1-20 OF 164 RESULTS FOR

Cadotte Member

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2010
AAPG Bulletin (2010) 94 (3): 293–315.
... and quartzose units are sufficiently different that they can be distinguished seismically. Seismic modeling and observations show that high-amplitude areas correspond to porous (and productive) chert-rich shoreface and beachface deposits. A map of seismic amplitudes for the Cadotte Member shows narrow (∼0.5 km...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1980
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1980) 28 (2): 173–199.
...Mark Thomas; Brian Miller ABSTRACT A well from northeastern British Columbia, which was drilled into the Cadotte Member (Lower Cretaceous), provides a good example of the significant effect that drilling fluids can have on the authigenic and detrital components of a reservoir, and on its subsequent...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2014
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2014) 62 (3): 177–212.
...Olivia A. Henderson; Kathleen M. Vannelli; A. Guy Plint Abstract The mudstone-dominated Harmon and sandstone-dominated Cadotte members of the Peace River Formation were deposited during the middle Albian in the southern end of a Boreal marine embayment that occupied the foredeep of the Western...
FIGURES | View All (31)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1990) 38A (1): 176–189.
... and erosional patterns of the mapped units. The Cadotte and Paddy members are characterized by abrupt superposed and thick northern depositional edges representing paleoshorelines that trended northeast-southwest. An elongate east-west, isopach depression in the Cadotte Member across Twps. 69, 70 and 71...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1991
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1991) 61 (5): 825–849.
...Dale A. Leckie; Chaitanya Singh Abstract Outcrop exposures of the Peace River Formation in northwestern Alberta contain evidence of significant relative sea-level fluctuations that occurred during the middle to late Albian. These include Paddy Member channels that incised into the Cadotte Member...
Image
Seismic amplitude map of the Cadotte Member, a Cretaceous-age clastic strandplain deposit from Alberta, Canada. (a) Uninterpreted map showing prominent amplitude trends that strike approximately east–west, with other trends more north–south in orientation. Note the acquisition geometry is oblique to these trends, suggesting that the amplitudes are not acquisition artifacts. (b) Interpreted map. The east–west-striking amplitude lineations are interpreted to indicate strandplain orientation (i.e., they represent paleoshorelines), whereas the approximately north–south trends are related to: (1) Cretaceous channels that cut through the Cadotte shoreline, (2) Cretaceous channels in the stratigraphic unit immediately above the Cadotte (i.e., the Paddy Member) that interfere with the Cadotte amplitudes, or (3) poor-data areas beneath a modern river floodplain. Seismic modeling, log-based stratigraphic interpretations, and comparison of the amplitude map to modern surficial features were used to constrain the amplitude interpretation. See McCullagh and Hart (2010) for further details. Reprinted by permission of the AAPG, whose permission is required for further use.
Published: 08 August 2013
Figure 3. Seismic amplitude map of the Cadotte Member, a Cretaceous-age clastic strandplain deposit from Alberta, Canada. (a) Uninterpreted map showing prominent amplitude trends that strike approximately east–west, with other trends more north–south in orientation. Note the acquisition geometry
Image
Representative photos of facies in the Cadotte Member; 1-cm (0.3-in.) scale is depicted by white box unless otherwise noted. (a) Interbedded hummocky cross-stratified sandstone with mudstone (transition zone). (b) Swaley cross-stratified sandstone (lower shoreface). (c) Heavily bioturbated sandstone (lower shoreface). Note the Planolites (Pl), Schaubcylindrichnus (Sh), Palaeophycus (Pa), and Terebellina (Te). (d) Trough cross-bedded sandstone (upper shoreface) with Macaronichnus (Ma). (e) Clast-supported chert-rich conglomerate (upper shoreface). (f) Matrix-supported chert-rich conglomerate (upper shoreface). (g) Planar-laminated sandstone (beachface). (h) Rooted-massive sandstone (backshore). (i) Nonmarine strata (coastal plain).
