Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
![First thumbnail for: Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: O...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: O...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: O...]()
![First thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">ARGONET</span> ...]()
![Second thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">ARGONET</span> ...]()
![Third thumbnail for: The <span class="search-highlight">ARGONET</span> ...]()
![First thumbnail for: Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Veloci...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Veloci...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Veloci...]()
![(a) General map with the prevailing seismotectonic features in western Greece (Cephalonia transform fault zone [CTFZ]); the frame marks the location of Cephalonia, (b) map of Cephalonia showing the exact location of the ARGOstoli Network (ARGONET) array, and (c) rough description of the stratigraphy at the ARGONET site and deployment of the vertical array.]()
![(a) Map of the broader study area. (b) Epicenters of the 964 earthquakes for which data have been used in this study. (c) Location of the ARGONET array. (d) Close‐up of the location of the borehole vertical array and two surface stations (CK0 and CKWP).]()
![Schematic layout of the (a) EUROSEISTEST and (b) ARGONET accelerometric arrays (see Fig. 2a for spatial scale) with borehole and surface stations. Stations are color coded according to their National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1997) soil classification (modified and extended from Ktenidou et al., 2018). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![First thumbnail for: Accelerometer, Velocimeter Dense‐<span class="sear...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Accelerometer, Velocimeter Dense‐<span class="sear...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Accelerometer, Velocimeter Dense‐<span class="sear...]()
![Example earthquake record (in gray) corresponding to an ML 3.4 earthquake at an epicentral distance of 31 km from the ARGONET vertical array. The black color highlights the selected S‐wave window, which is tapered at both ends. The pre‐event black line corresponds to the noise record of the same duration as the S wave, which is used to compute the signal‐to‐noise spectra ratio. The gray vertical solid lines mark the manually picked S‐wave arrival and the automatically determined end of the S wave.]()
![First thumbnail for: The “Glass Beads” Coupling Solution for Borehole a...]()
![Second thumbnail for: The “Glass Beads” Coupling Solution for Borehole a...]()
![Third thumbnail for: The “Glass Beads” Coupling Solution for Borehole a...]()
![(a) Location and configuration of the ARGONET (left inset) and EUROSEISTEST (right inset) accelerometer arrays, from which data has been used in this study. (b) Data set epicentral distance–local magnitude distribution. The distance–magnitude curves for peak ground acceleration (PGA) levels of 0.5 and 50 mg using the Skarlatoudis et al. (2003) ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) are also depicted by dashed lines. (c) Map view of the events used in this study. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![Dispersion of Rayleigh surface waves by high‐resolution frequency–wavenumber (HR‐FK) analysis using data from a temporary, small‐aperture array of six seismometers at the ARGONET site: Dispersion Curve (DC) obtained from data collected during a dry hour (7 November 2017 00:00) (gray thick line and ±1 standard deviation in light gray) and during a wet hour (27 November 2017 00:00) (black thick line and ±1 standard deviation as dashed lines).]()
![Comparison of the reference VS30mea‐values available for each station (circles) with the distribution of VSZPseis‐values, shown with box‐and‐whisker plots depicting the 25th–75th (box) and 10th–90th percentiles (whiskers). A logarithmic scale is used for the VS30‐values, and the NEHRP (1997) soil classification limits for classes B/A, C, D, and E are also depicted. ARGONET stations are shown in panel (a), and EUROSEISTEST stations are presented in panel (b) for the downhole array at the TST site, in panel (c) for the approximately north–south‐trending Mygdonia basin profile, and in panel (d) for the approximately east–west‐trending Mygdonia basin profile (see Fig. 2 for location details).]()
![First thumbnail for: Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Meth...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Meth...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Meth...]()
![Interferometry‐based shear‐wave velocity values (east–west direction) for different depth intervals at the site of the ARGONET vertical array using the (a,b,d,f) surface sensor and (c,e,g) intermediate sensors at depths of 5.6, 15.5, and 40.1 m, respectively, as a reference. VS values have been computed on the interferometry output with the original sampling rate (200 samples per second; gray symbols) and after upsampling (black symbols). Top right onset shows the interferometry‐based P‐wave velocity values (vertical recordings) for the 0–5.6 m depth interval.]()
