1-20 OF 102 RESULTS FOR

Bethanis Member

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Outcrop images of the Bethanis Member of the Ghaub Formation illustrating the following: (A) and (E) megaboulders of dolomitic stromatolite concentrated in base of Bethanis Member exposed in single outcrop (see Fig. 6) from left (A) to right (E) (note draping [white lines] of thinner-bedded strata onto massive boulder-bearing debris flows), (B) typical exposure of Bethanis Member above massive diamictite (see Fig. 7), (C) upper portion of Bethanis Member as seen in section 6–20 (see Fig. 6) with rounded stromatolite dolostone boulder, (D) coarse amalgamated turbidites interbedded in upper Ghuab Formation below contact of Bethanis Member (see Fig. 8), (F) climbing ripple mudstone and underlying laminated argillaceous mudstones with ice-rafted debris, found within upper most Bethanis Member in section 6–20 (see Fig. 6), (G) upper contact of Bethanis Member with Keilberg cap carbonate, and intervening pink marlstone (see Fig. 7), (H) typical sand turbidite and interbedded argillaceous (dark brown) siltstones with ice-rafted debris (see Fig. 8), (I) conformable upper contact of Bethanis Member with Keilberg cap carbonate as seen in section 6–20 (see Fig. 6), and (J) view of multiple clast dump structures in Bethanis Member.
Published: 01 July 2011
Figure 13. Outcrop images of the Bethanis Member of the Ghaub Formation illustrating the following: (A) and (E) megaboulders of dolomitic stromatolite concentrated in base of Bethanis Member exposed in single outcrop (see Fig. 6 ) from left (A) to right (E) (note draping [white lines] of thinner
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2011
GSA Bulletin (2011) 123 (7-8): 1448–1477.
...Figure 13. Outcrop images of the Bethanis Member of the Ghaub Formation illustrating the following: (A) and (E) megaboulders of dolomitic stromatolite concentrated in base of Bethanis Member exposed in single outcrop (see Fig. 6 ) from left (A) to right (E) (note draping [white lines] of thinner...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Oblique photo mosaic of outcrop of Ghuab Formation and associated Bethanis Member found in drainage (photo taken from adjacent ridge to the northeast). Contacts of lithofacies within Ghaub Formation are indicated, as well as bold lines of the contact with the Keilberg Member of the Maieberg Formation. Location of measured sections is indicated for the fence diagram illustrated below. See Figure 2 for location. Symbol key is as in Figure 5, except for rose diagram of paleocurrents (mean direction given) compiled from all three sections of the Bethanis Member.
Published: 01 July 2011
Figure 8. Oblique photo mosaic of outcrop of Ghuab Formation and associated Bethanis Member found in drainage (photo taken from adjacent ridge to the northeast). Contacts of lithofacies within Ghaub Formation are indicated, as well as bold lines of the contact with the Keilberg Member
Image
Reconnaissance measured sections of the Ghaub Formation on Fransfontein homocline east of district road C35 (Figs. 2A and 2B), corresponding to columns 6–14 in Figure 3. The prograded and semi-amalgamated diamictite complex of the main Ghaub Formation contrasts with lateral continuity and upward fining of the Bethanis Member of the Ghaub Formation. Datum is the top of the main Ghaub Formation. IRD—ice-rafted debris.
Published: 01 July 2011
continuity and upward fining of the Bethanis Member of the Ghaub Formation. Datum is the top of the main Ghaub Formation. IRD—ice-rafted debris.
Image
Schematic of the relative thickness of the Ghaub Formation along a east to west transect, parallel to the slope Refer to Figures 3–8, and 10 for information on the internal character of the Ghuab Formation as summarized in this diagram. Top insets (south to north sections) illustrate sequence of events including (1) trough erosion and deposition of sediment gravity flows above disconformity (basal Ghaub Formation), (2) formation of the diamict wedge, and (3) subsequent ice sheet collapse and draping by the Bethanis Member across the wedge. Generalized from Figure 3.
Published: 01 July 2011
sequence of events including (1) trough erosion and deposition of sediment gravity flows above disconformity (basal Ghaub Formation), (2) formation of the diamict wedge, and (3) subsequent ice sheet collapse and draping by the Bethanis Member across the wedge. Generalized from Figure 3 .
Image
Bedding and clast characteristics of the Ghaub Formation illustrating the following: (A–G, J) dropstone structures and clasts of all sizes, from boulders (A), cobbles (B, J), and pebbles (D, E–G) to granules (C). Note the interlaminated facies of mudstone associated with the ice-rafted debris (IRD) and intervening sandstone barren of ice-rafted debris (B and E). Rare bedding-plane surface in Bethanis Member (I) illustrates “crater” impact features where stones have been eroded out, yet delicate laminations indicative of deformation around the rim are evident (examine detail of largest impact). A rare silicified cobble (H) stands out from weathered diamicite and retains faceted surfaces but lacks surface detail sufficient to identify striations; note carbonate clasts here (H) weather with the matrix. Climbing rippled grainstone and mudstone (D) contain coarse fractions out of equilibrium with bed form and bed-load size fraction, and single large pebble (dropstone) displaces laminations and is draped by migrating (left to right) ripple laminations. Location of images can be found as follows: (A) Figure 6; (B) Figure 8; (C) Figure 10; (D) Figure 6; (E) Figure 6; (F) Figure 10 (and in Hoffman, 2008); (G) Figure 5; (H) Figure 6; (I) Figure 8; and (J) Figure 8. See also supplemental material for additional (microscale) dropstone features (see text footnote 1).
Published: 01 July 2011
debris (IRD) and intervening sandstone barren of ice-rafted debris (B and E). Rare bedding-plane surface in Bethanis Member (I) illustrates “crater” impact features where stones have been eroded out, yet delicate laminations indicative of deformation around the rim are evident (examine detail of largest
Image
Autochthonous columnar sections of the Abenab and basal Tsumeb Subgroups on Bethanis farm and across the asynchronous Soutput growth fault and Toekoms border fault (see Fig. 17 for locations). Vertical datum (0 m) is the base of the Keilberg Member (Karibib Formation, Tsumeb Subgroup), also the base of the Ediacaran Period. Soutput fault slip ended by middle Ghaub Formation time, and Toekoms by Rasthof Formation time. Soutput fault was not structurally inverted, likely because its strike nearly parallels the direction of Damaran shortening. Note localized thickening of the Marinoan Ghaub Formation on Bethanis farm. Lack of incision suggests that Ghaub thickening represents a positive topographic feature, unrelated to the Soutput growth fault. Field number for each section is shown beneath each column.
Published: 01 June 2017
Figure 18. Autochthonous columnar sections of the Abenab and basal Tsumeb Subgroups on Bethanis farm and across the asynchronous Soutput growth fault and Toekoms border fault (see Fig. 17 for locations). Vertical datum (0 m) is the base of the Keilberg Member (Karibib Formation, Tsumeb Subgroup
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 1973
Geology (1973) 1 (2): 69–70.
...Gerard J. B. Germs Abstract Two new fossils, a possible sprigginid worm and a new trace fossil, were discovered in loose shale slabs from the Upper Clastic Member of the Kuibis Formation on a farm, Buchholzbrunn 99, in the Bethanie district, South West Africa. The discovery of a sprigginid worm...
Image
Field photographs from the Fransfontein foreslope (see Figure 9 for locations). (a) Stratified proglacial carbonate (grey limestone and tan dolostone) with ice-rafted debris, grading upward into massive ‘rain-out’ diamictite, Ghaub Formation lower member, section 8. (b) Finely laminated ‘silt-stringer’ within massive diamictite, Ghaub Formation middle member, section 10. The ‘silt-stringers’ are interpreted to have settled from suspension in meltwater puddles beneath grounded ice. (c) Submarine debris flow containing slabs of partially silicified ooid grainstone in the low-stand wedge beneath the Ghaub Formation, Franni-aus Member, section 7. (d) Low-stand wedge (Franni-aus Member) overlain by terrigenous siltstone ‘drift’ of the Ghaub Formation lower member, which grades into massive carbonate diamictite, west end of Bethanis Synclinorium located 58 km southwest of the western terminus of Fransfontein Ridge. The siltstone is the only terrigenous incursion in the Ghaub Formation and is likely derived from erosion of the Narachaams Member in the Duurwater Trough (see Figure 9) or equivalent structure.
Published: 01 December 2005
-stand wedge beneath the Ghaub Formation, Franni-aus Member, section 7. ( d ) Low-stand wedge (Franni-aus Member) overlain by terrigenous siltstone ‘drift’ of the Ghaub Formation lower member, which grades into massive carbonate diamictite, west end of Bethanis Synclinorium located 58 km southwest
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1144/M36.14
EISBN: 9781862394117
... (particularly on Bethanis farm), where the basal stratified interval is composed of siliciclastic siltstone with rare outsize quartz granules. This terrigenous sediment is likely reworked from the Narachaams ( nahr -a-khams) Member (Figs  14.3 b & 14.5), a fine-grained siliciclastic incursion in the upper...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2006
GSA Bulletin (2006) 118 (5-6): 567–588.
