1-20 OF 46 RESULTS FOR

AMSR-E

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Vadose Zone Journal (2013) 12 (3): vzj2013.05.0093.
...V. Sridhar; W.T.A. Jaksa; Bin Fang; Venkat Lakshmi; Kenneth G. Hubbard; Xin Jin Abstract Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) soil moisture data products are proven to be useful across various regions around the world. However, numerous studies have suggested...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
(a) Average AMSR-E, observed, modeled, and scaled AMSR-E based on model and observed data for eight sites (based on 4 yr of data between 2002 and 05 in m3 m−3). Figure shows higher volumetric soil moisture in the eastern sites (YORK, BEAT, REDC, and INDI) and during the growing season (AMJ and JAS) in all sites. (b) Computed RMSE between AMSR-E and Observed, Model and Observed, Scaled (M) and Observed and Scaled (O), and observed for eight sites during 2002–2005. (c) Computed mean percentile error (MPE) for eight sites during 2002–2005. (d) Computed mean absolute error (MAE) for eight sites during 2002–2005.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 4. (a) Average AMSR-E, observed, modeled, and scaled AMSR-E based on model and observed data for eight sites (based on 4 yr of data between 2002 and 05 in m 3 m −3 ). Figure shows higher volumetric soil moisture in the eastern sites (YORK, BEAT, REDC, and INDI) and during the growing season
Image
Overall scatter plots of spatial standard deviation of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture versus the Oklahoma Mesonet and Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 10. Overall scatter plots of spatial standard deviation of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture versus the Oklahoma Mesonet and Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months.
Image
Comparison of the estimated soil moisture, AMSR-E and NARR soil moisture data with in situ observations for the Scotty Creek area.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 7. Comparison of the estimated soil moisture, AMSR-E and NARR soil moisture data with in situ observations for the Scotty Creek area.
Image
Temporal patterns of AMSR-E soil moisture, observed soil moisture data (m3 m−3) and precipitation for eight sites during 2002–2005.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 3. Temporal patterns of AMSR-E soil moisture, observed soil moisture data (m 3 m −3 ) and precipitation for eight sites during 2002–2005.
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Table 2. RMSE and R 2 statistics for AMSR-E and in situ soil moisture observations, along with the deviation between interpolated observed vs. AMSR-E, Scaled (M), and Scaled (O) soil moisture. R 2 RMSE Unbiased RMSE Bias Number of points 2003 0.15 0.12 0.11 −0.08 48
Image
Comparisons of spatial soil moisture pattern between bias-corrected AMSR-E and Variable Infiltration Capacity model (VIC) estimates in June 2004 in southwestern Idaho.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 8. Comparisons of spatial soil moisture pattern between bias-corrected AMSR-E and Variable Infiltration Capacity model (VIC) estimates in June 2004 in southwestern Idaho.
Image
Comparison of the estimated soil moisture and the AMSR-E soil moisture data with NARR soil moisture for (a) the PAD and (b) the Scotty Creek areas.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 6. Comparison of the estimated soil moisture and the AMSR-E soil moisture data with NARR soil moisture for (a) the PAD and (b) the Scotty Creek areas.
Image
Maps of the NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture (m3 m−3) from May 22, 2004, July 17, 2005 and August 9, 2005 in Oklahoma.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 6. Maps of the NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture (m 3 m −3 ) from May 22, 2004, July 17, 2005 and August 9, 2005 in Oklahoma.
Image
Maps of the NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture (m3 m−3) from 22 May 2004, 17 July 2005, and 2 August 2005 in Little Washita.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 7. Maps of the NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture (m 3 m −3 ) from 22 May 2004, 17 July 2005, and 2 August 2005 in Little Washita.
Image
(a) Overall scatter plots of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture versus the Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months. (b) Overall scatter plots of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km detrended soil moisture versus the Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 9. (a) Overall scatter plots of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture versus the Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months. (b) Overall scatter plots of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km detrended soil moisture versus the Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations
Image
(a) The time series of raw AMSR-E soil moisture, observed soil moisture and scaled soil moisture using model and observed data (m3 m−3) from June 2002 to December 2005 for INDI site. (b) Comparison of normalized anomaly between raw and scaled soil moisture computed from model estimated and observed soil moisture for MITC station.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5. (a) The time series of raw AMSR-E soil moisture, observed soil moisture and scaled soil moisture using model and observed data (m 3 m −3 ) from June 2002 to December 2005 for INDI site. (b) Comparison of normalized anomaly between raw and scaled soil moisture computed from model
Image
The relationship between interpolated Observed (Obs) data, AMSR-E, Scaled (M), and Scaled (O) in (top) 2003, (middle) 2004, and (bottom) 2005 for Nebraska (m3 m−3). The spline regularized interpolation function was used to interpolated 37 sites dataset into raster surface. The averages of 34 by 12 pixels were used for statistical analysis and graphical representation.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 7. The relationship between interpolated Observed (Obs) data, AMSR-E, Scaled (M), and Scaled (O) in (top) 2003, (middle) 2004, and (bottom) 2005 for Nebraska (m 3 m −3 ). The spline regularized interpolation function was used to interpolated 37 sites dataset into raster surface
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Vadose Zone Journal (2013) 12 (3): vzj2013.05.0089.
...Fig. 10. Overall scatter plots of spatial standard deviation of NLDAS, AMSR-E, and 1-km soil moisture versus the Oklahoma Mesonet and Little Washita Micronet soil moisture observations for all the months. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Vadose Zone Journal (2013) 12 (3): vzj2012.0134.
...Fig. 7. Comparison of the estimated soil moisture, AMSR-E and NARR soil moisture data with in situ observations for the Scotty Creek area. ...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Vadose Zone Journal (2013) 12 (3): vzj2012.0097.
.... A validation example of an AMSR-E satellite and a GLDAS-Noah model product showed a small but positive impact of the flagging. On the basis of the positive results of this study we will add the flags as a standard attribute to all soil moisture measurements contained in the ISMN. The International Soil...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Non-bias-corrected (NBC), bias-corrected (BC) based cumulative distribution function (CDF) of AMSR-E in comparison with Noah land surface model.
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 2. Non-bias-corrected (NBC), bias-corrected (BC) based cumulative distribution function (CDF) of AMSR-E in comparison with Noah land surface model.
Image
Weekly moving average values of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E) soil moisture at four selected meteorological stations from 2003 to 2011 (inset for 2010).
Published: 01 October 2016
Fig. 15. Weekly moving average values of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E) soil moisture at four selected meteorological stations from 2003 to 2011 (inset for 2010).
Image
Study areas: (a) the Brown (BRW) site in Illinois, (b) the Walnut Creek (WC 11–14) sites in Iowa based on Polarimetric Scanning Radiometer (PSR) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and (c) the Lubbock site in Texas based on Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer–Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) and MODIS.
Published: 01 August 2013
–Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) and MODIS.
Image
Maps of variables used in the soil moisture downscaling algorithm from 21 July 2005 over Oklahoma, MODIS Aqua 1-km land surface temperature (a) during the day and (b) at night; (c) 1/4° spatial resolution AMSR-E soil moisture; (d) 1/8° spatial resolution NLDAS soil moisture; (e) MODIS Aqua 1-km NDVI.
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 2. Maps of variables used in the soil moisture downscaling algorithm from 21 July 2005 over Oklahoma, MODIS Aqua 1-km land surface temperature (a) during the day and (b) at night; (c) 1/4° spatial resolution AMSR-E soil moisture; (d) 1/8° spatial resolution NLDAS soil moisture; (e) MODIS