Abstract Day 4 of the Field Forum is dedicated entirely to the magmatic evolution of the Tuolumne Intrusive Complex. The Tuolumne Intrusive Complex is mostly located in Yosemite National Park and is superbly exposed due to a series of glaciations that started 2–3 million years ago and ended ca. 10,000 yr B.P. one of the many reasons why it has become one of the most studied intrusions in the world. We will be driving from Mammoth Lakes to Yosemite National Park taking Hwy 395 north and then Hwy 120 west crossing the entire Tuolumne Intrusive Complex before we start off at its western margin. On this side, the Tuolumne Intrusive Complex intruded into the rocks of the Yosemite Valley Intrusive Suite, Sentinel, and Yosemite Creek granitoids (Day 3). Today we will make stops along Hwy 120 while traversing the Tuolumne Intrusive Complex from west to east ( Fig. 4-1) looking at exposures near the road and discussing field data, structural geology, geochronology, and geochemistry from the Tuolumne Intrusive Complex…

Abstract Our goals today are several-fold. We have now spent five days examining different parts of the Mesozoic Sierran arc, and hopefully discussions are already under way attempting to integrate both the shared and distinct characteristics of these individual magma plumbing systems and synchronous tectonics. We will briefly continue these discussions below. Our main focus will be to consider the arc as a whole and introduce a number of new regional data sets related to the tectonic and magmatic components of this arc. By the end of the day, we hope that our discussions have evolved to a consideration of the overall petrologic evolution of the arc, the tectonic and magmatic arc tempos, and their potential links. Without an airplane, or satellite, or Hollywood earth coring machine, it is difficult to take you to field locations where we can observe large sections of the arc. Instead, as we travel west back across the arc, we have selected a number of scenic overview stops, where we will introduce and discuss these new data sets while looking at gorgeous views of the arc…

Abstract Mesoproterozoic basement in the vicinity of Mount Rogers is characterized by considerable lithologic variability, including major map units composed of gneiss, amphibolite, migmatite, meta-quartz monzodiorite and various types of granitoid. SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology and field mapping indicate that basement units define four types of occurrences, including (1) xenoliths of ca. 1.33 to ≥1.18 Ga age, (2) an early magmatic suite including meta-granitoids of ca. 1185–1140 Ma age that enclose or locally intrude the xenoliths, (3) metasedimentary rocks represented by layered granofels and biotite schist whose protoliths were likely deposited on the older meta-granitoids, and (4) a late magmatic suite composed of younger, ca. 1075–1030 Ma intrusive rocks of variable chemical composition that intruded the older rocks. The magmatic protolith of granofels constituting part of a layered, map-scale xenolith crystallized at ca. 1327 Ma, indicating that the lithology represents the oldest, intact crust presently recognized in the southern Appalachians. SHRIMP U-Pb data indicate that periods of regional Mesoproterozoic metamorphism occurred at 1170–1140 and 1070–1020 Ma. The near synchroneity in timing of regional metamorphism and magmatism suggests that magmas were emplaced into crust that was likely at nearsolidus temperatures and that melts might have contributed to the regional heat budget. Much of the area is cut by numerous, generally east- to northeast-striking Paleozoic fault zones characterized by variable degrees of ductile deformation and recrystallization. These high-strain fault zones dismember the terrane, resulting in juxtaposition of units and transformation of basement lithologies to quartz- and mica-rich tectonites with protomylonitic and mylonitic textures. Mineral assemblages developed within such zones indicate that deformation and recrystallization likely occurred at greenschist-facies conditions at ca. 340 Ma.

Abstract A review of geochronological data underlying the geological timescale for the Triassic yields a significantly different timescale calibration than that published in the most recent compilation (Geologic TimeScale 2004). This is partly due to the availability of new radio–isotopic data, but mostly because strict selection criteria are applied and complications arising from biases (both systematic and random) are accounted for in this contribution. The ages for the base and the top of the Triassic are constrained by U–Pb ages to 252.3 and 201.5 Ma, respectively. These dates also constrain the ages of major extinction events at the Permian–Triassic and Triassic–Jurassic boundaries, and are statistically indistinguishable from ages obtained for the Siberian Traps and volcanic products from the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, respectively, suggesting a causal link. Ages for these continental volcanics, however, are mostly from the K–Ar ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar) system, which requires accounting and correcting for a systematic bias of c . 1% between U–Pb and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar isotopic ages (the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages being younger). Robust age constraints also exist for the Induan–Olenekian boundary (251.2 Ma) and the Early–Middle Triassic (Olenekian–Anisian) boundary (247.2 Ma), resulting in a surprisingly short duration of the Early Triassic, which has implications for the timing of biotic recovery and major changes in ocean chemistry during this time. Furthermore, the Anisian–Ladinian boundary is constrained to 242.0 Ma by new U–Pb and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages. Radio–isotopic ages for the Late Triassic are scarce, and the only reliable and biostratigraphically-controlled age is from an upper Carnian tuff dated to 230.9 Ma, yielding a duration of more than 35 Ma for the Late Triassic. All of these ages are from U–Pb analyses applied to zircons with uncertainties at the permil level or better. The resulting compilation can only serve as a guideline and must be considered a snapshot, resolving some of the issues mainly associated with inaccurate and misinterpreted data in previous publications. However, further advances will require revision of some of the data presented here.