1-20 OF 821 RESULTS FOR

ANGUS

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 22 March 2022
Geophysics (2022) 87 (2): X5–X6.
...Don White; Lisa Roach; Kyle Harris; Doug Angus Nemeth and Escalante’s underlying concern is that “the primary factor that will control the NRMS are the variability of seismic amplitude along the trace and choice of calculation window.” This is true to a large degree but does not disqualify...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 31 December 2021
Geophysics (2022) 87 (2): X1–X3.
... repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability : The Leading Edge , 21 , 640 – 647 , doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1497316 . Roach L. A. N. White D. J. Roberts B. Angus D. , 2017 , Initial 4D seismic results after CO 2 injection start-up at the Aquistore storage site...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1988
The Canadian Mineralogist (1988) 26 (3): 467–486.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 April 1986
Geology (1986) 14 (4): 295–298.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1966
GSA Bulletin (1966) 77 (9): P191–P192.
Series: Geological Society, London, Geology of Series
Published: 20 August 2024
DOI: 10.1144/GOS5-2022-52
EISBN: 9781786206893
FIGURES | View All (41)
Image
Chemostratigraphy of the Angus Core. From left to right: wt% carbonate content and wt% total organic carbon (TOC) (open circles are new data in Supplemental Material [see text footnote 1]; filled circles are from Joo and Sageman, 2014), bulk organic carbon isotopic ratios δ13Corg (‰; Joo and Sageman, 2014), initial osmium isotope ratios Osi, rhenium concentrations (circles), and osmium-192 concentrations (squares) (see Table 1). Mbr.—member; OAE2—Oceanic Anoxic Event 2.
Published: 13 October 2020
Figure 3. Chemostratigraphy of the Angus Core. From left to right: wt% carbonate content and wt% total organic carbon (TOC) (open circles are new data in Supplemental Material [see text footnote 1 ]; filled circles are from Joo and Sageman, 2014 ), bulk organic carbon isotopic ratios δ 13 C org
Image
Published: 13 October 2020
TABLE 1. RHENIUM-OSMIUM GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE ANGUS AND SH#1 CORES THROUGH OCEANIC ANOXIC EVENT 2 INTERVAL, WESTERN INTERIOR BASIN
Image
Fig. 12.
Published: 23 March 2018
Fig. 12. Stratigraphic unit (SU) 7. ( a ) Upper part of SU7 at Angus (see Figs. 3 , 13 for location), showing Type-A climbing ripples (northwest paleoflow directions) in fine-grained sand draped by thick (up to 15 cm) beds of laminated silt with thin stringers of very fine-grained sand. ( b
Image
Detailed stratigraphy for the Angus core, plotted with 5-mm-resolution wt% CaCO3, SiXRF, AlXRF, and δ13Corg data. The numbered circles to the right of the stratigraphic column identify bentonite layers, and the three stars indicate the stratigraphic location of dated ash beds that have been correlated into the Angus core for geochronologic constraints. (A) Calibrated XRF wt% CaCO3 profile from this study, (B) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning results for Si (counts). (C) XRF scanning results for Al (counts). (D) Bulk organic carbon isotope data from Joo et al. (2014). The shaded area indicates the interval of oceanic anoxic event (OAE) 2. VPDB—Vienna Peedee belemnite.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 2. Detailed stratigraphy for the Angus core, plotted with 5-mm-resolution wt% CaCO 3 , Si XRF , Al XRF , and δ 13 C org data. The numbered circles to the right of the stratigraphic column identify bentonite layers, and the three stars indicate the stratigraphic location of dated ash beds
Image
Correlation of the Angus core to the USGS #1 Portland core, using lithostratigraphy, CaCO3, Mn, Fe, and δ13Corg data. For the Angus core, plotted to the right of Bridge Creek Limestone Member lithostratigraphy are: (A) calibrated wt% CaCO3 content, (B) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning results for Mn (counts), (C) XRF scanning results for Fe (counts), and (D) bulk organic carbon isotopes (‰ vs. Vienna Peedee belemnite [VPDB]; Joo et al., 2014). For the USGS #1 Portland core, plotted to the left of Bridge Creek Limestone Member lithostratigraphy (after Meyers et al., 2012a) are: (E) bulk organic carbon isotopes (‰ vs. VPDB; Sageman et al., 2006), (F) Mn content (ppm; Sageman and Lyons, 2003), (G) Fe content (wt%; Sageman and Lyons, 2003), and (H) wt% CaCO3 (Sageman et al., 1997). Adjacent to the Angus core lithostratigraphy, the circles with numbers 1 and 2 are bentonite layers correlated to bentonite layers “B” and “A” (respectively) in the Portland core. The two dotted lines identify the initiation and termination of the oceanic anoxic event (OAE) 2 based on available δ13Corg data (the shaded area for the upper correlation indicates uncertainty in our placement of the termination). Numbers adjacent to the wt% CaCO3 records from the Angus core and Portland core demarcate the proposed high-resolution correlation. Legend for the Angus core lithology is the same as in Figure 2. Legend for the Portland core lithology follows Sageman et al. (2006). HS—Hartland Shale. S. gracile—Sciponoceras gracile, N. juddii—Neocardioceras juddii, W. devon.—Watinoceras devonense, P.f.—Pseudaspidoceras flexuosum, V.b.—Vascoceras birchbyi, M. nodosoides—Mammites nodosoides, C. woolgari—Collignoniceras woollgari.
Published: 01 July 2014
Figure 3. Correlation of the Angus core to the USGS #1 Portland core, using lithostratigraphy, CaCO 3 , Mn, Fe, and δ 13 C org data. For the Angus core, plotted to the right of Bridge Creek Limestone Member lithostratigraphy are: (A) calibrated wt% CaCO 3 content, (B) X-ray fluorescence (XRF
Image
Published: 01 July 2014
TABLE 1. SEDIMENTATION RATE CONSTRAINTS FOR THE ANGUS CORE ASTROCHRONOLOGIC TESTING, BASED ON RADIOISOTOPICALLY DATED BENTONITES
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 June 2021
Economic Geology (2021) 116 (4): 1011–1033.
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2016
South African Journal of Geology (2016) 119 (2): 305–328.
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 2015
Economic Geology (2015) 110 (5): 1295–1312.
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2013
South African Journal of Geology (2013) 116 (2): 219–240.
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2012
South African Journal of Geology (2012) 115 (1): 77–90.
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 2008
Economic Geology (2008) 103 (5): 981–1004.
FIGURES | View All (26)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2007
South African Journal of Geology (2007) 110 (4): 585–596.
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2004
South African Journal of Geology (2004) 107 (3): 325–332.
FIGURES | View All (6)