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 4 Representative photos of facies in the Cadotte Member; 1-cm (0.3-in.) scale is depicted by white box unless otherwise noted. (a) Interbedded hummocky cross-stratified sandstone with mudstone (transition zone). (b) Swaley cross-stratified sandstone (lower shoreface). (c) Heavily
Image
Crossplots of measurements from within the upper Cadotte Member and corresponding crossover thicknesses. (a) Crossover thickness versus core density (n = 10); note the negative correlation between the two. (b) A positive correlation is present between the crossover thickness and core permeability (n = 10). (c) A positive correlation is also present between the thickness of the crossover thickness and normalized production data (i.e., the first 6 months of production data) (n = 9). The highest permeabilities and greatest production are from wells with the thickest crossover zones that correspond to cherty sandstone and conglomerate.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 8 Crossplots of measurements from within the upper Cadotte Member and corresponding crossover thicknesses. (a) Crossover thickness versus core density ( n = 10); note the negative correlation between the two. (b) A positive correlation is present between the crossover thickness and core
Image
Seismic amplitude map of the Cadotte Member. (a) Uninterpreted map that shows two main amplitude trends with one set striking approximately east–west and the other set striking north–south. Note that the acquisition geometry is orientated obliquely to each of these anomalies. (b) Interpreted map highlighting the east-northeast- and north-south-amplitude anomalies.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 10 Seismic amplitude map of the Cadotte Member. (a) Uninterpreted map that shows two main amplitude trends with one set striking approximately east–west and the other set striking north–south. Note that the acquisition geometry is orientated obliquely to each of these anomalies. (b
Image
Graphic lithological log of the Cadotte Member, Chinook Field, showing storm amalgamated lower and middle shoreface sandstones overlain by conglomeratic upper shoreface, and pebbly sandstone foreshore deposits. Well 09-11-65-13W6. Refer to Figure 2 for legend of symbols.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 14. Graphic lithological log of the Cadotte Member, Chinook Field, showing storm amalgamated lower and middle shoreface sandstones overlain by conglomeratic upper shoreface, and pebbly sandstone foreshore deposits. Well 09-11-65-13W6. Refer to Figure 2 for legend of symbols.
Image
Conglomeratic facies of the Cadotte Member. A) Trough cross-stratified pebbly sandstone in the upper shoreface. Despite the variability in grain size, note the well developed grain segregation typical of the facies. Well 06-21-70-12W6, 1875.2 m. B) Low-angle, planar-bedded, chert pebble conglomerate interstratified with trough cross-stratified pebbly sandstone of the upper shoreface complex. Arrows point to Macaronichnus segregatis. Well 08-02-66-09W6, 2366.0 m. C) Largely structureless granule to pebble conglomerate. The interval lacks matrix (open framework). Well 10-23-72-11W6, 1583.8 m.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 15. Conglomeratic facies of the Cadotte Member. A) Trough cross-stratified pebbly sandstone in the upper shoreface. Despite the variability in grain size, note the well developed grain segregation typical of the facies. Well 06-21-70-12W6, 1875.2 m. B) Low-angle, planar-bedded, chert
Journal Article
Published: 21 April 2011
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2011) 48 (4): 719–727.
... of the Peace River Formation record transgression, whereas sandstones of the Cadotte Member of the Peace River Formation record shoreline regression to the north. Abundant hummocky and swaley lamination in the Cadotte sandstone attest to the influence of storms on a shallow shelf. The Cadotte sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Synthetic seismograms showing comparison between wireline log and seismic expression of the Cadotte Member and adjacent units. Curve mnemonics used are GR (gamma ray), SYN (synthetic seismogram), and ILD (deep resistivity). (a) In well 7-14-65-8W6, the upper part of the member corresponds to a peak, and the contact between the upper and lower Cadotte Member corresponds to a zero crossing in the seismic data. (b) The synthetic seismogram for 10-7-65-7W6 well shows that the entire Cadotte Member is represented by a broad peak at this location. See the legend in Figure 6 for well log and seismic picks.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 9 Synthetic seismograms showing comparison between wireline log and seismic expression of the Cadotte Member and adjacent units. Curve mnemonics used are GR (gamma ray), SYN (synthetic seismogram), and ILD (deep resistivity). (a) In well 7-14-65-8W6, the upper part of the member
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (11): 2269–2289.
... the upper (sandstone and shale) part of the Scatter formation with the middle member of the Buckinghorse formation in Chischa River, with part of the Commotion formation in Pine River foothills, and with the Cadotte member of the Peace River formation. An upper Gastroplites horizon is used as a basis...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1984
DOI: 10.1306/M38441C4
EISBN: 9781629811604
... shales of the Hulcross/Harmon members which cap the Notikewin Member. A well-developed regressive cycle, represented by the coastal plain to shallow marine sediments of the Paddy and Cadotte members occurs within this transgressive pulse, which continued until at least the end of Albian time. Lower...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1990
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1990) 27 (9): 1159–1169.
... of the Verneuilina canadensis Subzone of the Miliammina manitobensis Zone of the Lower Cretaceous (upper Albian). A stratigraphic hiatus of eight foraminiferal subzones is implied between the Paddy Member and subjacent Cadotte Member. Progressive transgression of the M . manitobensis sea is reflected by a succession...
Image
North–south well-log cross section from the study area (location shown in Figure 2). The discontinuity within the Cadotte Member is chosen as the datum to best represent the variable thickness within the upper part of that unit. (a) Gamma-ray and deep-resistivity logs, core placements, perforations, and lithological markers are displayed. Note that all perforated wells in this section produce from the Cadotte Member, and the cores all penetrate the boundary between upper and lower parts of that unit. (b) Gamma-ray logs and core locations for wells shown in panel a, with sequence-stratigraphic surfaces and overlay of depositional environments. Note the variable thickness of the upper Cadotte Member and the presence of shale- and siltstone-filled channels in the Paddy Member.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 6 North–south well-log cross section from the study area (location shown in Figure 2 ). The discontinuity within the Cadotte Member is chosen as the datum to best represent the variable thickness within the upper part of that unit. (a) Gamma-ray and deep-resistivity logs, core placements
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2005
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2005) 53 (2): 165–188.
... allowing for the northward transport of these coarser deposits. In the southeast, as a result of erosion between the Paddy and Cadotte members, deposits of the Joli Fou Formation are not well preserved. In the north and west, however, an equivalent conformable suite of mudstones is thinning in an easterly...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1995
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1995) 32 (7): 977–992.
.... Species of Gastroplites McLearn, 1930, Pseudopulchellia Imlay, 1961, Pseudogastroplites Jeletzky, 1980, and Stotticeras Jeletzky, 1980 are illustrated from the Ammobaculites sp. and Haplophragmoides multiplum subzones of the subjacent Cadotte Member of the Boulder Creek Formation and the underlying...
Image
Summary diagram relating the seismic anomalies and production. Curve mnemonics used are GR (gamma ray) and ILD (deep resistivity). (a) Close-up image of the amplitude map from the Cadotte Member horizon that displays a high-amplitude anomaly (light gray), which has eight producing wells (wells are not posted to conceal true location of seismic image) and is transected by the channel-like feature. (b) Two wells situated on and off of the anomaly shown in panel a; note that each well is perforated and has a clean gamma ray and adequate resistivity to be productive. However, only the 5-28-65-8W6 well is situated within the amplitude anomaly, has log crossover, and produces gas. (c) Log cross section (see Figure 3 for the location) illustrating a shale-filled channel replacing shoreface and beachface deposits in the upper Cadotte Member. Although none of these wells were perforated in the Cadotte Member, similar channel fills would seem likely to act as effective barriers to fluid flow (i.e., compartment boundaries). (d) Pressure-decline curves for two wells situated within the anomaly shown in panel a and on either side of the feature interpreted to be a channel that has incised into the upper part of the Cadotte Member (i.e., analogous to the channel fill shown in panel c). The wells were drilled approximately 20 yr apart, and both encountered virgin pressures, an indication of reservoir compartmentalization. The location of these two wells cannot be shown on the map because of a data confidentiality agreement. See Figure 6 for the legends for the other lithologies.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 13 Summary diagram relating the seismic anomalies and production. Curve mnemonics used are GR (gamma ray) and ILD (deep resistivity). (a) Close-up image of the amplitude map from the Cadotte Member horizon that displays a high-amplitude anomaly (light gray), which has eight producing wells