1-20 OF 1952 RESULTS FOR

Burton Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—(A) Well 30/6–11, core 7 at 3776 m. Top of the Burton Formation shales overlain by the Cook Formation bioturbated shoreface heterolithic facies. The contact is cemented and interpreted in terms of a regressive surface of marine erosion (RSME). Scale bar is 5 cm. (B) Well log 30/6–11 showing the cored interval. Note sharp base of the shoreface deposits (RSME) and the coarsening-upward pattern in the shoreface heterolithic deposits (above RSME and below sequence boundary SB). (C) Well 30/6–2, core 6 at 2433.7–2439.7 m. The Burton Formation shales (at lower right) are overlain by thin shoreface heterolithics of the Cook Formation. The top of the Cook is marked is marked by siderite-cemented sandstone that is interpreted to be of pedogenic origin and to mark a sequence boundary (SB). This is overlain by very thin bituminous silty shale and thick Cook Formation clean sandstones with their characteristic sharp base. The cores are each 1 m long. (D) Well log 30/6–2 showing the cored intervals. Note high natural radioactivity of the bituminous silty shale.
Published: 01 February 1997
Figure 5 —(A) Well 30/6–11, core 7 at 3776 m. Top of the Burton Formation shales overlain by the Cook Formation bioturbated shoreface heterolithic facies. The contact is cemented and interpreted in terms of a regressive surface of marine erosion (RSME). Scale bar is 5 cm. (B) Well log 30/6–11
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1997
AAPG Bulletin (1997) 81 (2): 276–292.
...Figure 5 —(A) Well 30/6–11, core 7 at 3776 m. Top of the Burton Formation shales overlain by the Cook Formation bioturbated shoreface heterolithic facies. The contact is cemented and interpreted in terms of a regressive surface of marine erosion (RSME). Scale bar is 5 cm. (B) Well log 30/6–11...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
—Stratigraphie position of the Dunlin Group, simplified after Vollset and Doré (1984). Compare this with the revised stratigraphie seheme, resulting from this paper, in Figure 2. The Amundsen, Cook, and Drake formations are heterolithie in nature with a varying sandstone eontent in the United Kingdom and Norwegian seetors. The most shaly level in the sueeession is the Burton Formation and the lowest part of the Drake Formation. Thiek sandstones oeeur only in the Johansen and Cook formations.
Published: 01 February 1997
in the United Kingdom and Norwegian seetors. The most shaly level in the sueeession is the Burton Formation and the lowest part of the Drake Formation. Thiek sandstones oeeur only in the Johansen and Cook formations.
Image
Illustration of the storage complex with storage units (Cook and Johansen formations, Statfjord Group) in yellow and brown (outlined by the turquois stippled line), and primary seal (Drake Formation) in grey. Secondary seals (Draupne Formation, Cromer Knoll, Shetland, and Rogaland groups) are present in the overburden. CO2 will be injected through a side-track of the 31/5-7 well into the Johansen Fm., encountered at approximatively 2700 m below seabed. The CO2 (in magenta) is predicted to migrate upwards from the Johansen Formation to the Cook Formation, and laterally within both formations, below the Drake Formation primary seal and the informal ‘Burton Formation equivalent’ barrier, respectively. The illustration represents the expected CO2 extent after a total amount of 37.5 Mt CO2 has been injected over a period of 25 years (based on 400 dynamical simulations). The figure is based on seismic data from CGG.
Published: 20 June 2024
formations, below the Drake Formation primary seal and the informal ‘Burton Formation equivalent’ barrier, respectively. The illustration represents the expected CO 2 extent after a total amount of 37.5 Mt CO 2 has been injected over a period of 25 years (based on 400 dynamical simulations). The figure
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 July 1982
Economic Geology (1982) 77 (4): 784–797.
... for each of the andradite sulfidation reactions. Owing to excessive scatter in the data for the hedenbergite sulfidation reaction, however, the log f (sub S 2 ) -1/T relation for this reaction, derived from the log f (sub O 2 ) data of Burton et al. (1982), is preferred to the one developed by Gamble (1976...
... basement along apparent steep normal faults. Both basement and cover were intruded by NE-SE–striking and steeply dipping, few-m-wide diabase dikes that were feeders to late Neoproterozoic Catoctin Formation metabasalt that overlies the rift sediments. The relatively weak dikes facilitated the deformation...
Series: Society of Exploration Geophysicists Geophysical References Series
Published: 01 January 2001
DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560801788.ch2
EISBN: 9781560801788
... Abstract Most stories about the early days of petroleum geophysics start with the formation of the Geological Engineering Company. 2 We mentioned in the prior chapter that four talented men—W. P. Haseman, J. C. Karcher, E.A. Eckhardt, and Burton McCollum—worked together at the U.S. Bureau...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1994
Journal of the Geological Society (1994) 151 (5): 893–895.
