- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Arctic Ocean
-
Barents Sea
-
White Sea (1)
-
-
-
Commonwealth of Independent States
-
Russian Federation
-
Karelia Russian Federation
-
Belomorsk Russian Federation (1)
-
-
Kursk magnetic anomaly (1)
-
Murmansk Russian Federation
-
Kola Peninsula (5)
-
Kola Russian Federation (2)
-
-
Volga region (2)
-
Vologda Russian Federation (1)
-
Voronezh Russian Federation
-
Voronezh Anteclise (4)
-
-
-
Urals (2)
-
-
Europe
-
Fennoscandian Shield (8)
-
Karelia (2)
-
Karelia Russian Federation
-
Belomorsk Russian Federation (1)
-
-
Kursk magnetic anomaly (1)
-
Lake Ladoga region (1)
-
Lapland (3)
-
Murmansk Russian Federation
-
Kola Peninsula (5)
-
Kola Russian Federation (2)
-
-
Vologda Russian Federation (1)
-
Voronezh Russian Federation
-
Voronezh Anteclise (4)
-
-
Western Europe
-
Scandinavia
-
Finland
-
North Karelia Finland
-
Outokumpu Finland (1)
-
-
Pirkanmaa Finland
-
Tampere Finland (1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
North America
-
Canadian Shield
-
Churchill Province
-
Hearne Province (1)
-
-
Slave Province (1)
-
Superior Province (1)
-
-
North American Craton (2)
-
-
Russian Platform (17)
-
-
geochronology methods
-
U/Pb (2)
-
-
geologic age
-
Phanerozoic (1)
-
Precambrian
-
Archean
-
Mesoarchean (1)
-
Neoarchean (2)
-
-
upper Precambrian
-
Proterozoic
-
Paleoproterozoic (14)
-
-
-
-
-
igneous rocks
-
igneous rocks
-
plutonic rocks
-
anorthosite (2)
-
diorites
-
tonalite
-
enderbite (2)
-
-
trondhjemite (1)
-
-
gabbros (1)
-
granites
-
charnockite (1)
-
-
granodiorites (1)
-
lamproite (1)
-
-
volcanic rocks (1)
-
-
-
metamorphic rocks
-
metamorphic rocks
-
eclogite (1)
-
gneisses
-
biotite gneiss (1)
-
paragneiss (1)
-
-
granulites (3)
-
metaigneous rocks
-
metagabbro (1)
-
-
metasedimentary rocks
-
metapelite (1)
-
paragneiss (1)
-
-
metavolcanic rocks (1)
-
migmatites (1)
-
schists
-
greenstone (2)
-
-
-
-
minerals
-
silicates
-
chain silicates
-
amphibole group
-
clinoamphibole
-
arfvedsonite (1)
-
-
-
pyroxene group
-
clinopyroxene
-
aegirine (1)
-
-
-
-
framework silicates
-
silica minerals
-
quartz (1)
-
-
-
orthosilicates
-
nesosilicates
-
garnet group (1)
-
zircon group
-
zircon (2)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
absolute age (2)
-
Arctic Ocean
-
Barents Sea
-
White Sea (1)
-
-
-
crust (18)
-
data processing (1)
-
Europe
-
Fennoscandian Shield (8)
-
Karelia (2)
-
Karelia Russian Federation
-
Belomorsk Russian Federation (1)
-
-
Kursk magnetic anomaly (1)
-
Lake Ladoga region (1)
-
Lapland (3)
-
Murmansk Russian Federation
-
Kola Peninsula (5)
-
Kola Russian Federation (2)
-
-
Vologda Russian Federation (1)
-
Voronezh Russian Federation
-
Voronezh Anteclise (4)
-
-
Western Europe
-
Scandinavia
-
Finland
-
North Karelia Finland
-
Outokumpu Finland (1)
-
-
Pirkanmaa Finland
-
Tampere Finland (1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
folds (1)
-
foliation (1)
-
geophysical methods (5)
-
igneous rocks
-
plutonic rocks
-
anorthosite (2)
-
diorites
-
tonalite
-
enderbite (2)
-
-
trondhjemite (1)
-
-
gabbros (1)
-
granites
-
charnockite (1)
-
-
granodiorites (1)
-
lamproite (1)
-
-
volcanic rocks (1)
-
-
intrusions (5)
-
magmas (2)
-
mantle (7)
-
maps (1)
-
metamorphic rocks
-
eclogite (1)
-
gneisses
-
biotite gneiss (1)
-
paragneiss (1)
-
-
granulites (3)
-
metaigneous rocks
-
metagabbro (1)
-
-
metasedimentary rocks
-
metapelite (1)
-
paragneiss (1)
-
-
metavolcanic rocks (1)
-
migmatites (1)
-
schists
-
greenstone (2)
-
-
-
metamorphism (9)
-
North America
-
Canadian Shield
-
Churchill Province
-
Hearne Province (1)
-
-
Slave Province (1)
-
Superior Province (1)
-
-
North American Craton (2)
-
-
ocean floors (1)
-
orogeny (3)
-
paleogeography (3)
-
petrology (1)
-
Phanerozoic (1)
-
plate tectonics (11)
-
Precambrian
-
Archean
-
Mesoarchean (1)
-
Neoarchean (2)
-
-
upper Precambrian
-
Proterozoic
-
Paleoproterozoic (14)
-
-
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
iron formations
-
banded iron formations (1)
-
-
-
-
sedimentation (1)
-
structural analysis (1)
-
tectonics (12)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
sedimentary rocks
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
iron formations
-
banded iron formations (1)
-
-
-
-
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Extensive geological and geophysical surveying, including data acquisition along the 1-EU (1st European Geotraverse across Russian Platform) and TATSEIS (Tatarstan Seismic) geotraverses, cross-traverse 4B, seismic profiles URSEIS (Urals Seismic Experiment and Integrated Studies) and ESRU-2003–2005 (Europrobe Seismic Reflection profiling in the Urals) in the territory of Russia, as well as the FIRE (Finnish Reflection Experiment) project in Finland and the DOBRE (Donbas Basin region deep seismic Reflection profiling) geotraverse in Ukraine performed in 1995–2008, has contributed much new information for understanding the deep crustal structure and geological history of the Early Precambrian (3.5–1.8 Ga) crust of the eastern Fennoscandian Shield and the basement of the East European Platform. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the deep crustal structure of key tectonic units and the territory as a whole are presented for the first time. We have attempted to reconstruct the complete succession of geological events from comprehensive analysis of previously and newly obtained information, primarily common midpoint (CMP) data, which made it possible to obtain detailed images of the deep crustal structure. A key outcome is a 3D model (block diagram) of the East European craton crustal structure based on the 1-EU and TATSEIS geotraverses, 4B, FIRE-1, and FIRE-4 profiles. In addition, this volume presents results of geological, geochemical, petrological, and geochronological investigations of unique Mesoarchean–Neoarchean eclogites in the Belomorian province. Reconsideration of currently accepted concepts of the geodynamic setting of granulite metamorphism and the origin of granulite-gneiss belts leads to a new approach to this problem. We conclude that regional granulite-gneiss belts are as much evidence of mantle plumes as are large igneous provinces. The