a dotted line; variations in slip rate of the CDF are shown by the dashed line. Data presented were synthesized from multiple sources outlined in Table 3.
Published: 26 October 2017
Figure 10. Relative magmatic intrusion and/or eruption rates versus time-averaged slip rates for the Chemehuevi detachment fault (CDF) and Mohave Wash fault (MWF) at the latitude of the Chemehuevi Mountains plotted as a function of time. Rates of magmatism highly generalized. MWF slip rate shown
Image
Geologic map of the eastern Mojave Desert study area showing Hf sample sites (Table 2). Batholiths and intrusive sequences outlined by gray lines are the Jurassic Bristol (Bristol Mountains sequence; Barth et al., 2017) and Bullion (Bullion Mountains Intrusive Suite); the middle Cretaceous Whipple (Whipple Wash suite; Anderson and Cullers, 1990) and Turtle (Turtle assemblage); and the Late Cretaceous Cadiz (Cadiz Valley), Old Woman (Old Woman–Piute), and Chemehuevi (Chemehuevi Mountains) batholiths. Miocene Colorado River (Colo. R.) extensional corridor is indicated. Colorado River (dashed line) bounds California (left) from Arizona. Mapping by the authors.
Published: 05 January 2023
Cretaceous Whipple (Whipple Wash suite; Anderson and Cullers, 1990 ) and Turtle (Turtle assemblage); and the Late Cretaceous Cadiz (Cadiz Valley), Old Woman (Old Woman–Piute), and Chemehuevi (Chemehuevi Mountains) batholiths. Miocene Colorado River (Colo. R.) extensional corridor is indicated. Colorado
Image
Southernmost Nevada and adjacent Arizona and California, showing location of Ireteba pluton and Eldorado Mountains. Late Cretaceous–Paleocene peraluminous plutons: 1, Gold Butte region, Nevada (Fryxell et al. 1992); 2, White Hills, Arizona; 3, Black Mountains, Arizona; 4, Ireteba pluton, Eldorado Mountains; 5, White Rock Wash pluton, Newberry Mountains, Nevada (Ramo et al. 1999); 6, Chemehuevi Mountains, California (John and Wooden 1990); 7, Whipple Mountains, California (Anderson and Cullers 1990).
Published: 01 November 2002
, Ireteba pluton, Eldorado Mountains; 5 , White Rock Wash pluton, Newberry Mountains, Nevada (Ramo et al. 1999 ); 6 , Chemehuevi Mountains, California (John and Wooden 1990 ); 7 , Whipple Mountains, California (Anderson and Cullers 1990 ).