![First thumbnail for: Assessing the Applicability of Deconvolution of Bo...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Assessing the Applicability of Deconvolution of Bo...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Assessing the Applicability of Deconvolution of Bo...]()
![First thumbnail for: Site-response high-frequency frontiers and the add...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Site-response high-frequency frontiers and the add...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Site-response high-frequency frontiers and the add...]()
![First thumbnail for: A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for...]()
![Second thumbnail for: A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for...]()
![Third thumbnail for: A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for...]()
![First thumbnail for: Why Differential Data Work]()
![Second thumbnail for: Why Differential Data Work]()
![Third thumbnail for: Why Differential Data Work]()
![First thumbnail for: Seismic Response of a Mountain Ridge Prone to Land...]()
![Second thumbnail for: Seismic Response of a Mountain Ridge Prone to Land...]()
![Third thumbnail for: Seismic Response of a Mountain Ridge Prone to Land...]()
1-20 OF 24 RESULTS FOR
ARGONET Array
Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Journal Article
Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: Observations at the ARGONET Array, Cephalonia, Greece Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 15 May 2025
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025)
...Ioannis Grendas; Zafeiria Roumelioti; Nikolaos Theodoulidis; Fabrice Hollender ABSTRACT We use 964 earthquake records from the ARGONET, Cephalonia, Greece, array database to investigate the possible seasonal variation of ground motion at two surface and four borehole stations. We first apply...
FIGURES
Early Publication
Journal Article
The ARGONET (Greece) Seismic Observatory: An Accelerometric Vertical Array and Its Data Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 06 June 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1555–1565.
...N. Theodoulidis; F. Hollender; A. Mariscal; D. Moiriat; P.‐Y. Bard; A. Konidaris; M. Cushing; K. Konstantinidou; Z. Roumelioti ABSTRACT The ARGOstoli NETwork (ARGONET) consists of a vertical seismic array and a close by (440 m) free‐field station on bedrock, located in Cephalonia, western Greece...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Velocity in Soil and Implications for Soil Response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) Vertical Array Data Reveal Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 10 March 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (2): 441–451.
...Zafeiria Roumelioti; Fabrice Hollender; Philippe Guéguen ABSTRACT We apply interferometry by deconvolution to compute the shear‐wave velocity in shallow sediments (0–83.4 m) based on earthquake records from a vertical accelerometric array (ARGOstoli Network [ARGONET]) on Cephalonia Island, Greece...
FIGURES
Image
![(a) General map with the prevailing seismotectonic features in western Greece (Cephalonia transform fault zone [CTFZ]); the frame marks the location of Cephalonia, (b) map of Cephalonia showing the exact location of the ARGOstoli Network (ARGONET) array, and (c) rough description of the stratigraphy at the ARGONET site and deployment of the vertical array.](https://gsw.silverchair-cdn.com/gsw/Content_public/Journal/bssa/110/2/10.1785_0120190183/4/s_0120190183fig1.png?Expires=2147483647&Signature=pHCCHa~w6pR8Ks8~0IbOSGd27STR5RXIClpMO~eRe3IvXDDg1H8gNFQFjGj4GJmEG6PxfqhgGQZbB9ZP5gi1x6NPJ-AJPD5vVmwIunZU7-es12pVA8ItEKBbPTV8h41gajfNzaaom3c~ENIXry340AYOSuMQARvwpoWd1f5-Hmu10yJLHqa6J0Whi6rM2BDUMdnPe4IV3ORzNKUucAyBgSw6LhHmZ~6r5UzcexvPzxrW2SpgO-tjArhQf8a1PJ4t-eD4CWeXZe58EUsOIuwkRs2-nW97CjPuer-wQVioBlikJtSVrSF9SxK4CbK4-33hVkO6hvOfL64l91Hnc-29JQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
(a) General map with the prevailing seismotectonic features in western Gree... Available to Purchase
in Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Velocity in Soil and Implications for Soil Response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) Vertical Array Data Reveal
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 10 March 2020
Figure 1. (a) General map with the prevailing seismotectonic features in western Greece (Cephalonia transform fault zone [CTFZ]); the frame marks the location of Cephalonia, (b) map of Cephalonia showing the exact location of the ARGOstoli Network (ARGONET) array, and (c) rough description
Image
(a) Map of the broader study area. (b) Epicenters of the 964 earthquakes fo... Available to Purchase
in Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: Observations at the ARGONET Array, Cephalonia, Greece
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 15 May 2025
Figure 1. (a) Map of the broader study area. (b) Epicenters of the 964 earthquakes for which data have been used in this study. (c) Location of the ARGONET array. (d) Close‐up of the location of the borehole vertical array and two surface stations (CK0 and CKWP).
