Abstract The utility of outcrops to geoscientists working the subsurface is typically limited by provincial nomenclature, outcrop-based lithostratigraphic subdivisions, which commonly differ in name and numbers among researchers, and often a basic indifference to the subsurface stratigraphy. In the subsurface of South Texas, the Eagle Ford Group is commonly divided into an organic-rich Lower Eagle Formation and a carbonate-rich Upper Eagle Ford Formation. In contrast, coeval strata that crop out nearby in West Texas are traditionally referred to as the Boquillas Formation. Adding further complexity to the outcrop stratigraphy is that previous workers divided the Boquillas into two to five informal lithostratigraphic units whose names and boundaries differ among researchers. By convolving information from a handheld gamma ray spectrometer, outcrop geochemical data and sequence stratigraphy, the Lower and Upper Eagle formations, as defined in the subsurface of South Texas, can now be defined in the coeval Eagle Ford Group outcrops of West Texas. Integrating basic geochemical and petrophysical data to the updated stratigraphy on these outcrops was transformative. By doing this, these West Texas exposures became portals to examine, as well as explain and predict, the distribution and thickness variations of specific chronostratigraphic units that are critical to the economic success of exploiting the Eagle Group across the unconventional source rock play fairway in South Texas.

Abstract The 130-year history of study of the Cenomanian–Turonian Eagle Ford and Woodbine Groups of Texas has created a complicated and often confusing nomenclature system. Deciphering these nomenclatures has frequently been hindered by outdated biostratigraphic studies with inaccurate age interpretations. To resolve these issues, a comprehensive compilation and vetting of available biostratigraphic, geochemical, and lithologic data from Eagle Ford and Woodbine outcrops and subsurface penetrations was undertaken, which was then tied to a large network of wells in both south and east Texas. Composite sections were built for four outcrop areas of central and north Texas (Dallas, Red River, Waco, Austin), five outcrop areas from west Texas (Langtry, Del Rio, Big Bend, Chispa Summit, Quitman Mountains), four subsurface areas from south Texas (Webb County, Atascosa County, Karnes County, DeWitt/Gonzales Counties), and two cross sections from the east Texas subsurface (basin center and eastern margin). The resulting datasets were utilized to construct age models and characterize depositional environments, including paleoceanography. In agreement with previous studies, the total organic carbon (TOC)-rich Lower Eagle Ford was interpreted to have been deposited under anoxic to euxinic conditions and the Upper Eagle Ford under dysoxic to anoxic conditions. The Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (OAE2) interval is missing at all locations north of Atascosa County; when present it is characterized as having been deposited under oxic to suboxic conditions. High abundances of radiolaria and calcispheres identified within recrystallized medial to distal limestones of the Lower Eagle Ford indicated limestone formation during periods of enhanced water-column mixing and increased primary productivity, in contrast to proximal limestones composed of planktonic foraminifera and inoceramid prisms concentrated by bottom currents. Standardized nomenclature systems and age models are proposed for each of the outcrop and subsurface areas. Proposed changes to existing nomenclatures include reassignment of the Tarrant Formation of the Eagle Ford to the Lewisville Formation of the Woodbine in the Dallas area and the Templeton Member of the Lewisville Formation to the Britton Formation of the Eagle Ford in the Red River area. The proposed term “Waller Member” of Fairbanks (2012) for the former Cloice Member of the Lake Waco Formation in the Austin area is recognized with a new stratotype proposed and described, although the Waller Member is transferred to the Pepper Shale Formation of the Woodbine. The Terrell Member is proposed for the carbonate-rich section at the base of the Boquillas Formation in the Langtry and Del Rio areas, restricting the Lozier Canyon Member to the organic-rich rocks underlying the Antonio Creek Member. The south Texas subsurface is divided into the Upper Eagle Ford and Lower Eagle Ford Formations, with the clay-rich Maness Shale Member at the base of the Lower Eagle Ford and the foraminifera grainstone dominated Langtry Member at the top of the Upper Eagle Ford. Use of the term “middle Eagle Ford” for the clay-rich facies south of the San Marcos arch is not recommended.

