1-20 OF 1126 RESULTS FOR

Buchan Block

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 05 May 2016
Journal of the Geological Society (2016) 173 (5): 773–782.
...T. E. Johnson; C. L. Kirkland; S. M. Reddy; N. J. Evans; B. J. McDonald Abstract Detrital zircons from four samples of upper Dalradian metasedimentary rocks from the Buchan Block in the NE Grampian Highlands of Scotland were analysed by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Lithological and metamorphic maps of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain. (a) Lithological map based on Fettes and Chesher (1977) with modifications after Fettes et al. (1991), Read (1923) and Stephenson et al. (2013a, b). The inset map and cross-section are from Kneller (1987) and Carty et al. (2012). The ages of the igneous intrusions are from Stephenson and Gould (1995), Barreiro (1998), Dempster et al. (2002), Oliver et al. (2008), Viete et al. (2010), Carty et al. (2012) and references cited therein, with the 486 and 493 Ma ages for the Portsoy and Inzie Head mafic intrusions from Johnson et al. (2017). (b) Metamorphic map of the Buchan block based on the detailed metamorphic maps in Figures 2, 6 and 8 and the regional mineral assemblage map in Supplementary Figure S1. The inset map is from Gillen (1982). The domain labelled St?A indicates an area of andalusite schists that resemble in appearance staurolite + andalusite-bearing schists to the NE and SW, but in which staurolite has not been observed in samples from this study (see text). The data sources for the mineral assemblages used to build the map are provided in the text and in the captions to Figures 2, 6, 8 and S1. The garnet and orthopyroxene isograds in the migmatite domain in the NE Buchan domain between Fraserburgh and St Combs are from Johnson et al. (2015).
Published: 16 September 2021
Fig. 1. Lithological and metamorphic maps of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain. ( a ) Lithological map based on Fettes and Chesher (1977) with modifications after Fettes et al. (1991) , Read (1923) and Stephenson et al. (2013 a , b ). The inset map and cross-section
Image
Lithological and metamorphic maps of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain. (a) Lithological map based on Fettes and Chesher (1977) with modifications after Fettes et al. (1991), Read (1923) and Stephenson et al. (2013a, b). The inset map and cross-section are from Kneller (1987) and Carty et al. (2012). The ages of the igneous intrusions are from Stephenson and Gould (1995), Barreiro (1998), Dempster et al. (2002), Oliver et al. (2008), Viete et al. (2010), Carty et al. (2012) and references cited therein, with the 486 and 493 Ma ages for the Portsoy and Inzie Head mafic intrusions from Johnson et al. (2017). (b) Metamorphic map of the Buchan block based on the detailed metamorphic maps in Figures 2, 6 and 8 and the regional mineral assemblage map in Supplementary Figure S1. The inset map is from Gillen (1982). The domain labelled St?A indicates an area of andalusite schists that resemble in appearance staurolite + andalusite-bearing schists to the NE and SW, but in which staurolite has not been observed in samples from this study (see text). The data sources for the mineral assemblages used to build the map are provided in the text and in the captions to Figures 2, 6, 8 and S1. The garnet and orthopyroxene isograds in the migmatite domain in the NE Buchan domain between Fraserburgh and St Combs are from Johnson et al. (2015).
