1-20 OF 24 RESULTS FOR

Bayport Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Published: 10 May 2018
DOI: 10.1130/2018.2531(14)
EISBN: 9780813795317
... and stacking patterns, stratigraphic contacts, and well-established regional geologic relations of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian strata. The Bayport formation is composed of seven distinct primary depositional lithofacies reflecting open-marine and shoal-water to restricted peritidal environments, typically...
FIGURES | View All (12)
... of the Michigan Basin relative to other more extensively studied, North American cratonic interior basin successions in the Illinois and Appalachian basins. Stratigraphic relationships are evaluated in the Michigan, Bayport, and Saginaw formations on the basis of sedimentary lithofacies, contact relationships...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.1130/SPE256-p203
... equivalent Bedford and Ellsworth Shales (all Upper Devonian to Kinderhookian); Berea Sandstone (Kinderhookian); Sunbury Shale (Kinderhookian); Coldwater Shale (Kinderhookian to Osagian); Marshall Sandstone (Osagian); Michigan Formation (Osagian to Meramecian); and Bayport Limestone (Meramecian...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1944
AAPG Bulletin (1944) 28 (2): 173–196.
... the next younger formation, the Bayport, is absent. The thinnest section of the Michigan underneath the Bayport is along the top of the Porter anticline in Secs. 2 and 12, T. 13 N., R. 2 W., where the thickness of the formation ranges from 280 to 300 feet. However, at this particular point, as the thinning...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (11): 1950–1982.
.... The lower 50 feet of the formation is marked by the presence of red dolomitic or calcareous shale. The thickness of the Coldwater in the Buckeye field is 1,020 feet. In the drilling of the Buckeye field practically no samples were collected in this part of the section so that knowledge of the Bayport...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1938
AAPG Bulletin (1938) 22 (4): 393–415.
.... It is composed of gray, black, and green shales and white sandstones. It also contains local coal seams and here and there limestone lentils. Relatively few complete sets of samples from this formation are available, but from them it appears that heterogeneity is its outstanding characteristic. Bayport...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (11): 2324–2356.
... formation. Hard (1938 , p. 137) reports that, below the dolomite or shale, quartzose sand is encountered. Analysis of Unit C is made only where the Bayport formation is overlain by Pennsylvanian rocks, so that a minimum of error is introduced because of erosion. The Berea thins westward...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2004
GSA Bulletin (2004) 116 (1-2): 3–15.
... the direct groundwater discharge estimate to ∼3% but summarized that groundwater discharge indirectly entering Lake Michigan via streams accounted for 31% of the total hydrologic input to the lake. If this groundwater discharge is derived from formations containing saline water or brine, which are known...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1988
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1988) 36 (1): 1–8.
... rates of sedimentation in the Michigan Basin in the early Paleozoic (which presumably remained uniform into the late Paleozoic), and extrapolation f regional dip of the Mississippian Bayport Formation to the hinge tMichigan Department ofNatural Resources, Geological Survey Division, P.O. Box 30028...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (2): 130–136.
... American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved. 1984 American Association of Petroleum Geologists Figure 4 Extrapolation of regional dip of Bayport Limestone out to northern hinge line of Michigan basin. (Data from Western Michigan University, 1981 ). Recent...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1999
GSA Bulletin (1999) 111 (2): 177–188.
..., and gypsum and/or anhydrite (Westjohn and Weaver, 1996). The Bayport Limestone and Parma Sandstone generally overlie the Michigan Formation, forming a hydraulically connected, continuous unit that covers most of the basin; these two units form the Parma-Bayport aquifer. The Grand River Saginaw aquifer...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1961
AAPG Bulletin (1961) 45 (4): 471–483.
... Devonian or early Kinderhookian age in central Iowa (Aplington Dolomite on Sheffield Shale), but it is at progressively younger horizons toward the east, rising across the Kinderhookian and Osagian and well into the Meramecan in Michigan (Bayport Limestone on Michigan Formation). A megagroup may...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (12): 2150–2162.
... section, in which sea-level has been used as the datum plane, shows the entire group of formations from the Traverse limestone to the surface. It illustrates the loss by outcrop of the Michigan series, Bayport, and Marshall formations progressively toward the southwest, as well as the thinning...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2008
Journal of Paleontology (2008) 82 (3): 511–527.
... ). Although some of these deposits were obviously formed in shallow water environments, such as the Pitkin Formation of Arkansas, many can be attributed to lower energy, deeper water environments of deposition near or at the shelf edge ( Sutherland and Manger, 1979 ). The Fayetteville and Moorefield...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2006
AAPG Bulletin (2006) 90 (11): 1787–1801.
...John A. Luczaj; William B. Harrison, III; Natalie Smith Williams Abstract The Middle Devonian Dundee Formation is the most prolific oil-producing unit in the Michigan Basin, with more than 375 million bbl of oil produced to date. Reservoir types in the Dundee Formation can be fracture controlled...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 04 April 2024
GSA Bulletin (2024) 136 (9-10): 4285–4300.
...Jonathan J. Kolak; David T. Long Abstract The Michigan Basin is composed of geological formations that contain brines and evaporites, and solutes from these geological sources have affected benthic sediment pore-water chemistry in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron). We hypothesize that there exists similar...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1938
AAPG Bulletin (1938) 22 (2): 129–174.
... sands and the relation of gas production in the Michigan formation to oil production in the Dundee, where the two (on the same general structure) are not directly superposed. The term “stray sand” was first applied to the gas-producing stratum in the Clare field because the sand was believed...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1995
AAPG Bulletin (1995) 79 (1): 49–69.
... at 205 Ma; Beaumont et al., 1988 ) and, to a lesser extent, the post-Meramecian (post-Bayport limestones at 325 Ma; Harrell et al., 1991 ). These periods of erosion essentially postdate illite formation (367–322 Ma). In addition, if the meteoric fluids were introduced into the St. Peter Sandstone from...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1938
AAPG Bulletin (1938) 22 (11): 1519–1559.
..., produces some oil in eastern Ohio. TABLE II APPROXIMATE THICKNESS OF FORMATIONS IN FEET Formation Michigan Ohio Indiana Illinois Kentucky Tennessee Pennsylvanian 0– 570 0–2,200 0–1,175 0–2,260 0–3,000 0–4,500 Chester 0 0 0– 650 0–1,515 0–1,000 0– 340...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 02 April 2020
Geosphere (2020) 16 (3): 817–843.
.... A sample from the Upper Mississippian Parma Sandstone member of the upper part of the Bayport Formation ( Towne et al., 2018 ) in the southern part of the Michigan basin ( Figs. 1 , 2 , and 3A ; Table 1 ) has dominant ages of 1224–931 Ma with a dominant mode of 1054 Ma and a secondary mode of 1142 Ma...
FIGURES | View All (16)