1-20 OF 126 RESULTS FOR

Burma Microplate

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Regional setting of the Burma microplate  and surroundings. Solid line shows Burma plate  geometry in Bird (2003) model; dashed line shows  northern extension in Curray et al. (1979) model.  Note that the rate and direction of Burma–Sunda motion  inferred from magnetic anomalies and transform  trends on the Andaman spreading center are incompatible  with the trend of, and rate across, the Sagaing  fault. Star shows India–Burma pole inferred from Bird’s (2003) Burma–Sunda Euler vector. Modified  from Nielson et al. (2004).
Published: 01 January 2007
Figure 10. Regional setting of the Burma microplate and surroundings. Solid line shows Burma plate geometry in Bird (2003) model; dashed line shows northern extension in Curray et al. (1979) model. Note that the rate and direction of Burma–Sunda motion inferred from magnetic anomalies
Journal Article
Published: 06 July 2023
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (5): 2337–2347.
...Chit Thet Mon; Shun Yang; Changfeng Ren; Yumei He; Myo Thant; Kyaing Sein Abstract Myanmar is governed by the oblique subduction of India beneath the Burma microplate. Accurate earthquake location and focal mechanism data are crucial for understanding the detailed geometric features and dynamics...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2007
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2007) 97 (1A): S279–S295.
...Figure 10. Regional setting of the Burma microplate and surroundings. Solid line shows Burma plate geometry in Bird (2003) model; dashed line shows northern extension in Curray et al. (1979) model. Note that the rate and direction of Burma–Sunda motion inferred from magnetic anomalies...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 08 February 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (3): 1323–1335.
...Patcharaporn Maneerat; Douglas S. Dreger; Roland Bürgmann ABSTRACT The Indo‐Burma range (IBR) is the forearc of an oblique subduction zone where the Indian slab obliquely converges with the Burma microplate. In this study, we consider earthquake focal mechanisms to help elucidate the tectonic...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M45.07
EISBN: 9781862397101
... and MD-3 blocks (Fig. 7.2 ) which occupy the southwards continuation of the Rakhine Basin (discussed in Chapter 9 ) and includes the plate boundary between the Indian Plate and the Burma Microplate. Abstract The Moattama Region as defined by the Myanmar government and Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 July 2010
Geology (2010) 38 (7): 591–594.
... regional complexity induced by interaction between the Sunda and India plates, the Burma microplate, and the highly deformable eastern Himalayan syntaxis, the slip rate remains surprisingly constant along this fault. However, the modeled locking depth varies from 20 km in central Myanmar to 5 km...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Geometry of slip partitioning assuming  India–Sunda motion is taken up by the Burma  microplate, showing expected convergence directions  and hence earthquake slip vectors for partial and total  partitioning. Burma moves northwest, with respect to  India, faster than expected, even for pure slip partitioning  assuming the magnetic anomalies describe  Burma–Sunda motion.
Published: 01 January 2007
Figure 12. Geometry of slip partitioning assuming India–Sunda motion is taken up by the Burma microplate, showing expected convergence directions and hence earthquake slip vectors for partial and total partitioning. Burma moves northwest, with respect to India, faster than expected, even
Image
Regional tectonics and Global Positioning System (GPS) velocity map. (a) Topography and regional map. The red arrows represent GPS‐measured surface velocities relative to the eastern Burma microplate, realized by minimizing the velocities of stations between the Churachandpur Mao fault (CMF) and Sagaing fault (SF; Mallick et al., 2019). The white circles with black perimeters are the GPS station locations in the reference block. The velocity vectors (red arrows) are centered at the station locations. The blue arrows represent the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The thick gray lines are the slab depth contours extracted from SLAB2.0 (Hayes et al., 2018). The black lines are faults from Wang et al. 2014. The white dashed rectangle indicates the extent of the study region where stress inversions were performed. (b) The studied earthquakes used for the stress inversion in this study. Note that some of the Hurukawa et al. (2012) events are the same as International Seismological Centre (ISC) and Global Centroid Moment Tensor (Global CMT) catalogs. We plot those events in Hurukawa et al. (2012) group instead, because they are the same events. The black lines are faults (Wang et al., 2014). The dark gray, thick dashed line represents the boundary line separating north and south used in the earthquake division for latitudinal range domain (A2). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
Figure 1. Regional tectonics and Global Positioning System (GPS) velocity map. (a) Topography and regional map. The red arrows represent GPS‐measured surface velocities relative to the eastern Burma microplate, realized by minimizing the velocities of stations between the Churachandpur Mao fault
Image
