1-20 OF 1553 RESULTS FOR

Ashley Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2016
Journal of Paleontology (2016) 90 (1): 154–169.
... of an agorophiid recently collected from an underwater cliff face of the Ashley River, South Carolina, USA, is assigned to Agorophius pygmaeus . It derives from the base of the Ashley Formation (early Oligocene). The new specimen consists of most of the skull and periotics, which are well preserved and described...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A new specimen of Agorophius pygmaeus (Agorophiida...
Second thumbnail for: A new specimen of Agorophius pygmaeus (Agorophiida...
Third thumbnail for: A new specimen of Agorophius pygmaeus (Agorophiida...
Series: GSA Field Guides
Published: 21 March 2019
DOI: 10.1130/2019.0053(01)
EISBN: 9780813756530
...) Balanophyllia sp. in phosphate nodule; (C) Cervidae indet. (antler fragment); (D) Mammuthus sp. (tooth fragment). At Northbridge Park occasional fossils of barnacles ( Balanus sp.) infilled with Ashley Formation matrix (light-tan calcarenite) are encountered ( Fig. 2A ). Along the Stono River...
Image
 Figure 8. Map showing structure contours on the base of the Ashley Formation. Contour interval is 40 feet. “Greater than” symbol (>) means that the Ashley is not present at that locality and its former base was higher than the value given, which is the top of the next older unit present at that locality. “Less than” symbol (<) means that the Ashley was not completely penetrated during auger drilling, so the base of that unit lies lower than the value given, which is the elevation of the bottom of the hole. Gray shading reflects depth relative to sea level. The meizoseismal region of the 1886 Charleston earthquake is bounded by a gray dashed line. B—Bonneau dome, E—Edisto dome, FB—Fort Bull dome, MH—Mount Holly dome, MP—Mount Pleasant dome, PF—Parkers Ferry dome, and S—Stono dome. The northern end of the Stono dome is the feature described by Colquhoun and Comer (1973) as the “Stono arch.”
Published: 01 January 2002
Figure 8. Map showing structure contours on the base of the Ashley Formation. Contour interval is 40 feet. “Greater than” symbol (>) means that the Ashley is not present at that locality and its former base was higher than the value given, which is the top of the next older unit present
Image
▴ Stratigraphic section inferred from vibracores VC1 to VC3 (left to right). The ground surface elevation at each site was obtained by GPS. The source sand (fining upwards fluvial, sands) is between a clay layer above and a silty sand below. It was found to be ∼2 to ∼3 m thick and lie between ∼1.7 and 2.5 m below the surface. The vibracores bottomed out in the clay-rich sands of the Ashley formation (at a depth of ∼6 m).
Published: 01 July 2011
between ∼1.7 and 2.5 m below the surface. The vibracores bottomed out in the clay-rich sands of the Ashley formation (at a depth of ∼6 m).
Image
 Figure 2. Distribution of Tertiary units as mapped by Cooke (1936) in the Charleston, South Carolina, region. In the coastal region, the identity of underlying Tertiary units was unknown. Cooke's use of the name “Santee Limestone” is approximately the same as used here. His “Cooper Formation” corresponds roughly with the Ashley Formation as used here. His “Hawthorn Formation” roughly corresponds with the Chandler Bridge Formation, Tiger Leap Formation, Parachucla Shale, and Marks Head Formation as used here. His “Duplin Formation” and “Waccamaw Formation” correspond with parts of the Goose Creek Limestone and Duplin Formation as used here. In Cooke's day, the Waccamaw was considered to be Pliocene in age. Today the term is restricted to sediments of early Pleistocene age. The meizoseismal region of the 1886 Charleston earthquake is bounded by a red dashed line
Published: 01 January 2002
” corresponds roughly with the Ashley Formation as used here. His “Hawthorn Formation” roughly corresponds with the Chandler Bridge Formation, Tiger Leap Formation, Parachucla Shale, and Marks Head Formation as used here. His “Duplin Formation” and “Waccamaw Formation” correspond with parts of the Goose Creek
Image
Typical shear-wave velocity profile for the study area. Velocities in the upper part of region A (0–56 m) are defined on the basis of site-specific geotechnical investigation. Strain-dependent modulus and damping degradation is defined on the basis of site-specific lithology and confining pressure. Velocity in region B (56–100 m) is inferred from velocity logs at the Cooper River Bridge site. The modulus and damping degradation is that derived from experimental data for the Ashley formation (W. Camp, personal comm., 2002). Velocity in regions C, D, E, and F is inferred from the P-velocity log at the Clubhouse Crossroads no. 1 corehole site. The modulus and damping degradation models for regions C, D, E, and F are taken from Assimaki et al. (2000, 2001) and are functions of mean effective stress σ′, assuming a compaction ratio of 0.3.
Published: 01 April 2006
and confining pressure. Velocity in region B (56–100 m) is inferred from velocity logs at the Cooper River Bridge site. The modulus and damping degradation is that derived from experimental data for the Ashley formation (W. Camp, personal comm., 2002). Velocity in regions C, D, E, and F is inferred from the P
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2016
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2016) 86 (1): 38–58.
... Formation (herein defined as the Turonian Ashley Valley Member) reveals three northeast–southwest elongate, incised highstand, forced regressive, and lowstand offshore sandstone bodies partially to fully encased in offshore marine mudrock. These bodies are herein named the Buckskin Hills, Kane Hollow...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The Offshore Bar Revisited: A New Depositional Mod...
Second thumbnail for: The Offshore Bar Revisited: A New Depositional Mod...
Third thumbnail for: The Offshore Bar Revisited: A New Depositional Mod...
Journal Article
Published: 23 August 2017
Journal of Paleontology (2017) 91 (6): 1228–1243.
...Robert E. Weems; K. Mace Brown Abstract New and more-complete material of Procolpochelys charlestonensis Weems and Sanders, 2014 provides the first detailed information on the skull, jaw, and plastron of this species, which occurs in the Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge formations near...
Image
Published: 01 January 2016
Table 1.— Depositional facies observed in the Ashley Valley Member of the Frontier Formation. See text for additional explanation.
Image
—Mouth of gorge on Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing lower 95 feet of Phosphoria formation resting on Weber sandstone. Lower half of lower shaly interval is phosphatic shale member of Phosphoria formation.
Published: 01 January 1939
FIG. 5. —Mouth of gorge on Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing lower 95 feet of Phosphoria formation resting on Weber sandstone. Lower half of lower shaly interval is phosphatic shale member of Phosphoria formation.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1939
AAPG Bulletin (1939) 23 (1): 82–100.
...FIG. 5. —Mouth of gorge on Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing lower 95 feet of Phosphoria formation resting on Weber sandstone. Lower half of lower shaly interval is phosphatic shale member of Phosphoria formation. ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: “Park City” Beds on Southwest Flank of Uinta Mount...
Second thumbnail for: “Park City” Beds on Southwest Flank of Uinta Mount...
Third thumbnail for: “Park City” Beds on Southwest Flank of Uinta Mount...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1949
AAPG Bulletin (1949) 33 (6): 827–836.
.... A deeper-pool discovery in the Weber formation at Ashley Valley, Uintah County, by the Equity Oil Company provided the source for the first commercial oil production in Utah. Geophysical work increased during 1948, with the center of activity in Wyoming. Production of crude oil showed gains corresponding...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Developments in Rocky Mountain Region in 1948
Second thumbnail for: Developments in Rocky Mountain Region in 1948
Published: 01 January 1976
DOI: 10.1130/MEM148-p373
... Detailed mapping in the Ashley Falls, East Lee, Stockbridge, Great Barrington, and Monterey quadragles of Massachusetts and Connecticut has established 12 lithostratigraphic paragneiss and metavolcanic units, approximately 1,830 m in total thickness, in the Precambrian gneiss of the Berkshire...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1967
AAPG Bulletin (1967) 51 (6): 1074–1085.
