- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Gulf of Mexico (4)
-
-
-
Bell Creek Field (2)
-
Central America
-
Guatemala (2)
-
-
Europe
-
Western Europe
-
United Kingdom
-
Great Britain
-
England (2)
-
-
-
-
-
Fuego (2)
-
North America
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (3)
-
-
Permian Basin (1)
-
United States
-
Alaska (1)
-
Arkansas (1)
-
Central Basin Platform (1)
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Mississippi (1)
-
Montana (8)
-
Oklahoma
-
Cimarron County Oklahoma (1)
-
-
Ouachita Mountains (1)
-
Powder River basin (1)
-
South Dakota (1)
-
Texas
-
West Texas (1)
-
-
Wyoming (7)
-
-
-
commodities
-
energy sources (1)
-
oil and gas fields (3)
-
petroleum (3)
-
-
fossils
-
Invertebrata
-
Mollusca
-
Bivalvia (1)
-
-
-
-
geologic age
-
Cenozoic
-
Quaternary
-
Holocene (1)
-
Pleistocene (1)
-
-
Tertiary
-
Paleogene
-
Eocene
-
lower Eocene (1)
-
middle Eocene
-
Claiborne Group (1)
-
-
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (1)
-
-
Paleocene (1)
-
Wilcox Group (1)
-
-
-
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Muddy Sandstone (3)
-
-
-
Jurassic
-
Lower Jurassic (1)
-
Norphlet Formation (1)
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Oxfordian (3)
-
Stump Formation (1)
-
Sundance Formation (2)
-
Swift Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Lower Pennsylvanian
-
Morrowan (1)
-
-
-
-
Ordovician (1)
-
Permian
-
Lower Permian
-
Leonardian
-
Clear Fork Group (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Precambrian (1)
-
-
igneous rocks
-
igneous rocks
-
volcanic rocks
-
glasses (2)
-
pyroclastics (2)
-
-
-
volcanic ash (2)
-
-
minerals
-
minerals (1)
-
silicates
-
framework silicates
-
silica minerals
-
quartz (1)
-
-
-
sheet silicates
-
illite (1)
-
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Gulf of Mexico (4)
-
-
-
Cenozoic
-
Quaternary
-
Holocene (1)
-
Pleistocene (1)
-
-
Tertiary
-
Paleogene
-
Eocene
-
lower Eocene (1)
-
middle Eocene
-
Claiborne Group (1)
-
-
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (1)
-
-
Paleocene (1)
-
Wilcox Group (1)
-
-
-
-
Central America
-
Guatemala (2)
-
-
clay mineralogy (1)
-
crystal growth (1)
-
diagenesis (2)
-
economic geology (3)
-
energy sources (1)
-
Europe
-
Western Europe
-
United Kingdom
-
Great Britain
-
England (2)
-
-
-
-
-
geomorphology (1)
-
igneous rocks
-
volcanic rocks
-
glasses (2)
-
pyroclastics (2)
-
-
-
Invertebrata
-
Mollusca
-
Bivalvia (1)
-
-
-
marine geology (3)
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Muddy Sandstone (3)
-
-
-
Jurassic
-
Lower Jurassic (1)
-
Norphlet Formation (1)
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Oxfordian (3)
-
Stump Formation (1)
-
Sundance Formation (2)
-
Swift Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
minerals (1)
-
North America
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (3)
-
-
oceanography (1)
-
oil and gas fields (3)
-
paleoecology (1)
-
paleogeography (4)
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Lower Pennsylvanian
-
Morrowan (1)
-
-
-
-
Ordovician (1)
-
Permian
-
Lower Permian
-
Leonardian
-
Clear Fork Group (1)
-
-
-
-
-
petroleum (3)
-
petrology (2)
-
Precambrian (1)
-
sedimentary petrology (13)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
limestone
-
coquina (1)
-
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
chert (1)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
conglomerate (1)
-
mudstone (1)
-
sandstone (12)
-
shale (2)
-
-
-
sedimentary structures (3)
-
sedimentation (14)
-
sediments
-
carbonate sediments (1)
-
clastic sediments
-
clay (1)
-
sand (1)
-
-
-
stratigraphy (1)
-
United States
-
Alaska (1)
-
Arkansas (1)
-
Central Basin Platform (1)
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Mississippi (1)
-
Montana (8)
-
Oklahoma
-
Cimarron County Oklahoma (1)
-
-
Ouachita Mountains (1)
-
Powder River basin (1)
-
South Dakota (1)
-
Texas
-
West Texas (1)
-
-
Wyoming (7)
-
-
volcanology (2)
-
well-logging (1)
-
-
rock formations
-
Fort Union Formation (1)
-
Wilcox Formation (1)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
flysch (1)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
limestone
-
coquina (1)
-
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
chert (1)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
conglomerate (1)
-
mudstone (1)
-
sandstone (12)
-
shale (2)
-
-
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
mounds (1)
-
sedimentary structures (3)
-
-
sediments
-
sediments
-
carbonate sediments (1)
-
clastic sediments
-
clay (1)
-
sand (1)
-
-
-
