Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD

A source study of the Bhuj, India, earthquake of 26 January 2001 (M (sub w) 7.60)

S. K. Singh, J. F. Pacheco, B. K. Bansal, X. Perez-Campos, R. S. Dattatrayam and G. Suresh
A source study of the Bhuj, India, earthquake of 26 January 2001 (M (sub w) 7.60)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (August 2004) 94 (4): 1195-1206

Abstract

We study the source time function (STF) and radiated seismic energy (E (sub R) ) of the M (sub w) 7.6 Bhuj earthquake using the empirical Green's function (EGF) technique. Our estimations of the STF and E (sub R) are based on teleseismic P waves and regional seismograms, respectively. We find that the STFs as a function of azimuth have a similar shape and nearly constant duration of 18 sec. This suggests that the rupture propagation was essentially radial. The STFs show a sharp rise in the first 6 sec. The E (sub R) estimated from the EGF technique is 2.1X10 (super 23) erg. We find that E (sub R) 's computed from integration of corrected velocity-squared spectra of teleseismic P waves and regional seismograms are in excellent agreement with the E (sub R) obtained from the EGF technique. Since the seismic moment, M (sub 0) , is 3.4X10 (super 27) dyne cm, we obtain E (sub R) /M (sub 0) = 6.2X10 (super -5) . The radiation efficiency, eta (sub R) , during the Bhuj earthquake was low, about 0.23. The sharp rise of the STFs and eta (sub R) = 0.23 can be explained by Sato and Hirasawa's (1973) quasi-dynamic, circular source model with an effective stress of approximately 300 bar and the ratio of rupture to shear-wave velocity, V (sub R) /beta , of approximately 0.5. The corresponding estimate of slip velocity at the center of the fault is 156 cm/sec. V (sub R) /beta approximately 0.5 is in reasonable agreement with the duration of the STF and the reported dimension of the aftershocks, as well as with the results of inversion of teleseismic body waves. The observations may also be explained by a frictional sliding model, with gradual frictional stress drop and significant dissipation of energy on the fault plane. This model requires an average dynamic stress drop of about 120 bar and V (sub R) /beta approximately 0.7 to explain both the rapid rise in the first 6 sec of the STFs and, along with a static stress drop of 200 bar, the observed E (sub R) /M (sub 0) . High static stress drop is a common feature of most crustal earthquakes in stable continental regions. An examination of the available data, however, does not suggest that most of them also have relatively low radiation efficiency.


ISSN: 0037-1106
EISSN: 1943-3573
Coden: BSSAAP
Serial Title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Serial Volume: 94
Serial Issue: 4
Title: A source study of the Bhuj, India, earthquake of 26 January 2001 (M (sub w) 7.60)
Affiliation: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Geofisica, Mexico
Pages: 1195-1206
Published: 200408
Text Language: English
Publisher: Seismological Society of America, Berkeley, CA, United States
References: 40
Accession Number: 2005-001572
Categories: Seismology
Document Type: Serial
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Illustration Description: illus. incl. 3 tables, sketch map
N23°11'60" - N23°11'60", E69°54'00" - E69°54'00"
Secondary Affiliation: Government of India, IND, IndiaCalifornia Institute of Technology, USA, United StatesIndia Meteorological Department, IND, India
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2018, American Geosciences Institute.
Update Code: 200501

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal