1-20 OF 1306 RESULTS FOR

Athabasca Group

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 25 June 2015
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2015) 52 (10): 903–920.
... these, a prominent northeast-trending ridge is situated close to the McArthur River – Key Lake deposits trend. Structural interpretation and cross-sections illustrate that the topographic features that have been documented in previous studies are a function of three principal factors: ( i ) pre-Athabasca group...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2006
Clays and Clay Minerals (2006) 54 (3): 295–313.
...Philippe Kister; Emmanuel Laverret; David Quirt; Michel Cuney; Patricia Patrier Mas; Daniel Beaufort; Patrice Bruneton Abstract The spatial distribution of the dominant matrix minerals present in the middle-Proterozoic Athabasca Group sandstone (kaolin, illite, sudoite, dravite, hematite...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE HOST-ROCK ALTER...
Second thumbnail for: MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE HOST-ROCK ALTER...
Third thumbnail for: MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE HOST-ROCK ALTER...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1985
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1985) 22 (4): 637–641.
...John A. Wilson Abstract Members of the crandallite group of aluminous hydroxy phosphates are present in trace amounts in every formation of the Athabasca Group in Alberta. The minerals of the group present in Alberta form a solid-solution series with end members goyazite (SrAl 3 (PO 4 )OH 5...
Journal Article
Published: 07 October 2021
The Canadian Mineralogist (2021) 59 (5): 1021–1047.
... the unconformity between Archean to Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary basement and the Proterozoic Athabasca Group sandstones. In this study, the mineralogy and geochemistry of fracture materials within the entire ca . 550 m thickness of the Athabasca Group sandstones and the metasedimentary (host) rocks from...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Mineralogy and petrogenesis of fracture coatings i...
Second thumbnail for: Mineralogy and petrogenesis of fracture coatings i...
Third thumbnail for: Mineralogy and petrogenesis of fracture coatings i...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2017
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2017) 65 (1): 147–174.
...Chris L. Schneider; Matthias Grobe Elk Point Group outcrops in the Athabasca Oil Sands mining region (AOSMR) and adjacent areas include exposures of the La Loche, Contact Rapids, Keg River, and Prairie Evaporite formations. Here, we review prior investigations of these formations in outcrop...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2001
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2001) 49 (3): 376–392.
... Alberta, major oil expulsion occurred between 107 and 87 Ma ( Fowler and Riediger, 2000 ), soon after the deposition of the Mannville Group, which constitutes the main oil sands reservoir in the Athabasca area. The rate of lateral cross-basin oil migration at this time probably averaged about 20 km...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Flow systems in the Mannville <span class="search-...
Second thumbnail for: Flow systems in the Mannville <span class="search-...
Third thumbnail for: Flow systems in the Mannville <span class="search-...
Image
Published: 18 January 2021
TABLE 1. LITHOLOGICAL SUMMARY OF THE ATHABASCA GROUP IN STEWARDSON LAKE DRILL CORES
Image
Map showing the stratigraphic subdivisions of the Athabasca Group in the Athabasca Basin, underlying domains, and major unconformity-related uranium deposits (after Jefferson et al., 2007). The Centennial deposit is identified by a red star. The inset figure shows the location of the Athabasca Basin (yellow) in North America. Major brittle reactivated shear zones: BB = Black Bay, BLSZ = Black Lake shear aone, CB = Cable Bay, GR = Grease River, H = Harrison, RO = Robillard, VRSZ = Virgin River shear zone.
Published: 01 May 2014
Fig. 1 Map showing the stratigraphic subdivisions of the Athabasca Group in the Athabasca Basin, underlying domains, and major unconformity-related uranium deposits (after Jefferson et al., 2007 ). The Centennial deposit is identified by a red star. The inset figure shows the location
Image
Athabasca Group alteration. A) VR-38 826.4—SEM image of illite (I1) with interstitial APS minerals with later dravite (Dr) and euhedral quartz (Q3). B. VR-31 293.1—sandstone with dravite in fractures which is overgrown by euhedral quartz (Q3). C. VR-25 826.2—late euhedral quartz and pyrite (Py) in subvertical fracture. D. VR-22 774.3—pyrite precipitated along permeable layers and fractures in friable sandstone. E. VR-38 826.4—SEM image of partial recrystallization of sudoite to clinochlore. F. VR-40W3 816.3—SEM image of well-crystallized hexagonal clinochlore.
Published: 01 May 2014
Fig. 8 Athabasca Group alteration. A) VR-38 826.4—SEM image of illite (I1) with interstitial APS minerals with later dravite (Dr) and euhedral quartz (Q 3 ). B. VR-31 293.1—sandstone with dravite in fractures which is overgrown by euhedral quartz (Q 3 ). C. VR-25 826.2—late euhedral quartz
Image
Photomicrographs of typical Athabasca Group sandstones mineral assemblages from early, peak and late diagenesis and late alteration. (A) SH1 hematite highlighting the boundary between detrital quartz (SQ0) and SQ1 quartz overgrowth. SM muscovite and SK1 dickite are altering SQ1 quartz overgrowth. (B) Peak diagenesis muscovite (SM) and dickite (SK1) being crosscut by dravite (ST). (C) Hematite (SH2) crosscutting dravite (ST) and peak diagenesis muscovite (SM) and dickite (SK1). (D) Late diagenesis chlorite (SC) crosscut by late kaolinite (SK2).