Abstract The long-term production history of some offshore and onshore Gulf Coast reservoirs reveals that gas production exceeds assigned reserves for no readily apparent reason. The distinct possibility exists that surrounding shales contribute significant quantities of gas during the reservoir lifecycle. Direct evidence for economic gas production from non-fractured shale intervals comes from the Devonian of the Appalachian Basin and from Tertiary-Pleistocene reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico. Intergranular pores occur between detrital clay particles in true shales of the Devonian interval. The ability of this intergranular pore system to transmit gas (permeability) is controlled primarily by the microfabric of the shale. It is reasonable, therefore, to expect that Gulf Coast shales with similar internal characteristics will yield sufficient gas to impact reservoir economics. The Gulf Coast area contains significant proportions of sediments deposited in distal deltaic and deep water environments. These environments produce thick, fine grained “shale” intervals that, in reality contain numerous thin (<1 inch) laminations of porous and permeable silt and/or sand separated from one another by layers rich in clay minerals (true shales). Given a large number of silt/sand interbeds, sufficient permeability thickness can be developed in the interval to yield gas at high rates. Routine methods of log analysis fail to resolve the thin-bedding in these pay intervals, many of which are therefore bypassed. Reserve calculations can also be significantly effected by gas production from true shales in traditional reservoir settings (such as the Wilcox Formation). The amount of gas recovered in reservoirs developed in relatively thin sand bodies (generally <50ft) can be increased by gas migration from surrounding shales during production-related pressure depletion of the main reservoir body. Improved reserve calculations require that potentially productive shales are included in all aspect of reservoir evaluation, from petrophysics to simulation.
Abstract An integrated geological/petrophysical and reservoir engineering study has been performed for a large, mature waterflood project (>250 wells, 80% water cut) at the North Robertson (Clear Fork) Unit, Gaines County, Texas. The primary goal of the study was to develop an integrated reservoir description for “targeted” 10-ac (4-ha) infill drilling and future recovery operations in a low- permeability carbonate reservoir. Integration of geological/petrophysical studies and reservoir performance analyses provided a rapid and effective method for developing a comprehensive reservoir description. This reservoir description can be used for reservoir flow simulation, per-formance prediction, infill targeting, waterflood management, and optimizing well developments (patterns, completions, and stimulations). The following analyses were performed as part of this study: Geological/petrophysical analyses: (core and well log data) Rock typing based on qualitative and quantitative visualization of pore- scale features. Reservoir layering based on rock typing and hydraulic flow units. Development of a core-log model to estimate permeability using porosity and other properties derived from well logs. The core-log model is based on “rock types.” Engineering analyses: (production and injection history, well tests) Material balance decline type curve analyses performed to estimate total reservoir volume, formation flow characteristics (flow capacity, skin factor, and fracture half-length), and indications of well/boundary interference. Estimated ultimate recovery analyses yield movable oil (or injectable water) volumes, as well as indications of well and boundary interference. Well tests provide estimates of flow capacity, indications of formation damage or stimulation, and estimates of drainage (or injection) volume pressures. Maps of historical production characteristics (contacted oil-in-place, estimated ultimate recovery, and reservoir pressure) have been compared to maps generated from the geologic studies (rock type, permeability/thickness, hydrocarbon pore volume) to identify the areas of the unit to be targeted for infill drilling. Our results indicate that a close relationship exists between the rock type distribution and permeability calculated using porosity and other properties derived from well logs. The reservoir performance data also suggest that this reservoir depletes and recharges almost exclusively according to the rock type distribution. This integration of rock data and the reservoir performance attributes uses existing data and can eliminate the need for evaluation wells, as well as avoiding the loss of production that occurs when wells are shut-in for testing purposes. In short, a comprehensive analysis, interpretation, and prediction of well and field performance can be completed quickly, at a minimal cost, and this analysis can be used to directly improve our understanding of reservoir structure and performance behavior in complex formations.