enormous arcuate, 3500-km-long, late Paleoproterozoic Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental orogen is heterogeneous in structure. The marginal zones, made up of low-grade metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, are regarded as suture zones that arose at the site of closed ephemeral oceans. In the present-day structure, the sutures are expressed in packets of tectonic sheets, which are traced from the surface to the crust-mantle interface. The inner part of the orogen is dominated by synformal granulite-gneiss belts. The oval intracontinental orogens are considered to be a new type of large tectonic structural unit, with involvement of granulite-gneiss belts and terranes, formed under the effect of large mantle plumes. The style of tectonic processes and geodynamic setting in the Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic differed from those in the Paleoarchean to Mesoarchean and in the Phanerozoic. However paradoxical it might sound, the Archean tectonics of numerous miniplates resembled Phanerozoic plate tectonics much more than Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic supercontinent tectonics. Appendix I (available in reduced format at the end of this volume and on the accompanying CD-ROM) includes geological, tectonic, and petrophysical maps (1:2,000,000 and 1:2,500,000 scale); seismic and interpretational geological cross sections (1:1,000,000 scale); and 3D representations of large tectonic structures of the East European craton. The total length of these cross sections is more than 4000 km. Appendix II (at the end of this volume) summarizes the methodology used to gather, interpret, and apply the data. Additionally, Appendix II-4 examines emergence and evolution of the Paleoproterozoic orogens in the North American craton.
1. Tectonic zoning of the Early Precambrian crust of the East European Platform
2. Mesoarchean Kola-Karelia continent
The Mesoarchean Kola-Karelia continent in the eastern Fennoscandian Shield includes three tectonic provinces, Kola, Karelia and Belomoria, that were formed by the Paleoarchean and Mesoarchean microcontinents. Traces of Mesoarchean tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG)-type early crust were documented in all of the most ancient units of the Kola-Karelia continent. Ancient crust was revealed and dated in the Ranua and Iisalmi microcontinents, 3.5–3.4 Ga; Vodlozero and Khetolambina microcontinents, 3.25–3.15 Ga; Kuhmo-Segozero microcontinent, ~3.0 Ga; Murmansk and Inari-Kola microcontinents, 2.93 Ga; and Kianta microcontinent, 2.83–2.81 Ga. In the older (>3.0 Ga) tectonic units and microcontinents, the ancient crust was possibly formed in brief bursts of endogenic activity. In younger microcontinents (3.0–2.93 Ga), these processes could continue until 2.8 and even 2.72 Ga. The tectonic settings in which early TTG crust has been produced are largely uncertain. The primary melt glassy inclusions with a glass phase in cores of prismatic zircon crystals from TTG gneisses provide evidence for the volcanic origin of gneiss protolith. Suggested genetic modeling of TTG-type complexes assumes that felsic K-Na melts with positive Eu anomaly are a product of dry high-temperature partial melting of the previously formed mafic-to-felsic crustal rocks and/or thick older TTG crust. Positive Eu anomaly in the eutectic is directly related to the predominance of plagioclase and K-feldspar in the melt. TTG-type crust melted to produce granite-granodiorite (GG) rocks. Earliest microcontinents are separated by Mesoarchean greenstone belts (mainly 3.05–2.85 Ga, in some cases up to 2.75 Ga), which are fragments of paleo–island-arc systems accreted to their margins: the Kolmozero-Voronya, Central Belomorian, Vedlozero-Segozero, Sumozero-Kenozero, and Tipasjärvi-Kuhmo-Suomussalmi belts; and the mature island arcs (microcontinents): Khetolambina and Kovdozero. These structural units are characterized by significant extent, close to rectilinear trend, localization along the boundaries between Archean microcontinents, and a specific set of petrotectonic assemblages (basalt-andesite-rhyolite, komatiite-tholeiite, and andesite-dacite associations). The recently discovered Meso-Neoarchean Belomorian eclogite province that is structurally linked with the Central Belomorian greenstone belt contains two eclogite associations distributed within TTG gneisses: the subduction-type Salma association and the Gridino eclogitized mafic dikes. The protolith of the Salma eclogites is thought to have been a sequence of gabbro, Fe-Ti gabbro, and troctolite, formed at ca. 2.9 Ga in a slow-spreading ridge (similar to the Southwest Indian Ridge). The main subduction and eclogite-facies events occurred between ca. 2.87 and ca. 2.82 Ga. Mafic magma injections into the crust of the active margin that led to formation of the Grigino dike swarm were associated with emplacement of a mid-ocean ridge in a subduction zone, beginning at ca. 2.87 Ga. Crustal delamination of the active margin and subsequent involvement of the lower crust in subduction 2.87–2.82 Ga ago led to high-pressure metamorphism of the Gridino dikes that reached eclogite-facies conditions during a collision event between 2.82 and 2.78 Ga. This collision resulted in consolidation of the Karelia, Kola, and Khetolamba blocks and formation of the Mesoarchean Belomorian accretionary-collisional orogen. To date, the subduction-related Salma eclogites provide the most complete and meaningful information on the nature of plate tectonics in the Archean, from ocean-floor spreading to subduction and collision. The Kovdozero granite-greenstone terrain that separates the Khetolambina and Kuhmo-Segozero microcontinents is formed by TTG granitoids and gneisses hosting metasediments and metavolcanics of several greenstone belts, which belonged to the Parandovo-Tiksheozero island arc that existed from ca. 2.81 to 2.77 Ga. The Iringora greenstone belt includes the ophiolite complex of the same name with an age of 2.78 Ga. The collision of microcontinents resulted in the upward squeezing of the island arc and the obduction of its marginal portions onto surrounding structures.