Published: 16 September 2021
Fig. 1. Lithological and metamorphic maps of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain. ( a ) Lithological map based on Fettes and Chesher (1977) with modifications after Fettes et al. (1991) , Read (1923) and Stephenson et al. (2013 a , b ). The inset map and cross-section
Image
Photographs and photomicrographs of rocks from the western Buchan block and NW Buchan coastal section (for sample locations, see Figs 1b, 6, 8 and S1). Where present, scale is in centimetres. (a) Granular andalusite + staurolite schist; Maunderlea. (b) Granular andalusite + staurolite schist with coarse andalusite porphyroblasts; River Deveron, near Ardwell. (c) Staurolite + andalusite + garnet schist, with small equant garnets present in the matrix and as inclusions in staurolite and in andalusite of generation And2 that has overgrown the micaceous foliation that wraps the staurolite porphyroblasts; Maunderlea. (d) Two generations of andalusite (And1 and And2) in andalusite+sillimanite schist; between River Deveron and Fourman Hill. Fibrolitic sillimanite is sparsely present in the matrix. (e) Staurolite + andalusite + cordierite + biotite schist; Boyndie Bay. Diameter of coin, 27 mm. (f) Cut face of layered staurolite + andalusite + cordierite schist; Boyndie Bay. Pale andalusite porphyroblasts locally envelope altered cordierite porphyroblasts (brown oval shapes) and both porphyroblasts overgrow the layering and the weak biotite-bearing foliation. Small staurolites are also present. Scale in centimetres.
Published: 16 September 2021
Fig. 7. Photographs and photomicrographs of rocks from the western Buchan block and NW Buchan coastal section (for sample locations, see Figs 1b , 6 , 8 and S1 ). Where present, scale is in centimetres. ( a ) Granular andalusite + staurolite schist; Maunderlea. ( b ) Granular andalusite
Image
(a) Simplified metamorphic map of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain according to Scenario 2 of Figure 18b. The map is based on Figure 1b, but with intrusions and the Old Red Sandstone removed. The extent of the regional metamorphic zones in ground now occupied by intrusions is extrapolated. The domain labelled St?A indicates an area of andalusite schists that resemble in appearance staurolite + andalusite-bearing schists to the NE and SW, but in which staurolite has not been observed in this study. The shaded metamorphic zones are interpreted to have developed prior to a local andalusite–cordierite overprint in the NW Buchan domain (see text for discussion). The approximate trace of the Keith shear zone is from Stephenson (2013). Lines of section 1′, 1, 2 and 3 correspond to metamorphic field gradients 1′, 1, 2 and 3 in part (b). (b) Metapelitic phase diagram from Figure 16 showing different metamorphic field gradients corresponding to the lines of section in the map in part (a). See text for discussion.
Published: 16 September 2021
Fig. 19. ( a ) Simplified metamorphic map of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain according to Scenario 2 of Figure 18b . The map is based on Figure 1b , but with intrusions and the Old Red Sandstone removed. The extent of the regional metamorphic zones in ground now occupied
Image
Simplified geological map of the Buchan Block and surrounding rocks in the NE Grampian Highlands of Scotland, showing the distribution of Dalradian Supergroup, intrusive rocks and the overlying Old Red Sandstone (Devonian) based on bedrock data from DiGMapGB-625, with the permission of the British Geological Survey. The position of the regional (D2) shear zones is from Ashcroft et al. (1984). The locations of the four studied samples are indicated. The inset shows the location of the study area within Scotland.
Published: 05 May 2016
Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the Buchan Block and surrounding rocks in the NE Grampian Highlands of Scotland, showing the distribution of Dalradian Supergroup, intrusive rocks and the overlying Old Red Sandstone (Devonian) based on bedrock data from DiGMapGB-625, with the permission
Journal Article
Published: 16 September 2021
Journal of the Geological Society (2022) 179 (1): jgs2021-040.
...Fig. 1. Lithological and metamorphic maps of the Buchan block and adjacent Barrovian domain. ( a ) Lithological map based on Fettes and Chesher (1977) with modifications after Fettes et al. (1991) , Read (1923) and Stephenson et al. (2013 a , b ). The inset map and cross-section...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1144/SP335.7
EISBN: 9781862395831
... Abstract This contribution presents a new model for the Grampian-age tectonothermal development of the Buchan Block and Barrovian-type regions to its west, in the Grampian Terrane, Scotland. The model has drawn on evidence gathered from field mapping, microstructural analysis, metamorphic...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Book Chapter

Author(s)
P. W. G. Tanner
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2014
DOI: 10.1144/SP390.23
EISBN: 9781862396661
..., regional metamorphism, magmatism, termination of sedimentation and formation of the Buchan Block was probably linked to subduction of the spreading ridge. The driving force was NW-directed Andean-type subduction of part of the basin floor, and later of the microcontinental margin. These events caused...
