1-20 OF 1218 RESULTS FOR

Battle Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 25 January 2019
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 56 (10): 1041–1051.
...David A. Eberth; Sandra L. Kamo The Battle Formation (BFm) is a widespread Upper Cretaceous marker horizon in western Canada that records a time of low sediment input and marks the boundary between the Edmontonian and Lancian land-vertebrate ages. Here, we present the first high-precision U–Pb CA...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 21 December 2018
PALAIOS (2018) 33 (12): 525–534.
... on the occurrence of numerous freshwater diatom specimens and species from the Battle Formation, an extensive freshwater locality in western Canada that formed in the Late Cretaceous approximately 66.5 million years ago (Ma). The formation represents one of the oldest known localities worldwide harboring definitive...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2011
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2011) 59 (3): 195–206.
...Benjamin Hathway Abstract The Maastrichtian Battle Formation forms an important stratigraphic marker in the nonmarine Upper Cretaceous succession across a wide area of west-central Alberta. This mudstone-dominated unit, with a maximum thickness of 18.0 m, is distinctive both at outcrop and in down...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Battle Formation at Knudsen’s Farm. (A) Distribution of the Battle Formation (BFm) in Alberta. Field area location indicated by the star. C, Calgary; D, Drumheller; E, Edmonton; GP, Grande Prairie; RDR, Red Deer River; SCrk, Strawberry Creek locality. (B) Google Earth satellite image (2010) of field area at Knudsen’s Farm west of Red Deer River. The red dot indicates the sampling location. The red line indicates semicontinuous exposure of BFm at this locality. The white dotted line indicates the path of the measured section illustrated in Fig. 2. The measured section extends from the maximum flooding surface (mfs) of the Drumheller Marine Tongue (DMT) up-section to just above the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. m, metres; N, north. (C) BFm and Whitemud Member exposures at Griffith’s Farm directly across the Red Deer River from Knudsen’s Farm. Note scour-fill (sf) at the base of the BFm. Photograph taken in 2003. (D) Closeup of weathered Battle bentonite horizon (dashed line marks the top) above the Kneehills “tuff”, a siliceous concretion horizon throughout the region. Lens cap 6 cm. Photograph taken in 2006.
Published: 25 January 2019
Fig. 1. Battle Formation at Knudsen’s Farm. (A) Distribution of the Battle Formation (BFm) in Alberta. Field area location indicated by the star. C, Calgary; D, Drumheller; E, Edmonton; GP, Grande Prairie; RDR, Red Deer River; SCrk, Strawberry Creek locality. (B) Google Earth satellite image
Image
Antler sequence host rocks. (A) Battle Formation conglomerate in drill hole CLT-886, 0.24 g/t Au. (B) Edna Mountain Formation lithic sandstone in drill hole CLT-954, Au below detection limit. (C) Edna Mountain Formation quartz sandstone in drill hole CLT-1080, 0.34 g/t Au. (D) Edna Mountain Formation siltstone in drill hole CLT-886, 7.03 g/t Au. (E) Plane-polarized photomicrograph of Edna Mountain Formation lithic sandstone with late, open-space-filling barite, 0.26 g/t Au. (F) Cross-polarized photomicrograph of E. Abbreviations: Qz = quartz.