3. Neoarchean intracontinental areas of sedimentation, magmatism, and high-temperature metamorphism (hot regions) in eastern Fennoscandia
Beginning ca. 2.76 Ga, evolution of the Kola-Karelia crust was related to the intracontinental high-temperature metamorphic (up to granulite facies) and magmatic events in combination with formation of the basins related to rifting and infilling with intracontinental volcanic and sedimentary sequences initiated by plume-type processes in the mantle. The geological events corresponding to intracontinental evolution were expressed not only in the formation of new rock associations, juvenile to a significant extent, but also in reworking of previously formed rocks. The age, content, and mode of geological activity are somewhat different in the Kola and the Karelian-Belomorian regions. The Karelian-Belomorian region is oval in plan view. The long axis of this oval extends for 600–700 km in the meridional direction; its maximum width is 400–450 km. The southern part of this oval structure is cut off along the NW-trending boundary with the Paleoproterozoic Svecofennian accretionary orogen. The main constituents of the Karelian-Belomorian region are: epicontinental sequences of greenstone belts (Kostomuksha, Khedozero-Bolsheozero, Gimoly-Sukkozero, Jalonvaara) and paragneiss belts (Hattu, Nurmes); granulite-gneiss complexes and intrusive enderbite-charnockite series; sanukitoid-type granitoid intrusions and lamprophyre dikes, along with migmatization and emplacement of within-plate young granites; and local manifestations of granulite-facies metamorphism superposed on older rocks. Concentric spatial distribution of related geological units is characteristic of the Karelian-Belomorian region. The geometric pattern of the region can be satisfactorily explained assuming initial activity of a mantle plume ca. 2.76 Ga in the central part of the region. A peak of activity was related to the events that occurred ca. 2.74–2.70 Ga. The geochronological data show that a region of high-temperature processes expanded from its center (2.76–2.73 Ga) to the periphery (2.74–2.70 Ga). The concentric character of the tectonic structure was eventually formed as a result of these processes. Widespread high-temperature magmatism and metamorphism in combination with formation of synformal and linear sedimentary basins indicate the setting of anorogenic extension and vigorous influx of extracrustal heat, i.e., a large event related to a mantle plume. In contrast to the Karelian-Belomorian hot region, the coeval Kola region of intracontinental manifestations of high-temperature metamorphism and magmatism is characterized by oval-block geometry. This area, confined to the central part of the Kola Peninsula, extends for 600 km in the northwestern direction, having a width of ~200 km. It is possible that this area extends further to the southeast beneath the platform cover. The main tectonic units are the intracontinental greenstone belts (Sør-Varanger, Titovka, Uraguba, Olenegorsk, Voche-Lambina, Kachalovka, Runijoki–Khikhnajarvi, and Strelna system) in the Inari-Kola microcontinent, the granulite-gneiss Central Kola complex, and the Keivy volcanotectonic paleodepression. Sanukitoid intrusions play a modest role. The Keivy volcanotectonic paleodepression is situated in the eastern Kola Peninsula. Rocks of this tectonic unit are peculiar, and many of them have no obvious analogs in the Fennoscandian Shield or elsewhere. The major Neoarchean amphibolite-gneiss association consists of calc-alkaline to subalkaline garnet-biotite and subalkaline-peralkaline aegirine-arfvedsonite gneisses, as well as biotite-amphibole and amphibole gneisses, amphibolites, and rheomorphic alkali granites. In the western part of the paleodepression, gneisses (metavolcanic rocks) are cut through by small Sakharjok and Kuljok nepheline syenite intrusions. Geochronological estimates characterize two outbursts of magmatic activity separated by a long gap. The early outburst corresponds to magmatic crystallization of calc-alkaline metavolcanic rocks at 2.90–2.87 Ga. The second vigorous outburst documented at 2.68–2.63 Ga corresponds to eruption of subalkaline and subalkaline-peralkaline volcanic rocks, emplacement of alkali and nepheline syenites, and crystallization of gabbro-anorthosite of the Tsaga-Acherjok complex. The duration of the main magmatic phase is ~50 m.y., whereas the preceding gap lasted for ~200 m.y. A model of a volcanotectonic depression largely filled with pyroclastic flows seems plausible to explain pre-metamorphic events. Such manifestations of volcanic activity are inherent to intracontinental domains and related to activity of mantle plumes; similar processes can also develop in the back extensional zone of active continental margins. The synchronism of felsic volcanism and emplacement of the typically intracontinental gabbro-anorthosites form a sound argument in favor of an intracontinental setting for the Keivy paleodepression. The geometry of the Kola region can be satisfactorily explained in terms of mantle-plume activity noted ca. 2.76 Ga in the marginal part of this region; a peak of activity in its central part is related to the events that happened ca. 2.68–2.63 Ga.
The basement of the East European Platform corresponding to northeastern Sarmatia is known as the Voronezh Crystalline Massif (VCM). The Kursk microcontinent, which lies in northeastern Sarmatia, occupies the bulk of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif. The predominant portion of the Kursk microcontinent is a combination of sedimentary–volcanic complexes making up greenstone belts and granite-gneiss (granite-migmatite) associations of the granite-greenstone domain bearing the same name. The smaller Kursk–Besedino granulite-gneiss terrane is situated in the central part of the microcontinent. The following sequence of events may be proposed as a preliminary model of crustal evolution: (1) Paleo- to Mesoarchean: formation of granite-greenstone continental crust (3.7–3.1 Ga); (2) events related to the activity of a mantle plume 2.85–2.82 Ga ago: underplating by mantle-derived magmas; formation of an intracontinental depression; its rapid filling with sediments, including Fe-rich varieties; and metamorphism of granite-greenstone basement and the sedimentary fill of the depression; and (3) Neoarchean and/or Paleoproterozoic: collisional compression and transformation of the depression into a synformal tectonic nappe.
