1-20 OF 29 RESULTS FOR

Avedat Group

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1980
Journal of Paleontology (1980) 54 (2): 325–358.
Image
(a) Correlation between the depth to major seismic reflectors and resonance frequency. Dots represent ambient noise measurements. Red points correspond to the top of the Judea group, blue to the base of the Kurkar group, and orange to the base of the Bet Guvrin formation. (Qishon graben). Rectangles represent simulation results (figures are station numbers and peaks marked in Fig. 9). For stations 3–12 the lowest frequency peak is plotted against the depth to the top of the Judea group (black). In stations 6–10, where the Kurkar group overlies the Avedat or Mount Scopus groups, the frequency of the second lowest peak is plotted against the depth to the top Mount Scopus or Avedat groups. (b) Average shear-wave velocities of the sedimentary section as a function of its thickness.
Published: 01 April 2010
graben). Rectangles represent simulation results (figures are station numbers and peaks marked in Fig.  9 ). For stations 3–12 the lowest frequency peak is plotted against the depth to the top of the Judea group (black). In stations 6–10, where the Kurkar group overlies the Avedat or Mount Scopus groups
Image
Images of the mapped (A–B) early Miocene Hordos, (C–D) late Miocene Bira, (E–F) late Miocene–early Pliocene Gesher, (G–H) early Pleistocene Wadi Malih, and (I–J) late Pleistocene Lisan Formations. Avedat Group (in panel A) is of Eocene age. Note the Early Cretaceous red–brown sandstone gravel in the Wadi Malih conglomerate (panel H). Panel D shows the location of sample SM1 (near the hammer), which is dated to late Miocene Bira Formation age.
Published: 07 September 2022
Figure 4. Images of the mapped (A–B) early Miocene Hordos, (C–D) late Miocene Bira, (E–F) late Miocene–early Pliocene Gesher, (G–H) early Pleistocene Wadi Malih, and (I–J) late Pleistocene Lisan Formations. Avedat Group (in panel A) is of Eocene age. Note the Early Cretaceous red–brown sandstone
Image
Images of the mapped (A–B) early Miocene Hordos, (C–D) late Miocene Bira, (E–F) late Miocene–early Pliocene Gesher, (G–H) early Pleistocene Wadi Malih, and (I–J) late Pleistocene Lisan Formations. Avedat Group (in panel A) is of Eocene age. Note the Early Cretaceous red–brown sandstone gravel in the Wadi Malih conglomerate (panel H). Panel D shows the location of sample SM1 (near the hammer), which is dated to late Miocene Bira Formation age.
Published: 07 September 2022
Figure 4. Images of the mapped (A–B) early Miocene Hordos, (C–D) late Miocene Bira, (E–F) late Miocene–early Pliocene Gesher, (G–H) early Pleistocene Wadi Malih, and (I–J) late Pleistocene Lisan Formations. Avedat Group (in panel A) is of Eocene age. Note the Early Cretaceous red–brown sandstone
Image
 Section AA′ from Gvirtzman et al. (2005) showing the north Sharon graben, which preserves a complete section of the Mount Scopus and Avedat groups and a 600–100 m thick Bet Guvrin (lower Saqiye) section. The faults bounding that graben are detected seismically and mapped in the top Judea Group structural map (Fleischer & Gafsou 2003). They are buried by the undisturbed Quaternary Kurkar Group and possibly also by the Pliocene Yafo Formation that wedges out west of the Pardes Hanna well. Stratigraphic correlation with a nearby outcrop (section BB′) indicates that faulting probably occurred during the Miocene (upper part of the Bet Guvrin Formation).
Published: 01 March 2008
Fig. 9.  Section AA′ from Gvirtzman et al . (2005) showing the north Sharon graben, which preserves a complete section of the Mount Scopus and Avedat groups and a 600–100 m thick Bet Guvrin (lower Saqiye) section. The faults bounding that graben are detected seismically and mapped in the top
Image
Photos show faults that rupture Neogene and Quaternary units. The locations of these images are presented in Figure 3. (A) The relations between the early–middle Miocene Hordos Formation and the major southern boundary fault of the Faria Graben. Note that while the Eocene Avedat Group and the lower part of the Hordos Formation are faulted, the upper part of the Hordos Formation is un-faulted and developed on-lap relations with the fault scarp. Also, the upper calcrete crust of late Miocene–early Quaternary age is not faulted or deformed. These observations indicate that the Faria Graben has been tectonically inactive since the middle Miocene. (B) Image shows part of the Shadmot Mehola Fault (SMF) zone and the ruptured Bira and Wadi Malih Formations. The fault zone is covered by alluvium. (C) Ruptured Bira Formation along the SMF. (D) Ruptured Gesher Formation. The area was later covered by the late Pleistocene Lisan Formation. (E) Ruptured Wadi Malih and Lisan Formations near and east of the Jordan River. (F) Deformed Lisan sediments near the Mehola Fault, where the Wadi Malih channel changes its flow direction from north to west.
Published: 07 September 2022
Figure 5. Photos show faults that rupture Neogene and Quaternary units. The locations of these images are presented in Figure 3 . (A) The relations between the early–middle Miocene Hordos Formation and the major southern boundary fault of the Faria Graben. Note that while the Eocene Avedat Group
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2011
Journal of Micropalaeontology (2011) 30 (2): 129–139.
... as palaeoenvironmental indicators. For each slide, a total of 300 nannoforms was counted, from 10 slides with 3 repetitions. Error of counting was 5%. The counting emphasized a number of selected nannofossil groups. Figure 3 shows two calculations of sedimentation rates in the Avedat Plateau: the total...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2000
AAPG Bulletin (2000) 84 (7): 997–1014.
