1-20 OF 907 RESULTS FOR

Candela Field

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Map showing locations of wells and cross sections in Candela field (inset shows locations of study area and Figure 2). A and B are seismic sections (Figure 4); c is general cross section (Figure 5); d-h are electric-log correlation sections (Figures 6, 7, 9).
Published: 01 November 1988
Figure 1 —Map showing locations of wells and cross sections in Candela field (inset shows locations of study area and Figure 2 ). A and B are seismic sections ( Figure 4 ); c is general cross section ( Figure 5 ); d-h are electric-log correlation sections ( Figures 6 , 7 , 9 ).
Image
—Isopach maps (in meters) and facies variation diagrams for Candela field (Figure 1). Upper left: isopach map of stages C + D + E showing rapid transverse thinning (from 1,200 to 200 m or 3,937 to 656 ft) and insignificant longitudinal thickness variation. Thinning is result of laterally confined turbidity currents with high transport efficiency. Longitudinal ridges due to synsedimentary faults cause some irregularities in onlap (upper flank of compressional faults) and thickening (lower flank), which have not been recorded in detail. Marked distortions in northern area are due to transverse faults. Lateral variation in thickness can best be seen on an individual isopach map of stage D (not presented in this paper). Upper right: isopach map of stages A + B characterized by gentle synsedimentary tectonism and slight thinning to northeast. Thickness greatest in northwest (source area). Lower left: facies variations in stage B. Continuous (amalgamated) sand body in northwest is split (by shaly intervals) into three separate sand bodies (Bl, B2, and B3) toward the southeast. Each of these thins southeastward, forming thinning-upward sequence, which retrogrades progressively from lower B3 sand body to upper Bl. Bl and B2 grade laterally into thin-bedded turbidites (compare with Figure 7). Lower right: facies variations and areal extent of individual sand bodies of stage A. Major sandy fan body separates downcurrent (southeastward) into individual lobate minor bodies (indicated by Roman numerals). These lobate bodies partly overlap and vertically drift toward northeast in direction of lateral migration of subsidence. Their average thickness decreases from 30 m (98 ft) (I) to 15 m (49 ft) (IV).
Published: 01 November 1988
Figure 8 —Isopach maps (in meters) and facies variation diagrams for Candela field ( Figure 1 ). Upper left: isopach map of stages C + D + E showing rapid transverse thinning (from 1,200 to 200 m or 3,937 to 656 ft) and insignificant longitudinal thickness variation. Thinning is result
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1988
AAPG Bulletin (1988) 72 (11): 1370–1380.
...Figure 1 —Map showing locations of wells and cross sections in Candela field (inset shows locations of study area and Figure 2 ). A and B are seismic sections ( Figure 4 ); c is general cross section ( Figure 5 ); d-h are electric-log correlation sections ( Figures 6 , 7 , 9 ). ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Subsurface Basin Analysis of Fault-Controlled Turb...
Second thumbnail for: Subsurface Basin Analysis of Fault-Controlled Turb...
Third thumbnail for: Subsurface Basin Analysis of Fault-Controlled Turb...
Image
—General cross section c (location shown on Figure 1) of Bradano Trough in study area (Candela section). Modified from Casnedi et al, 1982. Portion studied in detail is included between calcarenite bed [crossed by Ascoli Satriano (AS) 3 and 4 wells] and pre-Pliocene calcareous basement. Stages A to E are depicted. Candela (CA) and Ascoli Satriano (AS) are wells that produce from turbidite sands in Candela field.
Published: 01 November 1988
basement. Stages A to E are depicted. Candela (CA) and Ascoli Satriano (AS) are wells that produce from turbidite sands in Candela field.
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2024
Earth Sciences History (2024) 43 (1): 1.
... by the IUGS International Commission on the History of Geological Sciences (INHIGEO) and organized by convenors Andrea Candela, Marco Pantaloni, Ezio Vaccari and Luigina Vezzoli. Although several studies have reconstructed the development of Earth sciences in Italy to date, the history of stratigraphy still...
