1-20 OF 430 RESULTS FOR

CMAS system

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2013
European Journal of Mineralogy (2013) 25 (4): 579–596.
... had pyroxene stoichiometry in the simple system CaO–MgO–Al 2 O 3 –SiO 2 ± Na 2 O (CMAS ± Na), which restricts possible end-member components to diopside (di), calcium-Tschermaks (CaTs), calcium-Eskola (CaEs), and clinoenstatite (en), ±jadeite. All run products had a typical eclogitic mineral...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Experimental constraints in the <span class="searc...
Second thumbnail for: Experimental constraints in the <span class="searc...
Third thumbnail for: Experimental constraints in the <span class="searc...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1994
European Journal of Mineralogy (1994) 6 (5): 633–646.
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1991
American Mineralogist (1991) 76 (1-2): 148–160.
Image
Back-scattered electron micrographs of run products in the CMAS system with calculated Ca-Eskola end-member. a) XCaEs = 19.1 mol %, b) XCaEs = 14.9 mol %, c) XCaEs = 16.7 mol % and d) XCaEs = 9.9 mol %. In all samples clinopyroxene (cpx) coexists with garnet (grt) and coesite (coe).
Published: 01 December 2013
Fig. 4 Back-scattered electron micrographs of run products in the CMAS system with calculated Ca-Eskola end-member. a) X CaEs = 19.1 mol %, b) X CaEs = 14.9 mol %, c) X CaEs = 16.7 mol % and d) X CaEs = 9.9 mol %. In all samples clinopyroxene (cpx) coexists with garnet (grt) and coesite (coe).
Image
Pressure-composition phase diagram for the CMAS system showing the fit of the calculated isotherms (°C) to the experimentally determined alumina contents of orthopyroxene. Bars with circles are data from Gasparik (1984c); empty bars at 1 bar are data from Carlson (1989); empty bars at 15–40 kbar are data from Perkins and Newton (1980), except the bar at 1500°C/30 kbar, which is from Howells and O’Hara (1978); empty bars at 50 kbar are data from Brey et al. (1986).
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 6. Pressure-composition phase diagram for the CMAS system showing the fit of the calculated isotherms (°C) to the experimentally determined alumina contents of orthopyroxene. Bars with circles are data from Gasparik ( 1984 c ); empty bars at 1 bar are data from Carlson ( 1989 ); empty
Image
Pressure-composition phase diagram for the CMAS system showing the fit of the calculated isotherms (°C) to the experimentally determined alumina contents of clinopyroxene. Bars with circles are data from Gasparik (1984c); empty bars at 1 bar are data from Carlson (1989); empty bars at 15–40 kbar are data from Perkins and Newton (1980), except the bar at 1500°C/30 kbar, which is from Howells and O’Hara (1978); empty bars at 50 kbar are data from Brey et al. (1986).
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 7. Pressure-composition phase diagram for the CMAS system showing the fit of the calculated isotherms (°C) to the experimentally determined alumina contents of clinopyroxene. Bars with circles are data from Gasparik ( 1984 c ); empty bars at 1 bar are data from Carlson ( 1989 ); empty
Image
Temperature-pressure phase diagram for the CMAS system calculated with the new model. Heavy solid lines are univariant boundaries and solidus. Thin lines are isopleths indicating, if solid, the Al contents (100 Al per 6 oxygens) of pyroxenes (1–40) and garnet (95–99) and the Ca contents (100 Ca per 6 oxygens) of orthopyroxene (dash-dot) and clinopyroxene (dashed). Solidus is based on Gudfinnsson and Presnall (1996) and Gasparik (1996). Heavy dashed line is the model continental geotherm of Pollack and Chapman (1977) for the surface heat flow of 40 mW/m2.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 8. Temperature-pressure phase diagram for the CMAS system calculated with the new model. Heavy solid lines are univariant boundaries and solidus. Thin lines are isopleths indicating, if solid, the Al contents (100 Al per 6 oxygens) of pyroxenes (1–40) and garnet (95–99) and the Ca contents
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2016
The Canadian Mineralogist (2016) 54 (6): 1437–1457.
... NaAlSi 2 O 6 ) is subtracted from the bulk composition. This works because the composition of any plagioclase can be expressed as a linear combination of an 1/3 ab 2/3 and an . The residual bulk-rock chemistry (after subtracting an 1/3 ab 2/3 = csk 1/2 jd 1/2 ) is in the CMAS system (M = Fe 2+ + Mg + Mn...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Modal-space Theory: a Study of the Mineralogical E...
Second thumbnail for: Modal-space Theory: a Study of the Mineralogical E...
Third thumbnail for: Modal-space Theory: a Study of the Mineralogical E...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2008
American Mineralogist (2008) 93 (11-12): 1721–1731.
...Daniel R. Neuville; Laurent Cormier; Valérie Montouillout; Pierre Florian; Francis Millot; Jean-Claude Rifflet; Dominique Massiot Abstract The structure and properties of glasses and melts in the MgO-Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 (MAS) and CaO-MgO-Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 (CMAS) systems play an important role in Earth...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and du...
Second thumbnail for: Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and du...
Third thumbnail for: Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and du...
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2000
The Journal of Geology (2000) 108 (1): 103–119.
...Figure 6. Pressure-composition phase diagram for the CMAS system showing the fit of the calculated isotherms (°C) to the experimentally determined alumina contents of orthopyroxene. Bars with circles are data from Gasparik ( 1984 c ); empty bars at 1 bar are data from Carlson ( 1989 ); empty...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: An Internally Consistent Thermodynamic Model for t...
Second thumbnail for: An Internally Consistent Thermodynamic Model for t...
Third thumbnail for: An Internally Consistent Thermodynamic Model for t...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2003
American Mineralogist (2003) 88 (8-9): 1241–1250.
... have been obtained by dynamic crystallization in the CaO–MgO-Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 (CMAS) system in a one-atmosphere vertical furnace. A fast cooling rate (1890°C/h) has been used with degrees of undercooling varying from 156 to 356°C. Different microstructures were observed depending on their location...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: TEM investigation of forsterite dendrites
Second thumbnail for: TEM investigation of forsterite dendrites
Third thumbnail for: TEM investigation of forsterite dendrites
Image
(a–j) BSE images of buffers and glasses produced in the series of CMAS glass experiments, from top to bottom: Ta (a and b), Nb (c and d), Cr (e and f), Mo (g and h), and W (i and j) buffers. For each experiment is shown an image of the buffer assembly (left) and the CMAS glass run product (right). The Ta, Nb, and W buffered experiments were carried out with a Mo outer capsule (a, c, and i, respectively) that helped to maintain the buffer assemblage for longer durations (see text for discussion). The Cr, Mo, and W experiments also produced a reaction product between MgO capsule and buffer materials—MgCr2O4, MgMoO4, and MgWO4 (e, g, and i, respectively; see text for discussion). Some of the CMAS glasses also contain plagioclase feldspar that is expected to be stable in the melt composition and P-T range (darker phase within the glass in b, f, and j). The presence of plagioclase does not affect the results of our series and the glasses produced in all experiments are within the range of compositions for CMAS systems glasses used by Sutton et al. (2005). All scale bars 10 µm.
Published: 01 March 2023
, and j ). The presence of plagioclase does not affect the results of our series and the glasses produced in all experiments are within the range of compositions for CMAS systems glasses used by Sutton et al. (2005) . All scale bars 10 µm.
Image
The garnet-in curves experimentally determined for: pyroxenite GV10 (this study); MORB pyrolite (hMPY) modelled in the hydrous Cr–Ti-bearing system from Niida &amp; Green (1999); model Hawaiian peridotite nodule (PX) studied by Fumagalli &amp; Poli (2005); lherzolite in CMAS system by Klemme &amp; O’Neill (2000) and Walter et al. (2002). The blue dashed curve represents the garnet-in curve derived by thermodynamic calculations using Perple_X package (Connolly, 1990; Connolly &amp; Petrini, 2002), in the model chemical system Cr-NCFMAS.
Published: 01 March 2018
Fig. 9 The garnet-in curves experimentally determined for: pyroxenite GV10 (this study); MORB pyrolite (hMPY) modelled in the hydrous Cr–Ti-bearing system from Niida & Green (1999) ; model Hawaiian peridotite nodule (PX) studied by Fumagalli & Poli (2005) ; lherzolite in CMAS system
Image
Comparison of experimental determinations of the model peridotite solidus in the CMAS system: LDEO (piston-in, barium carbonate pressure media = this study) vs. UTD (piston-out, talc/pyrex pressure media = Presnall et al. 1979; Walter and Presnall 1994; Milholland and Presnall 1998; Gudfinsson and Presnall 1996). The LDEO pressures are recalculated with the new regression equation described in the text.