... the basin, including the entire Wilmslow Sandstone sequence. In the marginal Stafford-Burton area, the unconformity cuts into Pebble Beds and farther south overlaps earlier Permo-Triassic deposits ( Wills 1970 , pp. 240, 261) eventually to rest directly upon Carboniferous in the Warwickshire-Oxfordshire...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (5): 906.
...Guy Burton; Robert Wellborn Abstract Lone Pine field, in the northwest part of North Park basin, Colorado, lies between the Park Range on the west and the Sheep Mountain-Delaney Butte thrust on the east. The oil field underlies a surface anticline mapped by Hale in 1965. Seismic work by a major oil...
Image
FIGURE 3—Allostratigraphic framework of the Viking Formation in the study area, showing the principal basal discontinuities (modified after Burton, 1997). RV = regional Viking parasequences, Roman numerals I-V refer to allomembers of the Viking Formation, BD = basal discontinuity, (IT) = initial transgressive surface, (RT) = resumed transgressive surface, CR = Crystal incised valley unconformities
Published: 01 October 2000
FIGURE 3 —Allostratigraphic framework of the Viking Formation in the study area, showing the principal basal discontinuities (modified after Burton, 1997 ). RV = regional Viking parasequences, Roman numerals I-V refer to allomembers of the Viking Formation, BD = basal discontinuity, (IT) = initial
Image
—Cross section Huldra-south Oseberg field (location number 2 in Figure 3), approximately oblique-dip section, 44.4 km long. Cored intervals are shown by black rectangles. Note the deep incision of surface A into the underlying Burton and Amundsen formations and the complex infill of this incised topography.
Published: 01 February 1997
Figure 10 —Cross section Huldra-south Oseberg field (location number 2 in Figure 3 ), approximately oblique-dip section, 44.4 km long. Cored intervals are shown by black rectangles. Note the deep incision of surface A into the underlying Burton and Amundsen formations and the complex infill
Image
Chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic chart focusing on the Jurassic stratigraphy, showing the main reservoir (green=fluvial/coastal, yellow=shallow, or deep marine) rocks. The shallow-water, open-marine shales of the Amundsen, Burton, and Drake Formations are shown in light blue; the Heather Formation is in medium blue; and the Draupne Formation is in dark blue. The first- and second-order boreal stratigraphic cycles are from Jacquin et al. (1998); the unconformities are shown in wavy gray lines. (Based on Jacquin et al., 1998; NPD Factpages, and International Commission on Statigraphy, 2014a).
Published: 10 June 2015
Figure 3. Chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic chart focusing on the Jurassic stratigraphy, showing the main reservoir ( green = fluvial / coastal , yellow = shallow , or deep marine) rocks. The shallow-water, open-marine shales of the Amundsen, Burton, and Drake
Image
The zonal scheme of the Barton Clay Formation. The notation is that of Burton (1933) but the thicknesses, given in metres, have been amended from measurements made in borings and from levelling on the cliff face carried out in the research described by Barton (1973). The location of the D Horizon is shown as a dotted line. Sands are shown stippled, nodules as rounded lenses, calcareous bands with a brick symbol, and clays left blank.
Published: 01 November 2006
Fig. 1 The zonal scheme of the Barton Clay Formation. The notation is that of Burton (1933) but the thicknesses, given in metres, have been amended from measurements made in borings and from levelling on the cliff face carried out in the research described by Barton (1973) . The location
Image
Published: 11 December 1991
Table 1. Processes and Environments of Formation and Destruction (Dissolution, Replacement) of Important Iron Oxides and Sulfides * * This table is compiled from empirical data on bacterial metabolism and from thermodynamic phase diagrams (in Machel and Burton, 1991 ) which represent
Image
(A) Generalized stratigraphic time-space diagram representative of the Neoproterozoic to Ordovician sedimentary units across south-central Laurentia. The ages of the youngest highly concordant detrital and rift-related igneous zircons (in Ma) are plotted as additional depositional constraints (see Table 2) (disc—discordant). In the case of the Bliss Formation, the ages of the youngest three concordant zircon analyses are plotted (from Amato and Mack, 2012). The weighted averages of multiple analyses of the youngest three zircons are plotted for the Van Horn Formation (see Fig. 7). Uncertainty is displayed at 2σ. Various rock types and general depositional settings are as per the following references: Death Valley stratigraphy—Heaman and Grotzinger (1992), Prave (1999), Corsetti and Kaufman (2003), Hogan et al. (2011); Death Valley detrital zircons—Stewart et al. (2001); Sonora stratigraphy—Stewart et al. (2002), Farmer et