1-20 OF 1093 RESULTS FOR

Burma Plate

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 08 February 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (3): 1323–1335.
.... * Corresponding author: [email protected] 19 November 2021 © Seismological Society of America KEY POINTS North–south trending maximum principal stress at the Indo‐Burma plate boundary indicates northward slab push. The slab‐dip‐parallel minimum principal stress in all depth...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 1987
Geology (1987) 15 (10): 911–912.
...Hla Maung Abstract The drag produced by the northward movement of the Indian plate has caused the Indoburman Ranges, an accretionary prism, to decouple from the Burma plate along the Kabaw fault, and the Burma plate itself has decoupled from the Eastern Highlands of Burma along the Sagaing fault...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 30 January 2020
GSA Bulletin (2020) 132 (9-10): 1953–1968.
.... Where and when the northeastern part of the Indian subcontinent amalgamated with the Burma plate has not yet been well defined. In order to better understand the tectonic affiliations and evolution of the Indo-Burma Ranges (IBR), we report new detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotope data of nine sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Tectonics of the Indian, Australian and Burma plates (Bird, 2003). The boundary between the India and Australia plate is approximated by a dashed line referred as the Ninety East– Sumatra Orogen (Bird, 2003). Indian and Australia plate velocities taken from Wiseman and Bürgmann (2011) and Engdahl et al. (2007).
Published: 01 June 2013
Fig.1. Tectonics of the Indian, Australian and Burma plates ( Bird, 2003 ). The boundary between the India and Australia plate is approximated by a dashed line referred as the Ninety East– Sumatra Orogen ( Bird, 2003 ). Indian and Australia plate velocities taken from Wiseman and Bürgmann (2011
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 14 October 2019
GSA Bulletin (2020) 132 (5-6): 1066–1082.
... quartz. Prominent detrital zircon age probability peaks are between 260 and 223 Ma, similar with that of Upper Triassic Pane Chaung turbidites and Kanpetlet schist on the West Burma plate. In the upper Kabaw Formation, turbiditic volcanic-rich sandstones have major age populations ranging from 103 to 70...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M45.02
EISBN: 9781862397101
... structural units that now comprise the western part of the country. Figure 2.1 shows the importance of the Sagaing Fault and its possible offshore continuation in separating the Burma Platelet from the Sunda Plate to its east. Here we follow the terminology of Rangin et al. (2013) in choosing to call...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 11 October 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (10): 1837–1856.
...–striking faults that bound them represent Pliocene– Pleistocene inversion of Miocene normal faults. During the Miocene, the Burma plate acted as a forearc sliver coupled with the India plate, subducting obliquely underneath it, and moved northward relative to Asia along the Sagaing fault. Normal faulting...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2007
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2007) 97 (1A): S279–S295.
.... The earthquake resulted from subduction of the Indian plate beneath the Burma microplate, a sliver plate between the Indian and Sunda plates. Hence, the rate and direction of convergence depends on the motion of the Burma plate, which is not well known. Convergence would be highly oblique if the rate of motion...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Schematic illustrations of the tectonic amalgamation of India and Burma (modified from Xiao et al., 2013). This figure is focused on the southern part of the Indo-Burma amalgamation zone, and the northeastern promontory of the Indian subcontinent is not reconstructed. (A) When the Boka Bil Formation was deposited (ca. 10 Ma), there was an oceanic basin between the Indian subcontinent and the Burma plate, so that the Boka Bil Formation only received sediments from the Indian subcontinent and the Trans-Himalayan arc. The suture separating the upper plate and the lower plate was the basal surface of the Paleogene accretionary prism of the Burma plate. The geomorphology of the western Burma plate is modified from Licht et al. (2018). (B) When the amalgamation occurred (ca. 2.4–3.9 Ma), some sediments were derived from the Indian subcontinent and the Trans-Himalayan arc, but also some from the Burma plate, which were deposited in the Tipam Formation. The suture of Indo-Burma amalgamation was the basal surface of the previous accretionary prism, which separated the Burma affiliated units from the Indian affiliated units. Green curve arrows mean detritus derived from the Indian subcontinent and orange curve arrows mean detritus from the Burma plate. Fm.—Formation; Gp.—Group; IBR—Indo-Burma Ranges.
Published: 30 January 2020
the Boka Bil Formation was deposited (ca. 10 Ma), there was an oceanic basin between the Indian subcontinent and the Burma plate, so that the Boka Bil Formation only received sediments from the Indian subcontinent and the Trans-Himalayan arc. The suture separating the upper plate and the lower plate
Journal Article
Published: 28 March 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (3): 1710–1720.
...), the IBR‐fore‐arc basin boundary, the fore‐arc basin, the volcanic arc, the back‐arc basin, and the Sunda plate. The Sunda plate has relatively higher upper crustal V S (>3.0 km/s) and thinner sedimentary cover (∼1 km) compared with the Central Myanmar basin in the Burma plate. The fore‐arc basin...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 31 January 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (2): 1041–1047.