Image
Schematic layout of the (a) EUROSEISTEST and (b) ARGONET accelerometric arr... Available to Purchase
in Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Method for Estimating V S 30 : Insights from Two Accelerometer Arrays in Greece
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 28 February 2025
Figure 3. Schematic layout of the (a) EUROSEISTEST and (b) ARGONET accelerometric arrays (see Fig. 2a for spatial scale) with borehole and surface stations. Stations are color coded according to their National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1997) soil classification (modified
Journal Article
Accelerometer, Velocimeter Dense‐Array, and Rotation Sensor Datasets from the Sinaps@ Postseismic Survey (Cephalonia 2014–2015 Aftershock Sequence) Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 24 January 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (2A): 678–687.
... experiment, the rotation sensor was moved back in the Koutavos basin and was collocated with the accelerometer ACAN and operated from 11 March 2014 to 2 July 2015 ( ∼ 16 months). The rotational station was called ROAN for this period (location of the then‐future Argonet vertical array). This dataset...
FIGURES
Image
Example earthquake record (in gray) corresponding to an M L 3.4 ea... Available to Purchase
in Ground‐Motion Dependency on Seasonal Variations: Observations at the ARGONET Array, Cephalonia, Greece
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 15 May 2025
Figure 3. Example earthquake record (in gray) corresponding to an M L 3.4 earthquake at an epicentral distance of 31 km from the ARGONET vertical array. The black color highlights the selected S ‐wave window, which is tapered at both ends. The pre‐event black line corresponds
Journal Article
The “Glass Beads” Coupling Solution for Borehole and Posthole Accelerometers: Shaking Table Tests and Field Retrievability Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 13 December 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (2A): 925–934.
... such as seasonal variations in shear‐wave velocities ( Roumelioti et al. , 2020 ). Numerous databases from vertical accelerometer arrays are available ( UC Santa Barbara, 1989 , EuroseisTest: Pitilakis et al. , 2013 ; Corinth gulf soft soil array [CORSSA]: Kassaras et al. , 2017 ; Argostoli network [ARGONET...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplemental Content
Image
(a) Location and configuration of the ARGONET (left inset) and EUROSEISTEST... Available to Purchase
in Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Method for Estimating V S 30 : Insights from Two Accelerometer Arrays in Greece
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 28 February 2025
Figure 2. (a) Location and configuration of the ARGONET (left inset) and EUROSEISTEST (right inset) accelerometer arrays, from which data has been used in this study. (b) Data set epicentral distance–local magnitude distribution. The distance–magnitude curves for peak ground acceleration (PGA
Image
Dispersion of Rayleigh surface waves by high‐resolution frequency–wavenumbe... Available to Purchase
in Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Velocity in Soil and Implications for Soil Response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) Vertical Array Data Reveal
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 10 March 2020
Figure 7. Dispersion of Rayleigh surface waves by high‐resolution frequency–wavenumber (HR‐FK) analysis using data from a temporary, small‐aperture array of six seismometers at the ARGONET site: Dispersion Curve (DC) obtained from data collected during a dry hour (7 November 2017 00:00) (gray
Image
Comparison of the reference V S 30 mea ‐values available for ea... Available to Purchase
in Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Method for Estimating V S 30 : Insights from Two Accelerometer Arrays in Greece
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 28 February 2025
for the V S 30 ‐values, and the NEHRP (1997) soil classification limits for classes B/A, C, D, and E are also depicted. ARGONET stations are shown in panel (a), and EUROSEISTEST stations are presented in panel (b) for the downhole array at the TST site, in panel (c) for the approximately north
Journal Article
Analyzing the Stability of P ‐Wave Seismogram Method for Estimating V S 30 : Insights from Two Accelerometer Arrays in Greece Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 28 February 2025
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025)
...Figure 3. Schematic layout of the (a) EUROSEISTEST and (b) ARGONET accelerometric arrays (see Fig. 2a for spatial scale) with borehole and surface stations. Stations are color coded according to their National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1997) soil classification (modified...