Stress inversion results for all 189 events from the ISC, Global CMT, Hurukawa et al. (2012) and Mon et al. (2020) catalogs in the Indo‐Burma range (IBR) region. (a) P–T axes of the studied events. Blue “+” signs represent the T axes, whereas the red circles, “o”, indicate P axes. (b) Principal stress directions from stress inversion. Generally, the result suggests an oblique‐reverse faulting environment. This likely reflects contributions from a more heterogeneous stress field across the region. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
Figure 3. Stress inversion results for all 189 events from the ISC, Global CMT, Hurukawa et al. (2012) and Mon et al. (2020) catalogs in the Indo‐Burma range (IBR) region. (a) P–T axes of the studied events. Blue “+” signs represent the T axes, whereas the red circles, “o”, indicate P
Image
Stress inversion results of the studied events in two latitudinal domains and two depth ranges (A2). (a,b) The principal stress orientations between 23° and 25° N or northern IBR and the depth ranges of 0–30 and >30 km, respectively. (c,d) The principal stress orientations between 18° and 23° N, or southern IBR, and the depth ranges of 0–30 and >30 km, respectively. There are 74, 40, 44, and 31 events used for the stress inversion of groups (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
° and 23° N, or southern IBR, and the depth ranges of 0–30 and >30 km, respectively. There are 74, 40, 44, and 31 events used for the stress inversion of groups (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from
Image
Stress inversion results of upper plate earthquakes (using limit depth of 40 km and megathrust window of ±10 km) divided into three groups based on their locations from two major faults—CMF and KF. (a) Map of events occurring in the three subdomains, which are west of CMF, between CMF and KF, and east of KF. (b–d) Inversion results for the west of CMF, between CMF and KF, and east of KF domains, respectively. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
and KF, and east of KF. (b–d) Inversion results for the west of CMF, between CMF and KF, and east of KF domains, respectively. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic
Image
Stress inversion results of the studied events for a range of hypocenter depth domains (A3). (a, b, c, d) Inversion solutions for depth ranges of 0–30, >30–50, >50–80, and >80 km, respectively. The numbers of events used for the stress inversion of (a), (b), (c), and (d) are 118, 30, 18, and 23, respectively. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the associated slab geometries from SLAB 2.0. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). (e) The average minimum principal stress (S3; blue diamonds) plunges and the average slab dip angles (black circles) of individual domains (a, b, c, d) are shown with their 1‐sigma error bars. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
) are 118, 30, 18, and 23, respectively. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the associated slab geometries from SLAB 2.0. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019) . (e) The average minimum
Image
Stress inversion results of earthquakes divided into three groups based on their shortest (perpendicular) distances to the top of the subducting slab, varying the limit depth from 60 to 40 and to 30 km. (a) Map of events in the three subdomains. The megathrust subset includes events that are within ±20 km from the slab interface, and the limit depth is assigned to 60 km. The focal mechanisms in the megathrust catalog marked by red outlines have shallow east‐dipping nodal planes, suggesting that they could potentially occur on the megathrust. The blue lines are faults from Wang et al. (2014). (b–d) Inversion results for the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs, respectively, mentioned in A4: division by perpendicular distance from the slab interface (PDSI) section, with limit depth of 60 km. (e–g) The inversion results of the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs for the limit depth of 40 km. (h–j) The inversion results of the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs for the limit depth of 30 km. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
catalogs for the limit depth of 40 km. (h–j) The inversion results of the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs for the limit depth of 30 km. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate
Image
Stress inversion results of earthquakes divided into three groups based on their shortest (perpendicular) distances to the top of the subducting slab, altering the megathrust window range from ±20 to ±10 km and to ±5 km. (a) Map of events in the three subdomains. The megathrust catalog includes events that are within ±10 km from the slab interface, and the limit depth is assigned to 40 km. The blue lines are faults from Wang et al. (2014). (b–d) Inversion results for the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs, respectively. Here, we consider the megathrust window ranges of ±20 km and the limit depth of 40 km. (e–g) Inversion results for the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs, respectively. For this group, we assign the megathrust window ranges to ±10 km and the limit depth to 40 km. (h–j) Inversion results for the intraplate, megathrust, and upper plate catalogs, respectively. Here, we set the megathrust window ranges to ±5 km and the limit depth to 40 km. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 February 2022
catalogs, respectively. Here, we set the megathrust window ranges to ±5 km and the limit depth to 40 km. The black lines on the Stereonets represent the slab geometries. The gray arrow indicates the plate motions relative to the eastern Burma microplate obtained from an elastic block model by Mallick et
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2006
Earthquake Spectra (2006) 22 (3_suppl): 43–66.
