1-20 OF 557 RESULTS FOR

Allegheny Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (12): 1924.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (3): 340.
...Romeo M. Flores ABSTRACT Sandstones between the Middle Kittanning and Lower Freeport coal beds in the Allegheny Formation of southeastern Ohio are divisible into three genetic categories based on gross external morphology of the sand body, proportion of major mineral components, grain size...
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.1130/SPE294-p7
... Studies of the physical stratigraphy and analyses of the Middle Pennsylvanian flora and fauna of some coal beds and marine units of the Breathitt Formation in Kentucky, the Pottsville and Allegheny Formations in Ohio, and the Kanawha Formation and Charleston Sandstone in West Virginia show...
Image
—Cross section of Pottsville and Allegheny Formations from vicinity of Bluefield, West Virginia, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, showing general arrangement of coal beds and depositional environments in which they formed (after Ferm and Cavaroc, 1969).
Published: 01 December 1978
Fig. 16 —Cross section of Pottsville and Allegheny Formations from vicinity of Bluefield, West Virginia, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, showing general arrangement of coal beds and depositional environments in which they formed (after Ferm and Cavaroc, 1969 ).
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (9): 1436.
... on the means can separate stratigraphic units into three categories: (1) Kanawha Formation, which has a mean of 5.04 ppm; (2) New River, Pocahontas, and Monongahela Formations, which have means of 10.1, 10.9, and 12.4 ppm, respectively; and (3) Allegheny Formation, which has a mean of 18.1 ppm. Data from 40...
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 1968
DOI: 10.1130/SPE106-p1
... The middle Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation, which crops out in the Appalachian Plateau of West Virginia, represents nonmarine equivalents of deltaic marine-brackish-nonmarine strata northwestward in Pennsylvania and Ohio. In West Virginia, the Allegheny is some 300 feet thick and consists...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (9): 1439.
...; succeeding inner deltaic coals are thinner (less than 3-4 ft) and are variable laterally. Deltaic deposits grade upward into lower alluvial plain strata of the Allegheny Formation near the ridge crests. Associated coals locally may be thick (up to 6 ft), but abrupt changes in thickness and shale partings...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (9): 1440.
...Paul C. Lyons; William F. Outerbridge; M. Deveruex Carter Abstract: The top of the Upper Freeport coal bed marks the contact between the Allegheny Formation (Middle Pennsylvanian) and the Conemaugh Formation (Upper Pennsylvanian) at their type area in western Pennsylvania. The position of the Upper...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 May 1991
Geology (1991) 19 (5): 514–517.
...Donald U. Wise; Edward S. Belt; Paul C. Lyons Abstract Abrupt shifts from single widespread coal swamps to coarse siliciclastic alluvial channel deposits occur in at least five coal beds and zones within the Pennsylvanian Allegheny Formation. One of these, the Upper Freeport coal zone...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1919
GSA Bulletin (1919) 30 (4): 637–644.
... ALABAMA, Crystalline rocks of 113 —, Graphite deposits of 112 ALAGOAS, Geology of 225 ALASKA, Glaciation in 115 ALDEN, W. C., cited on argillites 552 ALDRICH, L. B., cited on clouds 540 ALGONKIAN flora 506 ALLEGHENY formation of Maryland 572 — —, Typical section of the 153 ALLING, H. L.; Some problems...
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0020(03)
EISBN: 9780813756202
... k.y.). During deposition of the Pottsville and Allegheny formations (Bashkirian-Moscovian), the Appalachian climate exhibited perhumid to humid situations during periods of glacial advance, and humid to dry subhumid conditions during glacial retreats. Marine faunas and coal swamp floras during...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0020(03)
EISBN: 9780813756202
... k.y.). During deposition of the Pottsville and Allegheny formations (Bashkirian-Moscovian), the Appalachian climate exhibited perhumid to humid situations during periods of glacial advance, and humid to dry subhumid conditions during glacial retreats. Marine faunas and coal swamp floras during...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Series: GSA Microform Publications
Published: 01 January 1977
DOI: 10.1130/micro7-p10
EISBN: 9780813759074
... that were delineated.within the Carboniferous Allegheny Formation. A comparison of Caruccio’s and Ferm’s data reveals that the coals rich in reactive pyrite are found in back barrier and lower delta plain deposits, and coals poor in reactive pyrite can be associated with upper delta and alluvial plain...
