1-20 OF 3374 RESULTS FOR

Bishop method

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2016
GSA Bulletin (2016) 128 (9-10): 1423–1438.
... for characterizing the development of fracture networks during weathering? In the first part of the paper, the geological context of Bishop Creek site is described in terms of glacial deposits and weathering, as well as the sampling strategy. Second, in order to detect fractures, XRCT and 14 C-PMMA methods...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 November 1977
Geology (1977) 5 (11): 648–650.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 November 1977
Geology (1977) 5 (11): 650.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 1976
Geology (1976) 4 (10): 587–590.
...Glen A. Izett; Charles W. Naeser Abstract The zircon fission-track age of a sample of air-fall pumice of the Bishop Tuff (Pleistocene) of eastern California is 0.74 ± 0.05 m.y. This age is within the precision limits of the currently accepted age of the Bishop Tuff, about 0.7 m.y. Geological...
Image
LEM slope stability anal., Bishop method, stabilized landslide no. 16, FoS = 1.58.
Published: 08 November 2019
Figure 10. LEM slope stability anal., Bishop method, stabilized landslide no. 16, FoS = 1.58.
Image
Bishop Method
Published: 01 December 2016
Fig. 13. Bishop Method
Image
Bishop Method
Published: 01 December 2016
Fig.18. Bishop Method
Image
Bishop Method
Published: 01 December 2016
Fig.23. Bishop Method
Image
Sensitivity analysis using simplified Bishop method that compares slope stability and the friction angle of the deep failure zone in Domain D, with and without the effect of the confined aquifer.
Published: 01 November 2011
Figure 15. Sensitivity analysis using simplified Bishop method that compares slope stability and the friction angle of the deep failure zone in Domain D, with and without the effect of the confined aquifer.
Image
The Simplified Bishop’s method (Bishop, 1955) (a) Slices of the soil above failure plane, (b) Effect of the forces on the side of a particular slide
Published: 01 February 2017
Fig. 3. The Simplified Bishop’s method ( Bishop, 1955 ) (a) Slices of the soil above failure plane, (b) Effect of the forces on the side of a particular slide
Image
An analyzed cut slope: (10) Bishop’s method, circular slip surface). (11) Bishop’s method, auto slip surface. (12) Simplified Bishop’s method, path slip surface. (13) Corrected Janbu’s method, circular slip surface. (14) Corrected Janbu’s method, auto slip surface. (15) Corrected Janbu’s method, path slip surface
Published: 01 June 2013
Figs10-15. An analyzed cut slope: (10) Bishop’s method, circular slip surface). (11) Bishop’s method, auto slip surface. (12) Simplified Bishop’s method, path slip surface. (13) Corrected Janbu’s method, circular slip surface. (14) Corrected Janbu’s method, auto slip surface. (15
Image
Landslide accumulation stability calculation results of profile 2# by simplified Bishop method. (a) Natural condition by simplified Bishop method. (b) Rainstorm condition by simplified Bishop method. (c) Sudden drop from normal to dead water level by simplified Bishop method. (d) Natural condition by M-P method. (e) Rainstorm condition by M-P method. (f) Sudden drop from normal to dead water level by M-P method.
Published: 19 January 2022
Figure 15 Landslide accumulation stability calculation results of profile 2# by simplified Bishop method. (a) Natural condition by simplified Bishop method. (b) Rainstorm condition by simplified Bishop method. (c) Sudden drop from normal to dead water level by simplified Bishop method. (d
Image
Variation of base cohesion and shear stress w.r.t slices (16) Simplified Bishop’s method, circular slip surface. (17) corrected Janbu’s method, circular slip surface. (18) Simplified Bishop’s method, auto refine slip surface. (19) corrected Janbu’s method, auto refine slip surface. (20) Simplified Bishop’s method, path slip surface. (21) corrected Janbu’s method, path slip surface.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figs.16-21. Variation of base cohesion and shear stress w.r.t slices (16) Simplified Bishop’s method, circular slip surface. (17) corrected Janbu’s method, circular slip surface. (18) Simplified Bishop’s method, auto refine slip surface. (19) corrected Janbu’s method, auto refine slip
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2021
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2021) 97 (5): 513–519.
.... Based on the test results, static slope stability analysis using Modified Bishop method and dynamic slope stability analysis using Simplified Newmark method were carried out to find out factor of safety of the slopes which is used to derive the slope stability assessment of the study area. The landslide...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1987
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (1987) xxiv (4): 523–536.
... the Simplified Bishop Method of Slices. Based on stability analyses, an embankment containing three lifts, each 50 ft high and placed at 2.5 to 1 slopes, has been recommended. The proposed embankment design also includes plans for diversion drainage. © 1987 Association of Engineering Geologists 1987 ...
Image
Comparison between the UBA method and tilt derivative method on the Bishop model. (a) Three-class clustering in the space domain of the UBA method. (b) Boundaries identification on the Bishop model: the white lines indicate the transition between the yellow and the blue class obtained using the UBA method. (c) Tilt derivative of the data shown in Figure 6a. (d) Boundaries identification on the Bishop model: the white lines indicate the zero values of the tilt derivative.
Published: 10 April 2023
Figure 9. Comparison between the UBA method and tilt derivative method on the Bishop model. (a) Three-class clustering in the space domain of the UBA method. (b) Boundaries identification on the Bishop model: the white lines indicate the transition between the yellow and the blue class obtained
Image
Multiridge geometric method applied to the Bishop model along the profile shown in Figure 8. (a) Total field anomaly and its second vertical derivative at ground level. (b) Vertical section of the upward continuation of the total field (altitudes 0–10km with 0.2-km vertical steps). (c) Vertical section of the upward continuation of the second vertical derivative of the total field with types I, II, and III ridges (red, yellow, and white lines, respectively). Ridges converge to the sources of anomalies A (x=100km), B (x=202km), and C (x=320km). Values χ1, χ2, and χ3 are the magnetic susceptibilities of the different basement blocks.
Published: 30 June 2009
Figure 9. Multiridge geometric method applied to the Bishop model along the profile shown in Figure 8 . (a) Total field anomaly and its second vertical derivative at ground level. (b) Vertical section of the upward continuation of the total field (altitudes 0 – 10 km with 0.2
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2013
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2013) 81 (6): 804–812.
...Figs10-15. An analyzed cut slope: (10) Bishop’s method, circular slip surface). (11) Bishop’s method, auto slip surface. (12) Simplified Bishop’s method, path slip surface. (13) Corrected Janbu’s method, circular slip surface. (14) Corrected Janbu’s method, auto slip surface. (15...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Bishop’s simplified method of slices for the analysis of circular failure in slopes.
Published: 01 June 2013
Fig.7. Bishop’s simplified method of slices for the analysis of circular failure in slopes.
Image
Comparison of terracing of the Bishop magnetic field along a south−north profile at x=83.2  km. (a) SGC and k-means clustering methods. (b) Kuwahara filters of the Bishop magnetic field with different window sizes. (c) Kuwahara filtering of the clustered data.
Published: 26 June 2018
Figure 8. Comparison of terracing of the Bishop magnetic field along a south−north profile at x = 83.2    km . (a) SGC and k -means clustering methods. (b) Kuwahara filters of the Bishop magnetic field with different window sizes. (c) Kuwahara filtering of the clustered data.