Published: 01 August 2019
Fig. 6. Antler sequence host rocks. (A) Battle Formation conglomerate in drill hole CLT-886, 0.24 g/t Au. (B) Edna Mountain Formation lithic sandstone in drill hole CLT-954, Au below detection limit. (C) Edna Mountain Formation quartz sandstone in drill hole CLT-1080, 0.34 g/t Au. (D) Edna
Image
Stratigraphic context for the Battle Formation (BFm) at Knudsen’s Farm in the Red Deer River valley. The left column depicts the thickness and formal subdivisions of the Horseshoe Canyon, Battle, and lower Scollard formations (data from Eberth and Braman 2012). The right column depicts a composite of two measured sections at and adjacent to the Knudsen’s Farm locality. Outcrop at Knudsen’s Farm extends stratigraphically from the base of the Tolman Member of the Horseshoe Canyon Formation upward to just above the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. The stratigraphic position of the Battle bentonite is indicated near the top of the formation. B, bentonite; C, Carbon Member; cl, claystone; cong, conglomerate; css, coarse sandstone; D, Drumheller Member; DAE, measured-section field number; fss, fine sandstone; H, Horsethief Member; M, Morrin Member; Ma, megaanum; mss, medium sandstone; sltst, siltstone; SS, sandstone; T, Tolman Member; W and Wmd Mbr., Whitemud Member.
Published: 25 January 2019
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic context for the Battle Formation (BFm) at Knudsen’s Farm in the Red Deer River valley. The left column depicts the thickness and formal subdivisions of the Horseshoe Canyon, Battle, and lower Scollard formations (data from Eberth and Braman 2012 ). The right column depicts
Image
Isopach map of the Battle Formation in west-central Alberta with overlay of the modern drainage network. Boundaries of contoured area are the mapped top of the Horseshoe Canyon (St. Mary River Formation south of Township 17) and Wapiti formations from Hamilton et al. (1999) to the north and east, and the limit of data distribution. Lower left inset shows the Edson-Whitecourt area in more detail. Locations of cross-sections A–A′, B–B′ and C–C′ (Figs. 6 and 7) are shown.
Published: 01 September 2011
Fig. 5 Isopach map of the Battle Formation in west-central Alberta with overlay of the modern drainage network. Boundaries of contoured area are the mapped top of the Horseshoe Canyon (St. Mary River Formation south of Township 17) and Wapiti formations from Hamilton et al. (1999) to the north
Image
—Basal conglomerate of Battle formation (|Pb) resting with angular unconformity on deformed chert of Valmy formation (Ov), Antler Peak Quadrangle.
Published: 01 December 1958
Fig. 8. —Basal conglomerate of Battle formation (|Pb) resting with angular unconformity on deformed chert of Valmy formation (Ov), Antler Peak Quadrangle.
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1982
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1982) 52 (3): 925–940.
... of the Antler orogenic highlands. Alluvial conglomerates and sandstones of the Lower Atokan (Middle Pennsylvanian) Battle Formation (up to 240 m thick) rest unconformably on folded and faulted lower Paleozoic strata that were deformed by emplacement of the Roberts Mountains allochthon during the Antler orogeny...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1970
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1970) 18 (2): 125–155.
... with the Whitemud and Battle Formations of southeastern Alberta. Together the two units are easily recognized in outcrop and form a marker zone for field mapping; the Battle Formation is readily distinguished also on electric logs of drilled wells and is, therefore, an excellent datum for subsurface correlation...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1983
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1983) 20 (8): 1219–1231.
... of the Battle and Whitemud formations, which overlie in turn the Horseshoe Canyon Formation, the lowest division of the Edmonton Group. Near the top of the Battle Formation is a distinctive and widespread bed of volcanic origin (Kneehills Tuff). The contact of the Battle clay above this bed with the Scollard...
Series: Reviews in Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.5382/rev.20.04
EISBN: 9781629491189
... (A) and trace element concentrations (B, C) along the Target 2 pit transect across the Valmy Formation, quartz monzonite intrusion, and Battle Formation. Samples from fault intersections are marked with an asterisk. Fig. 9. Base metal sulfide minerals at Marigold. (A) Base metal sulfide clot...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
Simplified geological map (modified from Hamilton et al., 1999) showing the distribution of Horseshoe Canyon, Wapiti, Battle and Scollard formation rocks in southern and central Alberta. Breaks in the bold line marking the Battle Formation indicate areas where that formation is considered to be absent. Little down-hole geophysical data is available for the Battle Formation on the Cypress Hills in south-eastern Alberta and that area is not considered further in this study. The location of cored Alberta Geological Survey Edmonton-Calgary Corridor groundwater project well ECC 2008-002 is shown (Riddell et al., 2009).
