Abstract In NW Spitsbergen, the infill of a large Old Red Sandstone (ORS) basin was affected by the Svalbardian deformation shortly after the sedimentation of the uppermost ORS units. In the Billefjorden area, along the eastern margin of the basin, folded and thrust-faulted Devonian deposits are unconformably overlain by undeformed Carboniferous clastic sediments and platform carbonate deposits. To re-examine the age of the Svalbardian deformation, samples for palynological investigations were taken from the youngest deformed ORS strata and the oldest post-Svalbardian sediments. The results of palynological investigations show that the folded and thrust-faulted uppermost ORS unit, the Plantekløfta member of the Mimerdalen Formation (Andrée Land Group), is Late Famennian in age. The lowermost undeformed and unconformably overlying post-ORS unit, the Triungen member of the Hørbyebreen Formation (Billefjorden Group), is ?Late Tournaisian to Viséan but not Famennian in age. Thus, the compressional west-directed folding and thrusting of the Svalbardian deformation took place after Late Famennian and before Late Tournaisian time.

Abstract In NW Spitsbergen, the Late Silurian to Late Devonian infill of an Old Red Sandstone (ORS) basin was affected by west-vergent folding and west-directed thrusting during the Early Carboniferous (Tournaisian) Svalbardian deformation. The brittle, predominantly compressional structures of the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt are concentrated along at least five narrow, more or less north–south-trending zones. Three zones are exposed in the Devonian infill of the ORS basin. The involvement of the post-Caledonian ?Late Silurian to Earliest Devonian Viggobreen weathering zone and deposits Early Devonian in two thrust zones within the basement of the western basin margin indicates that the Svalbardian deformation also affected the basement areas along the west coast of NW Spitsbergen. Structures of the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt are exposed within an area at least 100 km wide between the Billefjorden Fault Zone in the east and the west coast of NW Spitsbergen. Therefore, the Svalbardian deformation represents a much more important fold belt than previously recognized. On the basis of the timing, the large extent and the orientation of the fold-and-thrust zones, the Svalbardian Fold-and-Thrust Belt appears to represent the eastern continuation of the Ellesmerian Fold Belt in North Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

Abstract In the Longyearbyen CO 2 laboratory project, it is planned to inject carbon dioxide into a Triassic–Jurassic fractured sandstone–shale succession (Kapp Toscana Group) at a depth of 700–1000 m below the local settlement. The targeted storage sandstones offer moderate secondary porosity and low permeability (unconventional reservoir), whereas water injection tests evidence good lateral fluid flow facilitated by extensive fracturing. Therefore, a detailed investigation of fracture sets/discontinuities and their characteristics have been undertaken, concentrating on the upper reservoir interval (670–706 m). Datasets include drill cores and well logs, and observations of outcrops, that mainly show fracturing but also some disaggregation deformation bands in the sandstones. The fracture distribution has a lithostratigraphical relationship, and can be subdivided into: (A) massive to laminated shaly intervals, offering abundant lower-angle shear fractures; (B) massive to thin-bedded, heterogeneous, mixed silty–shaly intervals, with a predominance of non-systematic, pervasive bed-confined fractures; and (C) massive to laminated, medium- to thick-bedded, fine- to coarse-grained sandstones with a lower frequency of mostly steep fractures. These domains represent pseudo-geomechanical units characterized by specific fracture sets and fracture intensity, with indicated relationships between the bed thickness and fracture intensity, and with domains separated along bedding interfaces. We discuss the impact of these lithostructural domains on the fluid flow pathways in the heterolithic storage unit.

Abstract The Late Silurian?–Devonian fluvial deposits of northern Spitsbergen were deposited on basement with Caledonian and earlier metamorphic ages in which two distinct terranes are recognized (Biskayerhalvøya and Krossfjorden). These form part of the central of three major terranes in Svalbard, assembled during the Caledonian Orogeny. The subsequent geological history of the Svalbard area has been strongly influenced by the north-trending structures which were active as transcurrent fault zones at this time. The unconformable base of the Siktefjellet Group, a Late Silurian?–earliest Devonian sequence of coarse conglomerates and breccias, overlain by fluvial sandstones, is preserved only on the Biskayerhalvøya terrane, and the final juxtaposition of the two terranes (during the Haakonian sinistral strike-slip phase) is interpreted to post-date the deposition of these sediments. The Lochkovian Red Bay Group, a sequence of conglomerates, fluvial sandstones and siltstones, was deposited on both terranes. This has been mapped and correlated throughout the basin exposure, allowing the reconstruction of the tectonic history. Sedimentation was influenced by active faulting during deposition of the oldest Wulffberget Formation, but subsequent deposits show little evidence of this. Deposition was interrupted in latest Lochkovian time by renewed sinistral strike-slip faulting, which broke up an area of the basin into rotating fault blocks, across which about 30 km of extension occurred. This was followed by east–west shortening, which uplifted the Red Bay basin and underlying basement, developing large folds, locally with related thrusting. The Monacobreen phase is defined to involve this deformation. The Andrée Land Group reflects a subsequent renewal of subsidence, and re-establishment of an extensive fluvial basin, occupying an area east of the inverted Red Bay basin. Conglomeratic units that overlie the Red Bay Group are interpreted as the products of the reworking of the uplifted Red Bay basin and its basement. The Latest Devonian–Earliest Carboniferous Svalbardian phase again involved east–west shortening, with limited strike-slip faulting, but it is difficult to discriminate these effects from the Monacobreen phase in the Siktefjellet and Red Bay groups. A review of North Atlantic and Arctic Devonian basins shows that during deposition of the Red Bay and Andrée Land groups, the tectonics of Svalbard was more similar to that of the developing Ellesmerian orogen, than to that of the collapsing Caledonian orogen. A model is proposed that links the repeated extension and shortening seen from Early Devonian time in north Spitsbergen to anticlockwise rotation of the Chukotka–Alaska plate, about an axis near the position of Svalbard during Ellesmerian collision, coupled with minor Caledonian-related strike-slip movement along reactivated fault zones.