... therein). This major lithostratigraphic interval is also of interest for regional groundwater exploitation. Because of its typically impermeable lithologies, the Mt. Scopus Group is considered to be an aquiclude separating the underlying Judea and overlying Avedat groups, both important regional aquifers...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2008
Journal of the Geological Society (2008) 165 (2): 563–578.
...Fig. 9.  Section AA′ from Gvirtzman et al . (2005) showing the north Sharon graben, which preserves a complete section of the Mount Scopus and Avedat groups and a 600–100 m thick Bet Guvrin (lower Saqiye) section. The faults bounding that graben are detected seismically and mapped in the top...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2010
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2010) 100 (2): 733–750.
... graben). Rectangles represent simulation results (figures are station numbers and peaks marked in Fig.  9 ). For stations 3–12 the lowest frequency peak is plotted against the depth to the top of the Judea group (black). In stations 6–10, where the Kurkar group overlies the Avedat or Mount Scopus groups...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1989
Journal of the Geological Society (1989) 146 (5): 746–748.
... Relationships in the ‘Avedat Group’ (Eocene) in the Northern Negev, Israel Israel Journal of Earth Sciences 1979 28 47 69 Boscence D. W. J. Peryt T. The Occurrence and Ecology of Recent Rhodoliths–A Review Coated Grains 1983 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer–Verlag 225 242 Boscence...
Image
Spectral ratios of the Fourier series shown in Figure 8. Black curves show the amplification of simulated horizontal acceleration relative to the no-basin models. Solid circles are the resonance peaks related to the seismic reflectors formed by the top Judea group and the base Kurkar-top Avedat or Mount Scopus groups (frequency-depth correlation in Fig. 10). Blue curves are the ratios between the horizontal and the vertical components of the basin simulation (H/V). Red curves are H/V spectral rations from ambient noise measurements conducted at nearby sites. Differences and similarities between curves are discussed in the text. Note that the large amplification of long periods in Station 13, resulting from division of two very small numbers, is misleading. It represents very weak surface waves that leak from the basin edge into the bedrock and are totally missing in the no-basin model.
Published: 01 April 2010
-top Avedat or Mount Scopus groups (frequency-depth correlation in Fig.  10 ). Blue curves are the ratios between the horizontal and the vertical components of the basin simulation (H/V). Red curves are H/V spectral rations from ambient noise measurements conducted at nearby sites. Differences
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2010
Journal of the Geological Society (2010) 167 (4): 731–749.
... procedure resulted in the vertically restored interface of the top of the Avedat Group, which is considered to represent the elevation at Middle Eocene time, as well as the restored interfaces for the top of the crystalline basement and the Moho boundary during the same period (Fig. 7 ). Fig. 7...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 01 April 2011
Lithosphere (2011) 3 (2): 95–109.
..., 1968 ; Garfunkel, 1988 ). The overlying Avedat Group was deposited in the early to middle Eocene when the sea had reached as far as Egypt and part of Arabia ( Garfunkel, 1988 ). The late Eocene–Pliocene Saqiye Group, which is the focus of this study, is mainly composed of greenish to gray shales...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 07 September 2022
GSA Bulletin (2023) 135 (5-6): 1310–1326.
...Figure 4. Images of the mapped (A–B) early Miocene Hordos, (C–D) late Miocene Bira, (E–F) late Miocene–early Pliocene Gesher, (G–H) early Pleistocene Wadi Malih, and (I–J) late Pleistocene Lisan Formations. Avedat Group (in panel A) is of Eocene age. Note the Early Cretaceous red–brown sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2003
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2003) 33 (3): 219–236.
... region, Benjamini (1980 , 1995) recognized the Planorotalites palmerae Total Range Zone in the early Middle Eocene ’Avedat Group distributed in southern Israel. However, other studies did not use the LAD of Planorotalites palmerae as a zonal boundary in the Early Eocene zonation due...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.1144/SP466.3
EISBN: 9781786203786
... (Mount Scopus Group). Most of the Negev caves are within late Cretaceous, Cenomanian–Turonian carbonates. Eocene limestones (Avedat Group) contain additional karst features, such as unconfined chamber caves. Fig. 1. Location map showing Ashalim Cave in the NW Negev Desert, Israel...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2004
Micropaleontology (2004) 50 (4): 397–400.
... . Radial Foraminifera; morphometrics and evolution . Verhandelingen Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Natuurkunde , 41 : 1 – 242 . FERMONT , W. J. J. , 1982 . Discocyclinidae from Ein Avedat (Israel) . Utrecht Micropaleontogical Bulletin , 27 : 1 – 173...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 August 2013
PALAIOS (2013) 28 (8): 491–508.
... features ( Figs. 3 – 5 ). They were combined into facies associations ( Table 1 ) and named for their interpreted carbonate depositional environment. The range of features present in these facies groups is characteristic of mixed carbonate-siliciclastic paleoenvironments ranging from nearshore to offshore...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 07 October 2015
Journal of Micropalaeontology (2016) 35 (1): 79–89.
.... 1980 . Plankton foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Avedat Group (Eocene in the northern Negev, Israel) . Journal of Paleontology , 54 , 325 – 358 . Berger W.H. Vincent E. 1986 . Deep-sea carbonates: reading the carbon isotope signal . Geologische Rundschau , 75 , 249 – 269...
FIGURES | View All (5)