Published: 01 September 2011
Fig. 1 Simplified geological map (modified from Hamilton et al., 1999 ) showing the distribution of Horseshoe Canyon, Wapiti, Battle and Scollard formation rocks in southern and central Alberta. Breaks in the bold line marking the Battle Formation indicate areas where that formation
Image
Published: 15 September 2010
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic nomenclature, radiometric dates, and paleomagnetochrons of the Edmonton Group. Ba, Battle Formation; W, Whitemud Formation; WB, Whitemud and Battle formations; DMT, Drumheller Marine Tongue; St/Mg, Scollardia trapaformis – Mancicorpus gibbus; T, transition Member; TMP
Journal Article
Published: 09 October 2019
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 57 (10): 1220–1237.
... from the overlying Battle Formation that we dated previously. In its type area, the HCFm ranges in age from 73.1–68.0 Ma. Significant paleoenvironmental and climatic changes are recorded in the formation, including (1) a transition from a warm-and-wet deltaic setting to a cooler, seasonally wet-dry...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1999
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1999) 36 (5): 669–683.
... Formation and demonstrated that most of the stratigraphy above the Battle Formation is assignable to the Ravenscrag Formation. The hole drilled in the Wood Mountain area of Saskatchewan recovered core from the Ravenscrag Formation to the Bearpaw Formation. This core helps explain the difficulty that has...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2000
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2000) 48 (4): 285–306.
...J.F. Lerbekmo; A.R. Sweet Abstract A chronology for Paleocene strata of the Calgary region is developed from the integration of magnetostratigraphy with palynological and mammal zones. Structural reference to the underlying Battle Formation adds stratigraphic control. These strata range in age from...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1970
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1970) 18 (2): 156–165.
...M. A. Carrigy ABSTRACT The nomenclature of the post-Kneehills strata is revised by placing the lower boundary of the Paskapoo Formation at the top of the Kneehills Member (Battle Formation) of the Edmonton Formation in central Alberta. The redefined Paskapoo Formation thus becomes equivalent...
Image
Study area in Alberta. (A) Map of Alberta showing extent of Horseshoe Canyon Formation (yellow shading), Bearpaw Formation (green shading), and Battle Formation (red line). (B) Locations (white dots) of all bentonites dated here. (C) Locations of Horseshoe Canyon Formation bentonites dated here. Base map from Arc GIS 10.7.1. (D) Typical example of weathered and freshly exposed bentonite (overflow parking bentonite, OPB) near the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada. Knife marks the sharp base of the bentonite. Scale bar = 10 cm. ABB, Albertosaurus Bonebed bentonite; BB, Battle bentonite; BFm, Battle Formation; BpB, Bearpaw bentonite; BpFm, Bearpaw Formation; BRG, Belly River Group; HCFm, Horseshoe Canyon Formation; MBB, Morrin Bridge bentonite; OPB, overflow parking bentonite; TRB, Trentham road bentonite. [Colour online.]
Published: 09 October 2019
Fig. 1. Study area in Alberta. (A) Map of Alberta showing extent of Horseshoe Canyon Formation (yellow shading), Bearpaw Formation (green shading), and Battle Formation (red line). (B) Locations (white dots) of all bentonites dated here. (C) Locations of Horseshoe Canyon Formation bentonites
Image
Published: 15 September 2010
) Aquilapollenites reductus Norton, 1965; TMP2008.204.0005; sample 2, slide b, N38/4. From Whitemud and Battle formations and the basal part of Scollard Formation. (E) Aquilapollenites collaris (Tschudy and Leopold) Nichols, 1994; TMP2008.204.0006; sample 9, slide b, U32/0. From basal Scollard Formation. (F