Abstract The Norwegian Barents Sea is used as a subsurface laboratory for improving our workflows to retrieve and quantify geomorphic information from seismic data over ancient carbonate systems. Here, we present a novel volume-based seismic interpretation work flow for improved imaging of carbonate features as, for example, subtle build-up complexes and karst. Frequency decomposition followed by RGB-blending is one of the most powerful tools in this work flow for extracting highly detailed information from seismic. A number of seismic surveys in the Norwegian Barents Sea have been revisited and interpreted with this work flow, revealing information on the Upper Paleozoic carbonate systems that otherwise would have remained hidden from interpreter. The newly retrieved seismic geomorphic data is paramount for suggesting new carbonate build-up growth models for the spectacular polygonal build-ups observed on seismic as widespread build-up complexes expanding over thousands of square kilometers. Systematic quantitative shape analyses provide insights on the geometry and self-organization of the polygonal build-ups. Growth is mainly controlled by the paleo-environmental position on the platform, stable slope, or on active fault blocks, reflecting variations in available accommodation space. Two separate phases of polygonal build-up development having distinct geomorphic expression are recognized through time: (1) Subtle features from the volume-based interpretation reveal low-relief Palaeoaplysina —phylloid algae polygonal-elongated ridge systems formed from the warm-water carbonate factory controlling the deposition during the Gipsdalen Group. These subtle systems compete with deposition of more basinal evaporites for space on low angle ramp systems.(2) A second set of polygonal build-ups are recognized in the cooler water carbonate interval of the Bjarmeland Group. These high relief Bryozoan- Tnbiphytes mound complexes have been recognized in previous studies, but our novel seismic geomorphic analysis allows unraveling the internal growth pattern of these spectacular complexes at a seismic scale. Starting as individual nuclei, these mounds amalgamate quickly into ridges that start to form polygonal networks. Subsequently, different cycles of aggradation followed by progradation are recognized in the buildups. Geomorphic quantification proves that basinal settings are dominated by aggradation, whereas slope and platform settings are prone to more progradational development of these polygons.

ABSTRACT Eocene Eurekan deformation has proven to be an enigmatic sequence of tectonic episodes dominated by tectonic plate compression and translation in the circum-Arctic region. Prins Karls Forland on western Spitsbergen is composed of Neoproterozoic siliciclastic metasediments of Laurentian affinity regionally metamorphosed to greenschist facies conditions. A crustal-scale ductile to brittle deformation zone, here named the Bouréefjellet fault zone, contains the amphibolite facies Pinkiefjellet Unit exposed between the lower metamorphic grade, upper structural unit of the Grampianfjella Group and the Scotiafjellet Group in the footwall. A preliminary age for the amphibolite facies metamorphism (ca. 360–355 Ma) indicates Ellesmerian tectonism, unlike other higher-grade basement rocks on Svalbard. Ten metasedimentary rocks from within the fault zone were collected for multiple single-grain fusion 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology, with up to ten muscovite crystals dated per sample. High strain in the rocks is evinced by mylonitic structure, mica fish, and C’ shear zones, and dynamically recrystallized quartz with significant grain bulging and subgrain rotation, indicative of >350 °C temperatures. There is notable dispersion in the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages between samples, with single muscovite dates ranging from ca. 300 Ma to as young as 42 Ma, reflecting recrystallization and resetting of the muscovite. Younger, reproducible ages were obtained from samples that possess chemically homogeneous muscovite, yielding dates of 55–44 Ma for the Eurekan deformation on Prins Karls Forland. We suggest that Ellesmerian structures on Prins Karls Forland were reactivated during the Eocene (commencing as early as 55 Ma) progressing under warm, yet brittle, conditions that continued to 44 Ma. These 40 Ar/ 39 Ar muscovite dates are the first documented Eurekan deformation ages from Svalbard and enable a better understanding of the stages of Eurekan deformation in the Eocene to improve correlations across the circum-Arctic region.

Abstract Palaeogeographic and tectono-stratigraphic considerations in the greater Barents Sea show that the distribution of reservoirs and hydrocarbon source rocks from the Late Palaeozoic to the Palaeogene can be related to three tectonic phases. Firstly, the Palaeozoic Caledonain Orogeny caused uplift to the west, followed by eastward sediment distribution across the shelf, towards carbonate platforms to the east. Secondly the Late Palaeozoic–Mesozoic Uralide Orogeny induced uplift to the east, causing widespread clastic deposition and reversal of the sediment distribution pattern. Thirdly, major Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic rifting and crustal breakup in the western Barents Sea led to the current basin configuration. Reservoir rocks comprise Late Palaeozoic carbonates and spiculites, Mesozoic terrestrial and marine sandstones and Palaeogene deep-water sandstones. Hydrocarbon source rocks range in age from Silurian to Early Cretaceous, and are grouped into three petroleum systems derived from Late Palaeozoic, Triassic and Late Jurassic source rocks. Multiple tectonic episodes caused formation of a variety of trap types, of which extensional fault blocks and gently folded domes have been the most prospective. Volumetric considerations of generated petroleum indicate that charging is not a limiting factor, except in the western margin.