- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Blake-Bahama Outer Ridge (1)
-
Gulf of Mexico (9)
-
-
-
Canada
-
Western Canada
-
Alberta (1)
-
-
-
Green Canyon (3)
-
Imperial Valley (1)
-
North America
-
Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (1)
-
-
San Andreas Fault (1)
-
United States
-
Anadarko Basin (1)
-
California
-
Southern California (1)
-
-
Central Basin Platform (1)
-
Colorado
-
Cheyenne County Colorado (1)
-
-
Delaware Basin (1)
-
Illinois
-
Morgan County Illinois (1)
-
-
Illinois Basin (1)
-
Kansas
-
Clark County Kansas (1)
-
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Pennsylvania (1)
-
South Carolina (1)
-
Texas
-
Andrews County Texas (1)
-
Fort Worth Basin (2)
-
King County Texas (1)
-
Kleberg County Texas (1)
-
Midland Basin (1)
-
Nueces County Texas (2)
-
Pecos County Texas (1)
-
Sherman County Texas (1)
-
West Texas (2)
-
-
-
-
commodities
-
energy sources (1)
-
geothermal energy (2)
-
oil and gas fields (3)
-
petroleum
-
natural gas (9)
-
-
-
geologic age
-
Cenozoic
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene (1)
-
-
Paleogene
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (2)
-
-
-
-
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian (2)
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Middle Pennsylvanian (1)
-
Morrow Formation (1)
-
Strawn Series (2)
-
Upper Pennsylvanian
-
Canyon Group (1)
-
Cisco Group (1)
-
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Middle Devonian
-
Marcellus Shale (1)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Ellenburger Group (2)
-
-
-
-
-
minerals
-
hydrates (2)
-
-
Primary terms
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Blake-Bahama Outer Ridge (1)
-
Gulf of Mexico (9)
-
-
-
Canada
-
Western Canada
-
Alberta (1)
-
-
-
Cenozoic
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene (1)
-
-
Paleogene
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (2)
-
-
-
-
-
continental shelf (1)
-
continental slope (1)
-
crystal structure (1)
-
data processing (7)
-
deformation (1)
-
energy sources (1)
-
explosions (1)
-
faults (5)
-
folds (1)
-
fractures (1)
-
geophysical methods (32)
-
geothermal energy (2)
-
North America
-
Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (1)
-
-
ocean floors (5)
-
ocean waves (1)
-
oil and gas fields (3)
-
paleogeography (1)
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian (2)
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Middle Pennsylvanian (1)
-
Morrow Formation (1)
-
Strawn Series (2)
-
Upper Pennsylvanian
-
Canyon Group (1)
-
Cisco Group (1)
-
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Middle Devonian
-
Marcellus Shale (1)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Ellenburger Group (2)
-
-
-
-
petroleum
-
natural gas (9)
-
-
reefs (1)
-
remote sensing (1)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
grainstone (1)
-
packstone (1)
-
-
-
sedimentation (2)
-
sediments
-
carbonate sediments (1)
-
marine sediments (4)
-
-
tectonics
-
salt tectonics (1)
-
-
United States
-
Anadarko Basin (1)
-
California
-
Southern California (1)
-
-
Central Basin Platform (1)
-
Colorado
-
Cheyenne County Colorado (1)
-
-
Delaware Basin (1)
-
Illinois
-
Morgan County Illinois (1)
-
-
Illinois Basin (1)
-
Kansas
-
Clark County Kansas (1)
-
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Pennsylvania (1)
-
South Carolina (1)
-
Texas
-
Andrews County Texas (1)
-
Fort Worth Basin (2)
-
King County Texas (1)
-
Kleberg County Texas (1)
-
Midland Basin (1)
-
Nueces County Texas (2)
-
Pecos County Texas (1)
-
Sherman County Texas (1)
-
West Texas (2)
-
-
-
well-logging (2)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
grainstone (1)
-
packstone (1)
-
-
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
channels (1)
-
-
sediments
-
sediments
-
carbonate sediments (1)
-
marine sediments (4)
-
-
Stress analysis using direct-S wavelets produced by a vertical vibrator
Direct-SV radiation produced by land-based P-sources — Part 2: Buried explosives
Direct-SV radiation produced by land-based P-sources — Part 1: Surface sources
Comparing P-P, P-SV, and SV-P mode waves in the Midland Basin, West Texas
SV-P extraction and imaging for far-offset vertical seismic profile data
Seismic chronostratigraphy at reservoir scale: Statistical modeling
Introduction to special section: Pitfalls in the structural interpretation of seismic data
Pitfall experiences when interpreting complex structure with low-quality seismic images
Interpretation of multicomponent seismic data across Wister geothermal field, Imperial Valley, California
Advantages of joint interpretation of P-P and P-SV seismic data in geothermal exploration
Generating direct-S modes with simple, low-cost, widely available seismic sources
SV-P: An ignored seismic mode that has great value for interpreters
S-S imaging with vertical-force sources
Interpretation of fractures and joint inversion using multicomponent seismic data — Marcellus Shale example
Application of 3C/3D converted mode reflections, King County, Texas
Introduction to special section: Multicomponent seismic interpretation