Published: 01 September 2009
F ig . 7. Photomicrographs of typical Athabasca Group sandstones mineral assemblages from early, peak and late diagenesis and late alteration. (A) SH1 hematite highlighting the boundary between detrital quartz (SQ0) and SQ1 quartz overgrowth. SM muscovite and SK1 dickite are altering SQ1 quartz
Published: 01 September 2010
DOI: 10.1130/2010.2465(26)
... observed in the Athabasca Group, the Carswell Formation. This ring surrounds an 18-km-wide uplifted basement core composed of gneiss units of Archean to Paleoproterozoic age that display shatter cones, planar deformation features (PDFs), pseudotachylyte veins, and impact melts and breccias (Cluff melt...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 May 2014
Economic Geology (2014) 109 (3): 539–566.
...Fig. 1 Map showing the stratigraphic subdivisions of the Athabasca Group in the Athabasca Basin, underlying domains, and major unconformity-related uranium deposits (after Jefferson et al., 2007 ). The Centennial deposit is identified by a red star. The inset figure shows the location...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Regional Setting, Geology, and Paragenesis of the ...
Second thumbnail for: Regional Setting, Geology, and Paragenesis of the ...
Third thumbnail for: Regional Setting, Geology, and Paragenesis of the ...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2005
European Journal of Mineralogy (2005) 17 (2): 325–342.
... activities in addition to temperature and pressure. Variations in the activities of the major brine components (Cl - , Na + , Ca 2+ ) and the oxygen fugacity (above the hematite-magnetite buffer) have little effect on the mineral stabilities. The mineralogical evolution of the Athabasca Group sandstone...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Thermodynamic constraints on the mineralogical and...
Second thumbnail for: Thermodynamic constraints on the mineralogical and...
Third thumbnail for: Thermodynamic constraints on the mineralogical and...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1985
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1985) 22 (3): 399–407.
...Richard Lee Armstrong; Paul Ramaekers Abstract The Athabasca Group overlies 1.8 Ga or older basement of the Churchill Province and predates uranium mineralization at 1.3 Ga. Cross-cutting diabase dikes have been dated by Rb–Sr mineral isochrons at 1.31 ± 0.07 Ga at Diabase Peninsula, Cree Lake...
Journal Article
Published: 23 January 2020
The Canadian Mineralogist (2021) 59 (5): 847–868.
... composition of Athabasca Group sandstones and of unconformity-related uranium deposits hosted by the basin. The chemical composition of unaltered and un-mineralized Athabasca Group sandstones is dominated by Al (median Al 2 O 3 of 1.14 wt.%), Fe (median Fe 2 O 3 of 0.24 wt.%), and K (median K 2 O of 0.11 wt...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geochemistry of the <span class="search-highlight"...
Second thumbnail for: Geochemistry of the <span class="search-highlight"...
Third thumbnail for: Geochemistry of the <span class="search-highlight"...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1993
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1993) 30 (4): 653–673.
...P. Bruneton Abstract The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2016
The Canadian Mineralogist (2016) 54 (6): 1459–1491.
... the sedimentary rocks of the basin in the Dufferin Lake zone, south-central Athabasca Basin (Saskatchewan, Canada). Up dip, and just below the unconformity with the Athabasca Group, the pelitic schists are replaced by texturally similar rocks within “graphite-depleted zones”. These zones consist of chlorite...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Graphite-bearing Pelitic Schists and Their Altered...
Second thumbnail for: Graphite-bearing Pelitic Schists and Their Altered...
Third thumbnail for: Graphite-bearing Pelitic Schists and Their Altered...
Image
Multistage evolution of the Centennial deposit (arrows represent possible fluid-flow directions). The approximate timing within the paragenesis is given in Figure 11. A. Potential extent of chemical weathering and regolith development and erosion prior to deposition of the Athabasca Group. B. Athabasca Group deposition, diagenesis, and uranium mineralization. C. Postdiabase hydrothermal activity (a = fracture hosted clinochlore, b = clinochlore associated with sudoite, c = local clinochlore in Athabasca Group). D. Late meteoric water and development of kaolinite (K2).
Published: 01 May 2014
Group. B. Athabasca Group deposition, diagenesis, and uranium mineralization. C. Postdiabase hydrothermal activity (a = fracture hosted clinochlore, b = clinochlore associated with sudoite, c = local clinochlore in Athabasca Group). D. Late meteoric water and development of kaolinite (K 2 ).
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 07 September 2012
Geophysics (2012) 77 (5): WC203–WC212.
... of flat lying, porous Paleoproterozoic to late Mesoproterozoic Athabasca Group sandstones. The deposit is associated with the sandstone-basement unconformity, post-Athabasca structure, and hydrothermal alteration. These features combine to create a complex 3D hydrogeologic setting that presents challenges...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: An interpretation of surface and borehole seismic ...
Second thumbnail for: An interpretation of surface and borehole seismic ...
Third thumbnail for: An interpretation of surface and borehole seismic ...
Series: Special Publications of the Society of Economic Geologists
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.5382/SP.15.2.16
EISBN: 9781629490403
... Abstract The Wheeler River property, host to the Phoenix deposit, is located in the Athabasca basin, northern Saskatchewan, 35 km southwest of the McArthur River uranium mine complex. Depths to the unconformity between the overlying Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic undeformed Athabasca Group...