Published: 01 January 2005
F igure 8. Comparison of experimental determinations of the model peridotite solidus in the CMAS system: LDEO (piston-in, barium carbonate pressure media = this study) vs. UTD (piston-out, talc/pyrex pressure media = Presnall et al. 1979 ; Walter and Presnall 1994 ; Milholland and Presnall
Image
Pressure-composition phase diagram showing the comparison between the experimentally observed Ca contents of clinopyroxene in equilibrium with orthopyroxene in the CMAS system with the isotherms calculated using a model based on data from the enstatite-diopside join (Gasparik 1996). Temperatures are in °C. Sources: FU, Fujii 1977; GS, Sen 1985; NB, Nickel et al. 1985; PN, Perkins and Newton 1980; TG, Gasparik 1984c; WC, Carlson 1989; YT, Yamada and Takahashi 1984.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 1. Pressure-composition phase diagram showing the comparison between the experimentally observed Ca contents of clinopyroxene in equilibrium with orthopyroxene in the CMAS system with the isotherms calculated using a model based on data from the enstatite-diopside join (Gasparik 1996
Image
The experimental uncertainty in the determination of the spinel-garnet peridotite boundary according to three recent studies (Walter et al. 2002 = WKKSNILF; Presnall et al. 2002 = PGW; and Klemme and O’Neill 2000 = KO) is illustrated for the CMAS system. This boundary plays a key role in our understanding of what material might constitute the lower oceanic lithosphere. Although not shown, Cr/Al ratio of the bulk peridotite can shift this boundary to higher pressures, stabilizing spinel to greater depths.
Published: 01 May 2005
F igure 11. The experimental uncertainty in the determination of the spinel-garnet peridotite boundary according to three recent studies ( Walter et al. 2002 = WKKSNILF; Presnall et al. 2002 = PGW; and Klemme and O’Neill 2000 = KO) is illustrated for the CMAS system. This boundary plays
Image
CaO vs. Al2O3 showing compositions of melt inclusions in polyhedral, dendritic polyhedral, skeletal and dendritic forsterite produced experimentally in the CMAS system. Both CaO vs. Al2O3 are incompatible during forsterite growth. The initial melt composition is shown by the solid diamonds in the lower left, and the final quenched residual melts are shown by the gray diamonds. [Figure used by permission of Elsevier Limited from Faure and Schiano (2005), Earth Planet Sci Lett, Vol. 236, Fig. 4, p. 887.]
Published: 01 January 2008
Figure 4. CaO vs. Al 2 O 3 showing compositions of melt inclusions in polyhedral, dendritic polyhedral, skeletal and dendritic forsterite produced experimentally in the CMAS system. Both CaO vs. Al 2 O 3 are incompatible during forsterite growth. The initial melt composition is shown
Image
P-T estimates for sample DH101E. The results of two-pyroxene geothermometry are shown as lines TW and TT for the Wells (1977) and Taylor (1998) formulations, respectively. Pressures are limited by the stability of spinel, which, in the CMAS system, ranges from ~9 to 15 kbar at 900 °C. Extreme upper and lower limits are ~3 and 36 kbar at 900 °C, whereas a better estimate for the high-P stability of spinel in sample DH101E is ~21 kbar. For conditions of mineral equilibration in this sample, we have chosen a P-T of 20 kbar and 900 °C (gray circle).
Published: 01 January 2009
F igure 1. P-T estimates for sample DH101E. The results of two-pyroxene geothermometry are shown as lines TW and TT for the Wells (1977) and Taylor (1998) formulations, respectively. Pressures are limited by the stability of spinel, which, in the CMAS system, ranges from ~9 to 15 kbar
Image
Р–Т diagram for xenoliths of garnet-containing pyroxenites from the Sigurd Volcano basalts (1, 2 – Spl–Grt clinopyroxenites and websterites, respectively). Model continental geotherms with a surface heat flow density of 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 mW/m2 (3–8, respectively) and position of the mantle adiabat with a potential temperature of 1350 °C are given after Hasterock and Chapman (2011). The curve of phase transition of spinel lherzolites into garnet ones in the CMAS system (9) is given after Robinson and Wood (1998) and Walter et al. (2002), and the curve of the graphite→diamond phase transition (10), after Bundy et al. (1996).
Published: 01 October 2022
) and position of the mantle adiabat with a potential temperature of 1350 °C are given after Hasterock and Chapman ( 2011 ). The curve of phase transition of spinel lherzolites into garnet ones in the CMAS system ( 9 ) is given after Robinson and Wood ( 1998 ) and Walter et al. ( 2002 ), and the curve
Image
Comparison of experimental determinations of the model peridotite solidus in the CMAS system: L-DEO (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, piston-in, barium carbonate pressure media – this study, Table 3) vs. UTD (University of Texas at Dallas, piston-out, talc/pyrex pressure media = Presnall et al. 1979; Walter and Presnall 1994; Milholland and Presnall 1998; Gudfinsson and Presnall 1996). There is no friction correction for the UTD runs. Pressures of L-DEO experiments in this figure may be calculated from the ram pressure in Table 3 and following expression explained in the text: P = [Pram + 0.135]/0.904, where pressure is in GPa.
Published: 01 January 2005
F igure 1. Comparison of experimental determinations of the model peridotite solidus in the CMAS system: L-DEO (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, piston-in, barium carbonate pressure media – this study, Table 3 ) vs. UTD (University of Texas at Dallas, piston-out, talc/pyrex pressure media