Basic Concepts
Abstract A principle that is emphasized throughout this book is that the physics of any multicomponent seismic technology cannot be understood unless that technology is viewed in terms of the particle-displacement vectors associated with the various modes of a seismic wavefield. This material therefore begins with a discussion of seismic vector-wavefield behavior to set the stage for subsequent chapters. Several approaches can be used to explain why each wave mode of nine-component (9C) and three-component (3C) seismic data that propagates through subsurface geology provides a different amount and type of rock/fluid information about the geology that the wave modes illuminate. Some approaches appeal to people who have limited interest in mathematics. Other options need to be structured for people who have an appreciation of the mathematics of wavefield reflectivity. Another argument that can be used focuses on the fundamental differences in P-wave and S-wave radiation patterns and the distinctions in target illuminations associated with 9C and 3C seismic sources. We will consider all of those paths of logic. A principle that will be stressed is that each mode of a multicomponent seismic wavefield senses a different earth fabric along its propagation path because its particle-displacement vector is oriented in a different direction than are the particle-displacement vectors of its companion modes. Although estimations of earth fabric obtained from various modes of a multicomponent seismic wavefield can differ, each estimate still can be correct because each wave mode deforms a unit volume of rock in a different direction, depending on the orientation of its
Multicomponent Data Acquisition
Abstract When acquiring multicomponent seismic data, careful attention must be given to the vector motions associated with P and S seismic displacements. For example, when acquiring onshore data with a vertical-displacement source, it is not necessary to be concerned about the azimuth orientation of the source at a source station. In contrast, when a horizontal-displacement source is used to generate S-wave data, it is essential to know the azimuth orientation of the source baseplate at each source station and the direction of first motion of that baseplate and to create consistent baseplate azimuth orientations at all source stations across a survey area. Likewise, it is mandatory to know the positive-polarity ends of the two horizontal sensor elements in a three-component (3C) receiver and to orient the horizontal sensors so that the positive-polarity ends point in consistent azimuths at all receiver stations. Such caution is not required when deploying vertical sensors used to acquire one-component (1C) P-wave data. If it is not possible to orient horizontal sensors in a consistent vector azimuth, as can be the case when four-component (4C) receiver nodes are deployed in deep water, a data-processing procedure must be implemented to determine sensor orientations at every receiver station. Analysis of the vector motion induced in seafloor sensors by first-arrival wavelets traveling from a large number of surface source-station coordinates is a common method used to determine 4C sensor orientation. This orientation information then can be used to mathematically transform data to a new coordinate system that describes data that would be
Multicomponent Data Processing
Abstract Multicomponent seismic data processing is a complex subject that would require a separate book to cover all aspects o the topic in a thorough manner. This chapter summarizes only basic principles and is not intended to be a complete treatise on multicomponent data-processing concepts and strategies. When nine-component (9C) data are acquired, processing S-wave data propagating in isotropic media is in concept no different than processing conventional single-component P-wave data because SH-SH and SV-SV modes satisfy the constraints of common-midpoint (CMP) data processing just as P data do. The fundamental requirement for CMP processing is that the velocity of the downgoing mode must be the same as the velocity of the upgoing mode. That assumption is valid for SH-SH and SV-SV data just as it is for P-P data. Because CMP data-processing software and expertise are widespread, processing 9C data to make SH-SH and SV-SV images is not a great challenge to a data processor skilled in processing conventional P-P data. Processing three-component (3C) and four-component (4C) data is a different matter. For those data, the velocity of the downgoing wavefield (P-wave) is not the same as the velocity of the upgoing wavefield (SV-wave), and CMP principles no longer apply. A different data-processing strategy based on common-conversion-point (CCP) principles has to be implemented. Some of the better CCP processing software is proprietary to seismic contractors and to a few research groups and service providers. The use of CCP software is beginning to be reasonably widespread, and CCP data-processing skills are expanding annually.