Was the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance near Novaya Zemlya an earthquake?
Was the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance near Novaya Zemlya an earthquake?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (August 2002) 92 (6): 2400-2409
- Arkhangelsk Russian Federation
- attenuation
- body waves
- Commonwealth of Independent States
- Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
- discriminant analysis
- earthquakes
- elastic waves
- Europe
- explosions
- focal mechanism
- magnitude
- models
- monitoring
- Norway
- Novaya Zemlya
- observations
- P-waves
- patterns
- Russian Federation
- S-waves
- Scandinavia
- seismic sources
- seismic waves
- seismicity
- seismograms
- SH-waves
- statistical analysis
- SV-waves
- Sweden
- Urals
- Western Europe
The Reviewed Event Bulletin for 16 August 1997, produced by the prototype International Data Center (pIDC), reported a small seismic disturbance in the vicinity of the northern Russian test site at Novaya Zemlya (at about 02:11 UTC). Initial reports suggested that this disturbance was caused by a small nuclear explosion, whereas others identify the source as an earthquake using vertical-component S/P ratios. However, other authors show evidence that questions the validity of the S/P method for this region and conclude that the disturbance cannot be positively identified as an earthquake using seismological evidence. The apparent attenuation from the 16 August 1997 disturbance to SPITS (Spitsbergen, distance Delta = 1280 km, azimuth = 317 degrees ) is reported to be weak. Similar low attenuation is suggested from high-frequency observations at KEV (Kevo, Finland, Delta = 1130 km, azimuth = 268 degrees ). Thus, high-frequency P and S waves propagate efficiently across the Barents Sea, leading to the possibility that the radiation pattern of the source may be inferred. We show, using a grid-search method, that the high-frequency SV/SH amplitude ratios observed at SPITS and KEV (measured from the complex envelopes of the free-surface corrected three-component seismograms), combined with simple P (sub n) signals (with positive first motion) at HFS (Hagfors, Sweden) and NORES (Norway), are consistent with a double-couple source, with a range of orientations. We compute synthetic seismograms for one such double-couple source oriented at sigma = 255 degrees , delta = 115 degrees , psi = 120 degrees (similar to the reported for 1 August 1986 Kara Sea earthquake). The synthetic P (sub n) seismograms at HFS and NORES and the relative SV/SH amplitudes of the synthetic S (sub n) seismograms at KEV and SPITS match those observed reasonably well. Our model also predicts (1) weak P (sub n) at NRI (Norilsk, Russia), suggesting that the emergent P (sub n) onset and signal-to-noise ratio observed is related to the focal mechanism, and (2) the negative P first motion and large SH/SV ratio observed at AMD (Amderma, Delta = 360 km, azimuth = 152 degrees ). Thus, we conclude that the 16 August 1997 seismic disturbance was an earthquake beneath the Kara Sea and that identification is possible using only data that would normally be available to the pIDC (assuming KEV can be used as an alternative for the nearby station ARCES, which was not working at the time of the disturbance).