5. Neoarchean Volgo-Uralia continent
The major tectonic units of the Neoarchean Volgo-Uralia continent, which is ~600,000 km 2 in area, are contrastingly expressed in regional gravity and magnetic maps. Interpretations of seismic images of the crust along the TATSEIS geotraverse in combination with 3D density and magnetic crust models provide insights into the volumetric representation of tectonic structures of various ranks. Granulite-gneiss crust of Volgo-Uralia is characterized by elevated thickness (~60 km and locally up to 65–70 km). The deep structure of Volgo-Uralia assumes that the entire crustal section, including the lower crust, is composed of high-density granulite metamorphic facies rocks. Specific structural units called ovoids play the main role in the structure of this continent. The ovoids are bowl-shaped crustal blocks, round or oval in plan view, 300–600 km across, and with the base reaching a level of crust-mantle interface at ~60 km. Ovoids are bounded by conic surfaces of reverse (thrust)-faults, along which their outer parts are thrust over the framework. The Tokmov, Buzuluk, Verkhnekamsk, Krasnoufimsk, and Orenburg ovoids, which generally are not in contact with one another, are dominated by mafic granulites, gabbroic rocks, gabbroanorthosites, and ultramafic rocks. A significant contribution of deep-seated intrusive rocks suggests that metamorphism developed in the lower and middle crust at high PT parameters that exceed the maximum estimates (940–950 °C, 9.5 kbar) recorded in samples of borehole cores. The interovoidal space is occupied by elongated oval synforms up to 200–400 km long. This space is considered to be an interovoidal domain, which includes three relatively narrow, compressed synforms (Yelabuga-Bondyug, Kilmez, Chusovaya) and four oval synforms (Srednevyatka, Verkhnevyatka, North-Tatar, Almetevsk). The Tokmov ovoid is framed in the southeast by the Tuma and Penza belts. Synforms are filled with metasedimentary granulites and mafic metaigneous rocks. The protoliths were formed over the time interval from 3.4–3.2 to 3.1–3.0 Ga. The internal zoning of the Volgo-Uralia crust is related to numerous local centers within ovoids and interovoidal region. At least two high-temperature metamorphic events were followed by periods of retrogression: 2.74–2.70 and 2.62–2.59 Ga. The areal and especially high-temperature character of tectonothermal processes during formation of the Neoarchean crust of the Volgo-Uralia Craton, and distinct geometrization of space with recognition of several concentric domains, finds a universal explanation in ascent of multiple plumes.
The Bryansk-Kursk-Voronezh intracontinental collisional orogen was formed by the juvenile Middle Paleoproterozoic assemblages in combination with Early Paleoproterozoic complexes and areas of reworked Archean crust. The crucial events fall in the time interval 2.1–2.0 Ga. The orogen includes a sequence of second-order, near-meridional orogens, which, in turn, consist of tectonic belts. From the west eastward, these are the Krivoi Rog–Bryansk orogen, the orogen of the Kursk magnetic anomaly (KMA), and the East Voronezh orogen. The latter may be regarded as an axial (central) structural element, which marks a transient rupture of the continental crust. The north to south extent of the orogen along the strike of the second-order orogens reaches 900 km long and ca. 900 km in width. The Krivoi Rog–Bryansk orogen consists of two groups of tectonic belts. Its western region is composed of tectonic nappes pertaining to the Kulazhino gneiss and the Bryansk granulite-gneiss belts. The eastern region, including the Krupetsk-Znamensk belt and the Meshchevsk system of tectonic sheets, with significant role of intensely deformed banded iron formations (BIF) of the Kursk and Oskol groups, is also the western imbricated margin of the Archean Kursk craton. The volcanic-sedimentary BIF belts play the main role in the structure of the KMA orogen. The second important component is composed of subvolcanic and plutonic mafic-ultramafic, felsic, and alkaline rock complexes. Granite-gneiss domes are related to the final stage of the orogen evolution. The East Voronezh orogen consists of the Lipetsk-Losevka volcanic-plutonic belt and the Vorontsovka imbricated thrust belt, separated by the Losevka-Mamon suture. The evolution of the Bryansk-Kursk-Voronezh orogen as a whole includes: onset of rifting within the Archean Kursk craton (2.59–2.53 Ga); terrigenous and chemical sedimentation including BIF and volcanic activity (2.5–2.10 Ga), periodically accompanied by emplacement of intrusions (2.6–2.5 Ga and 2.1–2.05 Ga); metamorphism under granulite-facies conditions in the Kulazhino and Bryansk belts at 2.13 Ga and in the Vorontsovka belt at 2.10 Ga; intrusive magmatism in the Vorontsovka belt generally synchronous with high-temperature metamorphism; suprasubduction magmatism and formation of the Lipetsk-Losevka volcanic-plutonic belt 2.10–2.05 Ga ago; the collision-related reverse and thrust faulting and folding in the BIF belts accompanied by westward and south-westward overturning; rheomorphism and formation of granite-gneiss and granite-migmatite domes deforming the fold-nappe assemblages in the BIF belts of KMA; and the tectonothermal activity of postcollisional and anorogenic stages (2.07–1.9 Ga) expressed by emplacement of alkaline ultramafic and gabbro-syenite intrusions in the Lipetsk-Losevka belt and its hinterland. The most active phase of tectonic evolution spanned the time interval 2.1–2.0 Ga, which was no less than 100 Ma long and coincided with the active stage of extension, sedimentation, and high-temperature metamorphism in the northern part of the East European craton.
8. Late Paleoproterozoic Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental collisional orogen
The Late Paleoproterozoic Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen surrounds the Karelian craton as a wide arc, separating it from Volgo-Uralia and Sarmatia. The orogen extends for more than 3000 km; its width in the northern and central segments is 400–700 km and increases to 1000 km in the southwest. The Lapland sector of the orogen is characterized by specific spatial distribution of tectonic belts composed of low-grade metavolcanic-metasedimentary rocks and granulite-gneiss complexes. The former are localized along the orogen boundaries; in turn, the axial zone is mainly formed by alternation of low-angle tectonic sheets varying in thickness from a few to 20–25 km. The sheets are composed of Paleoproterozoic granulite-gneiss complexes and Archean granite-greenstone and amphibolite-gneiss assemblages. The geological history of the orogen is subdivided into four stages. (1) The Early Paleoproterozoic magmatism (2.53–2.41 Ga, locally up to 2.32 Ga) corresponds to the initial stage in evolution of the superplume, which induced rifting of the Archean continent. This stage includes: the early volcanism (ca. 2.5 Ga), the layered peridotite-gabbronorite intrusions (2.53–2.42 Ga), bimodal volcanism (2.45–2.42 Ga), emplacement of the minor mafic intrusions that were later transformed into drusites (2.46–2.43 Ga), formation of the Pyrshin-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosite complex (2.51–2.42 Ga), and intrusions of charnockites