Abstract The Pakistan part of the Himalaya has major differences in tectonic evolution compared with the main Himalayan range to the east of the Nanga Parbat syntaxis. There is no equivalent of the Tethyan Himalaya sedimentary sequence south of the Indus–Tsangpo suture zone, no equivalent of the Main Central Thrust, and no Miocene metamorphism and leucogranite emplacement. The Kohistan Arc was thrust southward onto the leading edge of continental India. All rocks exposed to the south of the arc in the footwall of the Main Mantle Thrust preserve metamorphic histories. However, these do not all record Cenozoic metamorphism. Basement rocks record Paleo-Proterozoic metamorphism with no Cenozoic heating; Neo-Proterozoic through Cambrian sediments record Ordovician ages for peak kyanite and sillimanite grade metamorphism, although Ar–Ar data indicate a Cenozoic thermal imprint which did not reset the peak metamorphic assemblages. The only rocks that clearly record Cenozoic metamorphism are Upper Paleozoic through Mesozoic cover sediments. Thermobarometric data suggest burial of these rocks along a clockwise pressure–temperature path to pressure–temperature conditions of c. 10–11 kbar and c. 700°C. Resolving this enigma is challenging but implies downward heating into the Indian plate, coupled with later development of unconformity parallel shear zones that detach Upper Paleozoic–Cenozoic cover rocks from Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic basement rocks and also detach those rocks from the Paleoproterozoic basement.

Abstract The Main Mantle Thrust (MMT) represents the tectonic boundary between metamorphic shield and platform rock of the Indian plate hinterland, and dominantly mafic and ultramafic rock of the Kohistan-Ladakh arc complex in Pakistan. In some areas, this boundary is a sharp planar fault with development of mylonite; in other areas, it is a brittle-ductile imbricate zone; in still other areas, it contains large, discontinuous, slices of internally sheared and deformed ophiolitic mélange. The character of the MMT along its entire trace is discussed and it is concluded that there is no single continuous fault which marks the contact between the Indian plate and the Kohistan-Ladakh arc. On this basis, we propose a revised definition for the MMT that is consistent with both the original definition and with the usage of the term in literature. We suggest that the MMT fault contact be defined as the series of faults, of different age and tectonic history, that collectively define the northern margin of the Indian plate in Pakistan. On this basis, faults that define the MMT vary in age from Quaternary to possibly as old as Late Cretaceous. Discontinuous lenses of ophiolitic mélange that overlie the MMT fault contact, and which intervene between the Indian plate and the Kohistan-Ladakh arc, are considered to be part of an MMT zone that is equivalent with the Indus Suture Zone.

Abstract This paper describes the geology, tectonometamorphic history and geochronology of part of the northern flank of the Neelum valley in Azad Kashmir, NE Pakistan. Metamorphic crystalline rocks in this area belong to the Lesser and Higher Himalayan Crystalline complexes. Geological mapping of about 1500 km 2 confirms the presence of three main tectonic units characterized by similar lithostratigraphic sequences but with different tectonometamorphic histories. Whether these tectonic units belong to the Lesser or Higher Himalayan Crystallines depends on the, still controversial, position of the Main Central Thrust. A tectonic model, involving syn-convergent exhumation, is suggested that is consistent with new petrographic and geochronological data, and with a revised interpretation of the Main Central Thrust.

Abstract The Nanga Parbat massif lies in the core of the major north-south trending, broadly upright antiform that marks the NW syntaxis of the Himalayan arc. However, this antiformal structure is not evident in the trend of foliation and banding within the central and southern parts of the massif. Reconnaissance field studies in this region (Astor, Rama and Rupal areas) have delineated an important shear zone with top-to-the-south overthrust kinematics. This Rupal Shear Zone carries the migmatitic core of the massif onto non-migmatitic metasediments locally termed the Tarshing Group. The shear zone traces north into a broad high strain zone of steep foliation with gently plunging mineral elongation lineations with no consistent sense of shear. A tentative model is proposed whereby top-to-the-south overshear in the Rupal area passes northwards into a steep belt of apparently constrictional N–S elongation. This type of large-scale transpression may record the early growth of the syntaxis. However, relating these structures to Himalayan orogenesis and the amplification of the NW syntaxis is problematic. The Nanga Parbat massif displays a long and complex history of polyphase deformation, metamorphism and magmatism, as might be expected of a terrane derived from the basement of the Indian sub-continent. Although at least the later part of the constrictional steep belt developed with syn-kinematic leucogranite intrusions (< 10 Ma), the old age limit on the Rupal Shear Zone remains unconstrained.

Abstract There are several competing interpretations of the structure of the margins of the Nanga Parbat massif: that the massif is bounded by the original suture between the Indian continent and the Kohistan-Ladakh island arc―the Main Mantle Thrust; that the massif is entirely bounded by neotectonic faults; that it is bounded by a combination of early and late faults and shear zones. If the marginal structures of the massif are to be related to local and regional geo-tectonic evolution then their correct characterization is critical. The Raikhot Bridge area on the western margin of the massif is useful in this regard, as it provides accessible and near-continuous outcrops. This contact, sometimes called the Raikhot Fault, is composite. Sheared metagabbros of the Kohistan arc are juxtaposed tectonically against metasediments and orthogneisses of the Nanga Parbat massif along an early ductile shear contact, developed under amphibolite facies conditions. In this regard it may be a preserved segment of the Main Mantle Thrust. However, this ductile shear zone has been strongly modified, flattened and rotated, and is cut by younger shears and faults. The original kinematics of the shear zone have been largely overprinted by these subsequent deformations. The younger structures include NE-SW striking, dextral strike-slip faults and a major top-to-NW thrust and shear zone. A sequence of metamorphism, deformation and igneous emplacement may be used to study the history of structural evolution within the massif. The use of a single name (e.g. Raikhot Fault) for the present-day map contact between the Nanga Parbat massif and neighbouring Kohistan is misleading. The early contact (termed here the Phuparash Shear Zone, possibly the northeastern continuity of the Main Mantle Thrust) is modified by the Buldar Fault Zone (dextral strike-slip) and the Liachar Thrust Zone (top-to NW carriage of the Nanga Parbat massif across the Phuparash Shear Zone and onto Kohistan). The activity of the Buldar Fault and Liachar Thrust Zone continued during exhumation of the massif, through amphibolite facies to the Earth's surface. The interaction between these structures is at present unknown. However, establishing these and similar interactions within the Nanga Parbat area remain central to establishing the role of regional NE-SW dextral transpression in the modern structure of the massif.