FIGURES
Early Publication
Image
Interferometry‐based shear‐wave velocity values (east–west direction) for d... Available to Purchase
in Rainfall‐Induced Variation of Seismic Waves Velocity in Soil and Implications for Soil Response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) Vertical Array Data Reveal
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 10 March 2020
Figure 4. Interferometry‐based shear‐wave velocity values (east–west direction) for different depth intervals at the site of the ARGONET vertical array using the (a,b,d,f) surface sensor and (c,e,g) intermediate sensors at depths of 5.6, 15.5, and 40.1 m, respectively, as a reference. V S
Journal Article
Assessing the Applicability of Deconvolution of Borehole Records for Determining Near‐Surface Shear‐Wave Attenuation Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 26 February 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (2): 621–635.
... signals to obtain the acceleration time histories at the surface and downhole sensor depth, resulting in 30 pairs of synthetic accelerograms (downhole and at the wellhead). The input signals were selected from the database of the ARGONET vertical array (Cephalonia Island, west Greece; Hollender et al...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Can We Trust High‐Frequency Content in Strong‐Motion Database Signals? Impact of Housing, Coupling, and Installation Depth of Seismic Sensors Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 06 May 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (4): 2192–2205.
... . The ARGONET (Greece) seismic observatory: An accelerometric vertical array and its data , Seismol. Res. Lett. 89 , 1555 – 1565 , doi: 10.1785/0220180042 . Thompson E. M. Baise L. G. Kayen R. E. , and Guzina B. B. 2009 . Impediments to predicting site response: Seismic property...
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article
Site-response high-frequency frontiers and the added value of site-specific earthquake record-based measurements of velocity and attenuation Available to Purchase
Journal: Earthquake Spectra
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Published: 01 May 2025
Earthquake Spectra (2025) 41 (2): 1151–1176.
... and implications for soil response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) vertical array data reveal . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 110 (2): 441 – 451 .
Ruigrok
E
Rodriguez-Marek
A
Edwards
B...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article
A DesignSafe earthquake ground motion database for California and surrounding regions Available to Purchase
Journal: Earthquake Spectra
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Published: 01 February 2023
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (1): 702–721.
... for soil response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece) vertical array data reveal . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 110 ( 2 ): 441 – 451 .
Site EffectS Assessment Using AMbient Excitations (SESAME) ( 2004 ) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Why Differential Data Work Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 14 December 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (2): 597–607.
... tomography , Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111 , no. 3 , 1234 – 1247 , doi: 10.1785/0120210007 . Roumelioti Z. Hollender F. , and Guéguen P. 2020 . Rainfall‐induced variation of seismic waves velocity in soil and implications for soil response: What the ARGONET (Cephalonia, Greece...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article
Seismic Response of a Mountain Ridge Prone to Landsliding Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 21 July 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (6): 3004–3020.
.... Roumelioti Z. Regnier J. Perron V. , and Bard P.‐Y. 2018 . Respective advantages of surface and downhole reference stations for site effect studies: Lessons learnt from the Argonet (Cephalonia Island, Greece) and Cadarache (Provence, France) vertical arrays , 16th European Conf...
FIGURES
Includes: Supplemental Content
1