Series: Reviews in Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 1998
DOI: 10.5382/Rev.10.04
EISBN: 9781629490175
... of element partitioning, phase equilibria, etc.), and the complex, time-integrated natural world is a tenuous one. Without models, the deductive consequences of experiments cannot be tested against field observations. Candela and Piccoli (1995) refined a model (now called MVPart) that can be used to predict...
Image
Plots of Cl vs. F (a), Cl-OH-F (b), Y vs. Ce (ppm) (c) of apatite, and chondite-normalized REE patterns of apatite (d). In b, the concentrations of volatile components (atomic proportions) in apatite is estimated by using the method by Piccoli and Candela (2002). In c, the variation fields of apatite in S-type and I-type granite are from Laurent et al. (2017). Normalization values (d) are from McDonough and Sun (1995). (Color online.)
Published: 01 October 2021
Figure 4. Plots of Cl vs. F ( a ), Cl-OH-F ( b ), Y vs. Ce (ppm) ( c ) of apatite, and chondite-normalized REE patterns of apatite ( d ). In b , the concentrations of volatile components (atomic proportions) in apatite is estimated by using the method by Piccoli and Candela (2002) . In c
Image
(A) Plot of F and Cl in apatite and coexisting melt inclusions (MI) from the Plinian phase of the Pleistocene Bishop Tuff eruption (in red) and the 2006 Augustine volcano eruption (in blue). (B, C) Diagrams representing the calculated Cl and F concentrations in coexisting apatite and melts at the P–T conditions estimated for the two eruptions. The method of calculation, and the assumptions therein, are described in Piccoli and Candela (1994) and summarized in the text. The Augustine apatite and melt inclusion data are from Webster et al. (2010) and Doherty et al. (2014, reference therein). The yellow and blue fields represent the range in estimated melt Cl and F concentrations, respectively, based on published apatite compositions.
Published: 01 June 2015
and melts at the P–T conditions estimated for the two eruptions. The method of calculation, and the assumptions therein, are described in Piccoli and Candela ( 1994 ) and summarized in the text. The Augustine apatite and melt inclusion data are from Webster et al. ( 2010 ) and Doherty et al. ( 2014
Image
Regression analyses of experimentally determined halogen-OH distribution coefficients for apatite-melt (wt% basis), with dependence on both P and T [logKD = a + b/T + c(P – 1)/T] or temperature only (logKD = a + b/T). Regression coefficients for T-only analysis are given. Data symbols are the same as for Figure 6. Dark gray lines = predicted variations at 1 GPa (solid) and 50 MPa (dashed). Light gray lines = predicted variations for the system apatite-fluid from Piccoli and Candela (1994) at 1 GPa (dashed) and 50 MPa (dotted). Black dotted line shows the T-only regression. Gray fields show the experimental range of Li and Hermann (2017; 2.5 GPa). Dashed light gray outlines show the experimental range of Li and Hermann (2015; 2.5–4.5 GPa).
Published: 01 February 2018
are given. Data symbols are the same as for Figure 6 . Dark gray lines = predicted variations at 1 GPa (solid) and 50 MPa (dashed). Light gray lines = predicted variations for the system apatite-fluid from Piccoli and Candela (1994) at 1 GPa (dashed) and 50 MPa (dotted). Black dotted line shows the T
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new-field wildcats drilled during 1968.
Published: 01 August 1969
Fig. 12. —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new-field wildcats drilled during 1968. Minor Fields Main Fields 1. Cellino (Montedison) 3. San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP) 2. Bomba (AGIP) 7. Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP) 4. Montecilfone-Guglionesi (AGIP) 9. Candela
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily.
