1-6 OF 6 RESULTS FOR

COSEISMIQ

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Data completeness for the YM nodal and COSEISMIQ networks. The data recordings from the DataCubes are shown in black and from the SmartSolos in blue. Not existing stations are shown with a light gray bar. The name of the array together with the sensor numbers on the left side of the columns form the station names for the nodal array. The colors for the COSEISMIQ network indicate the different subnetworks involved. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 13 July 2022
Figure 4. Data completeness for the YM nodal and COSEISMIQ networks. The data recordings from the DataCubes are shown in black and from the SmartSolos in blue. Not existing stations are shown with a light gray bar. The name of the array together with the sensor numbers on the left side
Journal Article
Published: 13 July 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (5): 2498–2514.
...Figure 4. Data completeness for the YM nodal and COSEISMIQ networks. The data recordings from the DataCubes are shown in black and from the SmartSolos in blue. Not existing stations are shown with a light gray bar. The name of the array together with the sensor numbers on the left side...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 11 May 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (5): 2467–2483.
... in the Hengill region within the COSEISMIQ project ( Grigoli et al. , 2022 ). The automatic catalog generated by the SeisComP system was filtered accordingly to different quality control parameters, and three catalogs were produced, namely the low‐quality catalog (524 events), the medium‐quality catalog (448...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 16 November 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (2A): 731–745.
... presented here comprises two temporary installations and the regional permanent station network defined under the framework of the DEEPEN and COntrol SEISmicity and Manage Induced earthQuakes (COSEISMIQ) projects (Fig.  1 , Table  1 ; also Swiss Seismological Service [SED] at ETH Zurich, 2018 , 2021...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
(a) Long‐period surface waves from the 29 July 2021 M 8.2 Alaska earthquake recorded at the reference station STEKK (red) and the YM nodals (black). The dominant period is 20 s. (b) Optimal correction azimuth (dots) for each of the available backbone (2C, ON, VI) and YM‐NJ stations based on the reference station STEKK. The maximum correlation coefficient is color coded. Statistical values are denoted at the upper‐right corner, and the distribution is shown on the left‐hand‐side histogram. The black‐ and red‐dashed lines indicate the orientation to true north and magnetic north, respectively. COSEISMIQ, COntrol SEISmicity and Manage Induced earthQuakes The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 13 July 2022
, respectively. COSEISMIQ, COntrol SEISmicity and Manage Induced earthQuakes The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Journal Article
Published: 27 March 2023
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (2B): 1029–1314.
... of the seismicity and to characterise the fractures and state of stress of the area. We attempt to model this onset of induced seismicity using a hybrid coupled hydro-geomechanical model (TOUGH2-Seed). In the framework of the Geothermica project COSEISMIQ (httpwww.coseismiq.ethz.ch/en/ home a dense temporary...