Abstract In 1888, inspired by fieldwork in what has become known as the Moine Thrust Belt, NW Scotland, Henry Cadell conducted a pioneering series of analogue deformation experiments to investigate the structural evolution of fold–thrust belts. Some experiments showed that imbricate thrusts build up thrust wedges of variable form, without requiring precursor folding. Others demonstrated a variety of fold–thrust structures and how heterogeneities in basement can localize thrust structures. These experiments are described here and used to draw lessons on how analogue deformation experiments are used to inform the interpretation of fold–thrust structures. Early adopters used Cadell's results as guides to structural styles when constructing cross-sections in thrust belts. His models and the host of others created since serve to illustrate part of the range of structural geometries in thrust belts. However, as with much subsequent work, Cadell's use of a deformation apparatus, with a fixed basal slip surface, biases perceptions of fold–thrust belts to be necessarily ‘thin-skinned’ (experimental design bias) and can simply reinforce established interpretations of natural systems (confirmation bias). So analogue deformation experiments may be unreliable guides to the deterministic interpretations of specific fold–thrust structures in the sub surface of the real world.

Abstract Following years of sporadic debate, in the early 1880s consensus was reached that thrust tectonics explained hitherto controversial geological field relationships in NW Scotland. This spawned a major research effort there by the Geological Survey of Great Britain that culminated in a series of highly detailed geological maps, preliminary research papers and, eventually, the publication of a memoir to the region. These works became highly influential to early-20th century geoscience, especially structural geology. Not only did they provide the first major synthesis of thrust belt structure, they also provided the basis for descriptions of fault and shear zone processes and deductive methods for unravelling tectonic histories in metamorphic basement. A common misconception is that the results arose from mapping alone, without regard to extant models and theory and this approach is held up as an ideal for fieldwork. Yet the notebooks and writings of the surveyors show the application of learning not only from other research groups but also between themselves. As with modern mapping, the Survey team created interpretations that built on contemporary knowledge. This work in turn has driven subsequent research for over 100 years, in the NW Highlands and in deformed rocks throughout the world.