Update search
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Journal
Publisher
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Africa
-
West Africa
-
Ghana (1)
-
-
-
Asia
-
Indian Peninsula
-
India
-
Gujarat India
-
Kutch India (1)
-
-
Maharashtra India
-
Latur India (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Australasia
-
Australia (1)
-
-
Canada
-
Eastern Canada
-
Maritime Provinces
-
New Brunswick
-
Miramichi Bay (1)
-
-
-
-
Ungava (1)
-
-
United States
-
Illinois Basin (1)
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Missouri (1)
-
New Madrid region (2)
-
Reelfoot Rift (1)
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston County South Carolina
-
Charleston South Carolina (1)
-
-
-
Texas
-
East Texas (1)
-
East Texas Basin (1)
-
-
-
-
commodities
-
petroleum (2)
-
-
geologic age
-
Mesozoic
-
Jurassic
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Bossier Formation (1)
-
Haynesville Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
Africa
-
West Africa
-
Ghana (1)
-
-
-
Asia
-
Indian Peninsula
-
India
-
Gujarat India
-
Kutch India (1)
-
-
Maharashtra India
-
Latur India (1)
-
-
-
-
-
Australasia
-
Australia (1)
-
-
Canada
-
Eastern Canada
-
Maritime Provinces
-
New Brunswick
-
Miramichi Bay (1)
-
-
-
-
Ungava (1)
-
-
data processing (1)
-
earthquakes (4)
-
faults (2)
-
geophysical methods (1)
-
Mesozoic
-
Jurassic
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Bossier Formation (1)
-
Haynesville Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
petroleum (2)
-
plate tectonics (2)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
clastic rocks
-
mudstone (1)
-
-
-
tectonics (1)
-
United States
-
Illinois Basin (1)
-
Louisiana (1)
-
Missouri (1)
-
New Madrid region (2)
-
Reelfoot Rift (1)
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston County South Carolina
-
Charleston South Carolina (1)
-
-
-
Texas
-
East Texas (1)
-
East Texas Basin (1)
-
-
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
sedimentary rocks
-
clastic rocks
-
mudstone (1)
-
-
-
GeoRef Categories
Era and Period
Epoch and Age
Date
Availability
Quality control of surface-consistent deconvolution on land dynamite data
Multidisciplinary approach in determining the best zone to land a Haynesville horizontal well
Two-dimensional numerical modeling suggests preferred geometry of intersecting seismogenic faults
We undertook a parametric study, using a two-dimensional distinct element method, to investigate if there is a preferred geometry of intersecting faults that may favor the occurrence of intraplate earthquakes. This model subjects two and three vertical, intersecting faults within a block to a horizontal force across them, representing the maximum horizontal compression (S Hmax ). The main fault is oriented at an angle α with respect to S Hmax , and β is the interior angle between the main fault and the intersecting fault. The third fault is oriented parallel to the main fault and is half its length. The distribution of shear stresses is examined along the faults for different values of α and β, and varying lengths of the main and intersecting faults. In all cases, maximum shear stresses are generated at the fault intersections. The modeling results reveal that the magnitudes of the shear stresses depend on the values of α and β, with an optimum range for α between 30° and 60°. In the case where the sign of the shear stress on the intersecting fault is opposite that on the main fault, the largest stresses at the fault intersections are obtained when β is between 65° and 125°. When the stresses on these two faults are of the same sign, the largest stress values at the intersections are obtained when 145° ≤ β ≤ 170°. The results of the modeling are consistent with the observed geometry of faults in the New Madrid and Middleton Place Summerville seismic zones.