1-20 OF 37 RESULTS FOR

Brygge Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
(A–B) Time-structure maps of the mid-Brygge Formation (H9) and top Brygge (H7) Formation revealing tectonically uplifted and eroded parts of the south Modgunn arch. (C–D) Variance maps indicating the locations of vents (V) and faults (S—strike-slip faults; R—radial faults; P—polygonal faults). (D–F) Detailed maps of the distribution and character of group II polygonal faults (shown in D and further detailed in E and F). Relatively larger throws in area I relate to the long-term activity of faults. The top Brygge Formation (H7) was eroded by landslides to the west. The difference between polygonal faults at H7 and H9 levels is discussed in the text.
Published: 06 April 2020
Figure 5. (A–B) Time-structure maps of the mid-Brygge Formation (H9) and top Brygge (H7) Formation revealing tectonically uplifted and eroded parts of the south Modgunn arch. (C–D) Variance maps indicating the locations of vents (V) and faults (S—strike-slip faults; R—radial faults; P—polygonal
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 15 March 2024
DOI: 10.1144/SP525-2023-25
EISBN: 9781786209573
... is shown in (a). Source: seismic data courtesy of TGS. The sediments of the Brygge Formation were deposited in deep water from the Early Eocene to the Early Miocene. The Brygge Formation is thickest in the Møre Basin, where subsidence was most rapid. The formation mainly consists of claystone...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
Summary diagram showing the positions of seismic stratigraphic horizons H1 to H11 and a synthesis of wireline data from well 6403/6-1. The ages of horizons were taken from Forsberg and Locat (2005), Løseth and Henriksen (2005), Rise et al. (2006), and Kjoberg et al. (2017). H1—Seafloor; H3—top Kai Formation; H7—top Brygge Formation; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; GP—Group; GR—Gamma Ray; FM—Formation; MD—Measured Depth. Age scale is given in Ma; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Published: 06 April 2020
—Seafloor; H3—top Kai Formation; H7—top Brygge Formation; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; GP—Group; GR—Gamma Ray; FM—Formation; MD—Measured Depth. Age scale is given in Ma; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the study area. Its location is shown in Figure 1B. Magma intrusions that formed during the breakup of the northeast Atlantic gave rise to the migration of fluid via faults and pipes. Trapped fluid is revealed as high-amplitude reflections above pipes and around faults. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime; MTD—mass-transport deposit.
Published: 06 April 2020
as high-amplitude reflections above pipes and around faults. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the Modgunn arch. The location of the seismic profile is shown in Figure 1B. This profile images a pipe structure located on the northern flank of the south Modgunn arch that ends up as an eye-shaped hydrothermal vent at its top, revealing the pathway of released overpressured fluid from heated organic carbon around the magmatic intrusions below. Polygonal faults, radial faults, and high-amplitude reflections are also visible on this seismic profile. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Published: 06 April 2020
Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the southern flank of the south Modgunn arch. Its location is shown in Figure 1B. The control of faults on landslide scarps is revealed by F1, F2, F3, and other faults, including polygonal faults, radial faults, and strike-slip faults. The radial faults occur above intrusion-related structures, including local folds and vents. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime; MTD—mass-transport deposit.
Published: 06 April 2020
, and strike-slip faults. The radial faults occur above intrusion-related structures, including local folds and vents. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT; H9
Image
Maximum and average throw-depth diagrams. Four types of faults are interpreted in the study area, as plotted in this graph. In order to compare the development of faults on the evolving south Modgunn arch, all depths were plotted relative to the mid–Brygge Formation (H9). TWT—two-way traveltime.
Published: 06 April 2020
Figure 9. Maximum and average throw-depth diagrams. Four types of faults are interpreted in the study area, as plotted in this graph. In order to compare the development of faults on the evolving south Modgunn arch, all depths were plotted relative to the mid–Brygge Formation (H9). TWT—two-way
Image
A green amphibole grain with a shape determined by the two intersecting cleavages typical of amphibole. Paleogene Brygge Formation, well 6710/10-1, 504 m below the sea floor. The sample may possibly have been buried more deeply than at present.
Published: 01 December 2007
Figure 13 A green amphibole grain with a shape determined by the two intersecting cleavages typical of amphibole. Paleogene Brygge Formation, well 6710/10-1, 504 m below the sea floor. The sample may possibly have been buried more deeply than at present.
Image
Porosity for rocks with high concentrations of biogenically derived silica in the Oligocene Brygge Formation from the Norwegian Sea, calculated from density logs, and displayed together with the porosity data from this paper. All data were computed by applying a mineral density of 2.72 g/cm3. Diamonds represent Norwegian Sea samples. Otherwise, the symbols show stratigraphy and location as in Figure 5. The Norwegian Sea wells are displayed versus pseudodepths; see text for further explanations. RKB = rotary kelly bushing.
Published: 15 November 2019
Figure 10. Porosity for rocks with high concentrations of biogenically derived silica in the Oligocene Brygge Formation from the Norwegian Sea, calculated from density logs, and displayed together with the porosity data from this paper. All data were computed by applying a mineral density of 2.72
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 06 April 2020
GSA Bulletin (2020) 132 (11-12): 2397–2414.