FIGURES | View All (24)
Book Chapter

Author(s)
T. Wynn, E. Saundry
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2018-11
EISBN: 9781786205070
.... The Buchan Field is contained within two licence blocks: 21/1a and 20/05a. The blocks contain a field development area marked by a dashed red line on Figure 1 , which encompasses the producing portion of the Buchan Field as well as the Lower Cretaceous Hannay accumulation. Outside of this area...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Composite well logs of Buchan Formation from Alma Field, UK Block 30/24. (a) Fluvial-dominated intervals consist of superimposed fining-upward cycles. GR and density vary rapidly due to the presence of conglomerates and mudstones, well 30/24-34. (b) Aeolian-dominated intervals comprise pure sandstones with absence of conglomerates and mudstones. GR and density are consistently low. Sonic log is generally high due to poor cementation, well 30/24-31. After Tang et al. (2017).
Published: 18 April 2018
Fig. 10. Composite well logs of Buchan Formation from Alma Field, UK Block 30/24. ( a ) Fluvial-dominated intervals consist of superimposed fining-upward cycles. GR and density vary rapidly due to the presence of conglomerates and mudstones, well 30/24-34. ( b ) Aeolian-dominated intervals
Journal Article
Published: 30 January 2014
Journal of the Geological Society (2014) 171 (3): 343–352.
... accepted as c. 470 Ma. This is consistent with Sm–Nd garnet ages of Oliver et al. (2000) and Baxter et al. (2002) as well as the Rb–Sr biotite ages of Dempster et al. (1995) . This also places several of the intrusions in the Buchan Block within the tectonometamorphic event, in particular...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2017-34
EISBN: 9781786205070
... Abstract The Alma Field (formerly Argyll and then Ardmore) is located within Blocks 30/24 and 30/25 on the western margin of the Central Graben. Hamilton drilled the first discovery well 30/24-1 in 1969 and the field, named ‘Argyll’, became the first UK offshore oilfield when production...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Book Chapter

Author(s)
R. W. O’B. Knox
Series: Geological Society, London, Geology of Series
Published: 01 January 2002
DOI: 10.1144/GOS4P.13
EISBN: 9781862393905
... Buchan Gravels (Flett & Read 1921; Hall, A. M. 1985; McMillan & Merritt 1980) and an ice-rafted block of Miocene clay (Crampton & Carruthers 1914). The only substantial onshore deposits are the lavas and largely pyroclastic sediments of the Hebridean Igneous Province (see Chapter 14...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1995
Journal of the Geological Society (1995) 152 (2): 383–390.
...T. J. DEMPSTER; N. F. C. HUDSON; G. ROGERS Abstract The Buchan area of Dalradian rocks represents a distinct tectonothermal domain within the Scottish Highlands, and the Portsoy-Duchray Hill lineament on the western margin of this block is one of the best examples of a long-lived domain boundary...
Image
Seismic data (a) and geoseismic interpretation (b) from Licence Block 21/3. Well 21/3-1 lies on this line of section and controls the geology of the high; there are several offset wells in the basins on either side. Stratigraphic terminations (onlaps) and degradation sequences interpreted in South Buchan Graben.
Published: 01 February 2003
Figure 11 Seismic data (a) and geoseismic interpretation (b) from Licence Block 21/3. Well 21/3-1 lies on this line of section and controls the geology of the high; there are several offset wells in the basins on either side. Stratigraphic terminations (onlaps) and degradation sequences
Image
A, Simplified geological map of the Bayankhongor area and Baydrag block (modified after 1:500,000 geological map of western Mongolia); also indicated are areas investigated in this study (figs. 3, 4) and the location of samples M98/B11 and M99/B13 from the Burd Gol mélange and Dzag zone, respectively. B, Simplified cross section showing tectonic contacts between the Burd Gol mélange, the Bayankhongor ophiolite zone, and the Dzag zone (modified after Buchan et al. 2002; Osozawa et al. 2008).
