1-20 OF 298 RESULTS FOR

Bravo Dome

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2011
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2011) 81 (4): 248–265.
... hydrothermal origin, just predating migration of mantle-derived gas into the Bravo Dome reservoir. These findings offer insight into questions about the climate significance of dolomite in paleosols, origin of dolomite in hydrothermally altered hydrocarbon reservoirs, and the long-term effect of CO 2...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Contributions to underpressure in Bravo Dome (New Mexico, USA). A: Regional map of Bravo Dome and adjacent sedimentary basins. Well locations with preproduction brine pressure in Permian formations (Bair et al., 1985) are indicated by brown dots. B: Cross section along A-A′, dashed line in A. C: Histogram of initial bottom hole temperature at Bravo Dome. D: Pressure-temperature-density phase diagram of CO2 with isodensity contours. Light-brown cone shows range of estimated underpressure in Permian aquifers surrounding Bravo Dome. Brown circles are individual wells, and their size shows proximity to Bravo Dome. E: Histograms of initial bottom hole pressures (IBHPs) in Bravo Dome.
Published: 01 January 2017
Figure 3. Contributions to underpressure in Bravo Dome (New Mexico, USA). A: Regional map of Bravo Dome and adjacent sedimentary basins. Well locations with preproduction brine pressure in Permian formations ( Bair et al., 1985 ) are indicated by brown dots. B: Cross section along A-A′, dashed
Image
A: Map of Bravo Dome gas field (New Mexico, USA), showing top of CO2-hosting Tubb Formation (black contour lines, in m above sea level [a.s.l.]), gas-water contact (short dashed line), the 3He/4He ratio (long dashed line), and 26 sampling wells (circles). B: West-east cross-section highlighting gas-water contact within Tubb Formation on eastern side of westernmost fault, as opposed to west side, where gas reservoir is not in contact with formation water. Sampling wells are projected with their perforation depth (circles).
Published: 23 August 2017
Figure 1. A: Map of Bravo Dome gas field (New Mexico, USA), showing top of CO 2 -hosting Tubb Formation (black contour lines, in m above sea level [a.s.l.]), gas-water contact (short dashed line), the 3 He/ 4 He ratio (long dashed line), and 26 sampling wells (circles). B: West-east cross
Image
Pressures in Bravo Dome (New Mexico, USA) CO2 reservoir. A: Initial bottom hole pressures (IBHPs) form multiple gas-static trends. Ph—hydrostatic pressure, Pe—capillary entry pressure, Pg—pre-production gas pressure. B: Map delineating hydraulically isolated compartments. Dots indicate well locations shown in A, gray lines indicate faults, and black square indicates location of apatite samples. C: Cross section along M-M′, dashed line indicated in B. Fault offsetting the two main reservoirs is shown by black line. D: Gas pressures along cross section (shown as dots) and gas volume fraction (shown as red line).
Published: 01 January 2017
Figure 2. Pressures in Bravo Dome (New Mexico, USA) CO 2 reservoir. A: Initial bottom hole pressures (IBHPs) form multiple gas-static trends. P h —hydrostatic pressure, P e —capillary entry pressure, P g —pre-production gas pressure. B: Map delineating hydraulically isolated compartments
Image
A) 84Kr/36Ar plotted against 20Ne/36Ar for Bravo Dome samples, compared with air (dotted gray line), air-saturated water (ASW, solid gray line) and the calculated mantle-derived and groundwater end-members, redrawn from Dubacq et al. (2012). The trends in the concentration ratios of the noble gases can be described by a simple mixing model of mantle derived noble gases and atmospheric noble gases derived from degassed groundwater. B) Plot of 84Kr/36Ar against 20Ne/36Ar for the Sheep Mountain and McElmo Dome fields redrawn from Gilfillan et al. (2008). Also plotted are Rayleigh fractionation curves modeled by Gilfillan et al. (2008), calculated for a gas phase evolving from an ASW ground-water (dashed line) and for a gas with an ASW composition redissolving into degassed water containing no noble gases (solid line). This second model accounts for the observed extreme 20Ne/36Ar observed at Sheep Mountain. However, the observed 84Kr/36Ar values are up to 4× higher than predicted, possibly as a result of the addition of excess sedimentary Kr.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 7 A) 84 Kr/ 36 Ar plotted against 20 Ne/ 36 Ar for Bravo Dome samples, compared with air (dotted gray line), air-saturated water (ASW, solid gray line) and the calculated mantle-derived and groundwater end-members, redrawn from Dubacq et al. (2012) . The trends in the concentration
Image
Location map of wells in the Bravo Dome study region in northeastern New Mexico, with studied wells highlighted (modified from Kessler et al. 2001).
Published: 01 April 2011
Figure 4 Location map of wells in the Bravo Dome study region in northeastern New Mexico, with studied wells highlighted (modified from Kessler et al. 2001 ).
Image
Location map of wells in the Bravo dome region with studied wells highlighted (bold dots). The table insert lists names and locations of studied wells. The line linking the study wells is the trace of the fence diagram in Figure 4.
Published: 01 September 2001
Figure 3 Location map of wells in the Bravo dome region with studied wells highlighted (bold dots). The table insert lists names and locations of studied wells. The line linking the study wells is the trace of the fence diagram in Figure 4 .
