1-20 OF 25 RESULTS FOR

Changma earthquake 1932

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 12 December 2019
Lithosphere (2020) 12 (1): 19–39.
...Jiaxin Du; Bihong Fu; Qiang Guo; Pilong Shi; Guoliang Xue; Huan Xu Abstract The 1932 Ms 7.6 earthquake struck the active Changma fault in the NE Tibetan Plateau, and produced a distinct surface rupture along the fault zone. However, the segmentation and termination of the surface rupture zone...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
Distribution of the <span class="search-highlight">1932</span> <span class="search-highlight">Changma</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> surface-rupture zone along the ...
Published: 01 April 2010
Figure 12. Distribution of the 1932 Changma earthquake surface-rupture zone along the Changma fault in the west Qilian range (see Fig.  2 for location). Modified from Meyer (1991) and Institute of Geology and Lanzhou Institute of Seismology (1993) . The inset map (middle lower) shows
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2010
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2010) 100 (2): 541–561.
...Figure 12. Distribution of the 1932 Changma earthquake surface-rupture zone along the Changma fault in the west Qilian range (see Fig.  2 for location). Modified from Meyer (1991) and Institute of Geology and Lanzhou Institute of Seismology (1993) . The inset map (middle lower) shows...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Accumulation of Coulomb failure stress around epicenters of the strong eart...
Published: 04 August 2015
on earthquake of (a) the 1927 Gulang event, (b) the 1932 Changma event, (c) the 1954 Shandan event, and (d) 1990 Tianzhu event. All the stress is at a depth of 5 km with the effective coefficient of friction of 0.4. The crustal viscosities are from the solid lines in Figure  2b .
Image
(A) First-order segmentation of surface rupture zone related to the <span class="search-highlight">1932</span> M ...
Published: 12 December 2019
; CSLG-SYR segment—Choushuiliugou-Shiyou River segment; SYR-XSX segment—Shiyou River-Xishuixia segment. The 1932 Changma earthquake and 2002 Yumen earthquake events shown on the map were obtained from National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI).
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Image
Seismic Parameters for Historical <span class="search-highlight">Earthquakes</span> along the Hexi Corridor      ...
Published: 01 April 2010
7.6–7.7 7.7 6.9 5 †† Changma 25-12-1932 X 7.6 h 2.3/15 h 6.2 149 7.6 7.7 7.1–7.2 6 Shandan 11-2-1954 X 7.3 h 1.2/9 h 1.5 5.1 6.0 6.4 6.9 * Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA (1995) . † Earthquake magnitude M is estimated by empirical equation
Journal Article
Published: 13 March 2023
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2023) 113 (3): 976–996.
... and the southern Wuwei basin thrust fault moved simultaneously ( Guo et al. , 2020 ). On the western side of TLSF, the 1932 M  7.6 Changma earthquake formed a strike‐slip surface rupture zone of about 120 km on the Changma fault ( Du et al. , 2019 ). * Corresponding author: [email protected]...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 04 August 2015
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2015) 105 (5): 2724–2735.
... on earthquake of (a) the 1927 Gulang event, (b) the 1932 Changma event, (c) the 1954 Shandan event, and (d) 1990 Tianzhu event. All the stress is at a depth of 5 km with the effective coefficient of friction of 0.4. The crustal viscosities are from the solid lines in Figure  2b . ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2024
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2024) 65 (7): 779–794.
... and Earthquake Prediction (ISCSEP) . Seismol . Press, Beijing , pp. 225 – 242 . Du , J. , Fu , B. , Guo , Q. , Shi , P. , Xue , G. , Xu , H. , 2019 . Segmentation and termination of the surface rupture zone produced by the 1932 Ms 7.6 Changma earthquake: New insights...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 02 July 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (4): 1498–1523.
...) 50 Changma 120 1.33 ± 0.4–3.68 ± 0.4 LL 1932, 7.6 (0, 0.084], [0.90, 1); (0, 0.084], [0.90, 1); (0, 0.084], [0.90, 1) 1832, 5½, 0.90 7.6 5.46 5.39 ∼ 1000 Luo et al. (2013 , 2016) 51 Fodongmiao‐Hongyazi 110 1.27 ± 0.58 LL 1609, 7¼ †† [0.109, 0.199]; (0, 0.199...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 15 October 2020
Geosphere (2020) 16 (6): 1538–1557.
.... For example, the 1932 Ms 7.6 Changma earthquake produced a N70°W-striking coseismic surface rupture along the Changma fault ( Peltzer and Tapponnier, 1988 ). In contrast, the seismic hazard of the Danghe Nan Shan is also worthy of attention. The easternmost part of the Altyn Tagh fault, including...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 07 September 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (5): 2379–2392.
... 6.40 22 1.0 1.1 17.5 42 67 Changma 1932/12/25 7.56 149 2.3 5.0 16 43 68 Fuyun 1931/08/10 7.89 160 6.3 0.3 20 44 69 North Izu 1930/11/25 6.89 28 1.1 2.4 12 45 71 Tango 1927/03/07 7.04 35 1.0 0.3 14 46 72 Luoho‐Qiajiao (Daofu) 1923/03/24 7.32 80...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1984
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1984) 74 (6): 2379–2411.
.... (1974) . On the fracture zones of the Changma earthquake of 1932 and their causes , Acta Geophys. Sinica 17 , 272 - 287 also in Amer. Geophys. Union, Chinese Geophysics . 1 , 17 - 45 . Shor G. G...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2011
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2011) 101 (4): 1542–1553.
...) 02/02/1931 Hawkes Bay, New Zealand 7.89 Lettis et al. (1997) 12/25/1932 Changma, China 7.82 Lettis et al. (1997) 11/28/1933 Behabad, Iran 6.29 Lettis et al. (1997) 04/21/1935 Taiwan 7.23 Lettis et al. (1997) 01/15/1944 San Juan, Argentina 7.6 Lettis et al...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 24 May 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (3): 1110–1124.
... 35.80 134.92 S 35 7.0 0 1 (1 E) 1 (end, n.d.) 1928/01/06 Laikipia–Subukia Kenya 44 0.16 35.75 N 40 6.9 0 1 (1) 2 (end, –) 1931/08/10 Fuyun, China 45 46.57 89.97 S 160 7.9 2 (1.5, 2.5) 1 (2 R) 0 (n.d., n.d.) 1932/12/25 Changma, China 46 39.77 96.69 S 149 7.6 4...
FIGURES | View All (14)