Update search
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Journal
Publisher
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Barton Springs (3)
-
Red Mountain (1)
-
United States
-
Texas
-
Balcones fault zone (6)
-
Blanco County Texas (4)
-
Burnet County Texas (3)
-
Edwards Aquifer (6)
-
Edwards Plateau (2)
-
Gillespie County Texas (7)
-
Llano County Texas (3)
-
Llano Uplift (3)
-
Mason County Texas (3)
-
McCulloch County Texas (1)
-
Medina County Texas (1)
-
San Saba County Texas (1)
-
Trinity Aquifer (3)
-
-
-
-
commodities
-
water resources (2)
-
-
elements, isotopes
-
carbon
-
C-13/C-12 (1)
-
-
isotope ratios (1)
-
isotopes
-
stable isotopes
-
C-13/C-12 (1)
-
O-18/O-16 (1)
-
-
-
oxygen
-
O-18/O-16 (1)
-
-
-
fossils
-
Chordata
-
Vertebrata (1)
-
-
Invertebrata
-
Arthropoda
-
Mandibulata
-
Crustacea
-
Malacostraca
-
Amphipoda (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Brachiopoda
-
Inarticulata (1)
-
-
-
microfossils
-
Conodonta (1)
-
problematic microfossils (1)
-
-
Plantae
-
algae
-
Chlorophyta
-
Chlorophyceae
-
Dasycladaceae (1)
-
-
-
-
-
problematic fossils
-
problematic microfossils (1)
-
-
thallophytes (1)
-
-
geochronology methods
-
paleomagnetism (1)
-
-
geologic age
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
Paleozoic
-
Cambrian
-
Upper Cambrian
-
Wilberns Formation (1)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician (1)
-
-
-
Precambrian
-
upper Precambrian
-
Proterozoic (2)
-
-
-
-
metamorphic rocks
-
metamorphic rocks
-
metasedimentary rocks (1)
-
schists (1)
-
-
-
minerals
-
carbonates
-
calcite (1)
-
dolomite (1)
-
-
oxides
-
goethite (1)
-
-
sulfates
-
gypsum (1)
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
biogeography (1)
-
carbon
-
C-13/C-12 (1)
-
-
Chordata
-
Vertebrata (1)
-
-
conservation (1)
-
diagenesis (3)
-
ecology (1)
-
faults (1)
-
folds (2)
-
foliation (2)
-
fractures (1)
-
geophysical methods (1)
-
ground water (6)
-
Invertebrata
-
Arthropoda
-
Mandibulata
-
Crustacea
-
Malacostraca
-
Amphipoda (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Brachiopoda
-
Inarticulata (1)
-
-
-
isotopes
-
stable isotopes
-
C-13/C-12 (1)
-
O-18/O-16 (1)
-
-
-
land use (1)
-
maps (1)
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
metamorphic rocks
-
metasedimentary rocks (1)
-
schists (1)
-
-
metamorphism (2)
-
orogeny (2)
-
oxygen
-
O-18/O-16 (1)
-
-
paleogeography (1)
-
paleomagnetism (1)
-
paleontology (2)
-
Paleozoic
-
Cambrian
-
Upper Cambrian
-
Wilberns Formation (1)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician (1)
-
-
-
Plantae
-
algae
-
Chlorophyta
-
Chlorophyceae
-
Dasycladaceae (1)
-
-
-
-
-
pollution (2)
-
Precambrian
-
upper Precambrian
-
Proterozoic (2)
-
-
-
problematic fossils
-
problematic microfossils (1)
-
-
sea water (1)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
grainstone (1)
-
limestone
-
micrite (1)
-
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks (1)
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
girvanella (1)
-
-
planar bedding structures
-
bedding (1)
-
-
-
springs (1)
-
stratigraphy (2)
-
structural analysis (2)
-
structural geology (2)
-
tectonics (1)
-
thallophytes (1)
-
United States
-
Texas
-
Balcones fault zone (6)
-
Blanco County Texas (4)
-
Burnet County Texas (3)
-
Edwards Aquifer (6)
-
Edwards Plateau (2)
-
Gillespie County Texas (7)
-
Llano County Texas (3)
-
Llano Uplift (3)
-
Mason County Texas (3)
-
McCulloch County Texas (1)
-
Medina County Texas (1)
-
San Saba County Texas (1)
-
Trinity Aquifer (3)
-
-
-
waste disposal (1)
-
water resources (2)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
oolite (1)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
grainstone (1)
-
limestone
-
micrite (1)
-
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks (1)
-
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
girvanella (1)
-
-
planar bedding structures
-
bedding (1)
-
-
-
-
sediments
-
oolite (1)
-
GeoRef Categories
Era and Period
Epoch and Age
Book Series
Date
Availability
ABSTRACT Multiport monitor wells have been used by the Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District (BSEACD) to study complex, multilayer, and stacked aquifers in central Texas. Much of the data from water wells that are used for hydrogeological studies are of limited use owing to the thickness of the aquifers, vertical variation in hydraulic properties, and the often-uncertain completion of the wells. To address these concerns, hydrogeologists and engineers have employed various methods, such as installation of nested wells, multilevel completions in a single borehole, and multiport wells. The BSEACD has used multiport wells to determine vertical variations in an aquifer and the hydraulic relationships between stacked aquifers. With multiport wells, properties such as hydraulic head, temperature, hydraulic conductivity, and water quality of discrete units within an aquifer can be determined. The use of multiport wells has shown how portions of the Upper Trinity lithologic units are hydraulically connected to the overlying Edwards lithologic units, and how the Edwards Aquifer is hydraulically isolated from the Middle and Lower Trinity Aquifers.