...Figure 5. (A–B) Time-structure maps of the mid-Brygge Formation (H9) and top Brygge (H7) Formation revealing tectonically uplifted and eroded parts of the south Modgunn arch. (C–D) Variance maps indicating the locations of vents (V) and faults (S—strike-slip faults; R—radial faults; P—polygonal...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
(A) Location of the study area on the northwest flank of the Storegga Slide, mid-Norwegian margin, highlighting the distribution of the Storegga Slide complex (Solheim et al., 2005) and seafloor cracks (Mienert et al., 2010; Reiche et al., 2011). Map is modified from the GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group (2020). The gray-shaded area represents the location of south Modgunn Arch. (B) Detailed two-way time (TWT) map of the seafloor, as extracted from seismic data. The seismic profiles and key areas discussed in this work are highlighted by the black lines and rectangles. (C) Relationship amongst the Storegga Slide complex covering the variance map of basal glide plane (H3) in the study area, including slides W, S, R, and the Storegga Slide (Solheim et al., 2005). (D) Seismic profile crossing all the slope terraces in the study area with schematic slide stratigraphy in the Naust Formation (Fm.). Location is shown in Figures 1B and 1C. Horizon H1—seafloor; Horizon H2—inner glide plane between MTCs 1 and 2; Horizon H3—basal glide plane of the Storegga Slide complex; Horizon H4—top of Kai Formation; Horizon H5—top of Brygge Formation; Horizon H6—base of the post-breakup units, remaining intact during the Storegga Slide complex; S1–S6—slope scarps separating terraces.
Published: 24 August 2023
Formation (Fm.). Location is shown in Figures 1B and 1C. Horizon H1—seafloor; Horizon H2—inner glide plane between MTCs 1 and 2; Horizon H3—basal glide plane of the Storegga Slide complex; Horizon H4—top of Kai Formation; Horizon H5—top of Brygge Formation; Horizon H6—base of the post-breakup units
Image
General stratigraphy for (a) Labrador and (b) Mid-Norway. The Lower Cretaceous Bjarni represents synrift deposits comparable to the Jurassic and Triassic of Mid-Norway. The Upper Cretaceous Markland and Tertiary deposits of Labrador are similar to the Tertiary Nise and Egga Sandstones, the Brygge and Kai Shales, and the Cretaceous Lysing and Lange Formation in Mid-Norway.
Published: 01 April 2014
, the Brygge and Kai Shales, and the Cretaceous Lysing and Lange Formation in Mid-Norway.
Image
(A–B) Variance maps of the top Tang (H11) (A) and top Brygge (H7) (B) formations showing vent structures associated with the formation of radial faults above them. (C–D) Local differential compaction over intrusion-related structures led to the development of the radial faults (C), which have a central-cross shape and differ from the polygonal faults around them (D). The dotted black lines indicate the location of the Jan Mayen fracture corridor.
Published: 06 April 2020
Figure 11. (A–B) Variance maps of the top Tang (H11) (A) and top Brygge (H7) (B) formations showing vent structures associated with the formation of radial faults above them. (C–D) Local differential compaction over intrusion-related structures led to the development of the radial faults (C
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 June 2008
The Leading Edge (2008) 27 (6): 750–756.
... the main trend lines. Circle I contains shales from the lower 100 m of the Brygge Formation ( Figure 2 ), which are located 350 m below the opal-A to opal-CT transition (chemical transformation of amorphous silica), and approximately 100 m below the base siliceous ooze. Circle II contains data from...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 27 February 2020
Geology (2020) 48 (5): 473–477.
... faults, where throw accumulates primarily through dewatering of the largely fine-grained sediments composing the host layers for the PFSs, and through differential volumetric strain between the fault footwalls and hanging walls. The base of the PFS tier is identified as the base of the Brygge...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 24 August 2023
GSA Bulletin (2024) 136 (3-4): 1701–1712.
... Formation (Fm.). Location is shown in Figures 1B and 1C. Horizon H1—seafloor; Horizon H2—inner glide plane between MTCs 1 and 2; Horizon H3—basal glide plane of the Storegga Slide complex; Horizon H4—top of Kai Formation; Horizon H5—top of Brygge Formation; Horizon H6—base of the post-breakup units...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 15 November 2019
AAPG Bulletin (2019) 103 (11): 2665–2695.
...Figure 10. Porosity for rocks with high concentrations of biogenically derived silica in the Oligocene Brygge Formation from the Norwegian Sea, calculated from density logs, and displayed together with the porosity data from this paper. All data were computed by applying a mineral density of 2.72...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 09 May 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (3): SK65–SK81.
... and a variable content of tuffaceous material. The tuff content is highest toward the basal section of the formation, with increasing volume in the lowermost Eocene sediments. The Tare Formation is overlain by the late Eocene to middle Miocene Brygge Formation, which is part of the Hordaland group ( Deagan...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2005
AAPG Bulletin (2005) 89 (3): 359–381.
... et al., 1988 ), and has, in general, a finer grain size and lower permeability compared to the Naust Formation. The Oligocene–Eocene Brygge Formation, interval 3W, is also marine shale with a few thin sandstone, siltstone, and carbonate layers ( Ehrenberg et al., 1992 ), but with a distinct velocity...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2006
AAPG Bulletin (2006) 90 (7): 1145–1148.
... the sonic velocity but should be treated separately ( Storvoll and Bjørlykke, 2004 ). Based on mineralogical analysis ( Thyberg et al., 2000 ), it has been documented that the reduced velocities in the smectite-rich North Sea Eocene and Oligocene mudstones (equivalent Brygge Formation, Figure 1...
FIGURES