...‐lateral strike‐slip motion along a N21°W plane, which is confirmed by both waveform fitting and distribution of aftershocks. Interestingly, this earthquake occurred at the intersection of three major faults in this region—the Churachandpur Mao fault bounding the India and Burma plates, the Dauki fault...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2012
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2012) 80 (3): 393–402.
... 1954 -2011, within an area of 200 x 300 km 2 where the Indian plate subducts eastward to depths beyond 200 km below the Burma plate. An analysis on seismogenesis of this interplate region suggests that while the subducting lithosphere is characterized by profuse seismicity, seismicity in the overriding...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2009
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2009) 99 (6): 3496–3501.
... (∼100 million) makes this region very vulnerable if a large tsunami were to occur. Here we examine whether the India–Burma plate boundary in the Arakan and Irrawady region can produce a tsunamigenic earthquake. We find: (a) the region is characterized by oblique plate motion leading to strike-slip...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2011
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2011) 77 (3): 243–251.
...P. Mahesh; Amit Bansal; B. Kundu; J. K. Catherine; V. K. Gahalaut Abstract The recent 10 August 2009 Coco earthquake (Mw 7.5), the largest aftershock of the giant 2004 Sumatra Andaman earthquake, occurred within the subducting India plate under the Burma plate. The Coco earthquake nucleated near...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2007
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2007) 97 (1A): S25–S42.
... a high level of aftershock activity near the axis of the Sunda trench and the leading edge of the overthrust Burma plate. Much near-trench activity is intraplate activity within the subducting plate, but some shallow-focus, near-trench, reverse-fault earthquakes may represent an unusual seismogenic...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1997
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1997) 49 (5): 513–522.
... preceded the volcanism suggest that rupturing through normal dip-slip faulting prevailed in the overriding Burma plate prior to the recent volcanism. Pronounced back-arc seismicity at shallower depths is seen further to the east and southeast of the Alcock Seamount; this relates to back-arc rifting under...
Image
—Schematic tectonic model for polyphase deformation the Central basin of Myanmar. (A) By the end of the Eocene, the Burma plate had collided with the northeast edge of the India plate and was dragged northward as a fore-arc sliver. (B) In the Miocene, this accelerated motion expressed itself in the formation of northeast-southwest–trending extensional basins bounded by northeast-southwest–striking normal faults, and by the creation of the Andaman rift. (C) In the Pliocene, when the northern end of the Burma plate collided with Asia, extensional deformation ceased, and transpressional deformation created thrust and reverse faults, positive flower structures, and inversion of normal faults and extensional basins, and may have controlled extrusion of volcanics. Modified from Lee and Lawver (1995).
Published: 11 October 1998
Figure 13 —Schematic tectonic model for polyphase deformation the Central basin of Myanmar. (A) By the end of the Eocene, the Burma plate had collided with the northeast edge of the India plate and was dragged northward as a fore-arc sliver. (B) In the Miocene, this accelerated motion expressed
Image
Regional setting of the Burma microplate  and surroundings. Solid line shows Burma plate  geometry in Bird (2003) model; dashed line shows  northern extension in Curray et al. (1979) model.  Note that the rate and direction of Burma–Sunda motion  inferred from magnetic anomalies and transform  trends on the Andaman spreading center are incompatible  with the trend of, and rate across, the Sagaing  fault. Star shows India–Burma pole inferred from Bird’s (2003) Burma–Sunda Euler vector. Modified  from Nielson et al. (2004).
Published: 01 January 2007
Figure 10. Regional setting of the Burma microplate and surroundings. Solid line shows Burma plate geometry in Bird (2003) model; dashed line shows northern extension in Curray et al. (1979) model. Note that the rate and direction of Burma–Sunda motion inferred from magnetic anomalies
Image
Schematic diagrams illustrate the evolution of Indian-Burma amalgamation from ca. 11 Ma (A) to 2.5–3.9 Ma (B). This paleogeographic restoration was cited from van Hinsbergen et al. (2011). AP—accretionary prism; BB—Bengal Basin; BF—Bengal fan; BP—Burma plate; IB—Indochina Block; P-IBR—Paleogene belt of the Indo-Burma Ranges; KA—Kohistan arc; LT—Lhasa terrane; ST—Sibumasu terrane.
Published: 30 January 2020
Figure 8. Schematic diagrams illustrate the evolution of Indian-Burma amalgamation from ca. 11 Ma (A) to 2.5–3.9 Ma (B). This paleogeographic restoration was cited from van Hinsbergen et al. (2011) . AP—accretionary prism; BB—Bengal Basin; BF—Bengal fan; BP—Burma plate; IB—Indochina Block; P-IBR
Image
The Indian plate region indicating the location and focal mechanism of the 21 May 2014 Bay of Bengal earthquake (Mw 6.0) along with the seismic stations along coast considered in this study (inverted triangles). The significant earthquakes in the Bay of Bengal in the magnitude range of 4–6 are also shown (source: ANSS, National California Earthquake Data center). The thick line indicates the India–Burma plate boundary.
Published: 18 February 2015
of 4–6 are also shown (source: ANSS, National California Earthquake Data center). The thick line indicates the India–Burma plate boundary.