Image
Graphic column of paleosols recognized in the Bravo dome study area. Clay-mineral and dolomite content are plotted by intensity, or peak height, in counts per second as recorded by XRD analysis. Magnetic susceptibility is reported as averaged, drift-corrected susceptibility in volume-specific SI units (κ) of 10-5. Owing to the methodology used and the heterogeneous distribution of clay minerals and carbonate in the profile, XRD sampling and processing may lead to a somewhat dispersed result. Because of this difficulty, only general trends in data should be observed and spikiness must be disregarded. See text for detailed discussion of specific paleosols. A) Graphic column of moderately developed vertic dolosol paleosol from the base of the study interval. B) Graphic column of a moderately developed vertic dolosol paleosol profile from the top of the study interval. C) Graphic column of weakly developed vertic protosol paleosol profile. D) Graphic column of weakly developed dolic protosol paleosol profile.
Published: 01 September 2001
Figure 9 Graphic column of paleosols recognized in the Bravo dome study area. Clay-mineral and dolomite content are plotted by intensity, or peak height, in counts per second as recorded by XRD analysis. Magnetic susceptibility is reported as averaged, drift-corrected susceptibility in volume
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 January 2017
Geology (2017) 45 (1): 47–50.
...Figure 3. Contributions to underpressure in Bravo Dome (New Mexico, USA). A: Regional map of Bravo Dome and adjacent sedimentary basins. Well locations with preproduction brine pressure in Permian formations ( Bair et al., 1985 ) are indicated by brown dots. B: Cross section along A-A′, dashed...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 23 August 2017
Geology (2017) 45 (11): 995–998.
...Figure 1. A: Map of Bravo Dome gas field (New Mexico, USA), showing top of CO 2 -hosting Tubb Formation (black contour lines, in m above sea level [a.s.l.]), gas-water contact (short dashed line), the 3 He/ 4 He ratio (long dashed line), and 26 sampling wells (circles). B: West-east cross...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1992
GSA Bulletin (1992) 104 (7): 802–813.
... shifts during this cycle. Topography related to Early Cretaceous tectonic activity on crystalline basement structures, including the Dalhart Basin, Tucumcari Basin, and the intervening Bravo Dome, also had a direct effect on Early Cretaceous deposition and is reflected by thickness trends in marine...
Image
Trends from groundwater degassing mixing with a noble gas-poor mantle-derived end-member at Bravo Dome, St Johns Dome, McCallum and Sheep Mountain. Solid lines are the best fit mixing lines calculated from Dubacq et al. (2012) for Bravo Dome. Variations in 20Ne/22Ne and 3He/4He during CO2 dissolution for Bravo Dome samples are driven by mixing of mantle and atmospheric derived noble gas components.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 9 Trends from groundwater degassing mixing with a noble gas-poor mantle-derived end-member at Bravo Dome, St Johns Dome, McCallum and Sheep Mountain. Solid lines are the best fit mixing lines calculated from Dubacq et al. (2012) for Bravo Dome. Variations in 20 Ne/ 22 Ne and 3 He/ 4 He
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1946
AAPG Bulletin (1946) 30 (6): 925–929.
...Porter A. Montgomery, Jr.; Le Roy Fugitt ABSTRACT The Panhandle district includes the twenty-six northwestern counties in Texas. Ten of these counties produce oil or gas. The major structural features include the Amarillo uplift, the Anadarko basin, the Permian basin, the Bravo dome, the Stratford...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (2): 245–246.
.... The channels were diverted around the ridge until it was eventually buried. The deposition continued, from the west, until the source of granite was depleted. Through analysis of the dipmeter data, the Bravo dome was identified as the source of the granite, and it was determined that the channel system...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2001
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2001) 71 (5): 817–832.
...Figure 3 Location map of wells in the Bravo dome region with studied wells highlighted (bold dots). The table insert lists names and locations of studied wells. The line linking the study wells is the trace of the fence diagram in Figure 4 . ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (4): 505.
... and Bravo dome. Differential uplift of the margins of the basin caused draping, fracturing, and faulting, which increased the amounts and rates of erosion and salt dissolution coincident with fault-bounded structures. Structural control of topography around the southern high plains is indicated...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (8): 1945–1967.
... embayment, and the Dalhart, Palo Duro, Hardeman, and Hollis (Harmon) basins. Some of the more important positive or uplift areas are the buried Amarillo mountains or Amarillo uplift, the Matador archipelago, the Cimarron uplift, Bravodome,” Hall County anticline, Childress anticline, and the Narcisso...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (2): 423.
... basin occupy a part of the southeastern Texas Panhandle area. Some major positive areas of significance are Amarillo uplift, Cimarron uplift, BravoDome,” and Matador archipelago. Some other uplift areas are Childress anticline, Hall County anticline, Narcisso structure, Quinduno structure, etc...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (2): 426–427.
... field and one oil field within its limits; around its margins eight other oil pools are producing, of which the Anton-Irish is the largest. It is bounded on the north by the Amarillo Mountains and their westward continuance, the Bravo dome; on the west by the New Mexico Highlands; and on the south...
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1951
DOI: 10.1306/SV27345C25
EISBN: 9781629812472
... Abstract The area of the Plainview basin is about 32,000 square miles. It is located between the outcrops of pre-Cambrian rocks in northeast New Mexico on the west, the Bravo dome and Amarillo uplift on the north, and the Matador trend of uplifts on the south. The belt of uplifts along...