Uncertainty analysis in statics corrections obtained by tomographic inversion; application in a mountainous zone in Catatumbo (Colombia)
Uncertainty analysis in statics corrections obtained by tomographic inversion; application in a mountainous zone in Catatumbo (Colombia) (in Statics, Jeff Deere (editor) and Mike Cox (editor))
Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK) (February 2009) 28 (2): 212-215
- arrival time
- Colombia
- corrections
- elastic waves
- elevation
- geophysical methods
- geophysical profiles
- geophysical surveys
- inverse problem
- Monte Carlo analysis
- Santander Colombia
- seismic methods
- seismic profiles
- South America
- standard deviation
- static corrections
- statistical analysis
- surveys
- tomography
- topography
- uncertainty
- velocity
- Catatumbo Basin
- checkerboard tests
Seismic tomography techniques are frequently used to obtain velocity models of the weathering layer, which are then used to calculate static corrections times. The main idea in tomography is to use the misfit between synthetic and observed first-arrival (refraction) times to correct an initial velocity model. Due to the nature of the seismic method where, in general, sources and receivers are placed on only one edge of the medium, the Earth surface, it can be shown that inverting for velocities using the observed times does not give a unique solution. Instead, a family of solutions is obtained that explains the same data set. To give a meaning to a nonunique solution, uncertainty analysis techniques are necessary. They can give information about the family of solutions such as which zones have a larger error, which zones are better resolved, is there a dispersion measurement (such as variance) associated with the solution model family, and is there a more probable solution model. To give clues to the answers to these questions, we have used a real seismic data set and applied four uncertainty assessment methods: jackknifing, checkerboard test, Monte Carlo, and bootstrapping.