... between latitudes 10° N and 12° N. The Andaman trench marks the active subduction zone where the northeast-moving Indian plate is subducting below the Eurasian plate. This island chain acts as a small tectonic plate that has also been referred as the Burma microplate Dasgupta and Mukhopadhyay 1993, Ortiz...
Image
(a) Plate reconstruction of southern Sundaland at 100 Ma (modified from Hall et al. 2009; Clements et al. 2011) showing the impending collision of the East Java–West Sulawesi continental fragment with Eurasia. Prior to collision of the East Java–West Sulawesi Block there was subduction beneath Sundaland at the Java–Sumatra margin. WA, Woyla Arc, exposed onshore Sumatra as the Woyla Group (Nappe) (e.g. Barber & Crow 2005); IA, Incertus Arc (after Hall et al. 2009), which is correlated with the Mawgyi Nappe of western Burma. (b) Plate configuration at c. 60 Ma for southern Sundaland (base map modified from Hall 2009). This shows the approximate position of the extinct Cretaceous Java–Sumatra arc after collision of the East Java–West Sulawesi microplate. There was subduction only beneath West Sulawesi and Sumba between 63 and 50 Ma, which was accompanied by a short-lived phase of strike-slip faulting south of Java prior to the resumption of subduction beneath Sundaland at 45 Ma.
Published: 01 September 2011
there was subduction beneath Sundaland at the Java–Sumatra margin. WA, Woyla Arc, exposed onshore Sumatra as the Woyla Group (Nappe) (e.g. Barber & Crow 2005 ); IA, Incertus Arc (after Hall et al. 2009 ), which is correlated with the Mawgyi Nappe of western Burma. ( b ) Plate configuration at c . 60 Ma
Journal Article
Published: 21 August 2023
Journal of the Geological Society (2023) 180 (5): jgs2022-091.
...–Andaman Trench to the south ( Fig. 1 ). Rangin et al. (2013) proposed the existence of a so-called Burma (Myanmar) microplate, which includes the IMR, the complex core of the IMR and the CMB. A major belt of ophiolites and deep-marine sediments, including the Nagaland and Kalemyo ophiolites, separates...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 11 October 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (10): 1837–1856.
... ). Convergence between the India and the Burma plates is oblique to the north trend of the structures in western Myanmar ( Curray et al., 1979 ) ( Figure 1 ). The Burma plate has been interpreted as a microplate or fore-arc sliver, bounded to the west by a subduction zone, to the east by a north-striking strike...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2011
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2011) 77 (3): 273–279.
... . Tectonophysics , v. 191 , pp. 213 - 222 . Chatterjee , N. and Ghose , N.C. ( 2010 ) Metamorphic evolution of the Naga Hills eclogite and blueschist, Northeast India. Implications for early subduction of the Indian plate under the Burma microplate . Jour.Metamor. Geol. , v. 28 , pp. 209 - 225...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 2002
AAPG Bulletin (2002) 86 (12): 2023–2045.
..., consist of an upthrust block of Archean gneisses and granites. The Assam-Arakan thrust belt bounds the Assam valley on the southeast and extends southwestward across northern and western Myanmar (Burma). The thrust belt developed as a result of differential movement between the Burma microplate...
FIGURES | View All (18)