Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD

Intragranular plasticity vs. grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite; microstructural evidence at high pressures (3.5-5.0 GPa)

Caroline Bollinger, Katharina Marquardt and Filippe Ferreira
Intragranular plasticity vs. grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite; microstructural evidence at high pressures (3.5-5.0 GPa)
American Mineralogist (February 2019) 104 (2): 220-231

Abstract

The plasticity of the mantle is still not well constrained, and satisfactory mineral-physics-based rheological laws are still missing. Despite olivine being the major component of the upper mantle, it is still debated which deformation mechanism (dislocation creep, diffusion creep, grain boundary sliding) dominates deformation. High-pressure research developments (state-of-the-art presses, synchrotron experiments, and so on) as well as competitive analysis utilities (software analysis, microscopy, and so on) allow considering intra- and intergranular mechanisms (grain boundary sliding accommodated by diffusion/dislocation creep) simultaneously. To study the contribution of individual deformation mechanism to the overall deformation in the upper mantle, we deformed polycrystalline forsterite at 3.5-5.0 GPa, 1000-1200 degrees C, 2 X 10 (super -5) s (super -1) at different strains in a 6-axis Mavo press. Split-cylinder experiments allowed to characterize an "internal" surface of the sample before and after the deformation experiments. Intra- and intergranular deformation was tracked using a focus ion beam milled reference grid on this surface. Grain internal misorientation where obtained from electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data. Both techniques suggest the dominance of intragranular deformation, in agreement with the fact that the samples have been deformed in the dislocation creep regime, as usually defined. Moreover, strain markers and out-of-plane displacements of grains provide the first microstructural evidence for a contribution of grain boundary sliding to plastic deformation at upper mantle pressure. Whether these displacements are grain boundary sliding or involve grain boundary migration cannot be clarified, given the resolution of the strain markers. Our EBSD data suggest that grain boundary processes become increasingly relevant at temperatures above 1100 degrees C and ensure homogenous plastic strain distribution in the aggregate.


ISSN: 0003-004X
EISSN: 1945-3027
Coden: AMMIAY
Serial Title: American Mineralogist
Serial Volume: 104
Serial Issue: 2
Title: Intragranular plasticity vs. grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite; microstructural evidence at high pressures (3.5-5.0 GPa)
Affiliation: Universitaet Bayreuth, Bayerisches GeoInstitut, Bayreuth, Germany
Pages: 220-231
Published: 201902
Text Language: English
Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, United States
References: 59
Accession Number: 2019-044207
Categories: Geophysics of minerals and rocks
Document Type: Serial
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Illustration Description: illus. incl. 2 tables
Secondary Affiliation: Imperial College London, GBR, United Kingdom
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2019, American Geosciences Institute. Abstract, copyright, Mineralogical Society of America. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld, Alexandria, VA, United States
Update Code: 201923
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal