Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
GEOREF RECORD

Was the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance near Novaya Zemlya an earthquake?

David Bowers
Was the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance near Novaya Zemlya an earthquake?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (August 2002) 92 (6): 2400-2409

Abstract

The Reviewed Event Bulletin for 16 August 1997, produced by the prototype International Data Center (pIDC), reported a small seismic disturbance in the vicinity of the northern Russian test site at Novaya Zemlya (at about 02:11 UTC). Initial reports suggested that this disturbance was caused by a small nuclear explosion, whereas others identify the source as an earthquake using vertical-component S/P ratios. However, other authors show evidence that questions the validity of the S/P method for this region and conclude that the disturbance cannot be positively identified as an earthquake using seismological evidence. The apparent attenuation from the 16 August 1997 disturbance to SPITS (Spitsbergen, distance Delta = 1280 km, azimuth = 317 degrees ) is reported to be weak. Similar low attenuation is suggested from high-frequency observations at KEV (Kevo, Finland, Delta = 1130 km, azimuth = 268 degrees ). Thus, high-frequency P and S waves propagate efficiently across the Barents Sea, leading to the possibility that the radiation pattern of the source may be inferred. We show, using a grid-search method, that the high-frequency SV/SH amplitude ratios observed at SPITS and KEV (measured from the complex envelopes of the free-surface corrected three-component seismograms), combined with simple P (sub n) signals (with positive first motion) at HFS (Hagfors, Sweden) and NORES (Norway), are consistent with a double-couple source, with a range of orientations. We compute synthetic seismograms for one such double-couple source oriented at sigma = 255 degrees , delta = 115 degrees , psi = 120 degrees (similar to the reported for 1 August 1986 Kara Sea earthquake). The synthetic P (sub n) seismograms at HFS and NORES and the relative SV/SH amplitudes of the synthetic S (sub n) seismograms at KEV and SPITS match those observed reasonably well. Our model also predicts (1) weak P (sub n) at NRI (Norilsk, Russia), suggesting that the emergent P (sub n) onset and signal-to-noise ratio observed is related to the focal mechanism, and (2) the negative P first motion and large SH/SV ratio observed at AMD (Amderma, Delta = 360 km, azimuth = 152 degrees ). Thus, we conclude that the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance was an earthquake beneath the Kara Sea and that identification is possible using only data that would normally be available to the pIDC (assuming KEV can be used as an alternative for the nearby station ARCES, which was not working at the time of the disturbance).


ISSN: 0037-1106
EISSN: 1943-3573
Coden: BSSAAP
Serial Title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Serial Volume: 92
Serial Issue: 6
Title: Was the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance near Novaya Zemlya an earthquake?
Author(s): Bowers, David
Affiliation: AWE Blacknest, Reading, United Kingdom
Pages: 2400-2409
Published: 200208
Text Language: English
Publisher: Seismological Society of America, Berkeley, CA, United States
References: 39
Accession Number: 2003-010761
Categories: Seismology
Document Type: Serial
Bibliographic Level: Analytic
Illustration Description: illus. incl. 3 tables, sketch map
N70°00'00" - N77°00'00", E50°00'00" - E70°00'00"
Country of Publication: United States
Secondary Affiliation: GeoRef, Copyright 2018, American Geosciences Institute.
Update Code: 200304
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal