Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD

Boulders as a lithologic control on river and landscape response to tectonic forcing at the Mendocino triple junction

Charles M. Shobe, Georgina L. Bennett, Gregory E. Tucker, Kevin Roback, Scott R. Miller and Joshua J. Roering
Boulders as a lithologic control on river and landscape response to tectonic forcing at the Mendocino triple junction
Geological Society of America Bulletin (July 2020) 133 (3-4): 647-662

Abstract

Constraining Earth's sediment mass balance over geologic time requires a quantitative understanding of how landscapes respond to transient tectonic perturbations. However, the mechanisms by which bedrock lithology governs landscape response remain poorly understood. Rock type influences the size of sediment delivered to river channels, which controls how efficiently rivers respond to tectonic forcing. The Mendocino triple junction region of northern California, USA, is one landscape in which large boulders, delivered by hillslope failures to channels, may alter the pace of landscape response to a pulse of rock uplift. Boulders frequently delivered by earthflows in one lithology, the Franciscan melange, have been hypothesized to steepen channels and slow river response to rock uplift, helping to preserve high-elevation, low-relief topography. Channels in other units (the Coastal Belt and the Franciscan schist) may experience little or no erosion inhibition due to boulder delivery. Here we investigate spatial patterns in channel steepness, an indicator of erosion resistance, and how it varies between melange and non-melange channels. We then ask whether lithologically controlled boulder delivery to rivers is a possible cause of steepness variations. We find that melange channels are steeper than Coastal Belt channels but not steeper than schist channels. Though channels in all units steepen with increasing proximity to mapped hillslope failures, absolute steepness values near failures are much higher ( approximately 2X) in the melange and schist than in Coastal Belt units. This could reflect reduced rock erodibility or increased erosion rates in the melange and schist, or disproportionate steepening due to enhanced boulder delivery by hillslope failures in those units. To investigate the possible influence of lithology-dependent boulder delivery, we map boulders at failure toes in the three units. We find that boulder size, frequency, and concentration are greatest in melange channels and that Coastal Belt channels have the lowest concentrations. Using our field data to parameterize a mathematical model for channel slope response to boulder delivery, we find that the modeled influence of boulders in the melange could be strong enough to account for some observed differences in channel steepness between lithologies. At the landscape scale, we lack the data to fully disentangle boulder-induced steepening from that due to spatially varying erosion rates and in situ rock erodibility. However, our boulder mapping and modeling results suggest that lithology-dependent boulder delivery to channels could retard landscape adjustment to tectonic forcing in the melange and potentially also in the schist. Boulder delivery may modulate landscape response to tectonics and help preserve high-elevation, low-relief topography at the Mendocino triple junction and elsewhere.


ISSN: 0016-7606
EISSN: 1943-2674
Coden: BUGMAF
Serial Title: Geological Society of America Bulletin
Serial Volume: 133
Serial Issue: 3-4
Title: Boulders as a lithologic control on river and landscape response to tectonic forcing at the Mendocino triple junction
Affiliation: University of Colorado at Boulder, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States
Pages: 647-662
Published: 20200727
Text Language: English
Publisher: Geological Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States
References: 93
Accession Number: 2020-059415
Categories: Structural geologyGeomorphology
Document Type: Serial
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Illustration Description: illus. incl. geol. sketch map
N38°19'60" - N42°00'00", W124°19'60" - W122°00'00"
Secondary Affiliation: University of Exeter, GBR, United KingdomCalifornia Institute of Technology, USA, United StatesUniversity of Utah, USA, United StatesUniversity of Oregon, USA, United States
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2022, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld, Alexandria, VA, United States. Reference includes data supplied by the Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, United States
Update Code: 202036

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal