ABSTRACT The Pliocene–Quaternary igneous record of the Tyrrhenian Sea area features a surprisingly large range of compositions from subalkaline to ultra-alkaline and from ultrabasic to acid. These rocks, emplaced within the basin and along its margins, are characterized by strongly SiO 2 -undersaturated and CaO-rich to strongly SiO 2 -oversaturated and peraluminous compositions, with sodic to ultrapotassic alkaline and tholeiitic to calc-alkaline and high-K calc-alkaline affinities. We focused on the different models proposed to explain the famous Roman Comagmatic Region, part of the Quaternary volcanism that spreads along the eastern side of the Tyrrhenian area, in the stretched part of the Apennines thrust-and-fold belt. We reviewed data and hypotheses proposed in the literature that infer active to fossil subduction up to models that exclude subduction entirely. Many field geology observations sustain the interpretation that the evolution of the Tyrrhenian-Apennine system was related to subduction of the western margin of Adria continental lithosphere after minor recycling of oceanic lithosphere. However, the lateral extent of the subducting slab in the last millions of years, when magmatism flared up, remains debatable. The igneous activity that developed in the last millions of years along the Tyrrhenian margin is here explained as originating from a subduction-modified mantle, regardless of whether the large-scale subduction system is still active.

Anorogenic magmatism of the circum-Mediterranean area (the Tyrrhenian Sea, Sardinia, Sicily Channel, and the Middle East) and of continental Europe (the French Massif Central, Eifel, the Bohemian Massif, and the Pannonian basin) has been proposed to be related to the presence of one or more mantle plumes. Such conclusions based on geochemical data and seismic tomography are not fully justified because (1) a given chemical and isotopic composition of a magma can be explained by different petrogenetic models, (2) a given petrogenetic process can produce magmas with different chemical and isotopic composition, (3) tomographic studies do not furnish unique results (i.e., different models give different results), and (4) the commonly adopted interpretation of seismic wave velocity anomalies exclusively in terms of temperature is not unique; velocities are also dependent on other parameters, such as composition, melting, anisotropy, and anelasticity. Tomography and geochemistry are powerful tools but must be used in an interdisciplinary way, in combination with geodynamics and structural geology. Alone they cannot provide conclusive evidence for or against the existence of mantle plumes. The existence of large and/or extensive thermal anomalies under Europe is here considered unnecessary, because other models, based on the existence of upper-mantle heterogeneity, can explain the major-element, trace-element, and isotopic variability of the magmas. Volcanism in central Europe (the French Massif Central, Germany, and the Bohemian Massif) is concentrated in Cenozoic rifted areas and is here interpreted as the result of passive asthenosphere upwelling driven by decompression. Similarly, anorogenic magmatism in Sardinia, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and the Pannonian basin is explained as the result of lithospheric stretching in a back-arc geodynamic setting. The most important factors determining the locus and, in part, the geochemical characteristics of magmatic activity are the Moho and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary depths. Where both are shallowed by tectonic processes (e.g., in rift zones or back-arc basins), passive upwelling of asthenospheric mantle can explain the magmatic activity.