and K-rich granites (2.50–2.43 Ga) and granitoids (2.50–2.41, up to 2.37–2.36 Ga). The Pyrshin-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosites underwent granulite-facies metamorphism along with mafic protolith of the Lapland and Kolvitsa-Umba granulite complexes. The domain of initial magmatism in the Kola-Karelia region is a NW-trending band, 1000–1100 km in extent and 300–450 km in width. The area of manifestation of various modes of Early Paleoproterozoic magmatic activity can be regarded as a large igneous province. (2) The initial magmatism was followed by a long-term (2.3–2.1 Ga) stage of quiescent tectonics. Sedimentation in the Karelian Province initially occurred in the vast lacustrine-alluvial plain, then in the nearshore marine and continental evaporite basin, and by the end of this stage in a shallow-water marine basin characterized by deposition of evaporite carbonate and sulfate sediments and growth of numerous stromatolite reefs. The accumulation of salt has been documented by deep drilling in the Onega depression. The basement and sedimentary sequence were cut through by a NW-trending dike swarm almost synchronously with sedimentation. In the southwestern part of the basin within Karelia, separate lava fields were formed, whereas in Kola Peninsula, volcanic activity was much more intense, and sedimentation had been suppressed. (3) The resumption of tectonic activity by the onset of the Late Paleoproterozoic is recorded in a vigorous pulse of magmatic activity (2.11–1.92, locally up to 1.88 Ga), which was somewhat similar to the Early Paleoproterozoic initial magmatism. It developed within the same NW-trending band as the Early Paleoproterozoic initial magmatism. As in the previous case, the area of the Late Paleoproterozoic magmatism corresponds to the definition of a large igneous province. It involves: (i) mafic volcanic rocks inherent to continental and oceanic rifts (including the Jormua ophiolite complex) in combination with a bimodal rhyolite-picrite association close in geochemistry to ocean-island basalt and subvolcanic minor gabbro and wehrlite intrusive bodies (2.11–1.92 Ga); (ii) volcanic-sedimentary and mafic-ultramafic subvolcanic complexes of the Onega depression (ca. 1.98 Ga); (iii) Kimozero kimberlites (ca. 2.0–1.8 Ga); (iv) Jaurijok complex of gabbro-anorthosite intrusions (from 2.0–1.95 to 1.88 Ga); and (v) alkali intrusions (from 1.97–1.95 to 1.88 Ga) and granitoid plutons (ca. 1.95 Ga). All gabbro-anorthosite bodies of the Jaurijok complex are localized at the base of nappe-thrust ensemble of the Lapland granulite belt, i.e., in exactly the same position as the Early Paleoproterozoic Pyrshin-Kolvitsa complex. Appearance of the suprasubduction magmatism in volcanic-sedimentary belts almost at the same time (1.93–1.86 Ga) marked a change from the extensional regime to compression in the Paleoproterozoic history of the East European craton for the first time in Paleoproterozoic history. (4) The subsequent stage, with predominance of collisional and postcollisional processes (1.87–1.70 Ga), resulted in eventual formation of the intracontinental collisional orogen. In the history of the Lapland and Kolvitsa-Umba granulite-gneiss belts, an emplacement of the Pyrshin-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosite and granulite-facies metamorphism M0 were broadly coeval with Early Paleoproterozoic plume-influenced rifting of the Archean supercontinent ca. 2.51–2.44 Ga. This period was followed by deposition of volcaniclastic protoliths of the lower part of the Lapland granulite complex, which probably occurred within the intracratonic extensional basin. The next episode of plume-related extension, which induced emplacement of the Jaurijok gabbro-anorthosite bodies, lasted from 1.97 to 1.89 Ga. High-grade metamorphism M1 (ca. 1.95 Ga) and then pervasive granulite-facies metamorphic events M2 (1.95–1.91 Ga) and M3 (1.91–1.89 Ga) followed at the end of this episode. At the same time, in the area of low-grade volcanic-sedimentary belts, opening and subsequent closure of local intracontinental oceans occurred due to rapid subduction and/or obduction of the oceanic lithosphere. The Mid-Russia sector (basement of the East European platform—territory of the Moscow syneclise) is the central part of the southern branch of the Lapland– Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen surrounding the Karelian craton in the south. The Totma belt extends along the northern boundary, separating the Paleoproterozoic orogen from the Karelian craton, while the southern boundary, which separates the Paleoproterozoic orogen from the Volgo-Uralia continent and Sarmatia, is marked by the Aprelevka and Kazhim belts. The Kashino, Zubtsovsk-Diakonovo, Dmitrov-Galich, Moscow, Lezhsk-Grivino, and Oparino granulite-gneiss thrust-nappe belts are crucial in the upper-crustal structure of the Mid-Russia sector. They are combined with Archean or Paleoproterozoic gneiss-amphibolite-migmatite complexes in the Bologoevo, Tver, Bukalovo, and Ivanovo-Sharya belts. As a whole, the Mid-Russia sector of the Paleoproterozoic collisional orogen is a giant synform, 300–350 km wide and 1400 km long. The synform is composed of tectonic sheets, 6–8 km thick, alternating in vertical and lateral directions and formed by the Paleoproterozoic and Archean granulite-gneiss and migmatite-amphibole-gneiss complexes. It is bordered by tectonic sheets of volcanic-sedimentary belts conformably plunging southeast. The South Baltia sector of the orogen (basement of the East European platform—Southern Baltic region and Belarus) is composed of a series of arcuate (crescentic) belts consisting of metamorphic rocks ranging in grade from greenschist to epidote-amphibolite or from high amphibolite to granulite facies. The sector, which extends for 1200 km toward the northeast, is up to 800 km wide. The arcuate outlines of belts in the South Baltia sector are convex to the east. The internal structural elements of belts and their boundaries are generally characterized by westward centroclinal plunges. In the west, the South Baltia sector is cut off by the Transeuropean suture (Teisseyre-Tornquist Line), which separates it from the Hercynides of East Europe. The eastern part of the South Baltia Sector contains the Staraya Russa–South Finland granulite-gneiss belt, Ilmenozero migmatite-amphibolite-gneiss belt, and Vitebsk and Toropets granulite-gneiss allochthons. The northern segment of the South Baltia sector dominates the area and is composed of alternating arcuate (crescentic) belts: the Belarus-Baltic granulite-gneiss belt, Latvia–East Lithuania migmatite-amphibolite-gneiss belt, and West Lithuania granulite-gneiss belt at the western boundary of the East European craton. In the southern segment of the South Baltia sector, the sequence of the belt from west to east includes the Central Belarus migmatite-amphibolite-gneiss belt and the southern part of the Vitebsk granulite-gneiss allochthon. The South Baltia sector is, to a greater extent, similar in composition and structure to the other sectors of the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental orogen. This implies that granulite-gneiss belts of the South Baltia sector most likely are underlain by Archean or Early Paleoproterozoic crust.