Published: 01 July 2009
Figure 2. A , Simplified geological map of the Bayankhongor area and Baydrag block (modified after 1:500,000 geological map of western Mongolia); also indicated are areas investigated in this study (figs. 3 , 4 ) and the location of samples M98/B11 and M99/B13 from the Burd Gol mélange
Image
(A) Simplified model showing the Neoproterozoic position of the South China Block (after Qi et al., 2018). AFBM—Albany Fraser Belt/Musgrave; EAO—East African Orogeny; E. Ghats—Eastern Ghats Belt; HM—Himalayas; Mad—Madagascar; NPCMs—Northern Prince Charles Mountains; WIBH—Windmill Islands/Bunger Hills. (B) Bar chart of Pan-African and Grenvillian metamorphic records in western Australia, East Antarctica and India (Cawood and Buchan, 2007; Axelsson et al., 2020; Yang and Jiang, 2019). (C) Simplified model depicting the uplift and unroofing of metamorphic rocks in orogens after Zoleikhaei et al. (2022).
Published: 18 September 2023
Figure 9. (A) Simplified model showing the Neoproterozoic position of the South China Block (after Qi et al., 2018 ). AFBM—Albany Fraser Belt/Musgrave; EAO—East African Orogeny; E. Ghats—Eastern Ghats Belt; HM—Himalayas; Mad—Madagascar; NPCMs—Northern Prince Charles Mountains; WIBH—Windmill
Image
Simplified temporal and spatial evolution models showing Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic paleoposition and tectonics of the South China Block, relative to western Australia, East Antarctica, and eastern India. Cross sections are not to scale. Cumulative curves of 1400–400 Ma detrital zircon ages from four sub-basins during each period are used to exhibit spatio-temporal changes in different components in sediments. Proportions of significant zircon populations are also marked. The general location of the South China Block in Gondwana is also shown (modified after Cawood and Buchan, 2007; Metcalfe, 2013; Xu et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018a; Zhao et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2019b). E—Ghats-Eastern Ghats Belt; NPCMs—Northern Prince Charles Mountains; WIBH—Windmill Islands/Bunger Hills; AFBM—Albany Fraser Belt/Musgrave; HM—Himalayas; Qt—Qiangtang; Mad—Madagascar. Grey regions within the Cathaysia Block parts represent the four studied sub-basins.
Published: 04 August 2020
zircon ages from four sub-basins during each period are used to exhibit spatio-temporal changes in different components in sediments. Proportions of significant zircon populations are also marked. The general location of the South China Block in Gondwana is also shown (modified after Cawood and Buchan
Image
Simplified reconstruction of eastern Gondwana during the Early to Middle Devonian (ca. 410–380 Ma) (modified after Boger and Miller, 2004; Cawood and Buchan, 2007; Meert and Lieberman, 2008; Cawood et al., 2013; Metcalfe, 2013; Zhao et al., 2018). The Early Devonian extension in South China is coeval with rifting that led to the separation of the East Asian blocks (including South China, Tarim, Indochina, and North China) from eastern Gondwana. It was associated with the opening of the paleo–Tethys Ocean. Data on magmatism are from: 1—this study; 2—Feng et al. (2014); 3—Cai et al. (2017); 4—Qiu et al. (2017); 5—Li et al. (2016c).
Published: 18 March 2020
Figure 18. Simplified reconstruction of eastern Gondwana during the Early to Middle Devonian (ca. 410–380 Ma) (modified after Boger and Miller, 2004 ; Cawood and Buchan, 2007 ; Meert and Lieberman, 2008 ; Cawood et al., 2013 ; Metcalfe, 2013 ; Zhao et al., 2018 ). The Early Devonian