Abstract During the 1970s, geologists considered that the Upper Ordovician Taconic Orogeny represented the collision of Laurentia with the Ammonoosuc arc, now largely exposed on the Bronson Hill anticlinorium. Subsequently, several researchers noted that magmatic rocks which intrude and overlie the Ammonoosuc arc are younger than the c. 455–451 Ma Taconic Orogeny. This led them to hypothesize that a Middle Ordovician collision was followed by westward-dipping subduction beneath the amalgamated Laurentian–Ammonoosuc zone to produce the younger arc rocks. In this model, the Taconic allochthons and foredeep were produced later in a retro-arc setting above westward-dipping subduction. However, those models prove inadequate due to the lack of ash beds, foredeep sedimentation and deformation on the Laurentian platform prior to the Upper Ordovician Taconic Orogeny. Here, we resolve the dilemma by recognizing that the magmatic rocks, which post-date the 455–451 Ma Taconic Orogeny, are not arc rocks but, instead, typical post-collisional slab-failure rocks as old as 450 Ma, with Sr/Y > 10, Sm/Yb > 2.5, Nb/Y > 0.4 and La/Yb > 10. Thus, in New England and western New York, the Upper Ordovician Taconic Orogeny represents the collision of the Ammonoosuc arc with Laurentia followed by slab failure of the descending plate.

ABSTRACT In the standard model, Cordilleran-type batholiths form beneath volcanic arcs in thickened crust, but our survey of modern and ancient continental arcs revealed most to be regions of normal to thinned crust, not zones of crustal thickening. This suggested to us that the standard batholithic paradigm is flawed. In order to better understand the batholiths, we explored (1) the 100–84 Ma La Posta and Sierran Crest magmatic suites of the Peninsular Ranges and Sierran batholiths, which formed after the 100 Ma Oregonian event due to closure of the Bisbee-Arperos seaway; (2) plutons and batholiths emplaced into the metamorphic hinterland of the 124–115 Ma Sevier event, which occurred in the Great Basin sector of the United States but, due to younger meridional transport, are now exposed in the Omineca belt and Selwyn Basin of Canada; and (3) Late Cretaceous–early Cenozoic intrusive rocks, such as the Coast, Idaho, and Boulder batholiths, which intruded a metamorphic hinterland during and after the Laramide event. The dominance of syn-to postdeformational emplacement and the distinctive slab failure–type geochemistry indicate that most, but not all, Cretaceous plutons within Cordilleran batholiths formed during and after arc-continent collision as the result of slab failure. We interpret whole-rock geochemistry, as well as radiogenic and stable isotopes, to indicate that slab failure magmas involve only minor amounts of crust and are derived mainly from plagioclase-absent melting of garnet-bearing rocks in the mantle. Some suites, such as the <100 Ma Oregonian Sierran and Peninsular Ranges batholiths, have evolved Nd and Sr isotopes compatible with old enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle. The well-known 0.706 87/86 Sr i isopleth appears to separate rocks of Oregonian slab failure from rocks of older arc magmatism and is probably unrelated to any obvious crustal break; instead, it reflects involvement of old subcontinental lithospheric mantle in the slab failure magmas. To expand our findings we examined the geochemistry of Cenozoic slab window and Precambrian tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite suites and found them to share many similarities with the Cretaceous slab failure rocks. Because most Cretaceous plutons in the North American Cordillera appear to represent juvenile additions to the crust, we argue that substantial volumes of continental crust are formed by slab failure magmatism. Slab failure rocks, especially those emplaced within the epizone, are richly metalliferous and make excellent exploration targets.

Abstract During the Early to Middle Palaeozoic, prior to formation of Pangaea, the Canadian and adjacent New England Appalachians evolved as an accretionary orogen. Episodic orogenesis mainly resulted from accretion of four microcontinents or crustal ribbons: Dashwoods, Ganderia, Avalonia and Meguma. Dashwoods is peri-Laurentian, whereas Ganderia, Avalonia and Meguma have Gondwanan provenance. Accretion led to a progressive eastwards (present co-ordinates) migration of the onset of collision-related deformation, metamorphism and magmatism. Voluminous, syn-collisional felsic granitoid-dominated pulses are explained as products of slab-breakoff rather than contemporaneous slab subduction. The four phases of orogenesis associated with accretion of these microcontinents are known as the Taconic, Salinic, Acadian and Neoacadian orogenies, respectively. The Ordovician Taconic orogeny was a composite event comprising three different phases, due to involvement of three peri-Laurentian oceanic and continental terranes. The Taconic orogeny was terminated with an arc–arc collision due to the docking of the active leading edge of Ganderia, the Popelogan–Victoria arc, to an active Laurentian margin (Red Indian Lake arc) during the Late Ordovician (460–450 Ma). The Salinic orogeny was due to Late Ordovician–Early Silurian (450–423 Ma) closure of the Tetagouche–Exploits backarc basin, which separated the active leading edge of Ganderia from its trailing passive edge, the Gander margin. Salinic closure was initiated following accretion of the active leading edge of Ganderia to Laurentia and stepping back of the west-directed subduction zone behind the accreted Popelogan–Victoria arc. The Salinic orogeny was immediately followed by Late Silurian–Early Devonian accretion of Avalonia (421–400 Ma) and Middle Devonian–Early Carboniferous accretion of Meguma (395–350 Ma), which led to the Acadian and Neoacadian orogenies, respectively. Each accretion took place after stepping-back of the west-dipping subduction zone behind an earlier accreted crustal ribbon, which led to progressive outboard growth of Laurentia. The Acadian orogeny was characterized by a flat-slab setting after the onset of collision, which coincided with rapid southerly palaeolatitudinal motion of Laurentia. Acadian orogenesis preferentially started in the hot and hence, weak backarc region. Subsequently it was characterized by a time-transgressive, hinterland migrating fold-and-thrust belt antithetic to the west-dipping A–subduction zone. The Acadian deformation front appears to have been closely tracked in space by migration of the Acadian magmatic front. Syn-orogenic, Acadian magmatism is interpreted to mainly represent partial melting of subducted fore-arc material and pockets of fluid-fluxed asthenosphere above the flat-slab, in areas where Ganderian's lithosphere was thinned by extension during Silurian subduction of the Acadian oceanic slab. Final Acadian magmatism from 395– c . 375 Ma is tentatively attributed to slab-breakoff. Neoacadian accretion of Meguma was accommodated by wedging of the leading edge of Laurentia, which at this time was represented by Avalonia. The Neoacadian was devoid of any accompanying arc magmatism, probably because it was characterized by a flat-slab setting throughout its history.

Full article available in PDF version

Full article available in PDF version

Full article available in PDF version

Full article available in PDF version