Evolution of Edwards-Trinity Aquifer biodiversity: Insights from phylogeography
ABSTRACT The exceptional groundwater community inhabiting the karstic Edwards-Trinity Aquifer system in central Texas has inspired generations of biologists seeking to understand diversification in an extreme environment. Since the late 1990s, molecular genetic tools have increasingly been used to uncover hidden diversity and infer the evolutionary history of groundwater species inhabiting the Edwards-Trinity system. The field of phylogeography—the study of the spatial distribution of genealogical lineages within and among intraspecific populations and closely related species—has provided unparalleled insight into patterns of Edwards-Trinity groundwater biodiversity. Similar to other global groundwater biodiversity hotspots, phylogeographic studies in the Edwards-Trinity Aquifer system have documented exceptionally high levels of endemism and strong population structure due to isolation across naturally fragmented habitat. Cryptic species (two or more morphologically similar but genetically distinct species) have been discovered in a number of phylogeographic investigations, including Eurycea salamanders, Dionda minnows, and Stygobromus amphipods. A number of these species are threatened or endangered with extinction due to habitat loss and degradation resulting from urbanization. Accurately delimiting species boundaries has had significant implications for biodiversity and groundwater conservation in the Edwards-Trinity region because the Endangered Species Act has been used to regulate unrestricted groundwater withdrawal in the eastern Edwards Aquifer where listed species are found. New developments in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing technology coupled with advancements in model-based inference will provide powerful tools for furthering our understanding of Edwards-Trinity biodiversity and predicting its response to a rapidly changing environment.
ABSTRACT In Texas, the investigation and implementation of desalination began in the 1960s. The earliest operating desalination plants in Texas were in Port Mansfield (south of Corpus Christi) in 1965 and Dell City (far West Texas) in 1968. Since 1999, the number and capacity of desalination plants operating in Texas have steadily increased. In 2016, there were 49 municipal desalination plants in the state, and the total municipal desalination capacity was ~142 million gallons per day (537 million liters per day). The predominant desalination technology used today in municipal desalination plants is reverse osmosis, a membrane filtration process in which dissolved solids (salts) are removed from saline water by applying pressure and forcing the water through a semipermeable membrane. Three desalination plants are currently in operation within the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) Aquifer boundaries, and additional desalination of brackish groundwater from the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) and Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifers can alleviate stress on water resources from projected population growth and lessen potential water scarcity in central Texas.
Surface geophysics, Edwards and Trinity Aquifers, central Texas
ABSTRACT Geophysical methods have been an important component of effective hydrogeologic investigations over the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers in central Texas. Various electrical and electromagnetic methods have been used to map stratigraphy and geologic structure and to locate buried karst features. Geophysical methods can also characterize faults and fractures in the Balcones fault zone. Six case studies across three segments (San Antonio, Barton Springs, and Northern segments) of the Edwards Aquifer show that the locations of buried caves and sinkholes, on all three segments, are best defined using a combination of two- and three-dimensional resistivity imaging and natural potential (self-potential) methods. Localization and characterization of the Haby Crossing and Mount Bonnell faults, which are known to be the most significant faults in the Balcones fault zone, are best accomplished by integrating multiple geophysical methods (e.g., electrical resistivity, natural potential, magnetic, ground-penetrating radar, conductivity, and seismic refraction tomography). It is noted, however, that other karstic regions could respond differently to different geophysical methods and require different primary geophysical methods.
Emerging contaminants in groundwater, karst, and the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer
ABSTRACT Karst aquifers have hydrogeologic characteristics that render them uniquely vulnerable to contamination from emerging contaminants (ECs). ECs comprise numerous chemical groups, including pharmaceuticals, personal-care products, flame retardants, perfluorinated and polyfluorinated compounds, nanoparticles, and microplastics. Many ECs have sources, transport pathways, and chemical characteristics that facilitate their infiltration into groundwater, either indirectly from surface water or directly from sources such as landfill leachate and septic systems. What little is known about the occurrence, fate, and transport of ECs in the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer indicates that the aquifer might be increasingly vulnerable to this type of contamination. The natural physical characteristics of this karst aquifer and anthropogenic sources of ECs associated with increased urbanization in central Texas contribute to this vulnerability. In this chapter, we review groups of ECs and their sources, occurrence of ECs in groundwater and karst, and current knowledge about the occurrence of ECs in the Edwards Aquifer. We conclude by discussing specific factors, such as rapid flow and contaminant sources, that contribute to the vulnerability of the Edwards Aquifer to contamination by ECs.
ABSTRACT Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a proven water-supply strategy that uses an aquifer to store surplus water that will be available for later use when that stored water is needed. Although only three ASR systems are currently operating in Texas, recent incentives from the state, along with changes in regulatory framework, have helped to encourage consideration of ASR as a viable water-supply strategy. The changes in Texas law primarily reduced the power of groundwater conservation districts to regulate ASR, and they put the majority of the role of project authorization in the hands of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Two Edwards-named aquifers in Texas were considered in this work: the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) and the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifers. Both of the aquifers have areas that appear to be suitable, from a hydrogeologic standpoint, for ASR. The Edwards hydrostratigraphic unit of the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) Aquifer has generally good productivity and water quality. However, in some locations, the high natural gradient combined with low porosity may increase the design challenge due to bubble drift. These same characteristics exist in many areas of the freshwater portion of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zones) Aquifer, although its high productivity makes for very attractive per-well recharge and recover rates. The lower natural gradient (and thus smaller potential for bubble drift) in the brackish portion of the Edwards Aquifer may make it a good candidate in areas where productivity is sufficient.