Published: 01 October 1975
Fig. 15 —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily. Main fields —5, San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP); 13, Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP); 16, Candela-Palino (AGIP-Montedison); 22, Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP); 23, Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP); 25, Luna (AGIP); 26, Gagliano (AGIP); 32, Gela (AGIP); 33
Image
—Oil and gas fields of peninsular Italy and new-field wildcats drilled during 1966. Location shown on Figure 11. Minor FieldsMain Fields1. Cellino (Petrosud)2. S. Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP)3. Montecilfone-Guglionesi (AGIP)6. Monte Stillo (SNIA), Roseto (MPI)4. Portocannone (AMI)7. Candela-Palino (SNIA)5. Torrente Tona (AGIP)11. Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP)8. Ascoli Satriano (Idr. Castelgrande)12. Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP)9. Carapelle (Idr. Castelgrande) 10 Serra del Riposo (Montedison) 
Published: 01 August 1967
) 4. Portocannone (AMI) 7. Candela-Palino (SNIA) 5. Torrente Tona (AGIP) 11. Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP) 8. Ascoli Satriano (Idr. Castelgrande) 12. Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP) 9. Carapelle (Idr. Castelgrande)   10 Serra del Riposo (Montedison)   New-Field Wildcats Drilled During 1966
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily.
Published: 01 October 1976
Fig. 14 —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily. Main Fields —6, San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP); 13, Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP); 16, Candela-Palino (AGIP-Montedison); 22, Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP); 23, Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP); 25, Luna (AGIP); 26, Gagliano (AGIP); 32, Gela (AGIP); 33
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new-field wildcats drilled during 1967. Minor FieldsMain Fields1.Cellino (Petrosud)3.San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP)2.Bomba (IM)7.Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP)4.Montecilfone-Guglionesi (AGIP)9.Candela-Palino (SNIA-AGIP)5.Portocannone (AMI)13.Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP)6.Torrente Tona (AGIP)14.Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP)8.Sta. Croce-Jelsi (Idr. Castelgrande)10.Ascoli Satriano (Idr. Castelgrande)11.Torrente Carapelle (Idr. Castelgrande)12.Pietralunga (SNIA)—Serra del Riposo (Montedison)New-Field Wildcats Drilled During 1967 (TD in meters)15.San Giorgio Mare 1 (SIM) (Drlg.)25.Monterotaro 2 (RPM) (2,497)16.Ortezzano 1 (RPM) (2,154)26.Montedoro 2 (MPI) (2,974)17.S. Antonio 1 (Petrosud) (2,795)27.Celenza 2 (AGIP) (Drlg.)18.S. Stefano Mare 1 (SIM) (1,890)28.Maschito 1 (RPM) (2,187)19.Punta Penna 1 (SIM) (1,450) Maschito 2 (RPM) (Drlg.)20.Terr. Peligna 1 (IM) (2,116)29.S. Chirico 4 (AMI) (Drlg.)21.Monte Antico 1 (AGIP) (1,685)30.Pignola 1 (Idr. Castelgrande—strat. test) (1,160)22.Colle Scalello 2 (SORI) (Drlg.)31.Accettura 1 and 1-bis (2,381 and drlg.)23.Ateleta 2 (AGIP) (3,176)32.Serra d’OIivo (IM) (3,496)24.Nevera 1 (SORI) (1,600)Not on map—Strongoli 1 (Idr. Castelgrande) (1,035)
Published: 01 August 1968
FIG. 13. —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new-field wildcats drilled during 1967. Minor Fields Main Fields 1. Cellino (Petrosud) 3. San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP) 2. Bomba (IM) 7. Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP) 4. Montecilfone-Guglionesi (AGIP) 9. Candela
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new field wildcats drilled during 1969. Main FieldsMinor Fields4.San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP)1.San Giorgio Mare (EIM)10.Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP)2.Cellino (Montecatini-Edison)11.Candela-Palino (SNIA-AGIP)3.Santo Stefano Mare (EIM)16.Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP)5.Bomba (AGIP)17.Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP)6.Colle Scalella (SORI)  7.Montecilfone-Guglionesi (AGIP)  8.Portocannone (Montecatini-Edison)  9.Torrente Tona (AGIP)  12.Ascoli Satriano (Montecatini-Edison)  14.Pietralunga (SNIA) Serra del Riposo (Montecatini-Edison)  15.Accettura (Montecatini-Edison)  18.Cirò (Montecatini-Edison)New-Field Wildcats Drilled During 1969 (TD in Meters)19.Cartoceto 1 (ELF)(2,682)30.Castelmauro 2 (AGIP)(3,753.5)20.Loreto 1 (ELF)(2,820)31.Colle d’Armi 1 (Montecatini-Edison)(2,156)21.Treia 1 (ELF)(Drlg.)32.Monte Chiancone 1 (AGIP)(2,596)22.Torrente Tesino 1 (Fina)(5,044)33.Rendina 2 (SNIA-Gulf)(1,321)23.Penne 1 (Fina)(1,641)34.Oppido Lucano 1 (Fina)(1,745.5)24.Caprara 1 (AGIP)(3,969)35.Campomaggiore 1 (AGIP)(2,782)25.Catagnano 1 (Montecatini-Edison)(898)36.Garguso 1 (Montecatini-Edison)(2,273)26.Torricella PeUgna 2 (AGIP)(2,472)37.Monte S. Vito 1 & 2 (SPI)(1,256.2 & 1,054.3)27.Petacciato Fina 1 (Fina)(1,504)38.Fiume Crati 1 (SNIA-Gulf)(1,388)28.Rosello 1 (AGIP)(Drlg.)39.S. Tommaso 1 (ELF)(2,205)29.Messer Marino 1 (AGIP)(Drlg.)   
