1-20 OF 111 RESULTS FOR

Buckeye Field

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Published: 10 May 2018
DOI: 10.1130/2018.2531(12)
EISBN: 9780813795317
... General reservoir data were compiled by Harrison (1991) from the South Buckeye field, and a broad reservoir characterization of the South Buckeye oil field was conducted by Barnes et al. (2002) . Barnes et al. (2002) delineated five general facies from core analyses, four of which have...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1936
DOI: 10.1306/SV29337C32
EISBN: 9781629812540
... Abstract The Buckeye field is on a very deep-seated domai uplift; it covers about 800 acres, according to the surface indications and a magnetometer survey. The first well drilled came in as a producer, August 31, 1932. Seven wells have been completed, and of these, two were commercial...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1935
AAPG Bulletin (1935) 19 (3): 378–400.
...E. W. Brucks ABSTRACT The Buckeye field is on a very deep-seated domal uplift; it covers about 800 acres, according to the surface indications and a magnetometer survey. The first well drilled came in as a producer, August 31, 1932. Seven wells have been completed, and of these, two were commercial...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (11): 1950–1982.
...Carl C. Addison ABSTRACT The Buckeye oil field, located in T. 18 N., R. 1 W., Gladwin County, Michigan, was discovered in 1936, and represents a structural accumulation similar to other pools in the Michigan basin. The field consists of two separate oil pools, quite unlike in their ability...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
South <span class="search-highlight">Buckeye</span> <span class="search-highlight">field</span>.
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 3. South Buckeye field.
Image
North <span class="search-highlight">Buckeye</span> <span class="search-highlight">field</span>.
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 4. North Buckeye field.
Image
CROSS SECTIONS THRU NORTH <span class="search-highlight">BUCKEYE</span> <span class="search-highlight">FIELD</span> SHOWING STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIP ...
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 6. CROSS SECTIONS THRU NORTH BUCKEYE FIELD SHOWING STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIP OF OIL AND WATER ZONES
Image
CROSS SECTIONS THRU SOUTH <span class="search-highlight">BUCKEYE</span> <span class="search-highlight">FIELD</span> SHOWING STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIP ...
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 7. CROSS SECTIONS THRU SOUTH BUCKEYE FIELD SHOWING STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIP OF OIL AND WATER ZONES
Image
CROSS SECTIONS THRU NORTH AND SOUTH <span class="search-highlight">BUCKEYE</span> <span class="search-highlight">FIELD</span> SHOWING LENTICULAR CHARAC...
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 8. CROSS SECTIONS THRU NORTH AND SOUTH BUCKEYE FIELD SHOWING LENTICULAR CHARACTER OF OIL ZONES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1933
AAPG Bulletin (1933) 17 (5): 558–561.
... Manvel field, Brazoria County September, 1931 Conroe field, Montgomery County December, 1931 Buckeye field, Matagorda County May, 1932 Garwood area, Colorado County June, 1932 Mykawa field, Harris County June, 1932 Ariola dome, Hardin County August, 1932 Spurger area, Tyler County...
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Buckeye</span> oil <span class="search-highlight">field</span>, Gladwin County, Michigan.
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 2. Buckeye oil field, Gladwin County, Michigan.
Image
Generalized well log, <span class="search-highlight">Buckeye</span> oil <span class="search-highlight">field</span>, Gladwin County, Michigan.
Published: 01 November 1940
Fig. 5. Generalized well log, Buckeye oil field, Gladwin County, Michigan.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (6): 974–993.
...R. B. Newcombe ABSTRACT During 1939 the limelight was taken in Michigan by three fields, Bloomingdale (Van Buren County), Temple (Clare County), and Walker or Grand Rapids (Kent County). Before the beginning of the year Bloomingdale had eclipsed Buckeye (Gladwin County) and led until July, when...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1935
AAPG Bulletin (1935) 19 (7): 1069–1073.
... of the survey appears too abbreviated, it seems a most unsound procedure to predicate a general conclusion concerning the efficacy of the magnetic method for new dome discoveries on the fragmentary results of a single investigation. This precautionary thought is emphasized by Brucks’ paper, “Buckeye Field...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 850.
...Douglas J. Guion; L. Roger Hutson; Ted Shelton; Bill Gandera; Louise Kitely ABSTRACT During August 1983, Golden Buckeye Petroleum completed the Dinner 15–1 well, 4 mi (6.4 km) northeast of Greeley, Colorado, pumping 107 BOPD and 30 BWPD through untreated perforations in the “Parkman sandstone...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1944
AAPG Bulletin (1944) 28 (2): 173–196.
... in a subsurface section was made by Addison 5 in his report on the Buckeye field in Gladwin County. Addison differentiated the Rogers City from the underlying Dundee (restricted) on lithologic grounds. The same distinction can be made in the Porter field. So far, however, no paleontologic evidence has been...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1957
AAPG Bulletin (1957) 41 (6): 1062–1073.
... with a bottom-hole pressure of 574 lbs. There were seven Traverse limestone discoveries in 1956. The northeastern part of the Central Basin district claimed two of these as shallower-pool discoveries in the Adams field, Arenac County, and the South Buckeye field in Gladwin County. In the South Buckeye...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1993
AAPG Bulletin (1993) 77 (6): 1082–1100.
... covers an area of at least 40 mi 2 (104 km 2 ) and includes two major thrusts and their associated folds, which from hinterland to foreland are called Buckeye and Gale, respectively. These structures are part of the South Hartshorne gas field, which is located in the “wedge zone” ( Figure 2 ) between...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1934
AAPG Bulletin (1934) 18 (4): 500–518.
.... At Pledger, Brazoria County, a new prospect, discovered in 1932, is a sand in the basal Marginulina at 6,782 feet, producing gas. Stoddard or Buckeye field, Matagorda County, was discovered in 1932, and at the present time is the deepest producing field of the Gulf Coast. Production is obtained from...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1938
AAPG Bulletin (1938) 22 (6): 659–665.
..., are located on twelve distinct structural trends having northwest-southeast axes ( Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 ). FIG. 1. FIG. 2. The North Buckeye and South Buckeye pools in Gladwin County have been the most active fields in development during the past year. These two pools, separated by a narrow...
FIGURES