ABSTRACT The Monterey Formation of Central and Southern California has produced billions of barrels of oil since the early 1900s. The Monterey Formation in the Santa Maria Basin is a tectonically fractured reservoir, meaning that the fractures formed through natural geologic processes; they are not human-generated artifacts. Open natural fractures provide the effective porosity for oil storage and the permeability pathways through which oil flows from rocks to wells. Monterey strata are notable for a diverse range of lithologies characterized by contrasts in texture and composition. Not all Monterey rock types contain natural fractures. Structural geologists applied the concepts of mechanical stratigraphy to the Monterey Formation to explain fracture variability. Hard rocks, including chert, porcelanite, and dolostone, contain extensive open-fracture systems, while softer lithologies like siliceous mudstone and organic-rich mudstone have few or no open fractures. However, the words “hard and soft” or “strong and weak” are inexact and subject to interpretation. This report constrains these qualitative descriptions by using engineering-geology data to associate rock properties with quantitative measurements of rock mechanical strength.

ABSTRACT The Monterey Formation, consisting of siliceous and calcareous biogenic sediments, was deposited during the transition from a relatively warm greenhouse climate in the early Miocene to the cooler temperatures of icehouse climatic conditions during the early middle to late Miocene. This cooling event was associated with global paleoclimatic and oceanic changes assumed to be related to the deposition of organic carbon–rich sediments into the marginal basins of California. This chapter introduces an age model for the Miocene strata at Naples Beach based on a composite stratigraphic section and standardized data set, providing the framework for the integration of biostratigraphic zones with a series of astronomically tuned siliceous and calcareous microfossil bioevents, an updated strontium isotope stratigraphy, new tephrochronology ages, and ages from specific magnetostratigraphic units. This multidisciplinary approach, utilizing the integration of microfossil disciplines with independent age controls, is critical to obtaining an age resolution of ~200 k.y. for the majority of the Monterey Formation section. This chronostratigraphic framework improves the age control of the boundaries between the California benthic foraminiferal stages and provides more age refinement for the possible hiatus and condensed interval within the Carbonaceous Marl member of the Monterey Formation. The recalibrated ages for the tops of the Miocene benthic foraminiferal stages are Saucesian (ca. 17.4 Ma), Relizian (15.9 Ma), Luisian (13.1 Ma), and Mohnian (7.7 Ma). Also, the time missing in the hiatus between the Luisian and Mohnian is <200 k.y., and the duration of the condensed interval is from 13.0 to 11 Ma. This refined age model provides a correlation of the organic carbon–rich intervals occurring in the Luisian and lower Mohnian stages within the Naples Beach strata to the deep-sea δ 13 C maxima events CM5 (ca. 14.7 Ma) and CM6 (ca. 13.6 Ma), suggesting episodic increases in organic carbon deposition along the continental margins coincided with the Miocene carbon isotope excursion found in deep-sea cores. The transition from the Miocene climatic optimum to the icehouse world consisted of four climatic and oceanic phases (from ca. 17.5 to ca. 7 Ma), which are represented in the onshore section by variations in the organic carbon and phosphate contents, the occurrence of calcareous and siliceous lithologic facies, and the distribution of microfossils, especially changes in the benthic foraminiferal assemblages.

ABSTRACT The Carrizo Plain, the only closed basin in California’s Southern Coast Ranges, preserves landforms and deposits that record both climate change and tectonic activity. An extensive system of clay dunes documents the elevations of late Pleistocene and Holocene pans. Clay dune elevations, drowned shorelines, eroded anticlinal ridges, and zones of perturbed soil chemistry provide evidence of two lake levels higher than today’s (currently 581 m above sea level [masl]), one at ~591 masl at ca. 20 ka and another at ~585 masl that existed at ca. 10 ka, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dates on clay dune sediment. Two cores from the abandoned floor of the lake provide additional evidence of a long-lived lake in the Carrizo Plain during the late Pleistocene. The longer of the two cores (~42 m) was sampled for palynology, environmental magnetism, and scanning electron microscope–petrography. The magnetic susceptibility signal contains two notable features corresponding to sedimentary materials consistent with reducing conditions. The higher of these features occurs near the surface, and the lower occurs at ~18 m depth. A 14 C date on charcoal from the upper reduced zone places the top of this zone at no older than 22.6–20.9 cal ka. This date is consistent with the OSL date on geomorphic features associated with a highstand above ~591 masl. Assuming that reducing conditions correspond to at least a few meters’ depth of relatively fresh water, the new 14 C date suggests that the upper reduced zone represents a marine isotope stage (MIS) 2 pluvial maximum lake in the Carrizo Plain. Pollen and ostracodes from the reduced sediments indicate a wetter and cooler climate than today. These conditions would have been capable of sustaining a lake with water much less saline than that of the modern lake. The timing of the oldest documented highstand (no later than 20 ka) is consistent with a modified jet stream migration model and is not consistent with a tropical incursion model. Northeast-to-southwest asymmetry across the lake floor may be consistent with southwestward tilting driven by Coast Range shortening normal to the San Andreas fault, as is seen throughout the region.

ABSTRACT Forearc basins are first-order products of convergent-margin tectonics, and their sedimentary deposits offer unique perspectives on coeval evolution of adjacent arcs and subduction complexes. New detrital zircon U-Pb geochronologic data from 23 sandstones and 11 individual conglomerate clasts sampled from forearc basin strata of the Nacimiento block, an enigmatic stretch of the Cordilleran forearc exposed along the central California coast, place constraints on models for forearc deformation during evolution of the archetypical Cordilleran Mesozoic margin. Deposition and provenance of the Nacimiento forearc developed in three stages: (1) Late Jurassic–Valanginian deposition of lower Nacimiento forearc strata with zircon derived from the Jurassic–Early Cretaceous arc mixed with zircon recycled from Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary sources typical of the continental interior; (2) erosion or depositional hiatus from ca. 135 to 110 Ma; and (3) Albian–Santonian deposition of upper Nacimiento forearc strata with zircon derived primarily from the Late Cretaceous arc, accompanied by Middle Jurassic zircon during the late Albian–Cenomanian. These data are most consistent with sedimentary source terranes and a paleogeographic origin for the Nacimiento block south of the southern San Joaquin Basin in southern California or northernmost Mexico. This interpreted paleogeographic and depositional history of the Nacimiento block has several implications for the tectonic evolution of the southern California Mesozoic margin. First, the Nacimiento forearc depositional history places new timing constraints on the Early Cretaceous unconformity found in forearc basin strata from the San Joaquin Valley to Baja California. This timing constraint suggests a model in which forearc basin accommodation space was controlled by accretionary growth of the adjacent subduction complex, and where tectonic events in the forearc and the arc were linked through sediment supply rather than through orogenic-scale wedge dynamics. Second, a paleogeographic origin for the Nacimiento forearc south of the southern San Joaquin Valley places new constraints on end-member models for the kinematic evolution of the Sur-Nacimiento fault. Although this new paleogeographic reconstruction cannot distinguish between sinistral strike-slip and thrust models, it requires revision of existing sinistral-slip models for the Sur-Nacimiento fault, and it highlights unresolved problems with the thrust model.