The Upper Cretaceous strata of the Gulf Coast region of México, Texas, and southwestern Arkansas contain rich, abundant, well-preserved, and, hitherto, poorly studied assemblages of planktonic foraminifera. The rapid evolution and cosmopolitan nature of these planktonic microfossils make them an ideal biostratigraphic tool for the development of detailed, long-distance systems of zonation. In the present report, the planktonic foraminifera have been utilized to subdivide the Upper Cretaceous of the western Gulf Coast region into the following biostratigraphic units: (1) The Rotalipora s.s. Assemblage Zone: Rotalipora evoluta Subzone to Rotalipora cushmani - greenhornensis Subzone. Late Washitian to early Eagle-fordian (early to late Cenomanian). (2) The Marginotruncana helvetica Assemblage Zone: Marginotruncana sigali Subzone to Whiteinella archaeocretacea Subzone. Middle to late Eagle-fordian (early to late Turonian). (3) The Marginotruncana renzi Assemblage Zone: Early Austinian (Coniacian). (4) The Globotruncana bulloides Assemblage Zone: Marginotruncana concavata Subzone to Globotruncana fornicata Subzone. Middle to late Austinian (early to late Santonian). (5) The Globotruncana fornicata—stuartiformis Assemblage Zone: Archaeoglobigerina blowi Subzone (Dictyomitra multicostata Zonule to Planoglobulina glabrata Zonule); Globotruncana elevata Subzone (Pseudotextularia elegans Zonule to Globotruncana calcarata Zonule); and Rugotruncana subcircumnodifer Subzone ( Globotruncana lapparenti s.s. Zonule to Rugotruncana subpennyi Zonule). Archaeoglobigerina blowi Subzone = early Taylorian (early Campanian); Globotruncana elevata Subzone = late Taylorian (late Campanian); and Rugotruncana subcircumnodifer Subzone = early Navarroan (early Maestrichtian). (6) The Globotruncana contusa — stuartiformis Assemblage Zone: Globotruncana gansseri Subzone to Abathomphalus mayaroensis Subzone. Middle to late Navarroan (middle to late Maestrichtian). This system of zonation is based (1) on the association of diagnostic taxa at given stratigraphic horizons; (2) the range zones and concurrent range zones of the various taxa; (3) the relative abundance of important taxa at various stratigraphic horizons; and (4) the phylogeny and evolution of Upper Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera. It has become established through the analysis of more than 1000 fossiliferous samples from the surface and sub-surface in both the western part of the Gulf Coast region and in the Caribbean region. Where possible, samples were collected within the framework of measured sections of the lithic units under study. Samples for planktonic foraminifera were collected as far south in the western Gulf Coast region as the approximate latitude of Tampico, México (22° north latitude) and as far north as Brownstown, Sevier County, Arkansas (34° north latitude). At a given stratigraphic horizon, such as the Globotruncana elevata Subzone, there are few species of planktonic foraminifera that do not occur in both the Tethyan faunal province and southern part of the Boreal faunal province. In most cases planktonic species that do not occur in both areas are new species, whose stratigraphic and geographic distribution are yet unknown. The present study indicates that the above-mentioned system of zonation is applicable at the zonule level at least as far north as the latitude of Brownstown, Arkansas. Furthermore, Olsson’s (1964) work in New Jersey and investigations in progress in California by the writer, Douglas, and others suggest that the system of zonation introduced here can be applied at the subzone level as far as 40° north latitude in eastern North America and as far as 34° north latitude in western North America. One of the chief by-products of this study is the creation of a regional correlation chart for the Upper Cretaceous of the western Gulf Coast region that is based on planktonic-foraminiferal zonation. Accurate biostratigraphic dating of lithic units in eastern México utilizing planktonic foraminifera indicates that a number of formational units are time transgressive from north to south. Units like the San Felipe Formation and Agua Nueva Formation are considerably older in northern México near Monterrey than they are in southern México near Tampico. The present study has yielded few radical changes in the dating of lithic units in Texas and Arkansas previously established on the basis of megafossils (Stephenson and others, 1942). Notable among these changes are Navarroan ages for the Upson Clay and San Miguel Formation of the Rio Grande area of Texas (approximate latitude of Eagle Pass) and all, but perhaps, the lowermost part of the Marlbrook Marl of Arkansas. Correlation with the type-European Upper Cretaceous stages is rendered difficult (1) by the imprecise and often obsolete definition of the stages in their type areas and (2) by a lack of accurate data concerning the stratigraphic distribution of planktonic foraminifera in the type sections of the stages. The first of these problems affects all Upper Cretaceous biostratigraphy irregardless of the group of organisms used for correlation. It can perhaps only be solved by an international stratigraphic commission chosen to modernize the definition of the European stages. The second problem can be solved by detailed sampling of strata included in the type sections of each European stage for planktonic foraminifera. Until a detailed reanalysis of the majority of the type-European stages is made, the writer prefers to use North American stage names — particularly those of the standard Gulf Coast section. European stage names are used in this report only in a tentative way. The Eaglefordian Stage of the standard Gulf Coast Upper Cretaceous section has been subdivided into 3 new substages: (1) the Lozierian; (2) the Bocian; and (3) the Sycamorian. The Boquillas Formation in Val Verde and Terrell Counties, Texas, has been subdivided into a lower unit termed the Rock Pens Member and an upper unit termed the Langtry Member. The terms Ateo Chalk and Bruceville Chalk Marl , first used informally by Durham (1957), have been formally introduced here.