al. (2005), Stewart (2005), Sour-Tovar et al. (2007); Grand Canyon stratigraphy—Karlstrom et al. (2000, and references therein); south-central and southeast Arizona stratigraphy—Hayes (1972); south-central and southeast Arizona detrital zircons—Stewart et al. (2001); southern New Mexico stratigraphy—Hayes (1972); southern New Mexico detrital/igneous zircons—Amato and Mack (2012); west Texas stratigraphy—Lemone (1969), Hayes (1972); west Texas detrital zircons—this study; rift-related zircons from the Wichita Mountains—Gilbert and Hogan (2010); Precordillera stratigraphy—Finney et al. (2005); Pie de Palo stratigraphy and detrital zircons—Naipauer et al. (2010); southern Appalachians stratigraphy—Tollo et al. (2010), Tull et al. (2010), Chakraborty et al. (2012); central Appalachians stratigraphy—Astini (1995), Southworth et al. (2009), Burton and Southworth (2010), Tollo et al. (2010); central Appalachians rift-related zircons—Aleinikoff et al., (1995, recalculated by Burton and Southworth, 2010), Southworth et al. (2009). Position of Sonora is restored along the Mojave megashear as per Stewart (2005) and Precordillera/Pie de Palo restored within the Ouachita embayment of Thomas (2006). Geologic time scale is after Walker et al. (2012). (B) Diagrammatic cross-section of the Sauk Sequence through central North America. Note that the datum in the section is the base of the Tippecanoe Sequence. Redrawn from Bally (1989) and Burgess (2008).
Published: 01 July 2014
constraints (see Table 2 ) (disc—discordant). In the case of the Bliss Formation, the ages of the youngest three concordant zircon analyses are plotted (from Amato and Mack, 2012 ). The weighted averages of multiple analyses of the youngest three zircons are plotted for the Van Horn Formation (see Fig. 7
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1966
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1966) 14 (4): 385–404.
... and a carbonate unit, respectively, lying unconformably on th e Precambrian Roosville Formation and overlain unconformably by Devo- nian rocks. Burling reported an Albertella fauna from the shales of th e Burton Formation and referred it with some degree of certainty to th e early Middle Cambrian (Burling, 1914...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 November 2021
Geology (2021) 49 (11): e541.
...Andrew Cullen; Alex Burton-Johnson * E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] © 2021 Geological Society of America 2021 Forum Comment httpsdoi.org/10.1130/G49414C.1 New zircon radiometric U-Pb ages and Lu-Hf isotopic data from the ultramafic-mafic sequences of Ranau...
Image
Os (common Os) vs. Re variation plot for the samples studied here and reference data according to Carlson (2005), complemented by additional black shale samples from the Late Cretaceous Duwi Formation, Red Sea, Egypt (Baioumy et al., 2011). Note the position of the two black shale sequences from the Early Cambrian (South China) and Late Devonian (Nick prospect, Yukon, Canada) within the reference field for black shales, and the two metal- and sulfide-rich units in both sequences as an extension of this fractionation trend (data from Horan et al., 1992; Mao et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2012). Ferromanganese crusts have a range of about 100 to 8,000 ppt Os, but generally low Re contents (Burton et al., 1999); Re contents close to seawater (Pacific Ocean; Tagami and Uchida, 2007), as well as in the 100-ppt range (Pacific Ocean; Nielsen et al., 2011), and also in the 1,000-ppt range (Indian Ocean; Klemm et al., 2005) have been reported. The variation range for Fe-Mn crusts/nodules is shown schematically by the crossed black lines. Natural oil has unfractionated Re/Os but lower Re-Os contents than its black shale source rocks (gray pattern; Cumming et al., 2014).
Published: 01 January 2016
Fig. 5 Os (common Os) vs. Re variation plot for the samples studied here and reference data according to Carlson (2005) , complemented by additional black shale samples from the Late Cretaceous Duwi Formation, Red Sea, Egypt ( Baioumy et al., 2011 ). Note the position of the two black shale
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2000
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society (2000) 53 (1): 25–30.
... in the Edlington Formation, though Nutt (1989 ) ascribed them to dissolution of carbonate in the underlying Brotherton Formation. An attempt to dig into the conjectured cave system, from a doline to the NE of Burton Salmon, was made by the Yorkshire Subterranean Society in the 1980s, though work ceased before any...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1970
AAPG Bulletin (1970) 54 (2): 357–360.
... the main part of the “Upper Detrital member” and the “Singa Formation” of Jones’ nomenclature. Rather than the “fairly stable conditions” postulated for the Late Devonian and Carboniferous, this flysch indicates high mobility, leading to an orogenic episode in the middle to late Carboniferous ( Burton...