1-20 OF 2509 RESULTS FOR

Aki-Richards equations

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 03 May 2016
Geophysics (2016) 81 (3): N17–N29.
... equations to obtain an extended Aki-Richards equations (one that is in accord with the appropriate complex Snell’s law) is lacking in the literature. Also missing is a clear analytical path allowing such forms to be reconciled with more general volume scattering pictures of viscoelastic seismic wave...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Viscoelastic amplitude variation with offset <span...
Second thumbnail for: Viscoelastic amplitude variation with offset <span...
Third thumbnail for: Viscoelastic amplitude variation with offset <span...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 17 July 2023
Geophysics (2023) 88 (5): MR273–MR287.
... equation is obtained by linearizing the rock-physics model based on the differential effective medium model and Gassmann’s equation using Taylor series approximation, and we combine the linearization with the Aki-Richards equation. Thanks to the linearized model, the analytical solution to the inverse...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Bayesian linearized rock-physics amplitude-variati...
Second thumbnail for: Bayesian linearized rock-physics amplitude-variati...
Third thumbnail for: Bayesian linearized rock-physics amplitude-variati...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 10 April 2014
Geophysics (2014) 79 (3): N1–N10.
...Keshan Zou ABSTRACT Analyzing the Aki-Richards equation for converted waves, I found that it is possible to decouple the effect of density contrast from that of shear velocity contrast. The two terms were mixed when the P-wave incident angle was less than 30°, but they started to separate...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: S-Zero Stack: A converted wave processing to extra...
Second thumbnail for: S-Zero Stack: A converted wave processing to extra...
Third thumbnail for: S-Zero Stack: A converted wave processing to extra...
Image
Comparison of the reflection coefficients combining equations 4 and 7 (R-GEI) and the reflection coefficients combining equations 2 and 7 (R-NGEI) with the reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richards equation of the negative impedance reflector. (a) R-GEI, R-NGEI, and the reflection coefficients computed with the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richards equation. (b) Differences of reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and R-GEI, R-NGEI, and Aki-Richards equation.
Published: 12 May 2022
Figure 1. Comparison of the reflection coefficients combining equations  4 and 7 (R-GEI) and the reflection coefficients combining equations  2 and 7 (R-NGEI) with the reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richards equation of the negative impedance reflector
Image
Comparison of the exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards approximation, and novel equation in terms of PSR, P-wave velocity, and density of the negative impedance reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards equation, and novel equation. (b) Differences of reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards equation, and novel equation.
Published: 12 May 2022
Figure 3. Comparison of the exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards approximation, and novel equation in terms of PSR, P-wave velocity, and density of the negative impedance reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards equation, and novel equation. (b
Image
(a) A comparison between the curves derived from the exact Zoeppritz equation (circle), Aki-Richard equation (point), and fluid-matrix decoupled equation (plus) in model 1, (b) a comparison between the curves derived from the exact Zoeppritz equation (circle), Aki-Richard equation (point), and fluid-matrix decoupled equation (plus) in model 2, and (c) a comparison between the curves derived from the exact Zoeppritz equation (circle), Aki-Richard equation (point) and fluid-matrix decoupled equation (plus) in model 3.
Published: 21 August 2014
Figure 4. (a) A comparison between the curves derived from the exact Zoeppritz equation (circle), Aki-Richard equation (point), and fluid-matrix decoupled equation (plus) in model 1, (b) a comparison between the curves derived from the exact Zoeppritz equation (circle), Aki-Richard equation
Image
Comparison between the reflection coefficients as a function of the incidence angle computed with the full Zoeppritz equation and the rock-physics model (the solid black line), the Aki-Richards equation with the full/nonlinear rock-physics model (the dashed blue line), the Aki-Richards equation with the linearized rock-physics model (the dashed green line), and the proposed linearized formulation (the dashed red line) for the geologic models listed in Table 1, respectively. Each model has two layers with a single interface, at which upper and lower layers have the contrast(s) of (a) porosity, (b) aspect ratio, (c) porosity and saturation, (d) porosity and aspect ratio, and (e) aspect ratio and saturation, respectively.
