Abstract Detailed geological mapping of a highly fractured Paleozoic (pre-Permian) basement and the scarce outcrops of overlying Permian–Mesozoic cover in the surroundings of the Duje Valley (Picos de Europa Unit, Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain), together with new field data, have allowed the separation of four genetic fault sets in a polyorogenic area, affected by the Variscan and Alpine cycles. These fault sets are, from oldest to youngest: Variscan thrusts (late Carboniferous), late Variscan strike-slip faults (late Carboniferous–earliest Permian), Alpine normal faults (Permian–Mesozoic) and Alpine reverse faults (Cenozoic). A structural analysis is reported here, based on the joint use of geometric, kinematic and deformational features, cross-cutting and tectono – sedimentary relationships between the structures. This analysis has allowed the recognition and full characterization of the four fault sets. These types of structural analyses are useful for unravelling complex tectonic histories in regions where massive limestone lithologies make reconstructing the timing of fault activity difficult, especially if the basement is affected by late deformation events that are not recorded by cover outcrops.

Abstract For the west European regional chronostratigraphic framework, the Cantabrian substage was conceived as covering a widely apparent stratigraphic gap between the top of the Westphalian and the base of Stephanian A, the lowest unit of the Stephanian. A continuous depositional history covers this time gap in the Cantabrian region of Spain; the upper limit of this interval was defined by the succeeding Barruelian substage, equivalent to Stephanian A. Intense tectonic and magmatic activity characterizes this period; the Iberian orogenic belt was an essentially linear feature buckled through the Late Pennsylvanian into the tightly folded Cantabrian Orocline. This evidences an extensive southern foreland to the Variscides, in which the coal-swamp biome persisted through the Late Pennsylvanian, supporting biostratigraphical correlation with the Donbass. New high precision U–Pb CA-ID-TIMS radiometric dating of tonstein horizons supports a preliminary time-framework of regional substages: base of the Asturian (proposed, ex-Westphalian D) c. 310.7 Ma; base of the Cantabrian c. 307.5 Ma; base of the Barruelian (ex-Stephanian A) c. 304.9 Ma; base of the Saberian (proposed) c. 303.5 Ma. The Cantabrian and Barruelian embrace the entire Kasimovian of the global time-scale, and the top of the Barruelian is essentially coincident with the base of the Gzhelian.

Abstract In spite of numerous revisions from 1966 to present, the Cantabrian Substage of the Stephanian Stage (Pennsylvanian) was never properly defined as a chronostratigraphic unit. Defined and redefined at least three times, the Cantabrian lacks boundary stratotypes that correspond to clear and correlateable biochronological signals. Thus, instead of using a biochronological datum of well-established validity and utility, Cantabrian advocates have relied on ill-defined macrofloral assemblage zones and on lithostratigraphic boundaries to define the substage. As a result, the Cantabrian is demonstrably diachronous, even within Europe; indeed, the Cantabrian has proven to be unusable for correlations outside its type area in northern Spain. To resolve these problems, we recommend that the Cantabrian Substage be abandoned, and the Westphalian–Stephanian boundary be redefined at the major floral turnover that has been documented in the USA, western and central Europe, and in the Donets Basin. We further recommend that the bases of the Kasimovian Series, Stephanian Series, Missourian Series, and Upper Pennsylvanian Series all be aligned with this same floral turnover.

Abstract Critical gravity and magnetic data suggest the presence of a continuous zigzag exhumed mantle body inside the attenuated crust of the north Iberia continental margin. We propose that this body greatly conditioned the structural domains of the Cantabrian–Pyrenean fold-and-thrust belt during their evolution from hyperextension in Early Cretaceous times to shortening and inversion during the Cenozoic. This may be seen as a new line for cross-section construction and balancing, because previous cross-sections do not incorporate comparable volumes of exhumed mantle. Five structural cross-sections, constrained by the results of 3D gravity inversion, feed our discussion of the complexities of the doubly vergent Pyrenean orogen in view of the inversion of a precursor hyperextended rifted margin. In all sections, crustal rocks underthrust the lithospheric mantle in the hyperextended region, supporting that the near-surface exhumed mantle lithosphere acts as a more rigid buttress, allowing weaker continental material to be expelled outwards and upwards by thrusting during the Alpine collision; thus giving rise to two uplifted crustal triangular zones at the boundaries with the exhumed mantle. Contractional slip is localized in lithospheric-scale thrusts, which in turn reactivate parts of the extensional system. The NE–SW transfer zones that offset the rift therefore behave as compartmental faults during the orogenic phase. The amount of shortening increases from 34 km in the Cantabrian Cordillera, where the Basque–Cantabrian Basin partially preserves its original extensional geometry, to 135 km in the nappe stack of the central Pyrenees.

Abstract The Ayoluengo Field, commonly cited as the only onshore oil field in Spain, was discovered in June 1964 by Amospain, a joint venture of Chevron, Texaco and CAMPSA, by then the state-owned company. Ayoluengo is located about 300 km north of Madrid in the southern part of the Basque–Cantabrian Basin, a geological region where natural oil seeps, tar sands and asphalt have been recognized in outcrops since the early twentieth century. Now, 50 years after the first oil in 1967, the field has a cumulated production of 17 million barrels of oil. The 50-year production concession expired at the end of January 2017 and the field is now closed, awaiting a bidding process for a new concession to be awarded. The Ayoluengo Field consists of a NE–SW-orientated salt-cored anticline, related to Triassic salt movements. The field is divided into two large structural blocks by a normal fault. Oil and gas production comes from a series of thin lenticular fluvio-lacustrine sandstone packages of Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous age. More than 50 separate oil and gas sandstone beds have been identified by drilling. This multilayer reservoir, together with the structural component, means that Ayoluengo is considered to be a grouping of hundreds of small oil and gas fields. After years of intense exploration activity, the Ayoluengo Field still, surprisingly, remains a unique oil discovery and is the only onshore commercial oil field in Spain and also the only one in the entire Iberian Peninsula. This geological singularity has resulted in recurrent discussions between petroleum geologists because it is difficult to explain why a petroleum system is working uniquely at this particular spot and nowhere else within such a vast territory.