Abstract We present a new structural study of a D 2 –M 2 tectono-thermal structure in SW Iberia (Ponte de Sor–Seda gneiss dome) characterized by a spatial distribution of telescoping isograds providing a record of Buchan-type metamorphic conditions. The gneiss dome comprises an infrastructure made up of a lower gneiss unit (LGU) and an intermediate schist unit (ISU), separated by early D 2 ductile extensional shear zones. The LGU and the ISU are composed of Ediacaran–Cambrian rocks that experienced the highest-grade M 2 metamorphic conditions (amphibolite facies). Late Ediacaran–Early Terreneuvian and Late Miaolingian–Early Furongian protolith ages for LGU (496 ± 3 Ma) and ISU (539 ± 2 Ma) orthogneisses are reported. A superstructure made of Cambrian–Devonian rocks (Upper Slate Unit, USU) deformed under M 2 greenschist facies conditions, tectonically overlies the ISU across a D 2 extensional shear zone. Kinematic criteria associated with D 2 –M 2 fabrics indicate top-to-ESE–SE sense of shear. A late-D 2 brittle-ductile high-angle extensional shear zone (Seda shear zone) crosscuts the gneiss dome. D 3 upright folds, thrusts and transpressive shear zones caused the steepening of D 2 structures and the local crenulation of S 2 foliation. The Mississippian D 2 –M 2 event recorded in the Ossa–Morena Zone may be regarded as a regional-scale phenomenon that markedly influenced the crustal architecture of North Gondwana during the assembly of Pangaea.

Abstract A correlation between allochthonous units exposed in the NW Iberian Massif and the southern Armorican Massif is carried out based on lithological associations, structural position, age and geochemistry of protoliths and tectonometamorphic evolution. The units on both sides of the Bay of Biscay are grouped into Upper, Middle and Lower allochthons, whereas an underlying allochthonous thrust sheet identified in both massifs is referred to as the Parautochthon. The Lower Allochthon represents a fragment of the outermost edge of Gondwana that underwent continental subduction shortly after the closure of a Palaeozoic ocean which, in turn, is represented by the Middle Allochthon. The latter consists of supra-subduction ophiolites and metasedimentary sequences alternating with basic, mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB)-type volcanics, with inheritances suggesting the proximity of a continental domain. Seafloor spreading began at the Cambro-Ordovician boundary and oceanic crust was still formed during the Late Devonian, covering the lifetime of the Rheic Ocean, which is possibly represented by the Middle Allochthon. The opening of the oceanic domain was related to pulling apart the peri-Gondwanan continental magmatic arc, which is represented by the Upper Allochthon.

Abstract The Variscan metamorphic evolution of the autochthonous domain of NW and Central Iberia is characterized by a Barrovian gradient followed by a high-temperature–low-pressure (HT/LP) event associated with voluminous granite magmatism. The structural, metamorphic and magmatic histories of the region are described briefly and the relations between them are explained. A coherent model for evolution of the continental crust is proposed using published radiometric ages, thermal models and seismic reflection profiles. The metamorphic evolution, including the high-temperature event, is explained by crustal thickening resulting from the Gondwana–Laurussia collision followed by a period of thermal relaxation and a long-lasting extensional stage. The fact that the highest temperatures were reached in the core of the Central Iberian arc, partly occupied by remnants of a huge allochthonous nappe stack, is discussed in relation to both the emplacement of the allochthon and subsequent oroclinal bending. The overburden provided by the allochthonous pile was decisive in triggering the high-temperature event. Orocline development mostly occurred later and had no significant effect on the metamorphic evolution, although it was important for the present localization of gneiss domes and granitoids. The possible role of the mantle in supplying additional heat to explain the HT/LP event is also discussed. It would seem that little mantle contribution was needed and there are no strong arguments for mantle delamination, although some kind of mantle–crust interaction is expected beneath the hot regions presently occupying the core of the Central Iberian arc.