Published: 17 July 2023
Figure 3. Comparison between the reflection coefficients as a function of the incidence angle computed with the full Zoeppritz equation and the rock-physics model (the solid black line), the Aki-Richards equation with the full/nonlinear rock-physics model (the dashed blue line), the Aki-Richards
Image
Comparison of the top interface of the exact Zoeppritz formula, the Aki-Richards equation, and our proposed approximate formula. (a) Computed reflection coefficients and (b) approximation errors.
Published: 17 July 2023
Figure 8. Comparison of the top interface of the exact Zoeppritz formula, the Aki-Richards equation, and our proposed approximate formula. (a) Computed reflection coefficients and (b) approximation errors.
Image
Comparison of the bottom interface of the exact Zoeppritz formula, the Aki-Richards equation, and our proposed approximate formula. (a) Computed reflection coefficients and (b) approximation errors.
Published: 17 July 2023
Figure 9. Comparison of the bottom interface of the exact Zoeppritz formula, the Aki-Richards equation, and our proposed approximate formula. (a) Computed reflection coefficients and (b) approximation errors.
Image
A comparison of the curves derived using the exact Zoeppritz equation (the solid marked circle), the Aki-Richards equation (the solid line), the Fatti equation (the dashed line), the Russell equation (the dashed-dotted line), and the new equation (the dotted line) in (a) model 1, (b) model 2, and (c) model 3.
Published: 24 October 2018
Figure 6. A comparison of the curves derived using the exact Zoeppritz equation (the solid marked circle), the Aki-Richards equation (the solid line), the Fatti equation (the dashed line), the Russell equation (the dashed-dotted line), and the new equation (the dotted line) in (a) model 1, (b
Image
A comparison between the full Zoeppritz equations (see Appendix A) and the two forms of the Aki-Richards equation computed over the top of a gas sand, where (a) shows the intercept-gradient-curvature approximation of equation 12 and (b) shows the Fatti et al. (1994) approximation of equation 8. In both cases, the two-term and three-term sums are shown.
Published: 20 March 2014
Figure 9. A comparison between the full Zoeppritz equations (see Appendix  A ) and the two forms of the Aki-Richards equation computed over the top of a gas sand, where (a) shows the intercept-gradient-curvature approximation of equation  12 and (b) shows the Fatti et al. (1994) approximation
Image
Synthetic seismic data used for the inversion test: (a) near angle (15°), (b) mid angle (30°), and c) far angle (45°). The solid black lines represent the synthetic seismic data computed using de Figueiredo and Grana’s two-term approximation; dashed gray lines represent the synthetic seismic data computed using Aki-Richards’ equation.
Published: 24 June 2025
seismic data computed using Aki-Richardsequation.
Image
A two-layered model showing the contribution for VP (blue), VS (orange), and density (green) toward the total AVO response (red) for three-term Aki-Richards equation with (a) top layer full gas and bottom layer PRG, (b) top layer PRG and bottom layer brine, and (c) top layer full gas and bottom layer brine. Table 1 provides the VP, VS, and density values for the three cases. Correspondingly, (d)–(f) show the percentage change in the elastic properties: VP, VS, density, acoustic impedance, and Poisson's ratio (σ).
Published: 01 August 2022
Figure 3. A two-layered model showing the contribution for V P (blue), V S (orange), and density (green) toward the total AVO response (red) for three-term Aki-Richards equation with (a) top layer full gas and bottom layer PRG, (b) top layer PRG and bottom layer brine, and (c) top layer
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 12 May 2022
Geophysics (2022) 87 (4): N63–N74.
...Figure 1. Comparison of the reflection coefficients combining equations  4 and 7 (R-GEI) and the reflection coefficients combining equations  2 and 7 (R-NGEI) with the reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richards equation of the negative impedance reflector...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion using P-...
Second thumbnail for: Amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion using P-...
Third thumbnail for: Amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion using P-...
Image
Comparison of exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI of the negative reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI (b) Difference of reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI.