Permian Clear Fork Group, North Robertson Unit: Integrated Reservoir Management and Characterization for Infill Drilling, Part II—Petrophysical and Engineering Data
Determination of Productivity, Wilcox-Frio Sands, South Texas: ABSTRACT
Regional diagenetic trends in the Lower Cretaceous Muddy Sandstone, Powder River basin; discussion and reply
Nonmarine Sedimentation in an Active Fore Arc Basin
Abstract The modern fore arc basin of Guatemala receives non-marine sediments as a result of deposition of airfall ash, glowing avalanches (nuées ardentes), debris flows (lahars), and fluvial sediments. The lateral and vertical distribution of these deposits allows ready subdivision into four facies, including 1) the volcanic core facies, 2) proximal volcan- iclastic facies, 3) medial volcaniclastic facies, and 4) distal volcaniclastic facies. Recent sediments of the study area have been deposited during the past 20,000 to 30,000 years, in a series of similar and repeated cycles. Each cycle consists of four phases: 1) The Inter-Eruption Phase (Phase 1) which is characterized by low rates of sediment deposition, incision of meandering streams, and delta reworking. This phase has a duration of 80 to 125 years. 2) The Eruptive Phase, (Phase 2) dominated by the ejection of airfall ash and glowing avalanches. This phase generally lasts less than one year. 3) The Fan Building Phase (Phase 3) dominated by debris flows and the deposition of coarse grained fluvial sediment. This phase lasts for some two years after an eruption. 4) The Braiding Phase, (Phase 4) characterized by the introduction of large volumes of sediment into the stream systems, resulting in the transformation of the incised meandering channels to rapidly aggrading, braided channels, and rapid deltaic progradation. This phase lasts for some 20 to 30 years following an eruption. Phases 3 and 4 are triggered only by major eruptions which produce more than 6 × 10 7 m 3 ejecta. Smaller eruptions do not significantly affect the sedimentation system. Non-marine volcaniclastic sedimentation therefore proceeds as a series of relatively short-lived pulses (20 to 30 years duration) separated by longer periods (80 to 125 years duration) of comparatively minor depositional activity. The failure of the sedimentary system to respond in a similar fashion to all eruptions, indicates the existence of a geomorphic threshold, controlled entirely by the amount of ejecta produced during an eruption. In areas, dominated by fluvial activity (generally the distal volcaniclastic facies) the geologic record consists of superimposed or interdigitating deposits from braided and meandering streams. The change from braiding to meandering is not a function of change in slope or rainfall. Rather it is a response to the amount of sediment introduced into the fluvial systems.
Reservoir Quality, Pliocene-Pleistocene Sandstones, Offshore Gulf of Mexico: ABSTRACT
Nature of authigenic illites in sandstone reservoirs
Environments and Diagenesis, Morrow Sandstones, Cimarron County, Oklahoma
Sedimentology of Volcaniclastic Deposits from 1971-1974 Eruption Cluster of Volcano Fuego, Guatemala: ABSTRACT
Abstract Tertiary-Holocene continental volcanic sediments in southern Guatemala were deposited in three basins each approximately 150 km long and 50 to 100 km wide. Boundaries between these basins mark the positions of transverse breaks in the underlying lithospheric slab. The rates of sediment accumulation and subsidence, and the composition, texture, and thickness of sediments can be expected to vary greatly from basin to basin. Exploration for hydrocarbon reservoirs in similar fore-arc areas should take into account that large scale correlations along depositional strike may be virtually impossible over distances greater than 50 or 100 km. The nature, degree, and timing of the diagenesis of Guatemalan volcaniclastics poses problems as to the hydrocarbon production potential of similar areas in other parts of the world. Guatemalan continental volcaniclastics are feldspathic litharenites. Three successive episodes of diagenesis have resulted in the precipitation of the following sequence of minerals in rock pores:—hematite-goethite;—montmorillonite plus hematite;—montmoril- lonite plus heulandite. These minerals occur as secondary pore-linings and pore-fills. Diagenesis has resulted in significant reduction of original permeability within 2000 years of deposition. Data indicate that the diagenesis of these rocks may not be dependent on depth of burial or temperature. The major diagenetic control was the chemistry of the groundwater. Introduction of groundwater resulted in the solution of unstable components (glass, pyroxene) and penecontemporaneous precipitation from pore-fluids of dissolved ionic species. Specific cements formed in the sands at any time are considered to be a function of the chemistry of the pore-fluids. Boundaries between different diagenetic assemblages in these rocks are probably determined more by ground water chemistry than by temperature or pressure.
Abstract Lower Cretaceous sandstones of the Muddy Formation have produced a number of significant hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Powder River Basin. These reservoir sandstones accumulated in a variety of fluvial, deltaic, and shallow marine environments. The porosity and permeability of Muddy sandstones are affected significantly by the amount and composition of diagenetic clay minerals. Diagenetic clay mineral assemblages within the Muddy are time controlled. Oldest Muddy sandstones (sedimentologic zones 5 and 6) are characterized by a Kaolinite-Chlorite-Illite-Quartz assemblage with some smectite. Intermediate Muddy sandstones (sedimentologic zones 3 and 4) are characterized by an Illite-Smectite assemblage with sporadic Chlorite, Quartz and Kaolinite. Youngest Muddy sandstones (sedimentologic zones 1 and 2) are characterized by a Kaolinite-Quartz assemblage. This diagenetic time-trend is matched by a change in the composition of detrital components. Older Muddy sandstones are more feldspathic, contain more rock fragments and less quartz than the younger sandstones. Well stimulation and completion treatments should take into account the diagenetic assemblages present in the reservoir sandstones. In the oldest Muddy sandstones, the rocks will tend to be acid sensitive, occasionally fresh water sensitive, and there will be migration of fines. In the younger Muddy sandstones, the principal problem will be the migration of fines and the stabilizing of the kaolinite.