Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD
A comparative evaluation of scintillometric, geochemical, and biogeochemical methods of prospecting for uranium; discussion
S. H. U. Bowie and D. Ostle
A comparative evaluation of scintillometric, geochemical, and biogeochemical methods of prospecting for uranium; discussion
Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists (December 1969) 64 (8): 933
A comparative evaluation of scintillometric, geochemical, and biogeochemical methods of prospecting for uranium; discussion
Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists (December 1969) 64 (8): 933
Index Terms/Descriptors
Abstract
Exception is taken to statements (ibid., no. 1, p. 50-55) (1) that there is difficulty in recognizing apparent anomalies due to mass effect of uneven topography, (2) concerning usefulness of counting methods for laboratory determination of elemental uranium, and (3) that changes in water-flow rate impair reliability of hydrogeochemical prospecting.
ISSN: 0361-0128
EISSN: 1554-0774
Coden: ECGLAL
Serial Title: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists
Serial Volume: 64
Serial Issue: 8
Title: A comparative evaluation of scintillometric, geochemical, and biogeochemical methods of prospecting for uranium; discussion
Pages: 933
Published: 196912
Text Language: English
Publisher: Economic Geology Publishing Company,
Lancaster, PA,
United States
Accession Number: 1969-038347
Categories: Economic geology of ore deposits
Document Type: Serial
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Annotation: Discussion of paper by N. E. Whitehead and R. R. Brooks, Economic Geology, Vol. 64, No. 1, p. 50-55, 1969
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2017, American Geosciences Institute. Abstract, Copyright, Society of Economic Geologists. Reference includes data from Bibliography and Index of North American Geology, U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United States
Update Code: 1969
