Boulders as a lithologic control on river and landscape response to tectonic forcing at the Mendocino triple junction
Boulders as a lithologic control on river and landscape response to tectonic forcing at the Mendocino triple junction
Geological Society of America Bulletin (July 2020) 133 (3-4): 647-662
- boulders
- California
- channels
- clastic sediments
- Coast Ranges
- drainage basins
- drainage patterns
- East Pacific
- Eel River basin
- erosion
- erosion rates
- failures
- fluvial features
- geographic information systems
- GRASS GIS
- image analysis
- information systems
- landform evolution
- landscapes
- landslides
- lithologic controls
- mapping
- mass balance
- mass movements
- mathematical models
- melange
- Mendocino fracture zone
- North Pacific
- Northeast Pacific
- Northern California
- numerical models
- Pacific Coast
- Pacific Ocean
- plate tectonics
- Redwood Creek
- rivers
- sedimentation
- sediments
- slopes
- structural controls
- tectonics
- triple junctions
- United States
- uplifts
- steepness
- Russian River basin
- Mad River basin
Constraining Earth's sediment mass balance over geologic time requires a quantitative understanding of how landscapes respond to transient tectonic perturbations. However, the mechanisms by which bedrock lithology governs landscape response remain poorly understood. Rock type influences the size of sediment delivered to river channels, which controls how efficiently rivers respond to tectonic forcing. The Mendocino triple junction region of northern California, USA, is one landscape in which large boulders, delivered by hillslope failures to channels, may alter the pace of landscape response to a pulse of rock uplift. Boulders frequently delivered by earthflows in one lithology, the Franciscan melange, have been hypothesized to steepen channels and slow river response to rock uplift, helping to preserve high-elevation, low-relief topography. Channels in other units (the Coastal Belt and the Franciscan schist) may experience little or no erosion inhibition due to boulder delivery. Here we investigate spatial patterns in channel steepness, an indicator of erosion resistance, and how it varies between melange and non-melange channels. We then ask whether lithologically controlled boulder delivery to rivers is a possible cause of steepness variations. We find that melange channels are steeper than Coastal Belt channels but not steeper than schist channels. Though channels in all units steepen with increasing proximity to mapped hillslope failures, absolute steepness values near failures are much higher ( approximately 2X) in the melange and schist than in Coastal Belt units. This could reflect reduced rock erodibility or increased erosion rates in the melange and schist, or disproportionate steepening due to enhanced boulder delivery by hillslope failures in those units. To investigate the possible influence of lithology-dependent boulder delivery, we map boulders at failure toes in the three units. We find that boulder size, frequency, and concentration are greatest in melange channels and that Coastal Belt channels have the lowest concentrations. Using our field data to parameterize a mathematical model for channel slope response to boulder delivery, we find that the modeled influence of boulders in the melange could be strong enough to account for some observed differences in channel steepness between lithologies. At the landscape scale, we lack the data to fully disentangle boulder-induced steepening from that due to spatially varying erosion rates and in situ rock erodibility. However, our boulder mapping and modeling results suggest that lithology-dependent boulder delivery to channels could retard landscape adjustment to tectonic forcing in the melange and potentially also in the schist. Boulder delivery may modulate landscape response to tectonics and help preserve high-elevation, low-relief topography at the Mendocino triple junction and elsewhere.