... drilling of a 15,000-ft. Paleozoic test in Ashley County by Humble, should give Arkansas another good exploration year. Independent operators conducted most of the exploratory activity in North Louisiana. The Wilcox Group and the Sligo Formation were the chief targets, and the search for oil in these beds...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Developments in Arkansas, North Louisiana, and Eas...
Second thumbnail for: Developments in Arkansas, North Louisiana, and Eas...
Third thumbnail for: Developments in Arkansas, North Louisiana, and Eas...
Published: 01 January 1952
DOI: 10.1130/PenroseLetters.549
EISBN: 9780813759395
... Abstract Under date of April 5, 1920, eight prominent geologists, particularly interested in the economic aspects of that science, sent out a suggested constitution and by-laws for the formation of a society for “the advancement of the science of geology in its application to mining and other...
Image
Depositional-strike cross section illustrating the geometry, depositional facies, and the interpreted stratigraphic framework of the Raven Ridge Sandstone (RRS) of the Ashley Valley Member (AVM). Cross section locations are marked in Figure 1, and the datum is the Mowry Shale–Frontier Formation contact. (VD: Vernal Delta).
Published: 01 January 2016
Fig. 9.— Depositional-strike cross section illustrating the geometry, depositional facies, and the interpreted stratigraphic framework of the Raven Ridge Sandstone (RRS) of the Ashley Valley Member (AVM). Cross section locations are marked in Figure 1, and the datum is the Mowry Shale–Frontier
Image
—Isopachous map of Pennsylvanian System, restored where eroded from Uinta Mountains. Rangely and Ashley Valley oil fields produce from Weber Sandstone and are shaded with diagonal lines. Patterned areas in lower right corner are outcrops of Precambrian overlain by Triassic Chinle Formation. Isopachous interval, 500 feet.
Published: 01 November 1965
FIG. 3. —Isopachous map of Pennsylvanian System, restored where eroded from Uinta Mountains. Rangely and Ashley Valley oil fields produce from Weber Sandstone and are shaded with diagonal lines. Patterned areas in lower right corner are outcrops of Precambrian overlain by Triassic Chinle
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2006
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2006) 96 (2): 467–489.
... and confining pressure. Velocity in region B (56–100 m) is inferred from velocity logs at the Cooper River Bridge site. The modulus and damping degradation is that derived from experimental data for the Ashley formation (W. Camp, personal comm., 2002). Velocity in regions C, D, E, and F is inferred from the P...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Site-Response Models for Charleston, South Carolin...
Second thumbnail for: Site-Response Models for Charleston, South Carolin...
Third thumbnail for: Site-Response Models for Charleston, South Carolin...
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2011
Seismological Research Letters (2011) 82 (4): 589–598.
... between ∼1.7 and 2.5 m below the surface. The vibracores bottomed out in the clay-rich sands of the Ashley formation (at a depth of ∼6 m). ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Discovery of a Sand Blow and Associated Fault in t...
Second thumbnail for: Discovery of a Sand Blow and Associated Fault in t...
Third thumbnail for: Discovery of a Sand Blow and Associated Fault in t...
Image
—Diagrammatic section eastward along a line from Big Cottonwood Canyon, type section of “Park City formation” to Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing general stratigraphic relations of members of Phosphoria formation and lower member of “Park City formation.” Number with each locality is distance in miles of point of projection of locality on line from type section. WS, Woodside shale; RM, Rex member of the Phosphoria formation; PSM, phosphatic shale member of Phosphoria formation; AM, Mackentire “red-beds” tongue of Phosphoria formation; WPC, lower member of “Park City formation”; WSS, Weber sandstone; WQ, Weber quartzite.
Published: 01 January 1939
FIG. 2. —Diagrammatic section eastward along a line from Big Cottonwood Canyon, type section of “Park City formation” to Ashley Creek, Uinta County, Utah, showing general stratigraphic relations of members of Phosphoria formation and lower member of “Park City formation.” Number with each