1-20 OF 1191 RESULTS FOR

Bow Island Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2002
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2002) 50 (4): 441–477.
...Per Kent Pedersen; Claudia J. Schröder-Adams; Olga Nielsen Abstract We here present the first detailed published sequence stratigraphic study of the Lower Cretaceous Bow Island Formation. Two orders of sequences are identified, based on the integration of sedimentology, micropaleontology...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: High resolution sequence stratigraphic architectur...
Second thumbnail for: High resolution sequence stratigraphic architectur...
Third thumbnail for: High resolution sequence stratigraphic architectur...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1995
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1995) 43 (3): 320–342.
... and southeastern British Columbia. The channels can be traced intermittently along easterly trends for up to 66 km in several adjacent thrust slices. Correlative units in the Alberta subsurface occur in the Bow Island Formation of the Colorado Group. In the Foothills and Front Ranges, the conglomerate...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (2): 208.
...J. Cox; B.P.J. Williams Regionally, the Bow Island Formation of southwest Alberta consists of three lithostratigraphic units. Unit 1, the lowest unit, is approximately 100 m thick and consists of stacked, upward-coarsening clastic parasequences separated by marine flooding surfaces. Unit 2...
Image
Reference well for the Bow Island Formation, showing the subdivision into informal members. Major sequence stratigraphic subdivisions and their bounding surfaces are indicated.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 3. Reference well for the Bow Island Formation, showing the subdivision into informal members. Major sequence stratigraphic subdivisions and their bounding surfaces are indicated.
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1992
DOI: 10.2110/cor.92.01.0119
EISBN: 9781565760974
... Abstract A study of the Viking/Bow Island Formations in south-central Alberta has distinguished two major facies associations. Facies Association One ( i.e. FA1) comprises beds of thoroughly burrowed very fine grained sandstone, siltstone and shale, interbedded with rare one to fifteen...
Image
Sharp based shoreface sand within the lower member of the Bow Island Formation in well 10-22-9-19W4. See Figure 4 for stratigraphic position of the core. a) Core data showing core GR, sedimentological log, ichnology, position of sequence stratigraphic surfaces, and depositional environments. Note the good correlation between graphic log, core GR and the well logs shown in Figure 4. b) Core photograph of the sharp contact between the offshore and middle shoreface deposits, possibly a sequence boundary. c) Legend.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 6. Sharp based shoreface sand within the lower member of the Bow Island Formation in well 10-22-9-19W4. See Figure 4 for stratigraphic position of the core. a) Core data showing core GR, sedimentological log, ichnology, position of sequence stratigraphic surfaces, and depositional
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2008
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2008) 56 (4): 259–299.
...) of marine mudstone that coarsens in the north, where it is assigned to the lithostratigraphic Viking Formation, and in the far south, where it is assigned to part of the lithostratigraphic Bow Island Formation. The Viking alloformation erosively overlies the Joli Fou alloformation at surface VE0...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: An allostratigraphic correlation of Lower Colorado...
Second thumbnail for: An allostratigraphic correlation of Lower Colorado...
Third thumbnail for: An allostratigraphic correlation of Lower Colorado...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1988
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1988) 36 (4): 362–378.
... was the Bow Island Formation in southern Alberta, Canada, because of its lenticular structure, petroleum occurrences, confined lateral fluid flow, steep regional hydraulic gradients and good database. The study was executed in three main phases: 1. qualitative assessment and selection of target potentiometric...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (11): 2227–2244.
..., and Princess areas. Minor gas deposits are also in the Lower Cretaceous Bow Island Formation in long, narrow sandbars in the Pakowki Lake and Bindloss areas. A 300-ft-thick interval of silty and sandy shale in the Milk River Formation has been known to contain gas for some time, but, because of its low...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Petroleum Geology of Sweetgrass Arch, Alberta
Second thumbnail for: Petroleum Geology of Sweetgrass Arch, Alberta
Third thumbnail for: Petroleum Geology of Sweetgrass Arch, Alberta
Image
Maps demonstrating the variable facies distribution throughout the entire Bow Island Formation with respect to relative sea level changes. Each map displays interpretation of the paleogeography at major “turnaround” times. Note the variable core and well log control within the study area. Figures 10a to 10c are within the lower and middle members of the Bow Island Formation, Figures 10d to 10k are within the upper member, and Figure 10l is within the Westgate Formation.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 10. Maps demonstrating the variable facies distribution throughout the entire Bow Island Formation with respect to relative sea level changes. Each map displays interpretation of the paleogeography at major “turnaround” times. Note the variable core and well log control within the study
Image
Maps demonstrating the variable facies distribution throughout the entire Bow Island Formation with respect to relative sea level changes. Each map displays interpretation of the paleogeography at major “turnaround” times. Note the variable core and well log control within the study area. Figures 10a to 10c are within the lower and middle members of the Bow Island Formation, Figures 10d to 10k are within the upper member, and Figure 10l is within the Westgate Formation.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 10. Maps demonstrating the variable facies distribution throughout the entire Bow Island Formation with respect to relative sea level changes. Each map displays interpretation of the paleogeography at major “turnaround” times. Note the variable core and well log control within the study
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1975
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1975) 23 (4): 715–752.
... of the transition from the Bow Island Formation of the southern Plains to the Viking Formation of the central Plains, and is in the region of multiple sand development in the Viking Formation. Fourteen Viking cored wells and 250 electric logs distributed throughout the area were studied in detail. The cores...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1959
AAPG Bulletin (1959) 43 (3): 590–640.
... and shales. In southern Alberta the Viking and Joli Fou formations are not recognizable as two distinct units, and the entire succession is called the Bow Island formation, which is correlated with parts of the upper Blairmore and Crowsnest formations in the Foothills area. An isopach map of the Lower...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous of Southern Alberta and Adjoining...
Second thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous of Southern Alberta and Adjoining...
Third thumbnail for: Lower Cretaceous of Southern Alberta and Adjoining...
Image
a) Core photograph of upper part of the middle member and upper members of the Bow Island Formation, and lower part of the Westgate Formation in well 2-22-9-25W4. See Figure 7 for detailed sedimentological log and interpretation of depositional environments. Note the abrupt facies changes at sequence stratigraphic surfaces. b) Lag of mudstone and sandstone clasts eroded from the middle member of the Bow Island Formation overlying TS-1 in well 6-15-9-24W4. See Figure 12 for sedimentological log. c) TS-1 developed as a Glossifungites demarcated surface in well 10-9-11-25W4. Note mud layer couplet immediately above TS-1 and in upper most part of the photo. Core diameter is 9 cm. See Figure 13 for sedimentological log. d) Tidal channel deposits of lower unit of Sequence 2 in 6-15-9-25W4. Rhythmic laminated sandstone and carbonaceous rich mudstone lamina overlain by clay draped ripples. Note presence of several mud layer couplets within lower half of the photo. See Figure 12 for sedimentological log.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 8. a) Core photograph of upper part of the middle member and upper members of the Bow Island Formation, and lower part of the Westgate Formation in well 2-22-9-25W4. See Figure 7 for detailed sedimentological log and interpretation of depositional environments. Note the abrupt facies
Image
Dip section 3–3′ showing allostratigraphic divisions of Lower Colorado allogroup within lithostratigraphic Bow Island Formation. Note development of major shoreface sandstone body in Viking allomember VD.
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 13. Dip section 3–3′ showing allostratigraphic divisions of Lower Colorado allogroup within lithostratigraphic Bow Island Formation. Note development of major shoreface sandstone body in Viking allomember VD.
Image
Dip section 2–2′ showing allostratigraphic divisions of Lower Colorado allogroup within lithostratigraphic Bow Island Formation. Note eastward downlap of Westgate unit WC parasequences onto surface VE4.
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 12. Dip section 2–2′ showing allostratigraphic divisions of Lower Colorado allogroup within lithostratigraphic Bow Island Formation. Note eastward downlap of Westgate unit WC parasequences onto surface VE4.
Image
Crossplot of δ18O and δ2D in water coproduced with biogenic gas in the Tiger Ridge and Bowdoin dome areas, Montana (see Figure 11 for locations). Similar data from water in the Milk River aquifer and Bow Island Formation in Canada (Drimmie et al., 1991) are also shown. The global meteoric water line (Craig, 1961) and the northern Montana modern meteoric line (Sheppard et al., 1969) provide support for the old age of the Montana and Bow Island water. The cluster is displaced off the line and is on trend with progressively older dates.
Published: 01 November 2002
Figure 12 Crossplot of δ 18 O and δ 2 D in water coproduced with biogenic gas in the Tiger Ridge and Bowdoin dome areas, Montana (see Figure 11 for locations). Similar data from water in the Milk River aquifer and Bow Island Formation in Canada ( Drimmie et al., 1991 ) are also shown
Image
Core data of well 2/4-27-9-19W4 showing the sharp contact between the pedogenic altered deposits of the Mannville Group and the marine offshore deposits of the lower member of the Bow Island Formation. See Figure 6c for legend.
Published: 01 December 2002
Fig. 5. Core data of well 2/4-27-9-19W4 showing the sharp contact between the pedogenic altered deposits of the Mannville Group and the marine offshore deposits of the lower member of the Bow Island Formation. See Figure 6c for legend.
Image
Dip section 1–1′ showing divisions of the Lower Colorado allogroup in relation to lithostratigraphic divisions of the Bow Island Formation (from Pedersen et al., 2002). Note eastward downlap of Westgate unit WC parasequences onto surface VE4.
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 11. Dip section 1–1′ showing divisions of the Lower Colorado allogroup in relation to lithostratigraphic divisions of the Bow Island Formation (from Pedersen et al., 2002 ). Note eastward downlap of Westgate unit WC parasequences onto surface VE4.
Image
Composite section illustrating relations of the Paddy Member of the Peace River Formation and its interpretation (modified from Leckie and Singh 1991). Note the emergent nature that led to the deposition and incision of the Cadotte Formation followed by the resubmergence and filling of the incised channels by estuarine and shallow marine sediments. The Walton Creek, Viking, and Bow Island formations in Canada, as well as the Muddy and Newcastle sandstones in the United States, have similar stratigraphic units and relations.
Published: 27 September 2022
of the incised channels by estuarine and shallow marine sediments. The Walton Creek, Viking, and Bow Island formations in Canada, as well as the Muddy and Newcastle sandstones in the United States, have similar stratigraphic units and relations.