11. Late Paleoproterozoic late- and postcollisional granitoid and alkaline magmatism
The first broad Russian experiment aimed at the study of the deep structure of Earth's crust and upper mantle by the common midpoint (CMP) method along the 1-EU geotraverse and cross-traverse 4B was realized in 1995–2008 in the territory of the East European Platform under the Russian Federal Program on Development of the State Geotraverse Network and Deep and Superdeep Boreholes. At the same time, the EGGI profile, geotraverses TATSEIS, ESRU 2003–2005, and DOBRE in Ukraine, as well as the system of profiles under the FIRE project in the adjacent territory of Finland were acquired. Integration of the existing geological maps and available geological (in the widest sense: structural, geochemical, geochronological, and so forth) data with results of geological interpretation of seismic images of the crust and upper mantle have led to a three-dimensional (3D) model of the deep crustal structure of the East European craton and a significant revision of previous ideas on the deep structure and Early Precambrian evolution of the region. In the geological interpretation of seismic data, we attached particular significance to the direct tracing of geological boundaries and fault zones recognized on the seismic-reflection pattern and the section of effective acoustic impedance toward the present-day surface and to their correlation with mapped geological and tectonic units. Comparison of the seismic image geometry with the geology of the eastern Fennoscandian Shield at the present-day erosion level shows that the reflection pattern matches the general trends of compositional layering, gneissic banding, and schistosity. The roughly homogeneous structural domains of the crust correspond to relatively large tectonic sheets, 3–5 km thick. Their inner structure commonly is not discernible in reflection patterns. The 3D model of deep structure in the Kola-Lapland region is based on correlation of tectonostratigraphic complexes depicted in the geological-tectonic map with structural subdivisions recognized as a result of interpretation of seismic crust images and their tracing to depth. In addition to the geological section along the 1-EU geotraverse, the model includes the section along the FIRE-4–4a profile that crosses the western part of the region studied in Finland. The 3D model shows the Paleoproterozoic tectonic structures (Lapland granulite-gneiss belt and its structural and evolutionary relationships with lower-crustal granulites, the structure and tectonic position of the Tana belt) and Archean tectonic structural units (the Central Kola granulite-gneiss belt, the Inari-Kola granite-greenstone domain, and the boundary zone between the Kola craton and the Belomorian orogen). The detailed 3D model of the crust and uppermost mantle in the Karelian-Belomorian region is also based on correlation between the exposed geological structure and geological interpretation of seismic images along the 1-EU geotraverse and cross-traverse 4B. The geological interpretation of the seismic crust image along the FIRE-1 profile serves as the additional basis for the Svecofennian accretionary orogen and its boundary with the Kola-Karelia continent. The model of the crust in the Karelian-Belomorian region contains the Paleoproterozoic tectonic structures (East Karelian imbricate thrust belt, Svecofennian accretionary orogen, and Onega Depression) and also Archean tectonic structures (Kuhmo-Segozero and Kovdozero microcontinents, and Chupa granulite-gneiss belt). The deep structure of the platform basement beneath the Moscow syneclise is an immediate extension of the Fennoscandian Shield. The basement structure in this area was controlled by Paleoproterozoic processes resulting in formation of the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental orogen. The 3D model shows the marginal Totma and Aprelevka volcanic-sedimentary belts, and a synformal structure for the upper crust in the central domain of the orogen. The rock complexes of the Zubtsov-Diakonovo granulite-gneiss belt in the northwest and the Dmitrov-Galich belt in the southeast make up a distinctly outlined stage in the synform section. These complexes are underlain by gneiss-migmatite-amphibolite associations of the Bologoevo and Ivanovo-Sharya belts and are overlain by similar rocks of the Tver and Bukalovo belts. Lastly, the Kashin synformal granulite-gneiss belt is localized in the upper part of the section. The alternation of rocks of differing metamorphic grade clearly indicates the tectonic or tectonized stratigraphic character of the section in the Nelidovo synform. The crust sandwiched between the southward-plunging Totma and Aprelevka belts is characterized by rough layering. The reflections and boundaries of crustal sheets outlined in agreement with this pattern plunge southward beneath the Archean Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia continental blocks. The deep crustal structure of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif is determined by a succession of geodynamic settings and Archean and Paleoproterozoic tectonic events that resulted in the formation of the Archean crust in the Kursk granite-greenstone domain and probably in the Khopior microcontinent, the Middle Paleoproterozoic East Voronezh orogen, and the Late Paleoproterozoic North Voronezh orogen. The 3D model applies particularly well to the Middle Paleoproterozoic East Voronezh orogen. The orogen is localized in the area of collision of the Kursk and Khopior microcontinents, which differ markedly in crustal structure and composition. The crocodile-type tectonic structure of the East Voronezh orogen is clear evidence for collisional compression. The countermotion of microcontinents resulted in the wedge-shaped structure of the Kursk microcontinent extending for 150 km, delamination of crust in the Khopior microcontinent, and counterdisplacement of tectonic sheets coherently thrust over and under the Kursk microcontinent. The tectonic structure of the central and western Volgo-Uralia continent to a depth of 15–20 km is characterized by sections of 3D models of effective density and magnetization. The second block of information on the Volgo-Uralia continent deep structure comes from results of seismic profiling along the TATSEIS, ESRU 2003–2005, and URSEIS geotraverses. The TATSEIS geotraverse crosses a significant part of the Volgo-Uralia continent from southeast to northwest. The seismic crust images along this geotraverse not only create the basis for interpretation of regional deep structure, but also robustly link the crustal models of the western and southeastern parts of the Volgo-Uralia continent. The data along the ESRU 2003–2005 geotraverse played an important role in ascertaining the deep structure of the Krasnoufimsk ovoid, which is overlapped by sedimentary fill of the Ural foredeep. Additional evidence was provided by the URSEIS geotraverse. The Archean crust, slightly modified in the Paleoproterozoic, which forms the East European Platform basement in the Volgo-Uralia continent, is made up of mafic granulites, khondalite, mafic-ultramafic intrusions, and granitoid plutons. The 3D model of the crust based on the TATSEIS geotraverse demonstrates the deep structure of the Vetluga synform in the Tokmov ovoid and of the interovoid domain. Ovoids play a crucial role in the Volgo-Uralia continent structure and occupy no less than 60% of the crust. In 3D representation, they are bowl-shaped blocks, round or oval in outline, and 300–600 km in diameter at the basement surface, and with a base at the level of the crust-mantle interface, i.e., at a depth of 60 km. The thickness of crust of the interovoid domain does not commonly exceed 50 km. Two types of elongated oval synforms are distinguished: the interovoid ovals (Verkhnevyatka, North Tatar, Almetevsk), up to 200–300 m long, with aspect ratio of 2:1–3:1, and the interovoid belts (Usovo, Vyatka, Kilmez, Elabuga-Bondyuga, Tuma-Penza, as well as Zhiguli-Pugachev homocline), 300–400 km in extent, with aspect ratio of 4:1–5:1. The bottom of the largest interovoid oval crossed by the TATSEIS profile reaches 25 km in depth. In crustal section, the structural elements of the interovoid domain are underlain or partly crosscut by acoustically transparent layers composed of the Bakaly-type granitoids. The lower crust of the interovoid domain is ~35 km in thickness and is composed of tectonic sheets plunging toward the northwestern end of the geotraverse and penetrating into the mantle.