Published: 01 August 1970
Fig. 13. —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and new field wildcats drilled during 1969. Main Fields Minor Fields 4. San Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP) 1. San Giorgio Mare (EIM) 10. Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP) 2. Cellino (Montecatini-Edison) 11. Candela-Palino (SNIA-AGIP
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2024
Earth Sciences History (2024) 43 (1): 13–26.
...Andrea Candela ABSTRACT Scipione Breislak may be considered as one of the most renowned Italian ‘Plutonists’ at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth centuries. In the 1790s, he was a professor of Physics at the Military Academy of Nunziatella in Naples, where he also devoted...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: THEORIES OF THE EARTH AND ‘PLUTONISM’ IN THE INTRO...
Second thumbnail for: THEORIES OF THE EARTH AND ‘PLUTONISM’ IN THE INTRO...
Third thumbnail for: THEORIES OF THE EARTH AND ‘PLUTONISM’ IN THE INTRO...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 20 October 2022
Geology (2022) 50 (12): 1356–1360.
... in the field is lacking, especially for the phyllosilicate-rich gouges that are widely observed in natural faults. We integrated laboratory friction experiments with surface topography microscopy and demonstrated a quantitative correlation between frictional slip behavior and fault surface morphology...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Fault surface morphology as an indicator for earth...
Second thumbnail for: Fault surface morphology as an indicator for earth...
Third thumbnail for: Fault surface morphology as an indicator for earth...
Journal Article
Published: 05 September 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2025) 96 (1): 130–146.
... fracturing in western Alberta, Canada ( Karimi and Davidsen, 2023 ) Induced 0.2 0.25 Groningen gas field, Netherlands, KNMI catalog ( Candela et al. , 2019 ) Induced 1.0 0.18 Groningen gas field, Netherlands, KNMI catalog ( Post et al. , 2021 ) Induced 1.3 0.27 Groningen gas field...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Bursts of Fast Propagating Swarms of Induced Earth...
Second thumbnail for: Bursts of Fast Propagating Swarms of Induced Earth...
Third thumbnail for: Bursts of Fast Propagating Swarms of Induced Earth...
Image
—Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily and new-field wildcats drilled during 1970.
Published: 01 September 1971
Fig. 13. —Oil and gas fields of southern Italy and Sicily and new-field wildcats drilled during 1970. Main Fields 4. S. Salvo-Lentella-Trigno (AGIP) 10. Montestillo-Roseto (AGIP) 12. Candela-Palino (SNIA-AGIP) 17. Grottole-Ferrandina (AGIP) 18. Pisticci-Dimora (AGIP) Minor Fields 1
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 2015
EISBN: 9781629494883
... The material for this field trip covers only one stop: the abandoned workings and associated dump of the Mineral Hill mine, which is located on state land surrounding the Liberty Reservoir, Carroll County, Maryland. The mine is located approximately 15 miles west-northwest of the city...