Published: 03 October 2013
Figure 1. Comparison of exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI of the negative reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI (b) Difference of reflection coefficients
Image
Comparison of exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI of the positive reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI (b) Difference of reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation and Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI.
Published: 03 October 2013
Figure 2. Comparison of exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI of the positive reflector. (a) Reflection coefficients with exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richard approximate equation, YPD equation, and YPD-EI (b) Difference of reflection coefficients
Image
Comparison of the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation, and the approximate equation in terms of P-wave modulus, S-wave modulus, and density. (a) Reflection coefficient with the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation, and the approximate equation in terms of the P-wave modulus, S-wave modulus, and density. (b) Difference of reflection coefficients from the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation, and the approximate equation in terms of the P-wave modulus, S-wave modulus, and density (c) Synthetic common midpoint profile with the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation, and the approximate equation in terms of the P-wave modulus, S-wave modulus, and density with the same Ricker wavelet.
Published: 27 September 2012
Figure 1. Comparison of the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation, and the approximate equation in terms of P-wave modulus, S-wave modulus, and density. (a) Reflection coefficient with the exact Zoeppritz equation, the Aki-Richards approximate equation
Image
Comparing the modeled AVO and FAVO sensitivity to gas saturation in the sand B reservoir (Figure 8). (a and b) Sensitivity of the AVO amplitude (following the three-term Aki-Richard equation) at angles 20° and 30° at the interface of shale (α=2895.60  m/s, β=1219.20  m/s, and ρ=2.25  g/cm3) over sandstone, and the two sandstone points (sand B1 and sand B2) are from the sand B reservoir with the properties shown in Figure 8b and 8c. (c and d) Sensitivity of the real component AVO amplitude (following equation 3) at angles 20° and 30° in the sand B reservoir (100 ms time thickness) at 5 Hz (diamonds) and 10 Hz (triangles). There is a greater sensitivity to gas saturation (separation between the low and high gas saturations) at 5 Hz than there is at either the 10 Hz or the conventional AVO model. In addition, the difference between the 5 and 10 Hz response is greater at (c) 20° than at (d) 30°. Therefore, we use an angle that shows more sensitivity given the availability of good-quality seismic data at that angle. This illustrates how sensitivity studies using well logs should be used to find the tuning frequency (5 Hz on the real component in this example) and then the seismic attribute at this tuning frequency is used to interpret the anomaly due to fluids (or another reservoir property).
Published: 09 January 2020
Figure 11. Comparing the modeled AVO and FAVO sensitivity to gas saturation in the sand B reservoir (Figure  8 ). (a and b) Sensitivity of the AVO amplitude (following the three-term Aki-Richard equation) at angles 20° and 30° at the interface of shale ( α = 2895.60    m / s , β
Image
Profiles of the inverted results of (a) PSR, (b) P-wave velocity, (c) and density with Aki-Richards reflectivity equation across the known wells A and B. The inverted PSR result is indirectly computed with P- and S-wave velocities, which are estimated from seismic data with the Aki-Richards reflectivity equation.
Published: 12 May 2022
Figure 13. Profiles of the inverted results of (a) PSR, (b) P-wave velocity, (c) and density with Aki-Richards reflectivity equation across the known wells A and B. The inverted PSR result is indirectly computed with P- and S-wave velocities, which are estimated from seismic data with the Aki
Image
Four types of AVO reflection coefficients calculated with the exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards formula, Russell’s linear approximation, and equation 10. (a) Calculated AVO reflection coefficients and (b) errors of AVO reflection coefficients (the dotted red lines are the AVO reflection coefficients in equation 10, the blue lines are the calculated results using the exact Zoeppritz equation, the black lines are the calculated results using Russell’s linear approximation, and the dotted green lines are the calculated results using the Aki-Richards formula).
Published: 18 November 2021
Figure 2. Four types of AVO reflection coefficients calculated with the exact Zoeppritz equation, Aki-Richards formula, Russell’s linear approximation, and equation  10 . (a) Calculated AVO reflection coefficients and (b) errors of AVO reflection coefficients (the dotted red lines are the AVO