Series: GSA Microform Publications
Published: 01 January 1977
DOI: 10.1130/micro7-p18
EISBN: 9780813759074
... that were delineated.within the Carboniferous Allegheny Formation. A comparison of Caruccio’s and Ferm’s data reveals that the coals rich in reactive pyrite are found in back barrier and lower delta plain deposits, and coals poor in reactive pyrite can be associated with upper delta and alluvial plain...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1965
American Mineralogist (1965) 50 (9): 1457–1458.
...) Coal, which comprises part of the Allegheny Formation of the Pennsylvanian System. Copyright © 1965 by the Mineralogical Society of America 1965 Mineralogical Society of America ...
Image
Illustrated example of the method used to estimate sampled and potentially fossiliferous volumes using the Allegheny Formation in Pennsylvania. Created based on data from USGS, Macrostrat, and Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey.
Published: 01 November 2023
Figure 1. Illustrated example of the method used to estimate sampled and potentially fossiliferous volumes using the Allegheny Formation in Pennsylvania. Created based on data from USGS, Macrostrat, and Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey.
Image
Biostratigraphic ranges of key fossil-species in macrofloral assemblage correlated with chronostratigraphic units, lithostratigraphic units of Central Appalachian Basin, and American macrofloral biozonation scheme of Read and Mamay (1964) (* indicates incomplete unit); compiled from Darrah (1969), Gillespie and Pfefferkorn (1979), Blake et al. (2002), and B.M. Blake (personal communication, 2014). Maximum range overlap occurs in upper Kanawha to lower Allegheny formations (late Atokan to early Desmoinesian, late Bolsovian to early Asturian), equivalent to most of Zone 9 (‘Neuropteris’ rarinervis).
Published: 01 July 2016
Darrah ( 1969 ), Gillespie and Pfefferkorn ( 1979 ), Blake et al. ( 2002 ), and B.M. Blake (personal communication, 2014). Maximum range overlap occurs in upper Kanawha to lower Allegheny formations (late Atokan to early Desmoinesian, late Bolsovian to early Asturian), equivalent to most of Zone 9
Image
—Details of Brallier Formation and Greenland Gap Group along Allegheny Front in region indicated in Figure 4.
Published: 01 August 1971
Fig. 6. —Details of Brallier Formation and Greenland Gap Group along Allegheny Front in region indicated in Figure 4 .
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1955
AAPG Bulletin (1955) 39 (10): 2087–2090.
... and Pecopieris spp. Lower part Conemaugh formation and upper part Allegheny formation 6 Neuropleris rarinervis Lower part Allegheny formation 5 Neuropleris tenuifolia Major part Kanawha formation 4 Cannophyllites Base of Kanawha formation 3 Mariopleris pygmaea and Neuropleris...
FIGURES
Image
Stratigraphic section of the Allegheny and Glenshaw formations in western Pennsylvania. The marine intervals are important marker horizons throughout both formations. The names Upper Freeport coal, Brush Creek marine interval, and Gallitzin coal, mentioned specifically in the text, are capitalized for emphasis (modifiedfrom Harper and Laughrey 1987).
Published: 01 April 2015
Figure 8. Stratigraphic section of the Allegheny and Glenshaw formations in western Pennsylvania. The marine intervals are important marker horizons throughout both formations. The names Upper Freeport coal, Brush Creek marine interval, and Gallitzin coal, mentioned specifically in the text