14. 3D deep structure of the Early Precambrian crust in the East European craton: A synthesis
In this chapter, the available seismic and geological data are integrated and applied to the East European craton as a whole. The deep structure and seismic characteristics of the granite-greenstone crust in the Archean microcontinents vary significantly. The unevenly distributed and vaguely oriented short reflections are occasionally gathered into packets. The intensely reflecting bodies with high acoustic impedance correspond to greenstone belts reaching many tens of kilometers in extent. The oval acoustically transparent domains in the middle-crustal level are composed of moderately dense rocks that correspond to granitoid plutons. The total thickness of the crust in granite-greenstone domains can vary from 40 km in the Kola-Karelia continent to 50 km in the Kursk microcontinent. The Archean granulite-gneiss complexes form the delineated belts localized in the upper crust. These are synformal tectonic nappes, the vertical thickness of which reaches 15 km. A special case is the Volgo-Uralia continent, the crust of which is completely composed of granulite-gneiss rocks partly replaced by retrograde metamorphic assemblages. The granulite-gneiss crust is distinguished by significant thickness (~60 km; maximum 65–70 km). The lower-crustal “layer,” ~35 km thick, consists of inclined tectonic sheets plunging in a northwestern direction and penetrating the upper mantle. The interface between upper and lower crust is replaced by acoustically transparent granitoid crust 10–20 km in thickness. The Middle Paleoproterozoic East Voronezh intracontinental collisional orogen between the Archean Kursk and the Khopior microcontinents is represented by a “crocodile-jaw” structure. The structural pattern in the seismic image of the crust clearly indicates a Paleoproterozoic age of lower-crustal layer and shows the absence of the Paleoproterozoic lower-crustal complex at the base of the Kursk craton proper. The Late Paleoproterozoic intracontinental Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen surrounds in a wide arc the Karelian craton in the northeast, east, south, and southwest. The upper crust in the inner zone of the orogen in the Mid-Russia sector is composed of alternating granulite-gneiss and gneiss-migmatite-amphibolite tectonic sheets 5–10 km thick, deformed in gentle synformal folds. The marginal zones consist of south-plunging tectonic sheets of the Totma belt in the north and the Aprelevka belt in the south. The Totma sheet, reaching 10 km in thickness and dipping at a mean angle of 5°–10°, is traced by reflectors from the basement surface (interval 1700–1800 km) to the crust-mantle interface (interval 2000–2200 km). These parameters, along with composition of the rocks, allow interpretation of the Totma belt as a suture zone, separating the synformal structural assemblage from the lower crust. In the Paleoproterozoic Svecofennian accretionary orogen, interpretation of the FIRE-1 profile shows that the Central Finland granitoid massif is a nearly horizontal, sheetlike intrusive body that conceals an accretionary complex—a succession of tectonic sheets, 10–20 km thick, which plunges northeast at angles of 10°–12° down to the crust-mantle interface at a depth of 65 km and can be traced beneath the margin of the Karelian craton for more than 150 km. The lower-crustal layer, often called a reflectivity zone, is always present at the base of the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen and the Archean cratons surrounded by this arcuate orogen. This layer was formed in the Early Paleoproterozoic as a result of under- and interplating of mantle melts accompanied by granulite-facies metamorphism. The increase in thickness of the lower-crustal layer is related to hummocking (mutual over- and underthrusting and wedging) of tectonic sheets at the base of the crust. The lower-crustal layer of the Kola-Karelia continent was formed before the main collisional events, which took place in the Late Paleoproterozoic. The structure of the crust depicted by seismic reflectors indicates in some cases that the crust-mantle interface has remained unchanged since the time of crust formation, whereas in other situations, this boundary is younger than the bulk crust. The crust-mantle interface beneath the East European craton reveals manifold deviations from its persistent near-horizontal outline due to bending, plunging, and apparent dissolution of lower-crustal sheets in the mantle. The underlying upper mantle reveals a number of indistinct reflectors imaged as dashed lines, which trace lower-crustal structural elements incorporated into the mantle. These domains are regarded as crust-mantle mixtures. The crust images along the seismic lines exhibit widely varying structural features and degrees of contrast (sharpness) of the crust-mantle interface. The following structural and morphological types of the crust-mantle interface are distinguished beneath the East European craton: (1) a smooth, generally flat or horizontal or slightly sloping boundary with an abrupt decrease in number of reflectors at the lower edge of intensely reflecting layered lower crust; (2) a boundary similar to the previous type but periodically interrupted at sites where the sheetlike fragments of the lower crust sharply bend and sink into the mantle and acoustically as if they dissolve therein; (3) a serrated boundary in the regions of consecutive plunging lower-crustal tectonic sheets into the mantle; these domains are commonly conjugated: reverse-thrust assemblages in the upper crust rise in the same direction as the lower-crustal sheets plunge; (4) a serrated boundary confining from below the ensemble of inclined tectonic sheets that form the crust completely or partly; (5) a diffuse crust-mantle interface that is observed where a distinct lower-crustal reflectivity zone is absent; and (6) a phantom (disappearing) crust-mantle interface that separates acoustically transparent crustal and mantle domains that can be detected by seismic-refraction exploration. Integration of the entire body of information allowed us to simulate the 3D deep structure of the Early Precambrian crust of the East European craton as a whole using sections along the 1-EU geotraverse, cross-traverse 4B, TATSEIS regional profile, and FIRE-1 and FIRE-4 profiles. The 3D deep structure of the East European craton is represented by the tectonically delaminated Early Precambrian crust with a predominance of gently dipping boundaries between the main tectonic subdivisions and a complexly built crust-mantle interface. The integral model includes Archean granite-greenstone domains and granulite-gneiss areas and Paleoproterozoic accretionary and intracontinental collisional orogens.