..., silt, and clay and generally contain foraminifers. 5. The Uvigerina biofacies characterizes offshore middle neritic paleodepths (>75 m). Miocene lithostratigraphic units in the Bethany Beach core hole include (from oldest to youngest) an unnamed glauconitic clay and clayey glauconite...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (5): 918–942.
.... The thermoluminescence at this locality is very low. Notably higher thermoluminescence is associated with the 10 per cent insoluble contour. Lithologic character and field relations .—The Worland limestone is the main limestone member of the Altamont formation, which has been traced from northeastern Oklahoma...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Columnar sections of the Abenab and lower Tsumeb subgroups on the distal foreslope of Fransfontein homocline and the Bethanis inlier (inset), located 50 km WSW of section 1. Datum in columns 1–24 is the top of the Narachaams Member, datum in columns 24–33 is the top of the “grainstone prism,” and columns 33–37 are aligned to depict the rise of the upper foreslope. The overall depiction is intended to portray inferred paleotopography in a longitudinal section of the distal foreslope at the end of the Ghaub glaciation. Column 7 represents Fig. 5, column 9 = Fig. 6, column 14 = Fig. 7, column 15 = Fig. 8, columns 16–18 = Fig. 10, and column 30 is in supplemental material (see text footnote 1). The “grainstone prism” was a major submarine drainage system localized in a paleovalley carved during the Chuos glaciation, which was occupied by a transverse ice-stream that cut the Duurwater trough during the Ghaub glaciation. IRD—ice-rafted debris.
Published: 01 July 2011
Figure 3. Columnar sections of the Abenab and lower Tsumeb subgroups on the distal foreslope of Fransfontein homocline and the Bethanis inlier (inset), located 50 km WSW of section 1. Datum in columns 1–24 is the top of the Narachaams Member, datum in columns 24–33 is the top of the “grainstone
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1921
AAPG Bulletin (1921) 5 (2): 298–310.
... incomplete. Detailed study of the Bethany district emphasized this fact and led to the development of the section herewith presented. The data contained in this article were first used by the writer in July, 1920, in private reports, and are entirely the results of personal study. From the log of the W...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 October 2013
Geosphere (2013) 9 (5): 1286–1302.
... sequences in Maryland and Virginia, forming the basis for the East Coast Diatom Zones (ECDZ). Integrated study of both planktonic and shallow water diatoms in Hole M29A as well as in onshore sequences in Maryland (the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company well) and Delaware (the Ocean Drilling Program Bethany...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1923
AAPG Bulletin (1923) 7 (4): 362–369.
..., if separate members are to be distinguished in this formation, it seems preferable to the writer to retain the term “Nacatoch” for the sandy productive member in consideration of the fact that Veatch, 1 has already restricted that term to the sandy beds as differentiated from Hill’s “Washington greensand...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1969
AAPG Bulletin (1969) 53 (5): 1058–1074.
... to be a mound, but they may represent extensions of mound complexes in the subsurface. Swope Formation. —The Bethany Falls Limestone Member contains an algal-mound complex composed of up to 30 ft of sparry algal calcilutite in southern Neosho County, Kansas. In western Bourbon County the mound complex...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1936
AAPG Bulletin (1936) 20 (7): 975–978.
... in this area, namely, Bethany, Waskom, Long Lake, and Cayuga. At present, nearly all of the oil has been produced from the Woodbine sand, which is the basal member of the Upper Cretaceous. Some of the gas, in the Waskom and Bethany fields, is produced from the Lower Cretaceous. Another very important...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 25 September 2018
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2018) 88 (9): 1114–1131.
... pore space. An older analog is the Pennsylvanian Bethany Falls Limestone Member (Swope Formation) and Mound Valley Formation (equivalent to the oil- and gas-bearing K zone in the subsurface), below the Dewey. In both the subsurface of western Kansas and outcrops in eastern Kansas, these strata...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 01 August 2023
Paleobiology (2023) 49 (3): f1–f2.
... using the Permian Triassic marine invertebrate fossil record Bethany J. Allen, Matthew E. Clapham, Erin E. Saupe, Paul B. Wignall, Daniel J. Hill and Alexander M. Dunhill 509 A downcore increase in time averaging is the null expectation from the transit of death assemblages through a mixed layer Adam...