Abstract The youngest deformation structures on the Tibet Plateau are about NNE-trending grabens. We first combine remote-sensing structural and geomorphological studies with structural field observations and literature seismological data to study the Muga Purou rift that stretches at c . 86°E across central Tibet and highlight a complex deformation field. ENE-striking faults are dominated by sinistral strike–slip motion; NNE-striking faults have normal kinematics and outline a right-stepping en-echelon array of grabens, also suggesting sinistral strike–slip; along NW-striking fault sets, the arrangement of grabens may indicate a dextral strike–slip component. Thus, in central Tibet, rifts comprise mostly grabens connected to strike–slip fault zones or are arranged en-echelon to accommodate sinistral wrenching; overall strain geometry is constrictional, in which NNE–SSW and subvertical shortening is balanced by WNW–ESE extension. The overwhelmingly shallow earthquakes only locally outline active faults; clusters seem to trace linkage or propagation zones of know structures. The earthquake pattern, the neotectonic mapping, and the local fault–slip analyses emphasize a distributed, heterogeneous pattern of deformation within a developing regional structure and indicate that strain concentration is weak in the uppermost crust of central Tibet. Thus, the geometry of neotectonic deformation is different from that in southern Tibet. Next, we use structural and palaeomagnetic data along the Zagaya section of southern central Tibet to outline significant block rotation and sinistral strike–slip SE of the Muga Purou rift. Our analysis supports earlier interpretations of reactivation of the Bangong–Nujiang suture as a neotectonic strike–slip belt. Then, we review the existing and provide new geochronology on the onset of neotectonic deformation in Tibet and suggest that the currently active neotectonic deformation started c . 5 Ma ago. It was preceded by c . north–south shortening and c . east–west lengthening within a regime that comprises strike–slip and low-angle normal faults; these were active at c . 18–7 Ma. The c . east-striking, sinistral Damxung shear zone and the c . NE-trending Nyainqentanghla sinistral-normal detachment allow speculations about the nature of this deformation: the ductile, low-angle detachments may be part of or connect to a mid-crustal décollement layer in which the strike–slip zones root; they may be unrelated to crustal extension. Finally, we propose a kinematic model that traces neotectonic particle flow across Tibet and speculate on the origin of structural differences in southern and central Tibet. Particles accelerate and move eastwards from western Tibet. Flow lines first diverge as the plateau is widening. At c . 92°E, the flow lines start to converge and particles accelerate; this area is characterized by the appearance of the major though-going strike–slip faults of eastern-central Tibet. The flow lines turn southeastward and converge most between the Assam–Namche Barwa and Gongha syntaxes; here the particles reach their highest velocity. The flow lines diverge south of the cord between the syntaxes. This neotectonic kinematic pattern correlates well with the decade-long velocity field derived from GPS-geodesy. The difference between the structural geometries of the rifts in central and southern Tibet may be an effect of the basal shear associated with the subduction of the Indian plate. The boundary between the nearly pure extensional province of the southern Tibet and the strike–slip and normal faulting one of central Tibet runs obliquely across the Lhasa block. Published P-wave tomographic imaging showed that the distance over which Indian lithosphere has thrust under Tibet decreases from west to east; this suggests that the distinct spatial variation in the mantle structure along the collision zone is responsible for the surface distribution of rift structures in Tibet. Supplementary material: Containing supporting data is available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18446 .

Abstract The Cadomian Orogeny comprises a series of complex sedimentary, magmatic and tectonometamorphic events that spanned the period from the mid-Neoproterozoic ( c . 750 Ma) to the earliest Cambrian ( c . 540-530 Ma) along the periphery of the super-continent Gondwana (peri-Gondwana, Fig. 3.1 ). Modern data demonstrate broad continuity between Cadomian events and the later opening of the Rheic Ocean during Cambrian-Ordovician times ( Linnemann et al. 2007 ). Due to very similar contemporaneous orogenic processes in the Avalonian microcontinent, the collective terms ‘Avalonian-Cadomian’ Orogeny and ‘Avalonian-Cadomian’ Active Margin have often been used in the modern literature (e.g. Nance & Murphy 1994 ; Fig. 3.1 ). Rock units formed during the Cadomian Orogeny are commonly referred to collectively as ‘Cadomian Basement’. Peri-Gondwanan terranes, microcontinents and crustal units in Central, Western, Southern and Eastern Europe, in the Appalachians (eastern USA and Atlantic Canada), and in North Africa were affected by the Cadomian Orogeny. This orogenic event is also apparently present in Baltica because of the 'Cadomian affinity' of late Precambrian orogenic events in the Urals and in the Timanides on the margin of Baltica ( Roberts & Siedlecka 2002 ). The Cadomian Orogeny sensu stricto was first defined in the North Armorican Massif in France on the basis of the unconformity that separates deformed Precambrian rock units from their Early Palaeozoic (Cambro-Ordovician) overstep sequence (see below). This unconformity is commonly referred to as the ‘Cadomian unconformity’ (Fig. 3.2 ). However, it cannot be precluded that the youngest metasedimentary rocks affected by

Nd isotopic compositions for ten samples from the State Farm Gneiss (ca. 1046–1023 Ma), the Montpelier Anorthosite (1045 Ma), and several Neoproterozoic Atype granitoids (ca. 600 Ma) in the Mesoproterozoic Goochland terrane range in initial ε Nd from −0.4 to +1.3. The A-type granitoids reflect Neoproterozoic rifting of the Goochland terrane, and their isotopic compositions are consistent with a substantial contribution from the State Farm Gneiss, or equivalent crust at depth, in their petrogenesis. Protoliths of the State Farm Gneiss and Montpelier Anorthosite were emplaced at approximately the same time, and their Nd isotopic compositions are the same. Based on our results and age, bulk compositional, and isotopic similarities between the State Farm Gneiss and Mesoproterozoic rocks (Pedlar River and Archer Mountain suites) in the Blue Ridge Province, we suggest that the gneiss and anorthosite represent a coeval anorthosite-charnockite suite. The unusually potassic Montpelier Anorthosite is also isotopically similar to, and the same age as, the alkalic Roseland Anorthosite in the Blue Ridge Province. Depleted mantle model-ages for the State Farm Gneiss and Montpelier Anorthosite range from 1.38 to 1.43 Ga. These ages are similar to those of many other Grenvillian crustal blocks (e.g., Adirondacks, Blue Ridge, Llano uplift) along the eastern and southern margins of Laurentia, which show a strong peak from 1.3 to 1.5 Ga. Petrological, geochronological, and geochemical data obtained thus far from the Goochland terrane are consistent with the view that it represents a fragment of Laurentia.