15. Specifics of the eclogite-facies metamorphism in the Precambrian
In Chapter 2, we showed that the eclogite-facies metamorphism within the Mesoarchean–Neoarchean Belomorian eclogite province can be correlated with “hot” subduction. However, was such a thermal regime specific to the Archean? Comparison of pressure-temperature-time paths and data for peak metamorphic parameters demonstrates the general similarity of the Archean and Paleoproterozoic eclogites worldwide and their association with anomalously “hot” environments. In contrast, Phanerozoic high- and ultrahigh-pressure eclogite complexes formed in connection with “warm” subduction zones. The high-temperature character of the eclogite-facies metamorphism in the Proterozoic is impossible to explain through a distinctively anomalous thermal regime, as is often suggested for the Archean mantle. The occurrence of high-temperature conditions during eclogite-facies metamorphism can be attributed to either subduction of a mid-ocean ridge (Archean, Belomorian eclogite province) or to interaction with mantle plumes (Proterozoic).
16. Granulite-gneiss belt: A special type of tectonic structure, the uniqueness of which is not limited to high-grade metamorphism
17. Evolution and major features of the Early Precambrian crust of the East European craton
The earliest events in the geological history of the Early Precambrian crust of the East European craton (3.5–2.93 Ga) resulted in the emergence of spatially separate and genetically independent areas of continental crust (continental embryos), the dimensions of which rarely exceeded a few hundred kilometers across. The period between 3.05 Ga and ca. 2.75 Ga was a time of mainly plate-tectonic development: origin, evolution, and accretion of ancient island-arc systems, and collision of microcontinents. The Vedlozero-Segozero and Sumozero-Kenozero systems of greenstone belts, Tipasjärvi-Kuhmo-Suomussalmi and Central Belomorian greenstone belts in Karelia, and the Kolmozero-Voronya greenstone belt in the Kola Peninsula are interpreted as accretionary systems transformed in collisional orogens. The Belomorian eclogite province is structurally linked with the Central Belomorian greenstone (suture) belt. The Kovdozero granite-greenstone terrane is formed by granitoids and gneisses hosting metasediments and metavolcanics of several greenstone belts, which belonged to the Parandovo-Tiksheozero island arc. The amalgamation of the continental domains that made up the bulk of the Archean crust in the growing East European composite craton took from 2.82 to 2.66 Ga, but the main events had terminated by 2.75 Ga. During the period from 2.79–2.55 Ga, specific areas of intracontinental thermal and tectonic activity (hot regions) developed in the inner portions of the recently formed continent: Karelian-Belomorian and Kola areas in the eastern Fennoscandian Shield and extensive Volgo-Uralia granulite-gneiss area in the eastern part of the East European craton. These processes marked a principally new evolutionary episode in the Early Precambrian history of the East European craton. Widespread high-temperature magmatic and metamorphic processes and the development of synformal structures and linear sedimentary basins testify to an anorogenic extensional environment and a significant influx of heat to the crust, i.e., a significant event of mantle-plume type. During the Paleoproterozoic (2.53–1.87 Ga), a number of intracontinental collisional orogens were produced within the East European craton. The largest of them are the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental orogen and the Svecofennian accretionary orogen. The Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen surrounds the Karelian craton as a wide arc, separating it from Volgo-Uralia and Sarmatia. The orogen extends for more than 3000 km; its width in the northern and central segments is 400–700 km and increases to 1000 km in the southwest. The Lapland sector of the orogen is characterized by spatial distribution of tectonic belts composed of low-grade metavolcanic-metasedimentary rocks and belts of high-grade metamorphic rocks, including granulite-gneiss complexes. The former are localized along the orogen boundaries; in turn, the axial zone of the orogen is mainly formed by alternation of low-angle tectonic sheets varying in thickness from a few to 20–25 km: sheets composed of Paleoproterozoic granulite-gneiss complexes with a predominance of metamorphosed juvenile intrusive and volcanic bodies and sedimentary rocks alternate with the sheets of Archean granite-greenstone and amphibolite-gneiss complexes. The Paleoproterozoic evolution of the Kola-Karelia continent and, accordingly, the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia orogen, is subdivided into four episodes: (1) ca. 2.53–2.3 Ga: failed rifting of the Archean continent; (2) 2.3–2.1 Ga: quiescent within-plate activity and diffuse rifting that can be regarded as “failed attempts” to break the supercontinent; (3) 2.1–1.95 Ga: rifting of the Kola-Karelia continent; and (4) 1.95–1.87 Ga: origin of the intercontinental collisional orogens. The Paleoproterozoic pulse of tectonic activity, which transformed the Neoarchean Kola-Karelia continent, continued for more than 600 m.y. Globally speaking, Early Paleoproterozoic magmatic and thermal activities were largely constrained within the ancient continent that then included North America and most of the eastern European continent, including the Fennoscandian Shield (Lauroscandia). Analysis of the extensive data leads us to distinguish a new type of tectonic structure: the intracontinental oval orogen formed in the inner portions of continents under the effect of large mantle plumes. It is an oval-shaped tectonic ensemble of regional rank with diameters from 600–1000 to 2500–3000 km, of which at least a part is characterized by concentric structure and metamorphic zonation or which contains bowl-shaped crustal structures. Intracontinental orogens contain granulite-gneiss complexes, derivatives of juvenile (though crust-contaminated) mafic magmas (gabbro-anorthosites and layered mafic-ultramafics), intrusions of “dry” high- temperature, within-plate–type granites, enderbites, and charnockites, and low-grade sedimentary-volcanic belts. The oval or oval-concentric structure excludes the possibility that intracontinental orogens originated as a result of processes at convergent plate boundaries. Their size and morphology and the evidence of a vast influx of mantle heat make intracontinental orogens comparable to oceanic plateaus and large igneous provinces on the continents. The fundamental changes in Earth's geological evolution that occurred at the Mesoarchean-Neoarchean boundary (ca. 2.75 Ga) can be related to the transition from Archean “microplate tectonics” to Paleoproterozoic “supercontinent tectonics” (or “microocean tectonics,” with regard to the limited size of the Red Sea–type oceans that were formed within the partly fractured supercontinent). The origin of Earth's first supercontinent, a landmass covering much of Earth's surface, by 2.80–2.76 Ga, should have played an extremely important role in restyling the system of convection cells in the underlying mantle. The style of tectonic processes and the geodynamic environment of plate tectonics in the Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic differ from those in both the Archean and the Phanerozoic: the Archean tectonics of multiple “miniplates” was much more similar to Phanerozoic plate tectonics than to the Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic “tectonics of supercontinents.”